Will Obamas wiretapping of Trumps home bring down the democrat party?

[Contumacious]

boedicca, post: 16727019

Let's see if the 2nd FISA request actually specified Trump as an individual

Comey just called Trump a liar.

We can be certain that there were no FISA requests coming from the White House.

Will Trump fire Comey now?

http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/yes-obama-could-be-prosecuted-if-involved-with-illegal-surveillance/
Yes, There Could Be Serious Legal Problems if Obama Admin Involved in Illegal Surveillance

If the stories are correct, Obama or his officials might even face prosecution.

The stories currently are three-fold:

first, that Obama’s team tried to get a warrant from a regular, Article III federal court on Trump, and was told no by someone along the way (maybe the FBI), as the evidence was that weak or non-existent;


second, Obama’s team then tried to circumvent the federal judiciary’s independent role by trying to mislabel the issue one of “foreign agents,” and tried to obtain a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act “courts”, and were again turned down, when the court saw Trump named (an extremely rare act of FISA court refusal of the government, suggesting the evidence was truly non-existent against Trump); and so,


third, Obama circumvented both the regular command of the FBI and the regularly appointed federal courts, by placing the entire case as a FISA case (and apparently under Sally Yates at DOJ) as a “foreign” case, and then omitted Trump’s name from a surveillance warrant submitted to the FISA court, which the FISA court unwittingly granted, which Obama then misused to spy on Trump and many connected to Trump. Are these allegations true? We don’t know yet, but if any part of them are than Obama and/or his officials could face serious trouble.


.

 

[owebo]

America has never seen this level of democrat fascism.....Trump now knows all, and will attack democrats with the truth.....can they survive?

Let's start off with a premise: For the sake of argument, let's just say that there are a myriad of forces (like the Democrats, the media, and Republicans who are not sold on Trump) that are trying, both overtly and covertly, to bring down the Trump presidency. Okay so far?

All of those forces, all working together in concert, couldn't do as much damage to Trump's presidency as Trump does all by himself week after week.

Link to Trump doing damage to his presidency?

The only thing I see Trump doing is beating you fascist democrats like the rented mules you are.....

But please, don't let me stop your plantation circle jerk....your democrat party won't last much longer....

 

[owebo]

boedicca, post: 16727019

Let's see if the 2nd FISA request actually specified Trump as an individual

Comey just called Trump a liar.

We can be certain that there were no FISA requests coming from the Obama White House.

Will Trump fire Comey now?

Why, Comey told Trump what your Obama did..

 

[basquebromance]

Maybe Obama can use the "I was too stupid to know what's going on" excuse--& produce his college grades to prove the point

 

[NotfooledbyW]

boedicca, post: 16727019

Let's see if the 2nd FISA request actually specified Trump as an individual

Comey just called Trump a liar.

We can be certain that there were no FISA requests coming from the White House.

Will Trump fire Comey now?

Yes, There Could Be Serious Legal Problems if Obama Admin Involved in Illegal Surveillance

If the stories are correct, Obama or his officials might even face prosecution.

The stories currently are three-fold:

first, that Obama’s team tried to get a warrant from a regular, Article III federal court on Trump, and was told no by someone along the way (maybe the FBI), as the evidence was that weak or non-existent;


second, Obama’s team then tried to circumvent the federal judiciary’s independent role by trying to mislabel the issue one of “foreign agents,” and tried to obtain a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act “courts”, and were again turned down, when the court saw Trump named (an extremely rare act of FISA court refusal of the government, suggesting the evidence was truly non-existent against Trump); and so,


third, Obama circumvented both the regular command of the FBI and the regularly appointed federal courts, by placing the entire case as a FISA case (and apparently under Sally Yates at DOJ) as a “foreign” case, and then omitted Trump’s name from a surveillance warrant submitted to the FISA court, which the FISA court unwittingly granted, which Obama then misused to spy on Trump and many connected to Trump. Are these allegations true? We don’t know yet, but if any part of them are than Obama and/or his officials could face serious trouble.


