Will Obamas wiretapping of Trumps home bring down the democrat party?

[jc456]

No.

So, you approve of Obamas Putin like actions against political rivals.....what else do you approve of Putins?

YOU approved of the Russian hacking.

btw, why did you start a duplicate thread on this topic while at the same time you're posting in the original thread?

What hacking

 

[RASTAMEN]

Trump is running scared!

 

[RASTAMEN]

No.

So, you approve of Obamas Putin like actions against political rivals.....what else do you approve of Putins?

YOU approved of the Russian hacking.

btw, why did you start a duplicate thread on this topic while at the same time you're posting in the original thread?

What hacking

Trump has a Russian collusion problem. He must deliver for Putin or be exposed for treason!!!

 

[wjmacguffin]

America has never seen this level of democrat fascism.....Trump now knows all, and will attack democrats with the truth.....can they survive?

First, Trump wouldn't know truth if it bit him in the ass.

Second, Trump *appears* to be referencing the FBI's investigation into this campaign's ties to Russia. That's a far cry from Nixon-level criminality. Worse, it's Trump trying to divert attention away from his Russia connection — and you fell for it. Dupe.

And I say "appears" because we haven't seen any evidence or credible sources. Right now, it's Breitbart (who lies) and Trump (who lies even more).

Seems you democrats are in big trouble....who would have ever thought you would wiretap the home of a political opponent.....

You do realize that things don't because true just because you type them out, right? Or are you so out of touch with reality that you confuse thoughts with facts?

I get it. You're upset that Trump is behaving like a spoiled brat. Worse, his Russian connections are becoming more and more problematic. Even Republicans have talked about how to remove him from office. Just because you're scared and feel like you've been duped by Dear Leader doesn't mean you have to make stuff up. That's what Trump is for.

 

[hunarcy]

boedicca, post: 16725543

The germane question involves data that the Obabble Admin acquired under FISA - and What did Obabble know and When did he know it.

You don't even know that FISA authorized a wire tap at Trump Tower. You are getting way ahead of the story.

If FISA did authorize a wire tap, then it's a non-story. If the courts approved, it doesn't matter what what Obama knew or when he knew it.

 

[Doc1]

boedicca, post: 16725543

The germane question involves data that the Obabble Admin acquired under FISA - and What did Obabble know and When did he know it.

You don't even know that FISA authorized a wire tap at Trump Tower. You are getting way ahead of the story.

If FISA did authorize a wire tap, then it's a non-story. If the courts approved, it doesn't matter what what Obama knew or when he knew it.

FISA rarely rejects applications.

 

[skye]

Trump is running scared!

Really?????? you don't say!

 

[Doc1]

Trump is running scared!

Really?????? you don't say!

You'll have to excuse Pastapup, he lives in a parallel universe.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Doc1, post: 16726801

FISA rarely rejects applications

Source?

 

[boedicca]

boedicca, post: 16725543

The germane question involves data that the Obabble Admin acquired under FISA - and What did Obabble know and When did he know it.

You don't even know that FISA authorized a wire tap at Trump Tower. You are getting way ahead of the story.

If FISA did authorize a wire tap, then it's a non-story. If the courts approved, it doesn't matter what what Obama knew or when he knew it.

No. If the October request did not fully disclose all of the targets of the wire tap, then a criminal act occurred...which then causes one to question what Obama knew and when he knew it.

 

[Doc1]

Doc1, post: 16726801

FISA rarely rejects applications

Source?

Nice little Leftwing source.

"FISA Court Has Rejected .03 Percent Of All Government Surveillance Requests

FISA Court Has Rejected .03 Percent Of All Government Surveillance Requests

 

[Doc1]

The FISA court rules were relaxed by BushCo. All that is normally need is the Written request of the Prez.

 

[JakeStarkey]

boedicca, post: 16725543

The germane question involves data that the Obabble Admin acquired under FISA - and What did Obabble know and When did he know it.

