Why Is The GOP Senate So Afraid To Call Witnesses??

[Weatherman2020]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

Schiff will be called as a witness as will everyone involved in the bogus FISA documents.

Investigate your little hearts out.

The IG already said you are full of shit.

Was it Kos or CNN that told you that?

 

[Oldstyle]

The Stimulus spent nearly a trillion tax dollars and created so few jobs that you progressives had to use "jobs created or saved" to hide how few they DID create!

What did Trump do? He cut frivolous regulations. He let businesses know that they were no longer the enemy of the Federal Government.

The Stimulus lowered the une,ployment rate between 1/2% and 1 1/2% & shortened the lerngth of the recession.

So, you think by allowing more pollution, unsafe work places & food supply created all these supposed jobs?

Why aren't you taking about the 1.5 trillion he borrowed?

The Stimulus cost US taxpayers a trillion dollars. Unemployment went up after the Stimulus was employed. It didn't start to come down until the Democrats lost the House and could no longer implement their progressive agenda. Only THEN was it safe for private capital to come out of hiding and start investing again!

Unemployment was on the way up/. That is why we needed the stimulus you stupid shit.

Without it, unemployment could have surpassed 11% & the recession lasted a lot longer.

The CBO said the stimulus did was was intended.

The Obama Administration said that if the stimulus wasn't granted that unemployment would rise above 8% but if it were granted that unemployment would go to 6%. They got the stimulus money but utilized it so poorly that unemployment rose above 10%! Only a progressive would claim that the stimulus worked as intended!

You are referring to the Romer report & it was based on the economic conditions at the time it was written.

Blame the Democrats for running it poorly (even though the CBO saids otherwise) instead of the Republicans for running the country poorly & taking it from a balanced budget to the worst recession in 80 years.

The CBO s not partisan but be the typical Trumpette & blame the Democrats for not fixing the Republican's disaster.

LOL...the Romer Report was the President's economic advisor getting it wrong from the start. Why you think that makes the Obama Administration look better escapes me.

 

[Weatherman2020]

VIDEO: Graham Vows to Call Everyone Who Signed the Carter Page FISA Warrants to Testify | News Thud

 

[lantern2814]

He is not

So none of the people who he denied to testify can clear him? Further proof of guilt.

You have things half assed backwards, dave.

Its up to the Libs to prove Trump guilty, not for Trump to prove himself innocent. And even it was, there is nothing that Mr. Bolton could say that would convince extreme doofuses like Pocahontas and Crazy Bernie that Trump is a tremendous President who is worthy to rule over the nation he loves.

he could have prevented the charges, the articles of impeachment, from even happening,

if he was innocent he would have shown something, anything at all that would have discredited the accusations.... like any normal human being, innocent of accusations, would have presented to the cops before they were charged... that could exculpate them, before those charges are drawn.

Makes ya wonder, did Trump want this impeachment for some perverted political gain?

OR, is he really not as innocent and perfect, as he claims to you Trumpettes?


-----------------------------------------------------------

The R's do not want a trial, where the prosecution has to provide their case, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant is guilty.

There is no other way to view it.

Ya'll seem to want a SHAM trial, where the FIX IS IN, before prosecutors even present their witnesses and evidence.

STFU you stupid Obamanzee. Your utter ignorance of how things work isn’t astounding it’s expected. See stupid, YOU have to prove guilt. Trump does not have to prove his innocence no matter how many times you repeat your Dim masters talking points. May you be miserable with 5 more years of Trump.

That's fine, if he has no defense.... then don't give one, and don't complain the trial was unfair because you were not able to present your own defense and or, get due process.

But that should not stop prosecutors from presenting all of their evidence.

You had your chance to present your case. You have to do that in the House. The evidence you tried to manufacture there is ALL you are entitled to. The decision is based on what the House presents as their findings. Just because you screwed the pooch doesn’t mean you can cry for a do-over in the Senate. Nice of you to admit you have nothing.

 

[lantern2814]

You have things half assed backwards, dave.

Its up to the Libs to prove Trump guilty, not for Trump to prove himself innocent. And even it was, there is nothing that Mr. Bolton could say that would convince extreme doofuses like Pocahontas and Crazy Bernie that Trump is a tremendous President who is worthy to rule over the nation he loves.

he could have prevented the charges, the articles of impeachment, from even happening,

if he was innocent he would have shown something, anything at all that would have discredited the accusations.... like any normal human being, innocent of accusations, would have presented to the cops before they were charged... that could exculpate them, before those charges are drawn.