.

Comey calling the Trump a liar puts and end to it.

What can Trump and Sessions say after this.

(FBI Director James Comey asked the Department of Justice to “publicly reject” President Donald Trump’s explosive allegation over the weekend that then-President Barack Obama had ordered a wiretap of Trump’s communications during the presidential campaign, The New York Times reported on Sunday.

Comey said that Trump’s claim, which he tweeted early on Saturday without offering any evidence, “is false and must be corrected,” according to unnamed U.S. officials who spoke with the Times. The Justice Department, led by Trump-nominated Attorney General Jeff Sessions, has not done so yet.)

FBI Director James Comey Asked DOJ To Refute Trump's Wiretapping Claim | The Huffington Post

 

[JakeStarkey]

If FISA did authorize a wire tap, then it's a non-story. If the courts approved, it doesn't matter what what Obama knew or when he knew it.

No. If the October request did not fully disclose all of the targets of the wire tap, then a criminal act occurred...which then causes one to question what Obama knew and when he knew it.

Nope. It wouldn't have been a Presidential action and it wouldn't have been the White House who'd request it.

To which branch of the government does the DOJ and FBI report? Who was President when these things happened?

Deflection and means nothing. It's Trump who is the subject of investigation, not Obama.

Let's see if the 2nd FISA request actually specified Trump as an individual.

And you can keep spinning as fast as you can, but this is about Obama...what he knew and when he knew it. Or as the old saying goes...it's not the crime, it's the cover-up.

You are the spinner and the one covering for Trump. Obama is laughing, well out of it, and Trump is crying, snared in it. Comey is a master of the trap. First, Clinton, and now Trump.

James Clapper Denies Obama Wiretapped Trump | Zero Hedge
www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03.../james-clapper-denies-obama-wiretapped-trump
9 hours ago - James Clapper: "There was no such wire tap activity amounted against" Donald Trump. ... President Barack Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower in the last stages of the 2016 presidential campaign, .... Title is very misleading and Ryan says no such thing. ... Comey said the FBI approved the FISA wiretap.
Comey Asks Justice Dept. to Reject Trump's Wiretapping Claim
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-seeks...tapped.../ar-AAnOQko
3 hours ago - The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, asked the Justice Department this weekend to ... the tapping of the phones of Mr. Trump and his aides at Trump Tower in New York. ... “There was no suchwiretap activity mounted against the ... it told him all about the wire taps and that his cup of coffee confirmed it.
TowerGate - Timeline and Connecting Dots...follow the money!

 

[owebo]

boedicca, post: 16727019

Let's see if the 2nd FISA request actually specified Trump as an individual

Comey just called Trump a liar.

We can be certain that there were no FISA requests coming from the White House.

Will Trump fire Comey now?

Yes, There Could Be Serious Legal Problems if Obama Admin Involved in Illegal Surveillance

If the stories are correct, Obama or his officials might even face prosecution.

The stories currently are three-fold:

first, that Obama’s team tried to get a warrant from a regular, Article III federal court on Trump, and was told no by someone along the way (maybe the FBI), as the evidence was that weak or non-existent;


second, Obama’s team then tried to circumvent the federal judiciary’s independent role by trying to mislabel the issue one of “foreign agents,” and tried to obtain a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act “courts”, and were again turned down, when the court saw Trump named (an extremely rare act of FISA court refusal of the government, suggesting the evidence was truly non-existent against Trump); and so,


third, Obama circumvented both the regular command of the FBI and the regularly appointed federal courts, by placing the entire case as a FISA case (and apparently under Sally Yates at DOJ) as a “foreign” case, and then omitted Trump’s name from a surveillance warrant submitted to the FISA court, which the FISA court unwittingly granted, which Obama then misused to spy on Trump and many connected to Trump. Are these allegations true? We don’t know yet, but if any part of them are than Obama and/or his officials could face serious trouble.


.

Comey calling the Trump a liar puts and end to it.

What can Trump and Sessions say after this.

