Why the left wing embraces radical muslim terrorists....

ke
Name the American liberals who support Islamic terrorism.


Those who support linda sarsour.......and Cair....
Liberals don't support Islamic terrorism. They love this country.

Regressives and terrorism is a little more complicated.
.

Name the regressives who support terrorism.
Don't know. Tough to say. It's complicated.

But of course, that has nothing to do with my point.
.

The OP claims that the American left supports Islamic terrorism. He's either right or he's full of shit.

Get off your rocking horse and take a stand. Which is it?
This ain't tough. I doubt you that you Regressives actually support terrorism. Maybe some do. Overall, no.

Nor have I ever said you do, Mr. Straw Man.

But the point I made in Post 48 stands. Regardless of your efforts to deflect from it.
.
 
This is the thing that always amazes us on the Right...the left wing has teamed up with radical islamic terrorism thinking that they can use them to bring down the west........and there won't be any blow back in that relationship....

Leftists and Islamists: Strange Bedfellows

It cannot be repeated enough that the Marxist-anarchist radical left Antifa and Islamic jihadists have joined forces to destroy Western civilization. Known as the Red-Green Axis, this unlikely alliance of leftists with Islamic groups is actually a means to an end by Islamists.

Inexplicably, left-wing forces do not comprehend that they are merely one of the tools by which Islamists wish to impose a global caliphate. In his searing documentary Killing Europe, producer Michael Hansen makes the following cogent points.

The Islamic jihadists have found willing partners in the left for a number of reasons.

  • Particularly in Europe, the left's traditional voting bloc was the workers or proletariat. But as communism produced only mass misery and the deaths of millions, those who had invested 20-30 years in left-wing ideology soon found themselves without an identity once the proletariat saw the true nature of communism.
  • Enter Muslim refugees, and the left now sees a new voting base. The fact that these migrants come from a culture completely at odds with the West does not faze the left, since leftists have never accepted historical facts and, even more telling, now tout a multicultural paradise, notwithstanding the irrevocable differences that an Islamic religious-based system contains. In essence, the left has found a new base to promote its own identity.
  • That sharia law permits the stoning of gays, endorses gender apartheid, and advocates rape and murder of the infidel seems not to have registered in the leftist mind. Although the left abhors religion, leftists cannot fathom that their reliance on Islamist partners will not end well. This was borne out when the communists and Islamists joined to overturn the shah of Iran; the Islamic fundamentalists took the reins, eliminated the communists, and imposed draconian sharia law to maintain control.
As Ayn Rand wrote, "[r]eason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it." But as Kevin J. Johnston at Freedom Report explains, we need to be informed and realize that what is occurring is not to be denied even when political leaders reject the facts.

How, indeed, can a secularist or atheist even consider siding with a religiously mandated system that absolutely abhors secularism and atheism? How can leftists who are ostensibly concerned with women's rights and gay liberation partner with a system that mandates the murder of gays and the dehumanization and killing of women?

What both groups agree upon is a totalitarian society and censorship of ideas that would expose them. Political correctness hides their deeds. For example:
Your article seems to confuse migrants and terrorists. Its an act of deceit.
 
“If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.” Leviticus 20:13


Moron......they were destroyed because they were completely evil....no "righteous" people could be found in them......moron.
 
Liberals are at their best when they drag up a 1945 picture of the KKK and try to impose it on the here and now
They really have no true cause in the here and now so must dredge up 50-150 years ago
 
Liberals are at their best when they drag up a 1945 picture of the KKK and try to impose it on the here and now
They really have no true cause in the here and now so must dredge up 50-150 years ago
rts7k3.jpg
 
The far left may not embrace the Islamic terrorists, but they often see America as a bigger threat to the world than them, and are thus reluctant to criticize the terrorists when they attack the West.
 
Liberals are at their best when they drag up a 1945 picture of the KKK and try to impose it on the here and now
They really have no true cause in the here and now so must dredge up 50-150 years ago
How ironic. You must be new here. The pseudocons dredge up shit from 50 to 150 years ago on a weekly basis!
 
You're not a liberal you're a fucking imbecile.
You're the one that is not a liberal. You're a goose-stepping statist.
:lol:

A liberal is one who believes that all have the right to life, liberty, and property, and automatically, from birth, have the inalienable right to freedom of speech, press, religion, etc. The word liberal comes from the Latin word liber, which means "free." The very essence of liberalism is freedom, not statism, and the antithesis of authoritarianism.

