Wisconsin GOP: Forcing Women To Undergo Transvaginal Ultrasounds Is Our ‘Priority"

[Harry Dresden]

I'm not going to take reproductive advice from some unmarried conservative woman who claims to be a thumper and has rug rats running around her gov't subsidized (claims EIC & child exemptions) dwelling. Just sayin.....

i thought you were a guy?....

Hard to tell. Prog guys and gals are practically indistinguishable.

well everyone called her..."Dottie".....so i figured Dots a girl.....what guy would be called "Dottie"?.....so for the longest time i thought "Dottie" was a Female....but then i was told She is a HE.....but now HE is saying he doesnt want a Conservative Female giving him Reproduction advice in a thread about Ultrasound and Abortion.....what guy would say that?......

 

[daveman]

Trying to talk a woman out of having an abortion is not a medical advancement.

In fact, it is more dangerous, medically, to have a baby than it is to have an abortion.

Correctly aging the fetus and locating it prior to an invasive and risky procedure is not trying to talk a woman out of anything.

It's educating her about what's going on in her body, and lowering the chance that she might bleed to death in an abortion clinic, or in an ER some weeks later.

It's funny to see you try to invent a rationalization for the bill, to manufacture a reason for it,

when all we have to do is go to the actual sponsor of the bill, to find out the REAL reason:


The bill's chief Assembly sponsor, Rep. Pat Strachota, R-West Bend, said the ultrasound provision is designed to help the woman bond with the fetus by seeing it and convince her to save it.

Read more: Wisconsin lawmakers approve bill requiring ultrasound before abortion | Fox News

So stop trying to fool anyone with your bullshit.

Why do you oppose women bonding with their babies?

Oh, yes, that's right -- they might make the WRONG choice.

 

[daveman]

i thought you were a guy?....

Hard to tell. Prog guys and gals are practically indistinguishable.

well everyone called her..."Dottie".....so i figured Dots a girl.....what guy would be called "Dottie"?.....so for the longest time i thought "Dottie" was a Female....but then i was told She is a HE.....but now HE is saying he doesnt want a Conservative Female giving him Reproduction advice in a thread about Ultrasound and Abortion.....what guy would say that?......

I'm not unconvinced that he DOESN'T have a uterus. He certainly PMSes enough.

 

[Dot Com]

Hard to tell. Prog guys and gals are practically indistinguishable.

well everyone called her..."Dottie".....so i figured Dots a girl.....what guy would be called "Dottie"?.....so for the longest time i thought "Dottie" was a Female....but then i was told She is a HE.....but now HE is saying he doesnt want a Conservative Female giving him Reproduction advice in a thread about Ultrasound and Abortion.....what guy would say that?......

I'm not unconvinced that he DOESN'T have a uterus. He certainly PMSes enough.

will any of the resident rw females call him out on his misogyny in this, of all threads

 

[NYcarbineer]

Correctly aging the fetus and locating it prior to an invasive and risky procedure is not trying to talk a woman out of anything.

It's educating her about what's going on in her body, and lowering the chance that she might bleed to death in an abortion clinic, or in an ER some weeks later.

It's funny to see you try to invent a rationalization for the bill, to manufacture a reason for it,

when all we have to do is go to the actual sponsor of the bill, to find out the REAL reason:


The bill's chief Assembly sponsor, Rep. Pat Strachota, R-West Bend, said the ultrasound provision is designed to help the woman bond with the fetus by seeing it and convince her to save it.

Read more: Wisconsin lawmakers approve bill requiring ultrasound before abortion | Fox News

So stop trying to fool anyone with your bullshit.

Why do you oppose women bonding with their babies?

Oh, yes, that's right -- they might make the WRONG choice.

Why do you support trying to force women to bond with something that's going to be medical waste in a few hours?

 

[Dot Com]

Trying to talk a woman out of having an abortion is not a medical advancement.

In fact, it is more dangerous, medically, to have a baby than it is to have an abortion.

