Qball
Corner Pocket
- Thread starter
- #21
The answer is pretty simple. And, it's really no different from any other "no compromise" issue by the very right, amnesty and obamacare for example. The numbers are simply against you on these issues, as your post points out. So, your options are two: One: gee six out of ten disagree with me, could there be something to their view? Two: I'm principled. No compromise.
What your choice (and I mean the gop's choice too) does is that all those who'd seek to look at the other sides' motivations to find some good will are now unacceptable to you. So, in order to win a national election is you'll need someone like Caesar who was all things to all people.
I don't think gay marriage has enough literal support to justify the GOP changing their stance. People can admit to, and can report on, whatever they want. A vote is an actual thing...an affirmation of support. If you call somebody and go, "do you support gay marriage, yes or no?" they can say "yes" without meaning it. If you call more Democrats than Republicans, your poll might reflect more support than it would if the demographic breakdown was different.
And then, there's also the point gay marriage supporters like to skirt around by arguing "We're Right Because We Said So, But We're Gonna Win So It Doesn't Matter Anyway" which is that even if an idea "polls" well, you still have to deal with the inconvenient fact that you might still lose anyway. Since when does polling well automatically mean people don't have to affirm anything with an actual vote? What if we did that with Presidents? On Election Day, we shouldn't worry about voting. No, we can just see who polls the best in each state and let that decide the winner. That wouldn't fly...so why should people just submit to what someone else says is the popular opinion when the actual votes paints a different picture?