You say you are a liberal, but you're really an authoritarian. Socialism/Marxism in any form cannot succeed without unilaterally depriving individuals of their property rights.

So, please.....stop using a term that does not apply to you.

Thanks.
:beer:
 
kim_davis1.jpg

Look, faggot, I have been married five times and Jesus says that's okay.

Jesus answered, “It was because of your hardness of heart that Moses permitted you to divorce your wives; but it was not this way from the beginning. I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery." - Matthew 19:8-9.


rts7k3.jpg
 
Maajid Nawaz and Quilliam: The Money Trail Behind the Propaganda

Nawaz attributes his own dramatic metamorphosis to his discardment of Islamism. This is nonsensical. Israel has broken children’s bones. Israel has ”destroyed the houses upon the heads of people”. Israel has ”invaded and occupied”. To conflate all objections to these horrendous crimes with an irrational and anti-semitic Islamist ideology is disingenuous. The ”deradicalisation” of Maajid Nawaz from Islamist propagandist to ”friend of Israel” can be explained by amorality and by the pandering to the vested interests whose donations are keeping the Quilliam Foundation in existence and Maajid Nawaz in three-piece-suits.

Your hero is a bought and paid for hack.
Yes, he's under all kinds of attack from the Regressives.

A very good sign, indeed.

Thanks.
.
Which part of the article do you think is not accurate ?
 
Maajid Nawaz and Quilliam: The Money Trail Behind the Propaganda

Nawaz attributes his own dramatic metamorphosis to his discardment of Islamism. This is nonsensical. Israel has broken children’s bones. Israel has ”destroyed the houses upon the heads of people”. Israel has ”invaded and occupied”. To conflate all objections to these horrendous crimes with an irrational and anti-semitic Islamist ideology is disingenuous. The ”deradicalisation” of Maajid Nawaz from Islamist propagandist to ”friend of Israel” can be explained by amorality and by the pandering to the vested interests whose donations are keeping the Quilliam Foundation in existence and Maajid Nawaz in three-piece-suits.

Your hero is a bought and paid for hack.
Yes, he's under all kinds of attack from the Regressives.

A very good sign, indeed.

Thanks.
.
Which part of the article do you think is not accurate ?
That's an "article", and not an opinion piece?

Are you serious?

Holy crap. Amazing.
.
 
Truth be told, I think the real motivation behind the Regressive's constant defense of Islam is the "Oppressed/Oppressor" template they apply to virtually all relationships.

Once they have identified the "Oppressed" group, they will spin for, deflect for, attack for, lower standards for, lower expectations for and do anything else they can for that group - even though the net result of all this effort is ultimately and predictably to enable further bad behaviors from that group. Examples of the template:

Oppressed/Oppressor
Islam/Conservatives
Women/Men
Minorities/Whites
Muslims/Christians
Employees/Employers
Poor/Rich
Any other country/America
Non-Achievers/Achievers
Criminals/Cops
Government/Business

... on and on.
.
I personally react against sweeping generalisations of any group of people based on a subset of those people.
The vast majority of Muslims aren't terrorists...as just one example.

I fucking hate terrorists though...of any religion or ideology.
 
This is the thing that always amazes us on the Right...the left wing has teamed up with radical islamic terrorism thinking that they can use them to bring down the west........and there won't be any blow back in that relationship....

Leftists and Islamists: Strange Bedfellows

It cannot be repeated enough that the Marxist-anarchist radical left Antifa and Islamic jihadists have joined forces to destroy Western civilization. Known as the Red-Green Axis, this unlikely alliance of leftists with Islamic groups is actually a means to an end by Islamists.

Inexplicably, left-wing forces do not comprehend that they are merely one of the tools by which Islamists wish to impose a global caliphate. In his searing documentary Killing Europe, producer Michael Hansen makes the following cogent points.

The Islamic jihadists have found willing partners in the left for a number of reasons.

