Why Is The GOP Senate So Afraid To Call Witnesses??

[Faun]

Poor lying con tool, Obama was handed a horrible economy and turned it around. Impeached Trump was handed a good economy and kept it growing. I mentioned a bunch of things Obama did. It matters not to anyone the a lying con tool thinks Obama's policies didn't help. Of course, I'm saying this to an idiot who thinks Impeached Trump did help the economy before he was even sworn in, before even his first policy went into effect.

Wall Street welcomes Trump with a bang: Dow soars 257 points, nears lifetime high

Um, the stock market is not an economic indicator.

Ok, what about record low unemployment? Is that an "economic indicator?"

You mean the record low unemployment that started under Pres. Obama.

What about record wage growth? Is that an "economic indicator?"

Which jobs are these record wage growths growing under.

What about record housing sales, is that an "economic indicator?"

When did these record home sales start?

Did you want to take a crack at telling us all what economic policies of Barack Obama's it was that caused unemployment to go down?

You've been shown, lying con tool. Keep in mind, you call claim the Impeached Trump lowered the unemployment rate even before he became president and before he passed any policies.

 

[Polishprince]

Wall Street welcomes Trump with a bang: Dow soars 257 points, nears lifetime high

Um, the stock market is not an economic indicator.

Ok, what about record low unemployment? Is that an "economic indicator?"

You mean the record low unemployment that started under Pres. Obama.

What about record wage growth? Is that an "economic indicator?"

Which jobs are these record wage growths growing under.

What about record housing sales, is that an "economic indicator?"

When did these record home sales start?

Did you want to take a crack at telling us all what economic policies of Barack Obama's it was that caused unemployment to go down?

You've been shown, lying con tool. Keep in mind, you call claim the Impeached Trump lowered the unemployment rate even before he became president and before he passed any policies.

Actually he did. The positive vibes that Trump created throughout the business world after his vanquishing of Hillary, helped the economy immensely even before inauguration.

The business community realized that the large dark night of Obamunism was over and it was dawn in America.

 

[RealDave]

That's fine, if he has no defense.... then don't give one, and don't complain the trial was unfair because you were not able to present your own defense and or, get due process.

But that should not stop prosecutors from presenting all of their evidence.

How can it be a trial when there weren’t any jurors or judges?

The House is the prosecutor and his grand jury, determining if there are crimes to be indicted with in the impeachment process.

The Senate is the trial, senators are the jury, chief justice Roberts is judge....

That has not been started yet.

So you don’t see it as 100% political theater?

This is about the US Constitution. This is about the law.

The ones playing politics are the Republicans.

Oh, bullshit! This was never about "the law"! This was always about removing Donald Trump no matter what! Pelosi, Nadler, Schiff and Schumer know that Trump hasn't done anything that most Presidents before him have done...impeaching him on some vague "abuse of power" charge is farcical! This is a political maneuver because the Democrats are terrified that their candidates suck and that Trump is doing such a good job with the economy that he's going to get reelected. What's happening now is the very definition of political theatre!

This is 100% about Trump breaking the law.

If Obama would have done similar, Republicans would have impeached him.

Trump is a crook & is fucking over America & you are too stupid to see it.

The expe t GDP growth this yerar is 2.3%

You assfucks were dancing naked around the fire when Obama would have such a rate. Where is that promised 4%?

If the stupid fat ass fuck can't lower the deficit in the best economy ever, when is he?

 

[RealDave]

That's fine, if he has no defense.... then don't give one, and don't complain the trial was unfair because you were not able to present your own defense and or, get due process.

But that should not stop prosecutors from presenting all of their evidence.

How can it be a trial when there weren’t any jurors or judges?

The House is the prosecutor and his grand jury, determining if there are crimes to be indicted with in the impeachment process.

The Senate is the trial, senators are the jury, chief justice Roberts is judge....

That has not been started yet.

So you don’t see it as 100% political theater?

This is about the US Constitution. This is about the law.

The ones playing politics are the Republicans.

You are kidding. LOL. Delusion is your BFF. Both parties are playing political games.

The crime is real

Democrats are doing their Constitutional duty.

 

[Meister]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

The question should have been, "Why were the dems so afraid to have the GOP call their witnesses in the House proceedings?"

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

How can it be a trial when there weren’t any jurors or judges?

The House is the prosecutor and his grand jury, determining if there are crimes to be indicted with in the impeachment process.

The Senate is the trial, senators are the jury, chief justice Roberts is judge....

That has not been started yet.

So you don’t see it as 100% political theater?

This is about the US Constitution. This is about the law.