(FBI Director James Comey asked the Department of Justice to “publicly reject” President Donald Trump’s explosive allegation over the weekend that then-President Barack Obama had ordered a wiretap of Trump’s communications during the presidential campaign, The New York Times reported on Sunday.

Comey said that Trump’s claim, which he tweeted early on Saturday without offering any evidence, “is false and must be corrected,” according to unnamed U.S. officials who spoke with the Times. The Justice Department, led by Trump-nominated Attorney General Jeff Sessions, has not done so yet.)

FBI Director James Comey Asked DOJ To Refute Trump's Wiretapping Claim | The Huffington Post

Awwww...the huffy post....how cute....

 

[boedicca]

boedicca, post: 16727019

Let's see if the 2nd FISA request actually specified Trump as an individual

Comey just called Trump a liar.

We can be certain that there were no FISA requests coming from the White House.

Will Trump fire Comey now?

Yes, There Could Be Serious Legal Problems if Obama Admin Involved in Illegal Surveillance

If the stories are correct, Obama or his officials might even face prosecution.

The stories currently are three-fold:

first, that Obama’s team tried to get a warrant from a regular, Article III federal court on Trump, and was told no by someone along the way (maybe the FBI), as the evidence was that weak or non-existent;


second, Obama’s team then tried to circumvent the federal judiciary’s independent role by trying to mislabel the issue one of “foreign agents,” and tried to obtain a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act “courts”, and were again turned down, when the court saw Trump named (an extremely rare act of FISA court refusal of the government, suggesting the evidence was truly non-existent against Trump); and so,


third, Obama circumvented both the regular command of the FBI and the regularly appointed federal courts, by placing the entire case as a FISA case (and apparently under Sally Yates at DOJ) as a “foreign” case, and then omitted Trump’s name from a surveillance warrant submitted to the FISA court, which the FISA court unwittingly granted, which Obama then misused to spy on Trump and many connected to Trump. Are these allegations true? We don’t know yet, but if any part of them are than Obama and/or his officials could face serious trouble.


.

Comey calling the Trump a liar puts and end to it.

What can Trump and Sessions say after this.

(FBI Director James Comey asked the Department of Justice to “publicly reject” President Donald Trump’s explosive allegation over the weekend that then-President Barack Obama had ordered a wiretap of Trump’s communications during the presidential campaign, The New York Times reported on Sunday.

Comey said that Trump’s claim, which he tweeted early on Saturday without offering any evidence, “is false and must be corrected,” according to unnamed U.S. officials who spoke with the Times. The Justice Department, led by Trump-nominated Attorney General Jeff Sessions, has not done so yet.)

FBI Director James Comey Asked DOJ To Refute Trump's Wiretapping Claim | The Huffington Post

Again - look at the wordsmithing "Barack Obama had ordered a wiretap of Trump’s communications". The issue is not that Obama PERSONALLY ordered the surveillance...it's the fact that the powers of the executive branch were used for political purposes against a candidate for President.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

basquebromance, post: 16727181

Maybe Obama can use the "I was too stupid to know what's going on" excuse--& produce his college grades to prove the point

What will Trump do about his very own FBI director call him a liar on this in defense of Obama?

Your Trumpty Dumpty can't fire Comey now.

Obama did nothing. Trump is a liar.

FBI Director James Comey Asked DOJ To Refute Trump's Wiretapping Claim | The Huffington Post

 

[owebo]

basquebromance, post: 16727181

Maybe Obama can use the "I was too stupid to know what's going on" excuse--& produce his college grades to prove the point

What will Trump do about his very own FBI director call him a liar on this in defense of Obama?

Your Trumpty Dumpty can't fire Comey now.

Obama did nothing. Trump is a liar.

FBI Director James Comey Asked DOJ To Refute Trump's Wiretapping Claim | The Huffington Post

Nothing....he already told Trump the truth about what your Obama did....

Awww...the huffy post.....how cute....

 

[JakeStarkey]

FBI director asked DOJ to publicly reject Trump wiretapping claims

 

[JakeStarkey]

And there you go, trumpers.

