World on red alert!!!

[Bleipriester]

Trump fired missiles into a sovereign country. An illegal act of terrorism and war. He should be transferred to The Hague to stand trial.

Let me guess, this was far worse than what Bill Clinton did by firing a missile into the Sudan and Afghanistan back in the day?

U.S. Cruise Missiles Strike Sudan and Afghan Targets Tied to Terrorist Network

I'm not defending any of these actions, I'm merely pointing out that this is standard US policy it seems with the purpose of merely sending a message to stop whatever it is we don't want other countries doing.

Yes, far worse. While your missiles were illegal too, they targeted terrorists. Trump´s attack, on the other hand, goes hand in hand with another chemical false flag, was carried out in support of terrorists and targeted a legal site.

As I suspected, a partisan hack would lead us to believe that Trump tried to kill of Syrian civilians just for sport. Sorry, not very convincing, try again.

At least he did not sit back and watch a genocide of the Syrian population and do nothing as the rest simply set out on foot to create an immigrant crisis around the world.

There was no chemical attack this time. Search for the "White Helmets" happily "helping" in the Sarin cloud without protective clothing.
Under Obama, the false flag was carried out and killed hundreds.

 

[LoneLaugher]

You’d never accuse Trump of starting a war. Who the fuck are you trying to fool?

You are a Trombie. Trombies will believe what Trump tells them to believe. And, believe me, Trump will never admit to being responsible for starting a war.

You have already been asked once and then ran away

I will ask again.

What war did Trump start?

Dickhead. The post was discussing the future. If it was discussing the past, it was poorly worded.

Not responding to retarded questions does not equal "running away". Try harder.

Ok, so what future war will Trump create?

Now THAT is an awesome question. You are really catching on!

The only possible answer that you will accept for that retarded question is:

None. Trump will not start any war. If a war starts it will be due to things that happened before Trump was president or because of things that might happen when he is no longer president. Perhaps it will be the fault of Congress or the fake media.

Trump will never start a war. But, he will prevent them by the very fact that he exists and he will end them with his masterful military mind.

 

[Taz]

You’d never accuse Trump of starting a war. Who the fuck are you trying to fool?

You are a Trombie. Trombies will believe what Trump tells them to believe. And, believe me, Trump will never admit to being responsible for starting a war.

What war did Trump start?

The war on the poor, sick, old and/or disabled.

 

[fncceo]

The war on the poor, sick, old and/or disabled.

They attacked first...

 

[Taz]

The war on the poor, sick, old and/or disabled.

They attacked first...

^^^^^^^^ Please explain.

 

[jillian]

You are correct. The responsibility lays with those who gave NK nuclear power, and missile technology, and then let them have enough time to develop IRBM's. The can has been kicked down the road until there's no road left.

So becaise you may disagree with prior policy, it's ok for this person to play fast and loose with out safety and troll an equally lunatic leader who also has nuclear weapons?

Yeah that's the ticket.

 

[fncceo]

The war on the poor, sick, old and/or disabled.

They attacked first...

^^^^^^^^ Please explain.

They know what they did...

 

[gipper]

You are correct. The responsibility lays with those who gave NK nuclear power, and missile technology, and then let them have enough time to develop IRBM's. The can has been kicked down the road until there's no road left.

Of course you are referring to American leaders who supplied NK with technology. Why would they do this?

Simple answer is they needed an enemy to keep the Deep State/MIC flush with cash and continue to blackmail the American people.

 

[ChrisL]

You’d never accuse Trump of starting a war. Who the fuck are you trying to fool?

You are a Trombie. Trombies will believe what Trump tells them to believe. And, believe me, Trump will never admit to being responsible for starting a war.

You have already been asked once and then ran away

I will ask again.

What war did Trump start?

Dickhead. The post was discussing the future. If it was discussing the past, it was poorly worded.

Not responding to retarded questions does not equal "running away". Try harder.

Ok, so what future war will Trump create?

Now THAT is an awesome question. You are really catching on!

The only possible answer that you will accept for that retarded question is:

None. Trump will not start any war. If a war starts it will be due to things that happened before Trump was president or because of things that might happen when he is no longer president. Perhaps it will be the fault of Congress or the fake media.

Trump will never start a war. But, he will prevent them by the very fact that he exists and he will end them with his masterful military mind.

Oh, well thanks for letting us know that you plan on blaming FUTURE wars on Trump. You are aware that Hillary and Obama are/were (since they are HISTORY now), the war mongers?

So, if you like Obama and if you voted for Hillary, you like war and killing innocent civilians.



"The Obama administration has insisted that drone strikes are so “exceptionally surgical and precise” that they pluck off terror suspects while not putting “innocent men, women and children in danger”. This claim has been contested by numerous human rights groups, however, and the Bureau’s figures on civilian casualties also demonstrate that this is often not the case.

The White House released long-awaited figures last July on the number of people killed in drone strikes between January 2009 and the end of 2015, an announcement which insiders said was a direct response to pressure from the Bureau and other organisations that collect data. However the US’s estimate of the number of civilians killed – between 64 and 116 – contrasted strongly with the number recorded by the Bureau, which at 380 to 801 was six times higher.