Correctly aging the fetus and locating it prior to an invasive and risky procedure is not trying to talk a woman out of anything.

It's educating her about what's going on in her body, and lowering the chance that she might bleed to death in an abortion clinic, or in an ER some weeks later.

It's funny to see you try to invent a rationalization for the bill, to manufacture a reason for it,

when all we have to do is go to the actual sponsor of the bill, to find out the REAL reason:


The bill's chief Assembly sponsor, Rep. Pat Strachota, R-West Bend, said the ultrasound provision is designed to help the woman bond with the fetus by seeing it and convince her to save it.

Read more: Wisconsin lawmakers approve bill requiring ultrasound before abortion | Fox News

So stop trying to fool anyone with your bullshit.

exactly. After its born though, they could give a damn

 

[Dot Com]

I'm not going to take reproductive advice from some unmarried conservative woman who claims to be a thumper and has rug rats running around her gov't subsidized (claims EIC & child exemptions) dwelling. Just sayin.....

i thought you were a guy?....

There you go "thinking" again. Stick w/ things you're good at like FAILtrolling.

 

[Vox]

blh-blah-blah-vaginal ultrasound

Oh, puhlease, stop spreading the lie - nobody has to undergo vaginal US - it is not even performed when pregnancy is desired - US i s done on the abdomen and is not invasive

youtube. com/watch?v=JEFh13-qcNs

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Right, because abortions are not invasive. I mean sticking a vaginal vacuum into a woman's cervix after going into her vagina to suck out her unborn baby is not invasive, but going only into her vagina is...

An internal ultrasound is not necessary, and there is no medical reason why she needs to have one.

Force men to have a rectal exam before they get a prescription for Viagra, see how they howl the roof down then.

For republicans, however, there is a political reason.

 

[Vox]

Right, because abortions are not invasive. I mean sticking a vaginal vacuum into a woman's cervix after going into her vagina to suck out her unborn baby is not invasive, but going only into her vagina is...

An internal ultrasound is not necessary, and there is no medical reason why she needs to have one.

Force men to have a rectal exam before they get a prescription for Viagra, see how they howl the roof down then.

For republicans, however, there is a political reason.

stop showing your ignorance. US is done on the abdomen and has never been invasive, except for left-wing liers

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

It's funny to see you try to invent a rationalization for the bill, to manufacture a reason for it,

when all we have to do is go to the actual sponsor of the bill, to find out the REAL reason:


The bill's chief Assembly sponsor, Rep. Pat Strachota, R-West Bend, said the ultrasound provision is designed to help the woman bond with the fetus by seeing it and convince her to save it.

Read more: Wisconsin lawmakers approve bill requiring ultrasound before abortion | Fox News

So stop trying to fool anyone with your bullshit.

Why do you oppose women bonding with their babies?

Oh, yes, that's right -- they might make the WRONG choice.

Why do you support trying to force women to bond with something that's going to be medical waste in a few hours?

Why would anyone support something that is clearly an undue burden to the right to privacy and offensive to the Constitution?

 

[daveman]

Why do you oppose women bonding with their babies?

Oh, yes, that's right -- they might make the WRONG choice.

Why do you support trying to force women to bond with something that's going to be medical waste in a few hours?

Why would anyone support something that is clearly an undue burden to the right to privacy and offensive to the Constitution?

Beats hell outta me. Why DO you support the IRS enforcing Obamacare?

Anyone who gives a damn about the right to privacy and the Constitution should be opposed to it.

 

[koshergrl]

The ultrasound in question is medically necessary. It allows clinicians to pinpoint the age and the location of the fetus. If we were talking about cancerous tumors, the progressive ghouls would be rioting in the streets to make sure a mandatory vaginal ultrasound was forced on every single person on Obamacare..

Abortion fatalities generally occur when the abortionist perforates a bowel, the uterus, or attempts to abort a baby that is too far along for the procedure they employ. These ultrasounds eliminate that possibility.

Which is why the rabid baby killers don't want them used. If women must die so that babies are killed...so be it.