You don't even know that FISA authorized a wire tap at Trump Tower. You are getting way ahead of the story.

If FISA did authorize a wire tap, then it's a non-story. If the courts approved, it doesn't matter what what Obama knew or when he knew it.

No. If the October request did not fully disclose all of the targets of the wire tap, then a criminal act occurred...which then causes one to question what Obama knew and when he knew it.

You have no proof of that statement. A tap allows of course for any unforeseen criminal activity or conspiracy to be permitted fruit of the tap. Tough but there it is.

Remember, you said it was not. You have to prove that. You can't.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

No. If the October request did not fully disclose all of the targets of the wire tap, then a criminal act occurred

You don't even know if there were any FISA requests. That they even exist is in doubt.

Just in.

Comey is certain that Trump's claim is not true.

POLITICS
03/05/2017 05:30 pm ET
FBI Director James Comey Asked DOJ To Refute Trump’s Wiretapping Claim
He said the president’s allegation was false.

By Igor Bobic

FBI Director James Comey Asked DOJ To Refute Trump's Wiretapping Claim | The Huffington Post

When Trump lies he really lies stupidly. He is so easily proven wrong.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Doc1, post: 16726847

The FISA court rules were relaxed by BushCo. All that is normally need is the Written request of the Prez.

Source?

 

[boedicca]

boedicca, post: 16725543

The germane question involves data that the Obabble Admin acquired under FISA - and What did Obabble know and When did he know it.

You don't even know that FISA authorized a wire tap at Trump Tower. You are getting way ahead of the story.

If FISA did authorize a wire tap, then it's a non-story. If the courts approved, it doesn't matter what what Obama knew or when he knew it.

No. If the October request did not fully disclose all of the targets of the wire tap, then a criminal act occurred...which then causes one to question what Obama knew and when he knew it.

You have no proof of that statement. A tap allows of course for any unforeseen criminal activity or conspiracy to be permitted fruit of the tap. Tough but there it is.

Remember, you said it was not. You have to prove that. You can't.

The first FISA request was rejected...something that has happened only 12 out of over 30,000 times. Then, the Obama Administration reworked it to hide what they were trying to do (spy on Trump) and got it approved. That is the scandal - and it's' on Obabble's watch. What did he know and when did he know it?

 

[Doc1]

Doc1, post: 16726847

The FISA court rules were relaxed by BushCo. All that is normally need is the Written request of the Prez.

Source?

I'll let you do your own research kid. We both know I know what I'm talking about. I will help a bit though.....The Patriot Act.

 

[basquebromance]

It is so in character for an Alinskyite street bully like Obama to use government power against his opponents

 

[Doc1]

It is so in character for an Alinskyite street bully like Obama to use government power against his opponents

It's what he's always done. Karma will be a bitch though.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Doc1, post: 16726801

FISA rarely rejects applications

Source?

Nice little Leftwing source.

"FISA Court Has Rejected .03 Percent Of All Government Surveillance Requests

FISA Court Has Rejected .03 Percent Of All Government Surveillance Requests

Except that,

But according to Timothy Edgar, a top privacy lawyer at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the National Security Council under Bush and Obama, it's not quite as simple as the FISC rubber stamping nearly every application the government puts in front of it.
The reason so many orders are approved, he said, is that the Justice Department office that manages the process vets the applications rigorously...

But according to Timothy Edgar, a top privacy lawyer at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the National Security Council under Bush and Obama, it's not quite as simple as the FISC rubber stamping nearly every application the government puts in front of it.

The reason so many orders are approved, he said, is that the Justice Department office that manages the process vets the applications rigorously...



So getting the order approved by the Justice Department lawyers is perhaps the biggest hurdle to approval. "The culture of that office is very reluctant to get a denial," he [told the Journal].


That is walking pretty close to the ledge if Comey isn't 100% positive he knows what Trump is saying is not true. And he wants the Justice Department to renounce Trump's BS RIGHT Now.