  • Particularly in Europe, the left's traditional voting bloc was the workers or proletariat. But as communism produced only mass misery and the deaths of millions, those who had invested 20-30 years in left-wing ideology soon found themselves without an identity once the proletariat saw the true nature of communism.
  • Enter Muslim refugees, and the left now sees a new voting base. The fact that these migrants come from a culture completely at odds with the West does not faze the left, since leftists have never accepted historical facts and, even more telling, now tout a multicultural paradise, notwithstanding the irrevocable differences that an Islamic religious-based system contains. In essence, the left has found a new base to promote its own identity.
  • That sharia law permits the stoning of gays, endorses gender apartheid, and advocates rape and murder of the infidel seems not to have registered in the leftist mind. Although the left abhors religion, leftists cannot fathom that their reliance on Islamist partners will not end well. This was borne out when the communists and Islamists joined to overturn the shah of Iran; the Islamic fundamentalists took the reins, eliminated the communists, and imposed draconian sharia law to maintain control.
As Ayn Rand wrote, "[r]eason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it." But as Kevin J. Johnston at Freedom Report explains, we need to be informed and realize that what is occurring is not to be denied even when political leaders reject the facts.

How, indeed, can a secularist or atheist even consider siding with a religiously mandated system that absolutely abhors secularism and atheism? How can leftists who are ostensibly concerned with women's rights and gay liberation partner with a system that mandates the murder of gays and the dehumanization and killing of women?

What both groups agree upon is a totalitarian society and censorship of ideas that would expose them. Political correctness hides their deeds. For example:
Do you realize that the movement the Radical Islam feeds off of is against the Liberal ideals of the west, most prominently represented by the Left? In theory, Radical islam is an extremely conservative ideology. I see what you are trying to do by drawing a political correlation between the Left and Radical Islam. Its just a very weak attempt. They are a completely different bred


But yet the Trojan horse of what is called "moderate islam" has found a foothold within the DNC.....you can't deny that, Slade.
 
Liberals are at their best when they drag up a 1945 picture of the KKK and try to impose it on the here and now
They really have no true cause in the here and now so must dredge up 50-150 years ago

Rotsa ruck finding Klan pics from 1945 but here's a klown who dredged one up from 1924, called it "newly discovered" and blatantly lied about where and what it was.

So --- care to essplain why conservatives (two different ones posted the same thread which were merged) are dragging up a 1924 picture of the KKK and trying to impose it on the here and now?

Probably not.
 
Maajid Nawaz and Quilliam: The Money Trail Behind the Propaganda

Nawaz attributes his own dramatic metamorphosis to his discardment of Islamism. This is nonsensical. Israel has broken children’s bones. Israel has ”destroyed the houses upon the heads of people”. Israel has ”invaded and occupied”. To conflate all objections to these horrendous crimes with an irrational and anti-semitic Islamist ideology is disingenuous. The ”deradicalisation” of Maajid Nawaz from Islamist propagandist to ”friend of Israel” can be explained by amorality and by the pandering to the vested interests whose donations are keeping the Quilliam Foundation in existence and Maajid Nawaz in three-piece-suits.

Your hero is a bought and paid for hack.
Yes, he's under all kinds of attack from the Regressives.

A very good sign, indeed.

Thanks.
.
Which part of the article do you think is not accurate ?
That's an "article", and not an opinion piece?

Are you serious?

Holy crap. Amazing.
.
Its quite detailed.names,dates amounts. It shows that his funding originally came from the government and as that reduced he had to turn to other sources. He is just dancing to his masters tune.
 
Maajid Nawaz and Quilliam: The Money Trail Behind the Propaganda

Nawaz attributes his own dramatic metamorphosis to his discardment of Islamism. This is nonsensical. Israel has broken children’s bones. Israel has ”destroyed the houses upon the heads of people”. Israel has ”invaded and occupied”. To conflate all objections to these horrendous crimes with an irrational and anti-semitic Islamist ideology is disingenuous. The ”deradicalisation” of Maajid Nawaz from Islamist propagandist to ”friend of Israel” can be explained by amorality and by the pandering to the vested interests whose donations are keeping the Quilliam Foundation in existence and Maajid Nawaz in three-piece-suits.

Your hero is a bought and paid for hack.
Yes, he's under all kinds of attack from the Regressives.

A very good sign, indeed.

Thanks.
.
Which part of the article do you think is not accurate ?
That's an "article", and not an opinion piece?

Are you serious?

Holy crap. Amazing.
.
Its quite detailed.names,dates amounts. It shows that his funding originally came from the government and as that reduced he had to turn to other sources. He is just dancing to his masters tune.
You trot out a hit piece from a website called "Loon Watch" and use it as serious source material.

Tell ya what, I'll find a right winger to counter with an "article" from Alex Jones, that should balance things out nicely.