Makes ya wonder, did Trump want this impeachment for some perverted political gain?

OR, is he really not as innocent and perfect, as he claims to you Trumpettes?


-----------------------------------------------------------

The R's do not want a trial, where the prosecution has to provide their case, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant is guilty.

There is no other way to view it.

Ya'll seem to want a SHAM trial, where the FIX IS IN, before prosecutors even present their witnesses and evidence.

STFU you stupid Obamanzee. Your utter ignorance of how things work isn’t astounding it’s expected. See stupid, YOU have to prove guilt. Trump does not have to prove his innocence no matter how many times you repeat your Dim masters talking points. May you be miserable with 5 more years of Trump.

Nice racial slur you fucking racist piece of shit.

Fuck you you uneducated, racist, illiterate Obamanzee. That’s a statements on your lack of intelligence and blind loyalty to the worst president of all time. But you can call Trump supporters Trumpanzees and that’s okay. GFY you hypocritical loser.

Racist fuck.

There is NOTHING more disgusting & ignorant than a racist piece of shit like you.

Last I looked, Trump was orange. Referring to an orange person as a chimpanzee is not a racial slur.

Again FUCK YOU you ignorant illiterate fuck. You just admitted you are a racist. Then cry that YOUR racism is okay. Meanwhile moron, the term Obamanzee describes you perfectly. Lack of any intelligence or education and projecting. Lashing out because you’re an insecure ignorant racist. There is nothing more disgusting than a lying ignorant fuck like you Obamanzee.

 

[RealDave]

he could have prevented the charges, the articles of impeachment, from even happening,

if he was innocent he would have shown something, anything at all that would have discredited the accusations.... like any normal human being, innocent of accusations, would have presented to the cops before they were charged... that could exculpate them, before those charges are drawn.

Makes ya wonder, did Trump want this impeachment for some perverted political gain?

OR, is he really not as innocent and perfect, as he claims to you Trumpettes?


-----------------------------------------------------------

The R's do not want a trial, where the prosecution has to provide their case, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant is guilty.

There is no other way to view it.

Ya'll seem to want a SHAM trial, where the FIX IS IN, before prosecutors even present their witnesses and evidence.

STFU you stupid Obamanzee. Your utter ignorance of how things work isn’t astounding it’s expected. See stupid, YOU have to prove guilt. Trump does not have to prove his innocence no matter how many times you repeat your Dim masters talking points. May you be miserable with 5 more years of Trump.

Nice racial slur you fucking racist piece of shit.

Fuck you you uneducated, racist, illiterate Obamanzee. That’s a statements on your lack of intelligence and blind loyalty to the worst president of all time. But you can call Trump supporters Trumpanzees and that’s okay. GFY you hypocritical loser.

Racist fuck.

There is NOTHING more disgusting & ignorant than a racist piece of shit like you.

Last I looked, Trump was orange. Referring to an orange person as a chimpanzee is not a racial slur.

Again FUCK YOU you ignorant illiterate fuck. You just admitted you are a racist. Then cry that YOUR racism is okay. Meanwhile moron, the term Obamanzee describes you perfectly. Lack of any intelligence or education and projecting. Lashing out because you’re an insecure ignorant racist. There is nothing more disgusting than a lying ignorant fuck like you Obamanzee.

What race is being orange?

You are the ignorant racist.

I hate racists.

Especially the ones who spew slurs & then lie & hide & claim they didn't.

 

[RealDave]

VIDEO: Graham Vows to Call Everyone Who Signed the Carter Page FISA Warrants to Testify | News Thud

You & Grtaham are so fucking stupids to think that has anything to do with the impeachment.

If you assfucks want to investigate these warrants, open your own God damn investigation.

 

[RealDave]

The Stimulus lowered the une,ployment rate between 1/2% and 1 1/2% & shortened the lerngth of the recession.

So, you think by allowing more pollution, unsafe work places & food supply created all these supposed jobs?

Why aren't you taking about the 1.5 trillion he borrowed?

The Stimulus cost US taxpayers a trillion dollars. Unemployment went up after the Stimulus was employed. It didn't start to come down until the Democrats lost the House and could no longer implement their progressive agenda. Only THEN was it safe for private capital to come out of hiding and start investing again!

Unemployment was on the way up/. That is why we needed the stimulus you stupid shit.

