RodISHI
Platinum Member
- Nov 29, 2008
- 25,786
- 11,297
- 940
Metro areas of any size depend so much on outside sources to survive and thrive but planners rarely have the experience or forethought to consider that as they plan and scheme.The problem there is the negative consequences of such planning.A lot of money has been spent and efforts exerted to assist in the breakdown so it may be fifty plus years before this ends.
From what I see a big problem will be the cities and metro areas that have planned poorly, were short sighted or/and those that have been led by corrupt political associates.
Were central planning all that, then these urban centers -nearly all of which being singularly run by democrats- would be borderline paradises. But reality shows the exact opposite.
Self sufficiency in emergency situations, personal responsibilities or things that could improve even daily life are not even remotely considered in most of the metro areas. Plus regulations get in the way and much of that has to do with control freaks putting in regulations that prevent people from being self reliant.
Never got that far north on the East Coast but really had no desire to enter into congested areas as such either. Southern California when we left was crowded enough for me.so true-----the fantasies of ROBERT MOSES-----still plague the great city of NEW YORK