What a joke. Play with someone else. I'll side with the guy putting his life on the line every day, not you.
.
 
They already know......someone who commits murder, is not a Christian.....
They are Christians, and they want gays executed. I gave you the links.

And we have spent YEARS listening to you pseudocons telling us that Jesus doesn't want gays to have equal rights and that they are pedophiles and such.

rts7k3.jpg


Again......show me where Jesus said....."go ahead, murder gays." Since he never said that, anyone who advocates for that is not following Christ's Teachings and is not a Christian....

Moron....
Oh, I see. So it is possible that some people claiming to belong to a particular religion are not REAL members of that religion?

Huh!

But apparently it is also possible that someone who knows fuck-all about a different religion pretend they do, based on shit they parrot from their propaganda outlets.
I wonder then...in his fevered mind...who the real Muslims are?
The ones that go out and blow themselves up and murder innocent people...or those that don't?
The tards think the refugees who are fleeing the terrorists are the bad guys. These tards are no different than the fuckwads who turned away the Jews fleeing Hitler.

So they clearly believe the terrorists are the real Muslims.

You know, like these guys are the true Christians:

Klan_Red_Riders_Jesus_Saves_photo_small.jpg

rts7k3.jpg
Yeah...funny how that works.
Apparently, Christians that advocate killing aren't 'real Christians'.
Muslims that do the same are the real Muslims.
 
This is the thing that always amazes us on the Right...the left wing has teamed up with radical islamic terrorism thinking that they can use them to bring down the west........and there won't be any blow back in that relationship....

Leftists and Islamists: Strange Bedfellows

It cannot be repeated enough that the Marxist-anarchist radical left Antifa and Islamic jihadists have joined forces to destroy Western civilization. Known as the Red-Green Axis, this unlikely alliance of leftists with Islamic groups is actually a means to an end by Islamists.

Inexplicably, left-wing forces do not comprehend that they are merely one of the tools by which Islamists wish to impose a global caliphate. In his searing documentary Killing Europe, producer Michael Hansen makes the following cogent points.

The Islamic jihadists have found willing partners in the left for a number of reasons.

  • Particularly in Europe, the left's traditional voting bloc was the workers or proletariat. But as communism produced only mass misery and the deaths of millions, those who had invested 20-30 years in left-wing ideology soon found themselves without an identity once the proletariat saw the true nature of communism.
  • Enter Muslim refugees, and the left now sees a new voting base. The fact that these migrants come from a culture completely at odds with the West does not faze the left, since leftists have never accepted historical facts and, even more telling, now tout a multicultural paradise, notwithstanding the irrevocable differences that an Islamic religious-based system contains. In essence, the left has found a new base to promote its own identity.
  • That sharia law permits the stoning of gays, endorses gender apartheid, and advocates rape and murder of the infidel seems not to have registered in the leftist mind. Although the left abhors religion, leftists cannot fathom that their reliance on Islamist partners will not end well. This was borne out when the communists and Islamists joined to overturn the shah of Iran; the Islamic fundamentalists took the reins, eliminated the communists, and imposed draconian sharia law to maintain control.
As Ayn Rand wrote, "[r]eason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it." But as Kevin J. Johnston at Freedom Report explains, we need to be informed and realize that what is occurring is not to be denied even when political leaders reject the facts.

How, indeed, can a secularist or atheist even consider siding with a religiously mandated system that absolutely abhors secularism and atheism? How can leftists who are ostensibly concerned with women's rights and gay liberation partner with a system that mandates the murder of gays and the dehumanization and killing of women?

What both groups agree upon is a totalitarian society and censorship of ideas that would expose them. Political correctness hides their deeds. For example:
Do you realize that the movement the Radical Islam feeds off of is against the Liberal ideals of the west, most prominently represented by the Left? In theory, Radical islam is an extremely conservative ideology. I see what you are trying to do by drawing a political correlation between the Left and Radical Islam. Its just a very weak attempt. They are a completely different bred


Read the article numb nuts......the stupidity of the left is identified and exposed quite clearly.....
It is not clear at all. It conflates ANIFA and communists with the “Left” which in this country could include everything from liberals to progressives to democrats to socialists.... it is a very intellectually dishonest article that conflates way to many things to be taken seriously, especially with the way you are trying to use it.
 
This is the thing that always amazes us on the Right...the left wing has teamed up with radical islamic terrorism thinking that they can use them to bring down the west........and there won't be any blow back in that relationship....

