Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's based on the exit polls. It is what it is.
I have a hard time believing a third party Libertarian candidate hurt the Democratic candidate. Seems more likely to me that the exit polls were statistically flawed (or fabricated).
But whatever.
I'm with you. While I'm arguing that the Republicans don't own our votes, that a majority of libertarians came from the left doesn't pass the smell test.
I am not a dude
And it is not silly. It is scary.
No, it's silly.
Obama is not a marxist, he's a corporatist, bought and paid for in full. And the last thing those he's beholden to want is to cede their wealth to the state.
he is a marxist. he is a corporatist bought and paid for on the road to his goal.
that is what you guys seem not to understand, even knowing that the guy is a lie, only lie and nothing but lie
look at what he is doing in fundamentals of transforming the country.
He is actually extremely consistent.
Or his puppeteers.
there is no evolution towards socialism. it can occur only violently.
r.
Previously.
But Karl Marx suggested a peaceful transition period - fascism - in the Communist Manifesto:
"The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degree, all capital from the bourgeoisie, to centralize all instruments of production in the hands of the state…"
.
Karl Marx did not live to the time when it actually was put into life. Yes, the fascist variation of socialism was elected, but it took less than three months after the election to the monster to start showing it's real face.
and violence is needed mostly not to install the socialist state but to maintain it.
And that what all types of socialism proved - violence and blood and death.
and it still didn't work
Previously.
But Karl Marx suggested a peaceful transition period - fascism - in the Communist Manifesto:
"The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degree, all capital from the bourgeoisie, to centralize all instruments of production in the hands of the state…"[/size="4"]
.
Karl Marx did not live to the time when it actually was put into life. Yes, the fascist variation of socialism was elected, but it took less than three months after the election to the monster to start showing it's real face.
and violence is needed mostly not to install the socialist state but to maintain it.
And that what all types of socialism proved - violence and blood and death.
and it still didn't work
Insofar as there is a tiny majority who are not ready to accept full blown socialism iit will be violent here in the US.
But they will be easily crushed.......ask the surviving Davidians
.
oh, he has done PLENTY.No, it's silly.
Obama is not a marxist, he's a corporatist, bought and paid for in full. And the last thing those he's beholden to want is to cede their wealth to the state.
he is a marxist. he is a corporatist bought and paid for on the road to his goal.
that is what you guys seem not to understand, even knowing that the guy is a lie, only lie and nothing but lie
look at what he is doing in fundamentals of transforming the country.
He is actually extremely consistent.
Or his puppeteers.
You should take your own advice.
He's done nothing remotely consistent with the ideas promoted in Marx' Communist Manifesto.
lol, he's so superior his approvals are in the toilet
now you need to kiss his picture or bow to the shine you have of him
What's the old saying? The most popular guy in town is the back up quarterback? Romney isn't even that...he's not qualified.
If Romney were superior, he would have won. He didn't. He got beat. Badly.
Now you need to fire up your excuse machine (if it hasn't overheated from constant use) and start the blame game. It's your only move.
Obama ran a superior campaign Whether he's a better potus than Mitt would have been, that's debatable. Mitt ran so far right he couldn't even thnk about getting to the middle. But, he had no choice if he wanted the gop nomination
oh, he has done PLENTY.he is a marxist. he is a corporatist bought and paid for on the road to his goal.
that is what you guys seem not to understand, even knowing that the guy is a lie, only lie and nothing but lie
look at what he is doing in fundamentals of transforming the country.
He is actually extremely consistent.
Or his puppeteers.
You should take your own advice.
He's done nothing remotely consistent with the ideas promoted in Marx' Communist Manifesto.
you did not read the Manifesto yourself, did you?
oh, he has done PLENTY.he is a marxist. he is a corporatist bought and paid for on the road to his goal.
that is what you guys seem not to understand, even knowing that the guy is a lie, only lie and nothing but lie
look at what he is doing in fundamentals of transforming the country.
He is actually extremely consistent.
Or his puppeteers.
You should take your own advice.
He's done nothing remotely consistent with the ideas promoted in Marx' Communist Manifesto.
you did not read the Manifesto yourself, did you?
oh, he has done PLENTY.You should take your own advice.
He's done nothing remotely consistent with the ideas promoted in Marx' Communist Manifesto.
you did not read the Manifesto yourself, did you?
First we give banks a few billion and then have the Fed Reserve pour billions into markets.
oh, he has done PLENTY.You should take your own advice.
He's done nothing remotely consistent with the ideas promoted in Marx' Communist Manifesto.
you did not read the Manifesto yourself, did you?
If he's done PLENTY, I'm sure you could cite an example or three, no?
PS: I'm not holding my breath.
oh, he has done PLENTY.
you did not read the Manifesto yourself, did you?
