With their refusal to accept the results of an election, Democrats might trigger a second Civil War

Blackrook

Diamond Member
Jun 20, 2014
21,339
11,045
Because that's exactly what happened LAST TIME the Democrats refused to accept the results of an election, they triggered a war that killed 600,000 people, and when it was over, Democrats still lost their slaves.
 
Because that's exactly what happened LAST TIME the Democrats refused to accept the results of an election, they triggered a war that killed 600,000 people, and when it was over, Democrats still lost their slaves.
Trump's the one signaling that he won't accept the results of the 2020, if he loses. Didn't think we'd remember that? It's certainly more relevant than your little history lesson.
 
Because that's exactly what happened LAST TIME the Democrats refused to accept the results of an election, they triggered a war that killed 600,000 people, and when it was over, Democrats still lost their slaves.
Who is refusing to accept the results of an election?
 
Because that's exactly what happened LAST TIME the Democrats refused to accept the results of an election, they triggered a war that killed 600,000 people, and when it was over, Democrats still lost their slaves.
Trump's the one signaling that he won't accept the results of the 2020, if he loses. Didn't think we'd remember that? It's certainly more relevant than your little history lesson.
HAHA. you got suckered by a retweet! You'd think you guys wouldn't fall for that any more.
 
Because that's exactly what happened LAST TIME the Democrats refused to accept the results of an election, they triggered a war that killed 600,000 people, and when it was over, Democrats still lost their slaves.
Trump's the one signaling that he won't accept the results of the 2020, if he loses. Didn't think we'd remember that? It's certainly more relevant than your little history lesson.
LOL your talking points are MORONIC on their face, remind us how Bush wasn't gonna abide by the election, remind us how Obama wasn't gonna abide by the election. Then remind us how for a month before the 2016 election you ild DEMANDED that Trump accept the results no matter what they were then you morons wouldn't.
 
Because that's exactly what happened LAST TIME the Democrats refused to accept the results of an election, they triggered a war that killed 600,000 people, and when it was over, Democrats still lost their slaves.
Trump's the one signaling that he won't accept the results of the 2020, if he loses. Didn't think we'd remember that? It's certainly more relevant than your little history lesson.
HAHA. you got suckered by a retweet! You'd think you guys wouldn't fall for that any more.
Anyone who supports Trump shouldn't be talking about being suckered.
 
Because that's exactly what happened LAST TIME the Democrats refused to accept the results of an election, they triggered a war that killed 600,000 people, and when it was over, Democrats still lost their slaves.
Trump's the one signaling that he won't accept the results of the 2020, if he loses. Didn't think we'd remember that? It's certainly more relevant than your little history lesson.

Hes signaling that, is he? What, with pheromones, ESP or secret hand gestures or something?
 
Because that's exactly what happened LAST TIME the Democrats refused to accept the results of an election, they triggered a war that killed 600,000 people, and when it was over, Democrats still lost their slaves.

By bet is on them losing their tax cattle.
 
Because that's exactly what happened LAST TIME the Democrats refused to accept the results of an election, they triggered a war that killed 600,000 people, and when it was over, Democrats still lost their slaves.
tenor.gif


Oh, my goodness-gracious, and oh-dearie-me... what do we have here?

Malcontent hyper-wing nutjobs with tiny pee-pees blathering nonsense about civil war? :21:
 
Because that's exactly what happened LAST TIME the Democrats refused to accept the results of an election, they triggered a war that killed 600,000 people, and when it was over, Democrats still lost their slaves.
Trump's the one signaling that he won't accept the results of the 2020, if he loses. Didn't think we'd remember that? It's certainly more relevant than your little history lesson.
Link ?
 
Because that's exactly what happened LAST TIME the Democrats refused to accept the results of an election, they triggered a war that killed 600,000 people, and when it was over, Democrats still lost their slaves.
Trump's the one signaling that he won't accept the results of the 2020, if he loses. Didn't think we'd remember that? It's certainly more relevant than your little history lesson.
Hes signaling that, is he? What, with pheromones, ESP or secret hand gestures or something?
Same could be said about the OP. As for signaling, he did it in 2016 by claiming that the fix was in. Why would now be any different?
 
Because that's exactly what happened LAST TIME the Democrats refused to accept the results of an election, they triggered a war that killed 600,000 people, and when it was over, Democrats still lost their slaves.
Trump's the one signaling that he won't accept the results of the 2020, if he loses. Didn't think we'd remember that? It's certainly more relevant than your little history lesson.
HAHA. you got suckered by a retweet! You'd think you guys wouldn't fall for that any more.
Anyone who supports Trump shouldn't be talking about being suckered.
BURN!!!!!!
 
Because that's exactly what happened LAST TIME the Democrats refused to accept the results of an election, they triggered a war that killed 600,000 people, and when it was over, Democrats still lost their slaves.
Who is refusing to accept the results of an election?

Really!? How about Hillary, how about Stacey Abrams, how about most of the liberal loons on USMB.
 
Because that's exactly what happened LAST TIME the Democrats refused to accept the results of an election, they triggered a war that killed 600,000 people, and when it was over, Democrats still lost their slaves.
Trump's the one signaling that he won't accept the results of the 2020, if he loses. Didn't think we'd remember that? It's certainly more relevant than your little history lesson.
HAHA. you got suckered by a retweet! You'd think you guys wouldn't fall for that any more.
Anyone who supports Trump shouldn't be talking about being suckered.

Twitter, it's not for setting official policy any more.
 
Because that's exactly what happened LAST TIME the Democrats refused to accept the results of an election, they triggered a war that killed 600,000 people, and when it was over, Democrats still lost their slaves.
Trump's the one signaling that he won't accept the results of the 2020, if he loses. Didn't think we'd remember that? It's certainly more relevant than your little history lesson.

Hes signaling that, is he? What, with pheromones, ESP or secret hand gestures or something?

Smoke signals.
 
Because that's exactly what happened LAST TIME the Democrats refused to accept the results of an election, they triggered a war that killed 600,000 people, and when it was over, Democrats still lost their slaves.
Trump's the one signaling that he won't accept the results of the 2020, if he loses. Didn't think we'd remember that? It's certainly more relevant than your little history lesson.
HAHA. you got suckered by a retweet! You'd think you guys wouldn't fall for that any more.
Anyone who supports Trump shouldn't be talking about being suckered.
BURN!!!!!!

There's a cream for that.
 
Because that's exactly what happened LAST TIME the Democrats refused to accept the results of an election, they triggered a war that killed 600,000 people, and when it was over, Democrats still lost their slaves.


the only 'civil war' that is going on is within the tiny little fucking pea brains of folks like you & your fellow GOP shit balls.

You people support a piece of shit liar scum bag wanna be dictator; great.

go grab your goddamn guns and get fucking busy if you are so fucking excited then.
 

Forum List

Back
Top