The ones playing politics are the Republicans.

Oh, bullshit! This was never about "the law"! This was always about removing Donald Trump no matter what! Pelosi, Nadler, Schiff and Schumer know that Trump hasn't done anything that most Presidents before him have done...impeaching him on some vague "abuse of power" charge is farcical! This is a political maneuver because the Democrats are terrified that their candidates suck and that Trump is doing such a good job with the economy that he's going to get reelected. What's happening now is the very definition of political theatre!

This is 100% about Trump breaking the law.

If Obama would have done similar, Republicans would have impeached him.

Trump is a crook & is fucking over America & you are too stupid to see it.

The expe t GDP growth this yerar is 2.3%

You assfucks were dancing naked around the fire when Obama would have such a rate. Where is that promised 4%?

If the stupid fat ass fuck can't lower the deficit in the best economy ever, when is he?

LMAO

I disagree. Bush lied about WMDs and cost us 1000s of lives an trillions of dollars and he was not impeached. This is 100% about Trump and their loss in 2016. So Dave, you've never seen politicians over promise? Market is up over 500pts in ~7 says? The budget and lack of attention to healthcare is disappointing. But those are hardly impeachable offenses. I am also not a Republican. I am just an anti Leftist. I believe people like you are ruining this country and no one triggers you more than DJT.

Thank you, Mr. Trump.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

How can it be a trial when there weren’t any jurors or judges?

The House is the prosecutor and his grand jury, determining if there are crimes to be indicted with in the impeachment process.

The Senate is the trial, senators are the jury, chief justice Roberts is judge....

That has not been started yet.

So you don’t see it as 100% political theater?

This is about the US Constitution. This is about the law.

The ones playing politics are the Republicans.

You are kidding. LOL. Delusion is your BFF. Both parties are playing political games.

The crime is real

Democrats are doing their Constitutional duty.

If it were "real" then there would be bi-partisan support. Plus the transcript was released and still more than half the country doesn't see an impeachable offense.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

The question should have been, "Why are the dems so afraid to have the GOP call their witnesses in the House proceedings?"

The better question is why are the Democrats afraid to run against Trump in 2020?

 

[Mac-7]

Few of the so-called witnesses that the Pencil Necked Geek brought to "testify" ever even met the Trumpster.

So.

If dems did not have the evidence to convict trump they should not have voted to impeach

They do have it. They did impeach. You lying is not going to change it.

IMPOTUS!!!!!

You dont have the evidence to convince 67 senators

So dems in the house went off half-cocked

Most will vote party anyhow.

Yes because this is a political event

 

[Oldstyle]

Wall Street welcomes Trump with a bang: Dow soars 257 points, nears lifetime high

Um, the stock market is not an economic indicator.

Ok, what about record low unemployment? Is that an "economic indicator?"

You mean the record low unemployment that started under Pres. Obama.

What about record wage growth? Is that an "economic indicator?"

Which jobs are these record wage growths growing under.

What about record housing sales, is that an "economic indicator?"

When did these record home sales start?

Did you want to take a crack at telling us all what economic policies of Barack Obama's it was that caused unemployment to go down?

You've been shown, lying con tool. Keep in mind, you call claim the Impeached Trump lowered the unemployment rate even before he became president and before he passed any policies.

Trump actually DID lower the unemployment rate before he became President, Faun! Businesses knew what they were getting with him. As soon as he was elected...even before he was sworn in...businesses knew that they'd be working with an Administration that saw the Private Sector as a good thing rather than the outgoing President who saw the Private Sector as a problem.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Um, the stock market is not an economic indicator.

Ok, what about record low unemployment? Is that an "economic indicator?"

You mean the record low unemployment that started under Pres. Obama.

What about record wage growth? Is that an "economic indicator?"

Which jobs are these record wage growths growing under.

What about record housing sales, is that an "economic indicator?"

When did these record home sales start?

Did you want to take a crack at telling us all what economic policies of Barack Obama's it was that caused unemployment to go down?

You've been shown, lying con tool. Keep in mind, you call claim the Impeached Trump lowered the unemployment rate even before he became president and before he passed any policies.

Trump actually DID lower the unemployment rate before he became President, Faun! Businesses knew what they were getting with him. As soon as he was elected...even before he was sworn in...businesses knew that they'd be working with an Administration that saw the Private Sector as a good thing rather than the outgoing President who saw the Private Sector as a problem.

That was the point I have been trying to make but Fawn cannot grasp that.

 

[Oldstyle]

Ok, what about record low unemployment? Is that an "economic indicator?"