Without it, unemployment could have surpassed 11% & the recession lasted a lot longer.

The CBO said the stimulus did was was intended.

The Obama Administration said that if the stimulus wasn't granted that unemployment would rise above 8% but if it were granted that unemployment would go to 6%. They got the stimulus money but utilized it so poorly that unemployment rose above 10%! Only a progressive would claim that the stimulus worked as intended!

You are referring to the Romer report & it was based on the economic conditions at the time it was written.

Blame the Democrats for running it poorly (even though the CBO saids otherwise) instead of the Republicans for running the country poorly & taking it from a balanced budget to the worst recession in 80 years.

The CBO s not partisan but be the typical Trumpette & blame the Democrats for not fixing the Republican's disaster.

LOL...the Romer Report was the President's economic advisor getting it wrong from the start. Why you think that makes the Obama Administration look better escapes me.

I was pointing out the time. That report was written in December. The Stimulus was passed two months later when no one really knew how the recession would develop.

The CBO report says you are wrong.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

He is not

So none of the people who he denied to testify can clear him? Further proof of guilt.

You have things half assed backwards, dave.

Its up to the Libs to prove Trump guilty, not for Trump to prove himself innocent. And even it was, there is nothing that Mr. Bolton could say that would convince extreme doofuses like Pocahontas and Crazy Bernie that Trump is a tremendous President who is worthy to rule over the nation he loves.

he could have prevented the charges, the articles of impeachment, from even happening,

if he was innocent he would have shown something, anything at all that would have discredited the accusations.... like any normal human being, innocent of accusations, would have presented to the cops before they were charged... that could exculpate them, before those charges are drawn.

Makes ya wonder, did Trump want this impeachment for some perverted political gain?

OR, is he really not as innocent and perfect, as he claims to you Trumpettes?


-----------------------------------------------------------

The R's do not want a trial, where the prosecution has to provide their case, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant is guilty.

There is no other way to view it.

Ya'll seem to want a SHAM trial, where the FIX IS IN, before prosecutors even present their witnesses and evidence.

STFU you stupid Obamanzee. Your utter ignorance of how things work isn’t astounding it’s expected. See stupid, YOU have to prove guilt. Trump does not have to prove his innocence no matter how many times you repeat your Dim masters talking points. May you be miserable with 5 more years of Trump.

That's fine, if he has no defense.... then don't give one, and don't complain the trial was unfair because you were not able to present your own defense and or, get due process.

But that should not stop prosecutors from presenting all of their evidence.

How can it be a trial when there weren’t any jurors or judges?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

So none of the people who he denied to testify can clear him? Further proof of guilt.

You have things half assed backwards, dave.

Its up to the Libs to prove Trump guilty, not for Trump to prove himself innocent. And even it was, there is nothing that Mr. Bolton could say that would convince extreme doofuses like Pocahontas and Crazy Bernie that Trump is a tremendous President who is worthy to rule over the nation he loves.

he could have prevented the charges, the articles of impeachment, from even happening,

if he was innocent he would have shown something, anything at all that would have discredited the accusations.... like any normal human being, innocent of accusations, would have presented to the cops before they were charged... that could exculpate them, before those charges are drawn.

Makes ya wonder, did Trump want this impeachment for some perverted political gain?

OR, is he really not as innocent and perfect, as he claims to you Trumpettes?


-----------------------------------------------------------

The R's do not want a trial, where the prosecution has to provide their case, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant is guilty.

There is no other way to view it.

Ya'll seem to want a SHAM trial, where the FIX IS IN, before prosecutors even present their witnesses and evidence.

STFU you stupid Obamanzee. Your utter ignorance of how things work isn’t astounding it’s expected. See stupid, YOU have to prove guilt. Trump does not have to prove his innocence no matter how many times you repeat your Dim masters talking points. May you be miserable with 5 more years of Trump.

That's fine, if he has no defense.... then don't give one, and don't complain the trial was unfair because you were not able to present your own defense and or, get due process.

But that should not stop prosecutors from presenting all of their evidence.

What evidence do you think the prosecutors need to present?

Stop this BS. If either of you cannot see that this is political theater then you need a reality check. What Bush did was 100x worse and no one considered impeachment. The Democrats have lost their minds because they lost in 2016 and are projected to lose in 2020. It’s that simple.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

He is not

So none of the people who he denied to testify can clear him? Further proof of guilt.

