gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 67,753
- 36,152
Why do you need me to explain it? The CDC explained it. Is that enough?Still waiting for you to explain in your own words the significance of this 6% number, guess I’ll keep waiting.I did provide the reports.Don’t bring up reports if you aren’t willing to provide them.It shouldn’t. If you weren’t a left winger, you’d know what I posted was directly from the CDC. Do you think the CDC is right wing?It would mean a lot more if you provided one.It was reported in several non-right wing outlets. Does that mean anything to you?
Do you only accept information provided by left wing sources? If so, how can you claim to be “very informed?”
I know what the CDC has been reporting and I know how it’s being distorted in the right wing media which you’ve proven that you’ve fallen victim to.
So explain to me the significance that 6% of the deaths from COVID do not list comorbidities. Let’s see how well informed you actually are or if you’re just another puppet.
My son it goes both ways. The media you consume claims 200,000 died of Coivd. This is a blatant lie. Do you not see the fallacy in this? The right may be disengenuios about the 6% number, but the left is even worse.
No? Yes?
Where did you determine that 200,000 deaths is a blatant lie? It’s not 100% accurate, and when talking about 200,000 data points nothing every will be, but it’s not far off. People quibble about a few instances of people being hit by a bus and classified as a COVID death, which clearly is an incorrect classification, but represent a tiny fraction of the data.
So if the right claims there’s only 12,000 deaths from COVID and the left claims 200,000, it’s pretty easy for me to identify who is more disingenuous.
See now your partisanship shines through. You can’t even accept the MSM’s massive misinformation campaign about Covid deaths.
You claim you’re informed, but really your just a dupe for left wing propaganda.