You mean the record low unemployment that started under Pres. Obama.

What about record wage growth? Is that an "economic indicator?"

Which jobs are these record wage growths growing under.

What about record housing sales, is that an "economic indicator?"

When did these record home sales start?

Did you want to take a crack at telling us all what economic policies of Barack Obama's it was that caused unemployment to go down?

You've been shown, lying con tool. Keep in mind, you call claim the Impeached Trump lowered the unemployment rate even before he became president and before he passed any policies.

Trump actually DID lower the unemployment rate before he became President, Faun! Businesses knew what they were getting with him. As soon as he was elected...even before he was sworn in...businesses knew that they'd be working with an Administration that saw the Private Sector as a good thing rather than the outgoing President who saw the Private Sector as a problem.

That was the point I have been trying to make but Fawn cannot grasp that.

Oh, believe me...Faun grasps it...he's just unable to admit the truth because it's embarrassing. Barack Obama was terrible with the economy. Take out the numbers from the energy boom and his record would have been historically abysmal! The fact is...progressives don't know how to create jobs because they think that profit is antisocial and anyone who's making a profit is in some way ripping the public off! You can't create jobs when you're THAT clueless!

 

[Care4all]

i.) Everything the Dems complain about Trump doing, every act, is some act which the same Dems stayed silent about when they observed Obama Admin doing the same things from 2012-'16.

like what? When did Obama use his presidency and power to solicit a foreign president to make an announcement on CNN to the whole world, that the foreign gvt was opening an investigation in to the president's upcoming election political rival?

ii.) Trump stayed away from the House's impeachment sham, exactly because they refused to let him call his own witnesses and to invalidate the whistleblower. But now MitchMc & the Senate Repubs are dead wrong, for repeating what the Dems just did? go figure

"]The House did not have to refuse to let Trump question his whistleblowing-accuser's validity ---to legally guard any President from his critics concocting fictitious impeachable acts.

the president's goal was to out the whistleblower so he and his attack dogs could go after him in a personal way...

it's important to make WB's feel at ease with reporting all kinds of wrong doings of our gvt. Being anonymous, as with any anonymous tip line, is important. If not for any one single tip or complaint, but for the overall program that ends up saving us billions in fraud and corruption within the gvt... so if we can, we promise anonymity.

In this case, the whistle blower IS NOT NEEDED and CAN NOT exonerate the president, can not give the president any kind of a defense because there are 17 other sworn 1st and 2nd hand witnesses that showed up, who substantiated what was in the complaint,

along with the IG, who in his investigation FOUND the WB complaint credible and urgent. the IG said he spoke directly with FIRST HAND witnesses that confirmed the complaint.

if the IG found that the WB complaint had no legs, it would not have been pegged by the IG as credible and urgent... or gone forward. Not all or not even near all WB complaints are found credible... many DIE an early death after the IG investigates them.

So, this bulloney on not letting the president call witnesses is nothing but Trump obfuscating.... it was not a defense at all.

and not meant to be a defense.... just a smear and vengeance he could bring towards the WB and the whole WB program that is very beneficial to the USA...

ONLY CROOKS AND THE CORRUPT, hate it and work to destroy it.

Obama and his attorney general knowingly sold semi automatic weapons to the mexican drug gangs

That was an impeachable offense

why was it impeachable, in your opinion?

was it cheating? was it self dealing? was it self enriching? was it abusing his power?

or was it a crappy, imperfect, policy decision?

 

[Ethos Logos Pathos]

i.) Everything the Dems complain about Trump doing, every act, is some act which the same Dems stayed silent about when they observed Obama Admin doing the same things from 2012-'16.

like what? When did Obama use his presidency and power to solicit a foreign president to make an announcement on CNN to the whole world, that the foreign gvt was opening an investigation in to the president's upcoming election political rival?

ii.) Trump stayed away from the House's impeachment sham, exactly because they refused to let him call his own witnesses and to invalidate the whistleblower. But now MitchMc & the Senate Repubs are dead wrong, for repeating what the Dems just did? go figure

"]The House did not have to refuse to let Trump question his whistleblowing-accuser's validity ---to legally guard any President from his critics concocting fictitious impeachable acts.

the president's goal was to out the whistleblower so he and his attack dogs could go after him in a personal way...

it's important to make WB's feel at ease with reporting all kinds of wrong doings of our gvt. Being anonymous, as with any anonymous tip line, is important. If not for any one single tip or complaint, but for the overall program that ends up saving us billions in fraud and corruption within the gvt... so if we can, we promise anonymity.

