Why We Should Believe The CIA re: Russian Hacking

I doubt anybody but Obama's appointees are spreading that nonsense, not the real CIA agents with real jobs.
 
Really? A World Net Daily blog is your "source"?

It has a lot more cred than the NEW York Times, CNN, or any of the major news media, thanks to this last election cycle wherein they shot their cred all to shit for the next 50 years, and are still doing so. Do you have a point here?
 
The CIA hasn't said anything. Some unnamed high government official said there was a report from the CIA.

No one has ever seen the report. No one lays claim to writing the report. No one has admitted to being the high government official.

That says more than anything else.
 
Barack Obama appointed the Attorney Generals-----and the whole Justice Department was thus corrupted to his Marxist political Agenda.

Barack Obama appointed that perfect Ass Koskinin to head the IRS, and with the cover of a corrupt Justice Department, he completely corrupted the IRS.

Repeat for EPA.

Repeat for every other branch of the Federal Bureaucracy.

Barack Obama also appointed the head of the CIA....why should it not become a Political Arm of his Marxist Government just like every other arm of the Federal Government?

And this CIA bullshit comes to us through the filter of the Pravda-like Washington Times....and of course they can't "reveal their sources".

Julian Assange says the Russians didn't have anything to do with it.

I don't have any good reason to believe him....except I expect he is more reliable than the Washington Times and some unnamed Obama operative in the CIA.

Fuck this whole corrupt Marxist Administration. Only 39 days to go.

Then, maybe, at least, we can trust our own Government again.
 
The CIA hasn't said anything. Some unnamed high government official said there was a report from the CIA.

No one has ever seen the report. No one lays claim to writing the report. No one has admitted to being the high government official.

That says more than anything else.

Libtards might have to accept this election if it wasn't for those darned 'anonymous sources' that they run as Godspeak with.
 
There is absolutely no evidence that the CIA can present that the Russians hacked into voting machines. If there is then they MUST present this to the people. But they can't do this without lying.

The fact is that Trump could easily have both Clinton and Obumma arrested on his first day in office and Obumma knows this and is scared shitless
 
There is absolutely no evidence that the CIA can present that the Russians hacked into voting machines. If there is then they MUST present this to the people. But they can't do this without lying.

The fact is that Trump could easily have both Clinton and Obumma arrested on his first day in office and Obumma knows this and is scared shitless

The FBI handles things that happen IN America, and the CIA handles things OUTSIDE America. The FBI said there was no evidence that our voting machines were hacked.

The CIA is saying that Russia used the stuff they hacked from the DNC to INFLUENCE the election by releasing stuff that looked bad for Hillary.

Nobody is saying that the voting machines were hacked.
 
There is absolutely no evidence that the CIA can present that the Russians hacked into voting machines. If there is then they MUST present this to the people. But they can't do this without lying.

The fact is that Trump could easily have both Clinton and Obumma arrested on his first day in office and Obumma knows this and is scared shitless

The FBI handles things that happen IN America, and the CIA handles things OUTSIDE America. The FBI said there was no evidence that our voting machines were hacked.

The CIA is saying that Russia used the stuff they hacked from the DNC to INFLUENCE the election by releasing stuff that looked bad for Hillary.

Nobody is saying that the voting machines were hacked.
Then the word hacking was used wrong, as the recount is being done in conjunction with the word hacking. The typical democrap does not even know what the word means, just like they do not know a criminal or a Parkinsons patient when they see one
 
Last edited:
There is absolutely no evidence that the CIA can present that the Russians hacked into voting machines. If there is then they MUST present this to the people. But they can't do this without lying.

The fact is that Trump could easily have both Clinton and Obumma arrested on his first day in office and Obumma knows this and is scared shitless

The FBI handles things that happen IN America, and the CIA handles things OUTSIDE America. The FBI said there was no evidence that our voting machines were hacked.

The CIA is saying that Russia used the stuff they hacked from the DNC to INFLUENCE the election by releasing stuff that looked bad for Hillary.

Nobody is saying that the voting machines were hacked.

So???

The weather also influences elections. A flood prevents people from getting to the polls. What is yer' point?
 
There is absolutely no evidence that the CIA can present that the Russians hacked into voting machines. If there is then they MUST present this to the people. But they can't do this without lying.

The fact is that Trump could easily have both Clinton and Obumma arrested on his first day in office and Obumma knows this and is scared shitless

The FBI handles things that happen IN America, and the CIA handles things OUTSIDE America. The FBI said there was no evidence that our voting machines were hacked.

The CIA is saying that Russia used the stuff they hacked from the DNC to INFLUENCE the election by releasing stuff that looked bad for Hillary.

Nobody is saying that the voting machines were hacked.
I know what the law says, but the fact is that the CIA does whatever it wants, wherever it wants.
 
There is absolutely no evidence that the CIA can present that the Russians hacked into voting machines. If there is then they MUST present this to the people. But they can't do this without lying.

The fact is that Trump could easily have both Clinton and Obumma arrested on his first day in office and Obumma knows this and is scared shitless

The FBI handles things that happen IN America, and the CIA handles things OUTSIDE America. The FBI said there was no evidence that our voting machines were hacked.

The CIA is saying that Russia used the stuff they hacked from the DNC to INFLUENCE the election by releasing stuff that looked bad for Hillary.

Nobody is saying that the voting machines were hacked.
I know what the law says, but the fact is that the CIA does whatever it wants, wherever it wants.

Then, if you understand the law, then you understand why the FBI said no machines were hacked. They take care of stuff IN America.

And, you would also understand why the CIA said it was Russia that hacked the DNC and used the information by leaking it to the public and influencing how the public viewed Hillary.
 
There is absolutely no evidence that the CIA can present that the Russians hacked into voting machines. If there is then they MUST present this to the people. But they can't do this without lying.

The fact is that Trump could easily have both Clinton and Obumma arrested on his first day in office and Obumma knows this and is scared shitless

The FBI handles things that happen IN America, and the CIA handles things OUTSIDE America. The FBI said there was no evidence that our voting machines were hacked.

The CIA is saying that Russia used the stuff they hacked from the DNC to INFLUENCE the election by releasing stuff that looked bad for Hillary.

Nobody is saying that the voting machines were hacked.

"Russia used the stuff they hacked from the DNC"

Objection! Assumes facts not in evidence.




"by releasing stuff that looked bad for Hillary"

Are you talking about the honored, age old practice of the "October Surprise"? Hummmmm... That'll fly.

Hillary tried one against, but it flopped. The one against Hillary, and Trump had nothing to do with it, was perpetrated by a Whistleblower out of her own camp. Damned, that had to sting!
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't be surprised if it came from Harry Reid. He is used to telling tall tales.

The CIA hasn't said anything. Some unnamed high government official said there was a report from the CIA.

No one has ever seen the report. No one lays claim to writing the report. No one has admitted to being the high government official.

That says more than anything else.
 
An "unidentified CIA source" supposedly said something to a New York Slimes reporter. The New York Times that has been caught red handily several times making up false news stories.

On the basis of that the Moon Bats want to overturn an election after the recount bullshit didn't work.
 

Forum List

Back
Top