First we give banks a few billion and then have the Fed Reserve pour billions into markets.
Exactly. Bailing out banks is hardly Marxist. Nationalizing the entire financial system is Marxist.
oh, he has done PLENTY.
you did not read the Manifesto yourself, did you?
If he's done PLENTY, I'm sure you could cite an example or three, no?
PS: I'm not holding my breath.
sure. read for yourself
Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property, and on the conditions of bourgeois production; by means of measures, therefore, which appear economically insufficient and untenable, but which, in the course of the movement, outstrip themselves, necessitate further inroads upon the old social order, and are unavoidable as a means of entirely revolutionising the mode of production.
These measures will, of course, be different in different countries.
Nevertheless, in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.
1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of childrens factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c.
Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)
oh, he has done PLENTY.
you did not read the Manifesto yourself, did you?
If he's done PLENTY, I'm sure you could cite an example or three, no?
PS: I'm not holding my breath.
sure. read for yourself
Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property, and on the conditions of bourgeois production; by means of measures, therefore, which appear economically insufficient and untenable, but which, in the course of the movement, outstrip themselves, necessitate further inroads upon the old social order, and are unavoidable as a means of entirely revolutionising the mode of production.
These measures will, of course, be different in different countries.
Nevertheless, in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.
1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of childrens factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c.
Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)
Karl Marx did not live to the time when it actually was put into life. Yes, the fascist variation of socialism was elected, but it took less than three months after the election to the monster to start showing it's real face.
and violence is needed mostly not to install the socialist state but to maintain it.
And that what all types of socialism proved - violence and blood and death.
and it still didn't work
Insofar as there is a tiny majority who are not ready to accept full blown socialism iit will be violent here in the US.
But they will be easily crushed.......ask the surviving Davidians
.
it is violent everywhere where it is installed and maintained ( even for a short period of time)
because you can not install and maintain a regime where private property is expropriated from the citizens and not expect the resistance.
still won't work. in terms of sustainability. it did not work anywhere - the only regimes still there are on life support.
If he's done PLENTY, I'm sure you could cite an example or three, no?
PS: I'm not holding my breath.
sure. read for yourself
Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property, and on the conditions of bourgeois production; by means of measures, therefore, which appear economically insufficient and untenable, but which, in the course of the movement, outstrip themselves, necessitate further inroads upon the old social order, and are unavoidable as a means of entirely revolutionising the mode of production.
These measures will, of course, be different in different countries.
Nevertheless, in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.
1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of childrens factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c.
Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)
Ok, no 10 .. done that. LOL
Insofar as there is a tiny majority who are not ready to accept full blown socialism iit will be violent here in the US.
But they will be easily crushed.......ask the surviving Davidians
.
it is violent everywhere where it is installed and maintained ( even for a short period of time)
because you can not install and maintain a regime where private property is expropriated from the citizens and not expect the resistance.
still won't work. in terms of sustainability. it did not work anywhere - the only regimes still there are on life support.
Gee, I haven't heard about any violence in Cuba, Venezuela.
The state apparatchiks can easily crush the dissenters.
.
sure. read for yourself
Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property, and on the conditions of bourgeois production; by means of measures, therefore, which appear economically insufficient and untenable, but which, in the course of the movement, outstrip themselves, necessitate further inroads upon the old social order, and are unavoidable as a means of entirely revolutionising the mode of production.
These measures will, of course, be different in different countries.
Nevertheless, in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.
1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of childrens factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c.
Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)
Ok, no 10 .. done that. LOL
read the whole chapter II. The abolition of the family is much more impressive.
If he's done PLENTY, I'm sure you could cite an example or three, no?
PS: I'm not holding my breath.
sure. read for yourself
Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property, and on the conditions of bourgeois production; by means of measures, therefore, which appear economically insufficient and untenable, but which, in the course of the movement, outstrip themselves, necessitate further inroads upon the old social order, and are unavoidable as a means of entirely revolutionising the mode of production.
These measures will, of course, be different in different countries.
Nevertheless, in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.
1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c.
Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)
You must've misunderstood.
I'm looking for examples of things Obama has done. Not a summary of items from the Communist Manifesto that he didn't do. Unless of course your plan is to prove my point. And if that's the case, well done kemosabe, well done.
it is violent everywhere where it is installed and maintained ( even for a short period of time)
because you can not install and maintain a regime where private property is expropriated from the citizens and not expect the resistance.
still won't work. in terms of sustainability. it did not work anywhere - the only regimes still there are on life support.
Gee, I haven't heard about any violence in Cuba, Venezuela.
The state apparatchiks can easily crush the dissenters.
.
oh really? you haven't heard about violence in Cuba?
where have you been for the last 50+ years?
Under the rock?
time to get to the world and learn something
