... in a sense.
They won on a wave of anti-Trump protest voting, rather than having any merit in and of themselves. I think this will mislead them into thinking that lazy approach is sufficient to win from state to state, when that is just not true IMO; the democrats HAVE to come up with some kind of intelligent, meaningful, and appealing strategic policy. The anti-Trump weapon is yet another glass sword, just like identity politics. They need something substantial to run on, not more of that bullshit that didn't work in 2016.
The fact that their lazy approach won the day is a bit disturbing to me. I'd like to see Trump out of office with narrow majorities in house and senate (for either party).
They won on a wave of anti-Trump protest voting, rather than having any merit in and of themselves. I think this will mislead them into thinking that lazy approach is sufficient to win from state to state, when that is just not true IMO; the democrats HAVE to come up with some kind of intelligent, meaningful, and appealing strategic policy. The anti-Trump weapon is yet another glass sword, just like identity politics. They need something substantial to run on, not more of that bullshit that didn't work in 2016.
The fact that their lazy approach won the day is a bit disturbing to me. I'd like to see Trump out of office with narrow majorities in house and senate (for either party).