WikiLeaks has a surprise for Tim Kaine and Donna Brazile?

Obama, as a constitutional lawyer and professor, I'd say YES.....
GWB, as a cheerleader at Yale, I'd say, MAYBE......

Does THAT answer your question?

Affirmative action confers positions, not knowledge.

I seriously doubt Obama has even read the Constitution.
 
Clinton is getting hammered by WikiLeaks. What's up next? Tim Kaine and Donna Brazile.

WikiLeaks on Twitter


Brazile already complained that she's being persicutified.

Donna Brazile Claims She's Being 'Persecuted' When Megyn Kelly Brings Up WikiLeaks Email
Only a matter of time before she starts using the woman card
Brazile already did, accusing Young Turks reporter in an interview of badgering a woman at 0:40:

What a sleaze!
 
Last edited:
Clinton is getting hammered by WikiLeaks.
An objective smart analyst has to wonder why Wikileaks is providing only stolen DNC emails? What about Trump insider emails?
Who hacked those DNC emails? Russians? Were they altered before given to Wikileaks?
Wikileaks has been criticized for not verifying their source information.
Even Snowden has criticized Wikileaks for their sloppiness.
A "smart" person would ask whether Trump's email sever is a million times more secure than any stupid LIB operated system.
Two Inuit school kids were able to hack into the DNC server. They using a fucking burned out 286 for Christ's sake!
 
[

An objective smart analyst has to wonder why Wikileaks is providing only stolen DNC emails? What about Trump insider emails?
Who hacked those DNC emails? Russians? Were they altered before given to Wikileaks?
Wikileaks has been criticized for not verifying their source information.
Even Snowden has criticized Wikileaks for their sloppiness.

Objective you are not.

There is ZERO evidence that any emails were altered, and hundreds have been independently verified. I understand that you of the left must do ANYTHING you can to blunt the impact of these facts.

Assange is going after Hillary because Hillary tried to kill him, twice. So she gets and deserves all the attention he has.

You are whining purely because someone is telling the truth, and you don't like it one bit.
 
Clinton is getting hammered by WikiLeaks.
An objective smart analyst has to wonder why Wikileaks is providing only stolen DNC emails? What about Trump insider emails?
Who hacked those DNC emails? Russians? Were they altered before given to Wikileaks?
Wikileaks has been criticized for not verifying their source information.
Even Snowden has criticized Wikileaks for their sloppiness.
A "smart" person would ask whether Trump's email sever is a million times more secure than any stupid LIB operated system.
Two Inuit school kids were able to hack into the DNC server. They using a fucking burned out 286 for Christ's sake!

Leftists are just stupid.
 
Clinton is getting hammered by WikiLeaks.
An objective smart analyst has to wonder why Wikileaks is providing only stolen DNC emails? What about Trump insider emails?
Who hacked those DNC emails? Russians? Were they altered before given to Wikileaks?
Wikileaks has been criticized for not verifying their source information.
Even Snowden has criticized Wikileaks for their sloppiness.
A "smart" person would ask whether Trump's email sever is a million times more secure than any stupid LIB operated system.
Two Inuit school kids were able to hack into the DNC server. They using a fucking burned out 286 for Christ's sake!
Links?
 
[

An objective smart analyst has to wonder why Wikileaks is providing only stolen DNC emails? What about Trump insider emails?
Who hacked those DNC emails? Russians? Were they altered before given to Wikileaks?
Wikileaks has been criticized for not verifying their source information.
Even Snowden has criticized Wikileaks for their sloppiness.

Objective you are not.

There is ZERO evidence that any emails were altered, and hundreds have been independently verified. I understand that you of the left must do ANYTHING you can to blunt the impact of these facts.

Assange is going after Hillary because Hillary tried to kill him, twice. So she gets and deserves all the attention he has.

You are whining purely because someone is telling the truth, and you don't like it one bit.
Where is your evidence? Links?
 
Clinton is getting hammered by WikiLeaks.
An objective smart analyst has to wonder why Wikileaks is providing only stolen DNC emails? What about Trump insider emails?
Who hacked those DNC emails? Russians? Were they altered before given to Wikileaks?
Wikileaks has been criticized for not verifying their source information.
Even Snowden has criticized Wikileaks for their sloppiness.
A "smart" person would ask whether Trump's email sever is a million times more secure than any stupid LIB operated system.
Two Inuit school kids were able to hack into the DNC server. They using a fucking burned out 286 for Christ's sake!
Leftists are just stupid.
Gee, how informative. Not much smarter than saying "rightists are just stupid". LOL.
 
legal and constitutional?

Does he know the meaning of those words?


Obama, as a constitutional lawyer and professor, I'd say YES.....
GWB, as a cheerleader at Yale, I'd say, MAYBE......

Does THAT answer your question?

Stop lying,Barry was never a professor.
Why do you liberals constantly repeat the same old lies when they've been debunked multiple times?
 