 

[Markle]

Let's be clear....

NO ONE ORDERED wiretapping of Trump's home...that's a LIE.

You need to update yourself.

 

[Contumacious]

boedicca, post: 16727019

Let's see if the 2nd FISA request actually specified Trump as an individual

Comey just called Trump a liar.

We can be certain that there were no FISA requests coming from the White House.

Will Trump fire Comey now?

Yes, There Could Be Serious Legal Problems if Obama Admin Involved in Illegal Surveillance

If the stories are correct, Obama or his officials might even face prosecution.

The stories currently are three-fold:

first, that Obama’s team tried to get a warrant from a regular, Article III federal court on Trump, and was told no by someone along the way (maybe the FBI), as the evidence was that weak or non-existent;


second, Obama’s team then tried to circumvent the federal judiciary’s independent role by trying to mislabel the issue one of “foreign agents,” and tried to obtain a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act “courts”, and were again turned down, when the court saw Trump named (an extremely rare act of FISA court refusal of the government, suggesting the evidence was truly non-existent against Trump); and so,


third, Obama circumvented both the regular command of the FBI and the regularly appointed federal courts, by placing the entire case as a FISA case (and apparently under Sally Yates at DOJ) as a “foreign” case, and then omitted Trump’s name from a surveillance warrant submitted to the FISA court, which the FISA court unwittingly granted, which Obama then misused to spy on Trump and many connected to Trump. Are these allegations true? We don’t know yet, but if any part of them are than Obama and/or his officials could face serious trouble.


.

Comey calling the Trump a liar puts and end to it.

What can Trump and Sessions say after this.

(FBI Director James Comey asked the Department of Justice to “publicly reject” President Donald Trump’s explosive allegation over the weekend that then-President Barack Obama had ordered a wiretap of Trump’s communications during the presidential campaign, The New York Times reported on Sunday.

Comey said that Trump’s claim, which he tweeted early on Saturday without offering any evidence, “is false and must be corrected,” according to unnamed U.S. officials who spoke with the Times. The Justice Department, led by Trump-nominated Attorney General Jeff Sessions, has not done so yet.)

FBI Director James Comey Asked DOJ To Refute Trump's Wiretapping Claim | The Huffington Post

Yo Dingle Berry

The story is bullshit.

The Huffington Post relied on a statement issued by NBC's Bradd Jaffy..

Mr Comey is very talkative yet He has released no official statement.

.I don't trust the crooked media.

.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

boedicca, post: 16727210

Again - look at the wordsmithing "Barack Obama had ordered a wiretap of Trump’s communications". The issue is not that Obama PERSONALLY ordered the surveillance...it's the fact that the powers of the executive branch were used for political purposes against a candidate for President.

Trump made the claim that Obama ordered the wiretapping.

Are you now calling Trump a tweeting fool who didn't mean to say Obama was personally involved.

That's a huge walk back.

FBI Director James Comey Asked DOJ To Refute Trump's Wiretapping Claim | The Huffington Post

You and Trump need to start destroying Comey now.

I think it's too late. Trump should not be tweeting lies that his FBI director so strongly and publicly will reject.

 

[JakeStarkey]

End game, Trumpers.

 

[bodecea]

Where's the proof of any REAL wiretapping? It's fun to watch the RWrs so gullible again and again and again and again......

 

[owebo]

End game, Trumpers.

Your democrat party will soon be nothing but a bad racist memory....

 

[owebo]

Where's the proof of any REAL wiretapping? It's fun to watch the RWrs so gullible again and again and again and again......

The wiretapping is settled....it's the extents of the wire tapping Obama conducted that we are looking at now....

You worried snowflake?

 

[Contumacious]

Where's the proof of any REAL wiretapping? It's fun to watch the RWrs so gullible again and again and again and again......

Wait for it, wait for it


The president has the authority to declassify material

The FISA request has been declassified


DJT will soon release it to the Congress and to us the members of the tweeter community.


.