Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrong. We don't all pay the bills and we don't all benefit. this country if full of useless ticks on the ass of society who pay nothing and receive the bulk of the benefits.
I'm fairly certain that all the libturds posting in this forum are members of that class.
We do better as a whole than a bunch of individuals......especially the wealthy
The phrase "do better as a whole" is utterly meaningless. It's the kind of "feel good" pablum that liberals are so fond of. Productive people do not do better when they are burdened with supporting an infestation of useless blood sucking tics. Of course, the tics would like their hosts to believe that they benefit from the tics presence.
I wouldn't care for Cuba because of its generally depressed economic condition and because I don't like the climate.Why not move to Cuba or France if you want socialism?
If you are referring generally to your fellow citizens who understand why the socialist influence on American politics was responsible for the most prosperous, productive, and the happiest decades in our history, those between the late forties and the early eighties, you are revealing the state of embittered, ignorant paranoia which has been deposited in your mind by right-wing corporatist propaganda.Why destroy America???? We don't want your rat poison.
The phrase "do better as a whole" is utterly meaningless. It's the kind of "feel good" pablum that liberals are so fond of. Productive people do not do better when they are burdened with supporting a infestation of useless blood sucking tics. Of course, the tics would like their hosts to believe that they benefit from the tics presence.
Most of those over the age of 65 vote Republican. The great majority are retired and benefit from Social Security and Medicare. With his comment about the 47 percent Mitt Romney demonstrated that he agreed with you that they are "useless blood sucking tics." I wish he expressed the attitude he shares with you in more of his campaign speeches.
The phrase "do better as a whole" is utterly meaningless. It's the kind of "feel good" pablum that liberals are so fond of. Productive people do not do better when they are burdened with supporting a infestation of useless blood sucking tics. Of course, the tics would like their hosts to believe that they benefit from the tics presence.
Most of those over the age of 65 vote Republican. The great majority are retired and benefit from Social Security and Medicare. With his comment about the 47 percent Mitt Romney demonstrated that he agreed with you that they are "useless blood sucking tics." I wish he expressed the attitude he shares with you in more of his campaign speeches.
What percent of society would you say "contributes"?
So you believe these senior citizens, who vote GOP, are blood sucking ticks, to quote the parasite, bripat?
Most of those over the age of 65 vote Republican. The great majority are retired and benefit from Social Security and Medicare. With his comment about the 47 percent Mitt Romney demonstrated that he agreed with you that they are "useless blood sucking tics." I wish he expressed the attitude he shares with you in more of his campaign speeches.
What percent of society would you say "contributes"?
So you believe these senior citizens, who vote GOP, are blood sucking ticks, to quote the parasite, bripat?
What percent of society would you say "contributes"?
Uhh where did I say that?
Are you denying that you believe these senior citizens are not "contributors"?
What the VA who receive pensions and disabilities treatment?
What about those who have children and have been deserted by their spouses?
And so forth?
Don't ask silly questions if you don't want them in return. You are better than bripat.
So you believe these senior citizens, who vote GOP, are blood sucking ticks, to quote the parasite, bripat?
Uhh where did I say that?
Are you denying that you believe these senior citizens are not "contributors"?
What the VA who receive pensions and disabilities treatment?
What about those who have children and have been deserted by their spouses?
And so forth?
Don't ask silly questions if you don't want them in return. You are better than bripat.
Uhh where did I say that?
Again you didn't answer the question. Might have to give up on you.
If you really wanna know what I think, I think all these programs and really anything paid for with labor based income taxes is a violation of human rights as it takes property from a person against their will.
Why not move to Cuba or France if you want socialism?
Why destroy America???? We don't want your rat poison.
you believe your opinions are anything but the soundings of a bigot. You are intolerant of any opinion or person who disagrees with your narrow perspectives and hold unabashed extreme opinions mindful of a young man with a smallish mustache bloviating in a beer hall in the last century.
Wrong. We don't all pay the bills and we don't all benefit. this country if full of useless ticks on the ass of society who pay nothing and receive the bulk of the benefits.
I'm fairly certain that all the libturds posting in this forum are members of that class.
We do better as a whole than a bunch of individuals......especially the wealthy
The phrase "do better as a whole" is utterly meaningless. It's the kind of "feel good" pablum that liberals are so fond of. Productive people do not do better when they are burdened with supporting an infestation of useless blood sucking tics. Of course, the tics would like their hosts to believe that they benefit from the tics presence.
Why not move to Cuba or France if you want socialism?
Why destroy America???? We don't want your rat poison.
Do you have a job? You seem to spend a lot of time posting here. I hope you aren't posting while you're supposed to be working.
One of the primary purposes of our constitution was to get the government involved in the nation's economy. The framers abolished a government with no powers and no involvment in the economy-- about as limited as a government could be--and created a new government with one of its primary purposes to be part of the economy. As soon as the first government took office, it was involved in the economy and has been since. Too much for some and not enough for others.
I don't think so, mostly they just wanted to ensure free and fair trade between the states. I do not think they ever envisioned gov't controlled health care or bailouts of businesses that were poorly run.
I could prove you wrong but I get the impression you don't care for facts.
Remember how we rsn surpluses for years on end and even paid off the entire national debt once a long time ago when government was limited and there was no federal income tax.
One of the primary purposes of our constitution was to get the government involved in the nation's economy. The framers abolished a government with no powers and no involvment in the economy-- about as limited as a government could be--and created a new government with one of its primary purposes to be part of the economy. As soon as the first government took office, it was involved in the economy and has been since. Too much for some and not enough for others.
I don't think so, mostly they just wanted to ensure free and fair trade between the states. I do not think they ever envisioned gov't controlled health care or bailouts of businesses that were poorly run.
Trade between the states sounds like the economy was involved. And then the Jay Treaty 1794, and Pinkney Treaty 1795 both had commercial requirements. Add to that Hamilton's tariffs to help American industry, sort of suggests government involvement in the economy from day one.
As for evisioning health care, health care was a state function, but the founders didn't envision a lot of things i.e. atomic energy.
In 1912, a famous historian Charles Beard wrote a history An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution that is a must-read for most graduate students of history.
