Richard-H
Gold Member
- Aug 19, 2008
- 11,482
- 4,116
It's obvious that yoou didn't read my original postAs rents skyrocket almost everywhere, millions brace for eviction & homelessness, and local police try to prepare for mass rioting & arson beginning in August, the United States is on the brink of the greatest catastrophe it has ever faced.
All courtesy of the Democrat Party, which orchestrated a devastating Covid Coup in 2020 in order to regain power & increase its wealth at a cost of TRILLIONS of dollars (so far), and TENS OF MILLIONS of American lives destroyed.
The homeless population is about to explode, and some are estimating that even as rents are already skyrocketing, it's only the beginning of an even more devastating affordable housing crisis as millions of housing units may be destroyed by mass rioting and arson expected to occur in August.
Can anything stop the horror about to transpire as a result of the Democrat COVID Coup?
Will Democrats be properly identified as the perpetrators of the most horrendous acts of treason, terror and mass destruction in our nation's history?
Will the United States survive?
![]()
The Eviction Moratorium Ends This Month. Here's What's Next for Renters and Landlords
Local courts across the country could see a sudden influx of eviction cases when the moratorium expires at the end of July.www.realtor.com
Did you even read the article you posted?
There are 'eviction diversion' programs where landlords & tenants get federal assistance, and they work out payment programs.
Evictions help no one, and it's doubtful that courts are going to force mass evictions.
Even if there are a whole lot of evictions, it will cause a glut of housing resulting in much lower rents. In the long run, landlords will lose big time if they force evictions.
That's just Richard pleading his landlord not evict him. Richard is entitled to stay as long as he likes rent-free because "he'd lose bigtime if Richard is evicted".
Neat how that works right, follow the logic:
$1000 a month rent to landlord.
Nope, zero and I get to stay.
Nope, get the fuck out.
Richard logic: The landlord lost.
Just the fact that you posted this, when you know nothing about me or my financial status, proves what a LYING BAG OF SHIT YOU ARE!
WTH_Progs Logic: NADA!
Ah, your feelings.
Does it bother your landlord you play a bad guitar while you sit rent free in his apartment? How long do you think your PROG Democrats will protect you from eviction on the landlord's dime?
Your assumptions about my housing status just prove that you're an idiot.
It's an educated guess. You strike me as a pussy, useless, dependent and entitled.
Ditto!
It's obvious that the two of you have nothing intelligent to say regarding the topic of this thread or my posts.
I'm not interested in a flame war.
Troll elsewhere.
Educated responses to your empty posts. You come off as an excuse to begin with, and when you try and justify renters staying put without due compensation, that's a clue you're rent-free guy, living off someone else's dime because you feel entitled to it.
And after all "landlords take the loss" if those living rent-free are evicted, it's the landlord's fault.
It's obvious that you didn't read my original post.
Your statements have nothing to do with what I posted.
Try rereading my original post, then if you have anything intelligent to say, please post it. Otherwise STFU!
Richard denies saying the following. He has trouble reading between the lines & critical thought, so he's confused by others who can:
There are 'eviction diversion' programs where landlords & tenants get federal assistance, and they work out payment programs. Doesn't benefit the landlords and sure as fuck doesn't benefit the tax payer.
Evictions help no one, and it's doubtful that courts are going to force mass evictions. Except it helps the landlords lose the dead-weight and allows them to rent to someone who will actually pay.
Even if there are a whole lot of evictions, it will cause a glut of housing resulting in much lower rents. On the assumption those evicted don't learn from their mistakes and I guess we'll just pretend there's nobody behind them more than happy to rent that apt. and pay too.
In the long run, landlords will lose big time if they force evictions. In other terms please don't evict Richard, he can't pay the rent due he has the most best smart phone, digs Starbucks and has the best most fast internet & Netflix too. If Richard is evicted the landlords will suffer the consequences, just cuz.
Wow, you actually posted something relevant to what I posted...I'm amazed!
First, if a tenant is evicted, the landlord loses all the back rent that's owed. He loses big time.
If a payment deal is reached, in accordance with the eviction diversion programs, the landlord will eventually get all the back rent. The deal can be used as collateral against his mortgage - the banks will have to honor it. The monthly rent will not change.
Second, with the massive evictions that you seem to want, there'll be a glut of housing on the market. The landlord will have to rent the same apartment for considerably less. That's just basic market economics.
Third, you know nothing about my personal housing situation, so please cut the bullshit.
Finally, it seems that you're just a nasty, sadistic person that wants to see as many people evicted as possible. You haven't thought through the economics of the situation, or even what is best for the landlords. You just want to be a mean asshole - and think that will solve everything. No wonder you're a Trump supporter!