 

[daveman]

well everyone called her..."Dottie".....so i figured Dots a girl.....what guy would be called "Dottie"?.....so for the longest time i thought "Dottie" was a Female....but then i was told She is a HE.....but now HE is saying he doesnt want a Conservative Female giving him Reproduction advice in a thread about Ultrasound and Abortion.....what guy would say that?......

I'm not unconvinced that he DOESN'T have a uterus. He certainly PMSes enough.

will any of the resident rw females call him out on his misogyny in this, of all threads

Me, misogynist? That's rich. You're the guy who wants them to decide to abort without having all the facts.

Why do you hate women?

 

[TemplarKormac]

The ultrasound in question is medically necessary. It allows clinicians to pinpoint the age and the location of the fetus. If we were talking about cancerous tumors, the progressive ghouls would be rioting in the streets to make sure a mandatory vaginal ultrasound was forced on every single person on Obamacare..

Abortion fatalities generally occur when the abortionist perforates a bowel, the uterus, or attempts to abort a baby that is too far along for the procedure they employ. These ultrasounds eliminate that possibility.

Which is why the rabid baby killers don't want them used. If women must die so that babies are killed...so be it.

That last line... really creeped me out.

 

[daveman]

It's funny to see you try to invent a rationalization for the bill, to manufacture a reason for it,

when all we have to do is go to the actual sponsor of the bill, to find out the REAL reason:


The bill's chief Assembly sponsor, Rep. Pat Strachota, R-West Bend, said the ultrasound provision is designed to help the woman bond with the fetus by seeing it and convince her to save it.

Read more: Wisconsin lawmakers approve bill requiring ultrasound before abortion | Fox News

So stop trying to fool anyone with your bullshit.

Why do you oppose women bonding with their babies?

Oh, yes, that's right -- they might make the WRONG choice.

Why do you support trying to force women to bond with something that's going to be medical waste in a few hours?

In the hopes that it might NOT be medical waste. I know that's meaningless to you, because human life is worthless to you.

Damn, why don't you assholes just make abortion mandatory for everybody? Make it retroactive to age 12, or something?

Bloodthirsty barbarians.

 

[Vox]

The ultrasound in question is medically necessary. It allows clinicians to pinpoint the age and the location of the fetus. If we were talking about cancerous tumors, the progressive ghouls would be rioting in the streets to make sure a mandatory vaginal ultrasound was forced on every single person on Obamacare..

Abortion fatalities generally occur when the abortionist perforates a bowel, the uterus, or attempts to abort a baby that is too far along for the procedure they employ. These ultrasounds eliminate that possibility.

Which is why the rabid baby killers don't want them used. If women must die so that babies are killed...so be it.

It does not have to be vaginal. rabid baby killers do not want the woman to see the US of the baby ( performed by sliding the probe on the abdomen) because she might change her mind and NOT abort the baby - and that is the goal - to abort the baby no matter what.
It's a multimillion business for PP, do not forget

 

[koshergrl]

Because it protects the women who are being victimized by misogynistic ghouls, like DC, nyc and joeb.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Why do you oppose women bonding with their babies?

Oh, yes, that's right -- they might make the WRONG choice.

Why do you support trying to force women to bond with something that's going to be medical waste in a few hours?

In the hopes that it might NOT be medical waste. I know that's meaningless to you, because human life is worthless to you.

Damn, why don't you assholes just make abortion mandatory for everybody? Make it retroactive to age 12, or something?

Bloodthirsty barbarians.

Pure emotional hysteria. Turn your shorts inside out and you can wear them an extra day, old man.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Why do you oppose women bonding with their babies?

Oh, yes, that's right -- they might make the WRONG choice.

Why do you support trying to force women to bond with something that's going to be medical waste in a few hours?

Why would anyone support something that is clearly an undue burden to the right to privacy and offensive to the Constitution?

Lol, the anti-abortion nuts in this thread are right out of the same crowd that decided background checks were tyranny.