You have things half assed backwards, dave.

Its up to the Libs to prove Trump guilty, not for Trump to prove himself innocent. And even it was, there is nothing that Mr. Bolton could say that would convince extreme doofuses like Pocahontas and Crazy Bernie that Trump is a tremendous President who is worthy to rule over the nation he loves.

Nope.

The Democrats proved their case.

If your fast assed orange piece of shit is innocent, he can present it or we should judge based ion the testimony we have heard.

Your choice.

If the libs "proved their case" , why is Chuck U. Schumer so insistent on calling Bolton and Mulvaney and Giuliani? If the case is already "proven" then he should just present it.

BTW, Mr. Giuliani is President Trump's counsel. In what kind of country does the persecution call the defense lawyer? Maybe Marcia Clark should have brought Johnny Cochran up to the stand in the trial of the century?

The Trump supporters don't want to call anyone because they know it will look so bad for your orange buddy that Republican Senators will have no choice.

We all know Trump did it.

Did what? “We all”

Who is “we”?

 

[Polishprince]

The Stimulus cost US taxpayers a trillion dollars. Unemployment went up after the Stimulus was employed. It didn't start to come down until the Democrats lost the House and could no longer implement their progressive agenda. Only THEN was it safe for private capital to come out of hiding and start investing again!

Unemployment was on the way up/. That is why we needed the stimulus you stupid shit.

Without it, unemployment could have surpassed 11% & the recession lasted a lot longer.

The CBO said the stimulus did was was intended.

The Obama Administration said that if the stimulus wasn't granted that unemployment would rise above 8% but if it were granted that unemployment would go to 6%. They got the stimulus money but utilized it so poorly that unemployment rose above 10%! Only a progressive would claim that the stimulus worked as intended!

You are referring to the Romer report & it was based on the economic conditions at the time it was written.

Blame the Democrats for running it poorly (even though the CBO saids otherwise) instead of the Republicans for running the country poorly & taking it from a balanced budget to the worst recession in 80 years.

The CBO s not partisan but be the typical Trumpette & blame the Democrats for not fixing the Republican's disaster.

LOL...the Romer Report was the President's economic advisor getting it wrong from the start. Why you think that makes the Obama Administration look better escapes me.

I was pointing out the time. That report was written in December. The Stimulus was passed two months later when no one really knew how the recession would develop.

The CBO report says you are wrong.

The Stimulus was SUPPOSED to provide shovel-ready jobs by the million and fix our nation's infrastructure. Obama lied, it did neither. Our infrastructure is still in need of repair, yet Chuck and Nancy actually WALKED OUT of a meeting with the President instead of working with him on this issue.

 

[Polishprince]

VIDEO: Graham Vows to Call Everyone Who Signed the Carter Page FISA Warrants to Testify | News Thud

The Carter-Page-Fisa-warrantgate scandal is a disgrace. Mr. Page was a loyal American citizen who had his privacy totally violated in every way because of lies made to the Fisa Court. There is a MASSIVE lawsuit against the government and a settlement WILL be made. However, the guilty parties are going to have to forfeit their pensions and public service fortunes over it.

Its called justice.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Uh yea, sure. Unemployment went down under Obama. Because so many people stopped looking for jobs because they couldn't find any. OOPS.

Labor participation rate under Obama:

That's some UGLY shit right there and explains the unemployment rate. Liberals are too stupid to realize the number can down for TWO REASONS. Not just ONE.

 

[Polishprince]

Uh yea, sure. Unemployment went down under Obama. Because so many people stopped looking for jobs because they couldn't find any. OOPS.

Labor participation rate under Obama:

That's some UGLY shit right there and explains the unemployment rate. Liberals are too stupid to realize the number can down for TWO REASONS. Not just ONE.

Obama really motivated idleness during his regime.

He increase Unemployment Insurance claims to 99 weeks, basically 2 years of sitting on one's ass. He opened the SSD and SSI floodgates, approving record numbers of new recipients mostly due to "depression" or "back pain". And lastly, he temporarily rolled back Clinton's Welfare Reform of 1996 which made food stamps time limited for young able people without dependents (and now, Trump is getting grief for bringing back the Bill and hillary policy)

 

[Care4all]

So none of the people who he denied to testify can clear him? Further proof of guilt.

You have things half assed backwards, dave.