In this case, the whistle blower IS NOT NEEDED and CAN NOT exonerate the president, can not give the president any kind of a defense because there are 17 other sworn 1st and 2nd hand witnesses that showed up, who substantiated what was in the complaint,

along with the IG, who in his investigation FOUND the WB complaint credible and urgent. the IG said he spoke directly with FIRST HAND witnesses that confirmed the complaint.

if the IG found that the WB complaint had no legs, it would not have been pegged by the IG as credible and urgent... or gone forward. Not all or not even near all WB complaints are found credible... many DIE an early death after the IG investigates them.

So, this bulloney on not letting the president call witnesses is nothing but Trump obfuscating.... it was not a defense at all.

and not meant to be a defense.... just a smear and vengeance he could bring towards the WB and the whole WB program that is very beneficial to the USA...

ONLY CROOKS AND THE CORRUPT, hate it and work to destroy it.

This is very disingenuous.

The Dems fleeced our FISA laws to get Muellers' investigation launched. The whistleblower laws are not to make the WB anonymous. Yes they are to keep the WB from getting fired for coming forward. Dems broke the laws by keeping the WB anonymous and not letting Trump/Congressmembers question the WB validity.
The Dems knew that our Ukraine policy had long been to root out corruption, specifically ---so when they saw a corrupt Dem being illuminated? All of sudden, Trump is abusing his powers ---by following the same USA foreign policy we reqd for Ukraine since before Trump even ran for office.

The dems covered up a lot of dirt in order to rush thru the impeachment sham in the House. But You cannot wait until a, trial, to have a proper investigation into a crime. That alone, is illegal.

...

The Dems are always illegal, totally, so they need to quit complaining and let Repubs use the deceitful path the Dems laid out to follow.

 

[RealDave]

So.

If dems did not have the evidence to convict trump they should not have voted to impeach

They do have it. They did impeach. You lying is not going to change it.

IMPOTUS!!!!!

You dont have the evidence to convince 67 senators

So dems in the house went off half-cocked

Most will vote party anyhow.

Yes because this is a political event

It is because the Republicans are making it so by voting party instead of the law.

Trump is guilty. It is so obvious.

 

[RealDave]

i.) Everything the Dems complain about Trump doing, every act, is some act which the same Dems stayed silent about when they observed Obama Admin doing the same things from 2012-'16.

like what? When did Obama use his presidency and power to solicit a foreign president to make an announcement on CNN to the whole world, that the foreign gvt was opening an investigation in to the president's upcoming election political rival?

ii.) Trump stayed away from the House's impeachment sham, exactly because they refused to let him call his own witnesses and to invalidate the whistleblower. But now MitchMc & the Senate Repubs are dead wrong, for repeating what the Dems just did? go figure

"]The House did not have to refuse to let Trump question his whistleblowing-accuser's validity ---to legally guard any President from his critics concocting fictitious impeachable acts.

the president's goal was to out the whistleblower so he and his attack dogs could go after him in a personal way...

it's important to make WB's feel at ease with reporting all kinds of wrong doings of our gvt. Being anonymous, as with any anonymous tip line, is important. If not for any one single tip or complaint, but for the overall program that ends up saving us billions in fraud and corruption within the gvt... so if we can, we promise anonymity.

In this case, the whistle blower IS NOT NEEDED and CAN NOT exonerate the president, can not give the president any kind of a defense because there are 17 other sworn 1st and 2nd hand witnesses that showed up, who substantiated what was in the complaint,

along with the IG, who in his investigation FOUND the WB complaint credible and urgent. the IG said he spoke directly with FIRST HAND witnesses that confirmed the complaint.

if the IG found that the WB complaint had no legs, it would not have been pegged by the IG as credible and urgent... or gone forward. Not all or not even near all WB complaints are found credible... many DIE an early death after the IG investigates them.

So, this bulloney on not letting the president call witnesses is nothing but Trump obfuscating.... it was not a defense at all.

and not meant to be a defense.... just a smear and vengeance he could bring towards the WB and the whole WB program that is very beneficial to the USA...

ONLY CROOKS AND THE CORRUPT, hate it and work to destroy it.

This is very disingenuous.

The Dems broke the FISA laws to get MUELLERS' investigation launched. The whistleblower laws are not to make the WB anonymous. Yes they are to keep the WB from getting fired for coming forward. Dems broke the laws by keeping the WB anonymous and not letting Trump/Congressmembers question the WB validity.
The Dems knew that our Ukraine policy had long been to root out corruption, specifically ---so when they saw a corrupt Dem being illuminated? All of sudden, Trump is abusing his powers ---by following the same USA foreign policy we reqd for Ukraine since before Trump even ran for office.