Leftists and Islamists: Strange Bedfellows

It cannot be repeated enough that the Marxist-anarchist radical left Antifa and Islamic jihadists have joined forces to destroy Western civilization. Known as the Red-Green Axis, this unlikely alliance of leftists with Islamic groups is actually a means to an end by Islamists.

Inexplicably, left-wing forces do not comprehend that they are merely one of the tools by which Islamists wish to impose a global caliphate. In his searing documentary Killing Europe, producer Michael Hansen makes the following cogent points.

The Islamic jihadists have found willing partners in the left for a number of reasons.

  • Particularly in Europe, the left's traditional voting bloc was the workers or proletariat. But as communism produced only mass misery and the deaths of millions, those who had invested 20-30 years in left-wing ideology soon found themselves without an identity once the proletariat saw the true nature of communism.
  • Enter Muslim refugees, and the left now sees a new voting base. The fact that these migrants come from a culture completely at odds with the West does not faze the left, since leftists have never accepted historical facts and, even more telling, now tout a multicultural paradise, notwithstanding the irrevocable differences that an Islamic religious-based system contains. In essence, the left has found a new base to promote its own identity.
  • That sharia law permits the stoning of gays, endorses gender apartheid, and advocates rape and murder of the infidel seems not to have registered in the leftist mind. Although the left abhors religion, leftists cannot fathom that their reliance on Islamist partners will not end well. This was borne out when the communists and Islamists joined to overturn the shah of Iran; the Islamic fundamentalists took the reins, eliminated the communists, and imposed draconian sharia law to maintain control.
As Ayn Rand wrote, "[r]eason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it." But as Kevin J. Johnston at Freedom Report explains, we need to be informed and realize that what is occurring is not to be denied even when political leaders reject the facts.

How, indeed, can a secularist or atheist even consider siding with a religiously mandated system that absolutely abhors secularism and atheism? How can leftists who are ostensibly concerned with women's rights and gay liberation partner with a system that mandates the murder of gays and the dehumanization and killing of women?

What both groups agree upon is a totalitarian society and censorship of ideas that would expose them. Political correctness hides their deeds. For example:
Do you realize that the movement the Radical Islam feeds off of is against the Liberal ideals of the west, most prominently represented by the Left? In theory, Radical islam is an extremely conservative ideology. I see what you are trying to do by drawing a political correlation between the Left and Radical Islam. Its just a very weak attempt. They are a completely different bred


But yet the Trojan horse of what is called "moderate islam" has found a foothold within the DNC.....you can't deny that, Slade.
Explain that and then I’ll respond
 
Maajid Nawaz and Quilliam: The Money Trail Behind the Propaganda

Nawaz attributes his own dramatic metamorphosis to his discardment of Islamism. This is nonsensical. Israel has broken children’s bones. Israel has ”destroyed the houses upon the heads of people”. Israel has ”invaded and occupied”. To conflate all objections to these horrendous crimes with an irrational and anti-semitic Islamist ideology is disingenuous. The ”deradicalisation” of Maajid Nawaz from Islamist propagandist to ”friend of Israel” can be explained by amorality and by the pandering to the vested interests whose donations are keeping the Quilliam Foundation in existence and Maajid Nawaz in three-piece-suits.

Your hero is a bought and paid for hack.
Yes, he's under all kinds of attack from the Regressives.

A very good sign, indeed.

Thanks.
.
Which part of the article do you think is not accurate ?
That's an "article", and not an opinion piece?

Are you serious?

Holy crap. Amazing.
.
Its quite detailed.names,dates amounts. It shows that his funding originally came from the government and as that reduced he had to turn to other sources. He is just dancing to his masters tune.
You trot out a hit piece from a website called "Loon Watch" and use it as serious source material.

Tell ya what, I'll find a right winger to counter with an "article" from Alex Jones, that should balance things out nicely.

What a joke. Play with someone else. I'll side with the guy putting his life on the line every day, not you.
.
Well they are up front about their sources. I doubt that you have even read the article.

** Totals for funds donated to Quilliam from ‘Pro-Israel/Right-Wing’ organisations, are based mostly on publicly available, tax 990 form documents. It is unknown if there are any further donors which either donate privately or from outside the US/UK to Quilliam. Therefore the stated amounts are the minimum totals of funding that are known, and not necessarily entire amounts.
 

Forum List

Back
Top