Clinton is getting hammered by WikiLeaks.
An objective smart analyst has to wonder why Wikileaks is providing only stolen DNC emails? What about Trump insider emails?
Who hacked those DNC emails? Russians? Were they altered before given to Wikileaks?
Wikileaks has been criticized for not verifying their source information.
Even Snowden has criticized Wikileaks for their sloppiness.
A "smart" person would ask whether Trump's email sever is a million times more secure than any stupid LIB operated system.
Two Inuit school kids were able to hack into the DNC server. They using a fucking burned out 286 for Christ's sake!
Leftists are just stupid.
Gee, how informative. Not much smarter than saying "rightists are just stupid". LOL.

It's an observation..I concluded that after reading your gibberish
 
Clinton is getting hammered by WikiLeaks.
An objective smart analyst has to wonder why Wikileaks is providing only stolen DNC emails? What about Trump insider emails?
Who hacked those DNC emails? Russians? Were they altered before given to Wikileaks?
Wikileaks has been criticized for not verifying their source information.
Even Snowden has criticized Wikileaks for their sloppiness.
A "smart" person would ask whether Trump's email sever is a million times more secure than any stupid LIB operated system.
Two Inuit school kids were able to hack into the DNC server. They using a fucking burned out 286 for Christ's sake!

Leftists are just stupid.
They are genetically predisposed to chronic emotional hemophilia. This literally affects their ability to reason clearly.
LIB (cough) men are all 'vaguely gay'. LIB women are not to be trusted being alone with young girls.
There's more truth to these claims than is being excepted.
 
Clinton is getting hammered by WikiLeaks.
An objective smart analyst has to wonder why Wikileaks is providing only stolen DNC emails? What about Trump insider emails?
Who hacked those DNC emails? Russians? Were they altered before given to Wikileaks?
Wikileaks has been criticized for not verifying their source information.
Even Snowden has criticized Wikileaks for their sloppiness.
A "smart" person would ask whether Trump's email sever is a million times more secure than any stupid LIB operated system.
Two Inuit school kids were able to hack into the DNC server. They using a fucking burned out 286 for Christ's sake!

Leftists are just stupid.
They are genetically predisposed to chronic emotional hemophilia. This literally affects their ability to reason clearly.
LIB (cough) men are all 'vaguely gay'. LIB women are not to be trusted being alone with young girls.
There's more truth to these claims than is being excepted.

I tend to avoid them. Listening to a whiny leftist gives me a headache
 
Clinton is getting hammered by WikiLeaks.
An objective smart analyst has to wonder why Wikileaks is providing only stolen DNC emails? What about Trump insider emails?
Who hacked those DNC emails? Russians? Were they altered before given to Wikileaks?
Wikileaks has been criticized for not verifying their source information.
Even Snowden has criticized Wikileaks for their sloppiness.
A "smart" person would ask whether Trump's email sever is a million times more secure than any stupid LIB operated system.
Two Inuit school kids were able to hack into the DNC server. They using a fucking burned out 286 for Christ's sake!
Leftists are just stupid.
Gee, how informative. Not much smarter than saying "rightists are just stupid". LOL.

It's an observation..I concluded that after reading your gibberish
Your conclusion has no valid arguments. Is that smart?
 
Where is your evidence? Links?

Doesn't work that way sparky. YOU (George Soros actually, pulling your puppet strings) made the claim that the WikiLeaks emails were "altered."

Do YOU or the hate sites have even a shred of evidence to back this up?

No, all you have is demands that others prove a negative.

An objective and smart analyst would note the resignation of Debbie Wasserman Schultz. If the WikiLeaks revelations are "AHLL LIZE" as you Sorosbots claim, why would she resign? After all, the claim of your handlers is that the conspiracy against Sanders is all fabricated. Yet she still resigned. :eusa_whistle:

But you are a hack, not an objective or smart analyst.
 
An objective smart analyst has to wonder why Wikileaks is providing only stolen DNC emails? What about Trump insider emails?
Who hacked those DNC emails? Russians? Were they altered before given to Wikileaks?
Wikileaks has been criticized for not verifying their source information.
Even Snowden has criticized Wikileaks for their sloppiness.
A "smart" person would ask whether Trump's email sever is a million times more secure than any stupid LIB operated system.
Two Inuit school kids were able to hack into the DNC server. They using a fucking burned out 286 for Christ's sake!
Leftists are just stupid.
Gee, how informative. Not much smarter than saying "rightists are just stupid". LOL.

It's an observation..I concluded that after reading your gibberish
Your conclusion has no valid arguments. Is that smart?

Run along with what you think is some intelligent response. Leftists are inherently stupid....it's almost as if you morons work at it
 
Where is your evidence? Links?
Doesn't work that way sparky. YOU (George Soros actually, pulling your puppet strings) made the claim that the WikiLeaks emails were "altered."

Do YOU or the hate sites have even a shred of evidence to back this up?

No, all you have is demands that others prove a negative.

An objective and smart analyst would note the resignation of Debbie Wasserman Schultz. If the WikiLeaks revelations are "AHLL LIZE" as you Sorosbots claim, why would she resign? After all, the claim of your handlers is that the conspiracy against Sanders is all fabricated. Yet she still resigned.
But you are a hack, not an objective or smart analyst.
I agree that Wasserman should have resigned and Sanders likely got screwed.
So what?
That does not prove that all WikiLeaks information has not been altered.
Do you know who hacked those emails and who provided them to WikiLeaks?
 

Forum List

Back
Top