The dems covered up a lot of dirt in order to rush thru the impeachment sham in the House. But You cannot wait until a, trial, to have a proper investigation into a crime. That alone, is illegal.

...

The Dems are always illegal, totally, so they need to quit complaining and let Repubs use the deceitful path the Dems laid out to follow.

THE DEMS DID NOT LAUNCH THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION.
How fucking stupid are you people.

 

[RealDave]

i.) Everything the Dems complain about Trump doing, every act, is some act which the same Dems stayed silent about when they observed Obama Admin doing the same things from 2012-'16.

like what? When did Obama use his presidency and power to solicit a foreign president to make an announcement on CNN to the whole world, that the foreign gvt was opening an investigation in to the president's upcoming election political rival?

ii.) Trump stayed away from the House's impeachment sham, exactly because they refused to let him call his own witnesses and to invalidate the whistleblower. But now MitchMc & the Senate Repubs are dead wrong, for repeating what the Dems just did? go figure

"]The House did not have to refuse to let Trump question his whistleblowing-accuser's validity ---to legally guard any President from his critics concocting fictitious impeachable acts.

the president's goal was to out the whistleblower so he and his attack dogs could go after him in a personal way...

it's important to make WB's feel at ease with reporting all kinds of wrong doings of our gvt. Being anonymous, as with any anonymous tip line, is important. If not for any one single tip or complaint, but for the overall program that ends up saving us billions in fraud and corruption within the gvt... so if we can, we promise anonymity.

In this case, the whistle blower IS NOT NEEDED and CAN NOT exonerate the president, can not give the president any kind of a defense because there are 17 other sworn 1st and 2nd hand witnesses that showed up, who substantiated what was in the complaint,

along with the IG, who in his investigation FOUND the WB complaint credible and urgent. the IG said he spoke directly with FIRST HAND witnesses that confirmed the complaint.

if the IG found that the WB complaint had no legs, it would not have been pegged by the IG as credible and urgent... or gone forward. Not all or not even near all WB complaints are found credible... many DIE an early death after the IG investigates them.

So, this bulloney on not letting the president call witnesses is nothing but Trump obfuscating.... it was not a defense at all.

and not meant to be a defense.... just a smear and vengeance he could bring towards the WB and the whole WB program that is very beneficial to the USA...

ONLY CROOKS AND THE CORRUPT, hate it and work to destroy it.

Obama and his attorney general knowingly sold semi automatic weapons to the mexican drug gangs

That was an impeachable offense

why was it impeachable, in your opinion?

was it cheating? was it self dealing? was it self enriching? was it abusing his power?

or was it a crappy, imperfect, policy decision?

They sold nothing.
They allowed illegal cross border sales so they could track them.

This is sound policy when trying to break up smuggling operations. Let so go through to see where they go.

It was a local office effort & a local office botched plan.

 

[RealDave]

Um, the stock market is not an economic indicator.

Ok, what about record low unemployment? Is that an "economic indicator?"

You mean the record low unemployment that started under Pres. Obama.

What about record wage growth? Is that an "economic indicator?"

Which jobs are these record wage growths growing under.

What about record housing sales, is that an "economic indicator?"

When did these record home sales start?

Did you want to take a crack at telling us all what economic policies of Barack Obama's it was that caused unemployment to go down?

You've been shown, lying con tool. Keep in mind, you call claim the Impeached Trump lowered the unemployment rate even before he became president and before he passed any policies.

Trump actually DID lower the unemployment rate before he became President, Faun! Businesses knew what they were getting with him. As soon as he was elected...even before he was sworn in...businesses knew that they'd be working with an Administration that saw the Private Sector as a good thing rather than the outgoing President who saw the Private Sector as a problem.

I laugh at you people. Anything to steal Obama's good statistics.

 

[RealDave]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

The question should have been, "Why are the dems so afraid to have the GOP call their witnesses in the House proceedings?"

The better question is why are the Democrats afraid to run against Trump in 2020?

They are running ahainbst Trump.

Why do you think an election means crooks don't get punished?

 

[Mac-7]

If dems did not have the evidence to convict trump they should not have voted to impeach

They do have it. They did impeach. You lying is not going to change it.

IMPOTUS!!!!!

You dont have the evidence to convince 67 senators

So dems in the house went off half-cocked

Most will vote party anyhow.

Yes because this is a political event

It is because the Republicans are making it so by voting party instead of the law.

Trump is guilty. It is so obvious.

It has been political since the first day of the russia collusion hoax