Its up to the Libs to prove Trump guilty, not for Trump to prove himself innocent. And even it was, there is nothing that Mr. Bolton could say that would convince extreme doofuses like Pocahontas and Crazy Bernie that Trump is a tremendous President who is worthy to rule over the nation he loves.

he could have prevented the charges, the articles of impeachment, from even happening,

if he was innocent he would have shown something, anything at all that would have discredited the accusations.... like any normal human being, innocent of accusations, would have presented to the cops before they were charged... that could exculpate them, before those charges are drawn.

Makes ya wonder, did Trump want this impeachment for some perverted political gain?

OR, is he really not as innocent and perfect, as he claims to you Trumpettes?


-----------------------------------------------------------

The R's do not want a trial, where the prosecution has to provide their case, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant is guilty.

There is no other way to view it.

Ya'll seem to want a SHAM trial, where the FIX IS IN, before prosecutors even present their witnesses and evidence.

STFU you stupid Obamanzee. Your utter ignorance of how things work isn’t astounding it’s expected. See stupid, YOU have to prove guilt. Trump does not have to prove his innocence no matter how many times you repeat your Dim masters talking points. May you be miserable with 5 more years of Trump.

That's fine, if he has no defense.... then don't give one, and don't complain the trial was unfair because you were not able to present your own defense and or, get due process.

But that should not stop prosecutors from presenting all of their evidence.

How can it be a trial when there weren’t any jurors or judges?

The House is the prosecutor and his grand jury, determining if there are crimes to be indicted with in the impeachment process.

The Senate is the trial, senators are the jury, chief justice Roberts is judge....

That has not been started yet.

 

[Ethos Logos Pathos]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

IMHO this entire post epitomizes the very hypocrisy posing as, blood, which runs through Dem's veins.

i.) Everything the Dems complain about Trump doing, every act, is some act which the same Dems stayed silent about when they observed Obama Admin doing the same things from 2012-'16.

ii.) Trump stayed away from the House's impeachment sham, exactly because they refused to let him call his own witnesses and to invalidate the whistleblower. But now MitchMc & the Senate Repubs are dead wrong, for repeating what the Dems just did? go figure.

The House did not have to refuse to let Trump question his whistleblowing-accuser's validity ---to legally guard any President from his critics concocting fictitious impeachable acts.

I reiterate, that the House did not have to refuse to 1)let Trump have his own witnesses and 2)let Nunes or Jordan or any GOP Congessmember question his whistleblower. But, they did refuse to. Therefore if you sat silently and was a-okay with that unfairness by the Dems ---then you have to now do the same thing, the right thing/delete this thread then sit silently while the Repubs get their chance to be unfair. True?

 

[Care4all]

Uh yea, sure. Unemployment went down under Obama. Because so many people stopped looking for jobs because they couldn't find any. OOPS.

Labor participation rate under Obama:

That's some UGLY shit right there and explains the unemployment rate. Liberals are too stupid to realize the number can down for TWO REASONS. Not just ONE.

Nice chart, too bad it does not show the full picture and is cut off.... here is a chart that shows the trend that Obama inherited...

And the greatest recession since the great depression doesn't ring a bell?

Civilian labor force participation rate


Trumps trend and numbers ain't that great either, and trump has a booming economy.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

You mean the record low unemployment that started under Pres. Obama.

Which jobs are these record wage growths growing under.

When did these record home sales start?

Did you want to take a crack at telling us all what economic policies of Barack Obama's it was that caused unemployment to go down?

The stimulus bill helped the economy go back to growing, creating jobs.

Wht did your fat ass orange buddy do? Besides borrow 1.5 trillion to pump up his house of cards economy.

The Stimulus spent nearly a trillion tax dollars and created so few jobs that you progressives had to use "jobs created or saved" to hide how few they DID create!

What did Trump do? He cut frivolous regulations. He let businesses know that they were no longer the enemy of the Federal Government.

Wow did you not read my last post, these economic trends that you pat Trump on the back for today started under Pres. Obama. I know that is hard for a Trump Humper to admit.

I've never denied that the growth of the American economy started under Barack Obama...I simply pointed out that his economic policies not only had little to do with that growth...they generally discouraged it. The main driver of the economy during the Obama years was an energy boom...an energy boom that his administration did everything they could to prevent from happening.

Ok, so tell me what specific policies or bills Trump has put into place that cause it to continue to grow.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

Here is what we think of your trial....

That's actually what you think of the Constitution to protect your God.