That figure does not include deaths in active battlefields including Afghanistan – where US air attacks have shot up since Obama withdrew the majority of his troops at the end of 2014. The country has since come under frequent US bombardment, in an unreported war that saw 1,337 weapons dropped last year alone – a 40% rise on 2015.

Afghan civilian casualties have been high, with the United Nations (UN) reporting at least 85 deaths in 2016. The Bureau recorded 65 to 105 civilian deaths during this period. We did not start collecting data on Afghanistan until 2015.

Pakistan was the hub of drone operations during Obama’s first term. The pace of attacks had accelerated in the second half of 2008 at the end of Bush’s term, after four years pocked by occasional strikes. However in the year after taking office, Obama ordered more drone strikes than Bush did during his entire presidency. The 54 strikes in 2009 all took place in Pakistan.

563
Strikes in Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen during Obama’s two terms

57
Strikes in those countries under George W. Bush

Strikes in the country peaked in 2010, with 128 CIA drone attacks and at least 89 civilians killed, at the same time US troop numbers surged in Afghanistan. Pakistan strikes have since fallen with just three conducted in the country last year.

Obama also began an air campaign targeting Yemen. His first strike was a catastrophe: commanders thought they were targeting al Qaeda but instead hit a tribe with cluster munitions, killing 55 people. Twenty-one were children – 10 of them under five. Twelve were women, five of them pregnant.

Through 2010 and the first half of 2011 US strikes in Yemen continued sporadically. The air campaign then began in earnest, with the US using its drones and jets to help Yemeni ground forces oust al Qaeda forces who had taken advantage of the country’s Arab Spring to seize a swath of territory in the south of the country.

In Somalia, US Special Operations Forces and gunships had been fighting al Qaeda and its al Shabaab allies since January 2007. The US sent drones to Djibouti in 2010 to support American operations in Yemen, but did not start striking in Somalia until 2011.

The number of civilian casualties increased alongside the rise in strikes. However reported civilian casualties began to fall as Obama’s first term progressed, both in real terms and as a rate of civilians reported killed per strike.

In Yemen, where there has been a minimum of 65 civilian deaths since 2002, the Bureau recorded no instances of civilian casualties last year. There were three non-combatants reportedly killed in 2016 in Somalia, where the US Air Force has been given broader authority to target al Shabaab – in previous years there were no confirmed civilian deaths.

Strikes in Yemen, Pakistan and Somalia have always been dwarfed by the frequency of air attacks on battlefields such as Afghanistan.

December 2014 saw the end of Nato combat operations there, and the frequency of air attacks plummeted in 2015. Strikes are now increasing again, with a 40% rise in 2016, though numbers remain below the 2011 peak.

The number of countries being simultaneously bombed by the US increased to seven last year as a new front opened up in the fight against Islamic State (IS). The US has been leading a coalition of countries in the fight against IS in Iraq and Syria since August 2014, conducting a total of 13,501 strikes across both countries, according to monitoring group Airwars.

In August US warplanes started hitting the group hard in Libya. The US declared 495 strikes in the country between August 1 and December 5 as part of efforts to stop IS gaining more ground, Airwars data shows."

Obama’s covert drone war in numbers: ten times more strikes than Bush

 

[LoneLaugher]

You’d never accuse Trump of starting a war. Who the fuck are you trying to fool?

You are a Trombie. Trombies will believe what Trump tells them to believe. And, believe me, Trump will never admit to being responsible for starting a war.

You have already been asked once and then ran away

I will ask again.

What war did Trump start?

Dickhead. The post was discussing the future. If it was discussing the past, it was poorly worded.

Not responding to retarded questions does not equal "running away". Try harder.

Ok, so what future war will Trump create?

Now THAT is an awesome question. You are really catching on!

The only possible answer that you will accept for that retarded question is:

None. Trump will not start any war. If a war starts it will be due to things that happened before Trump was president or because of things that might happen when he is no longer president. Perhaps it will be the fault of Congress or the fake media.

Trump will never start a war. But, he will prevent them by the very fact that he exists and he will end them with his masterful military mind.

Oh, well thanks for letting us know that you plan on blaming FUTURE wars on Trump. You are aware that Hillary and Obama are/were (since they are HISTORY now), the war mongers?

So, if you like Obama and if you voted for Hillary, you like war and killing innocent civilians.



"The Obama administration has insisted that drone strikes are so “exceptionally surgical and precise” that they pluck off terror suspects while not putting “innocent men, women and children in danger”. This claim has been contested by numerous human rights groups, however, and the Bureau’s figures on civilian casualties also demonstrate that this is often not the case.

The White House released long-awaited figures last July on the number of people killed in drone strikes between January 2009 and the end of 2015, an announcement which insiders said was a direct response to pressure from the Bureau and other organisations that collect data. However the US’s estimate of the number of civilians killed – between 64 and 116 – contrasted strongly with the number recorded by the Bureau, which at 380 to 801 was six times higher.

That figure does not include deaths in active battlefields including Afghanistan – where US air attacks have shot up since Obama withdrew the majority of his troops at the end of 2014. The country has since come under frequent US bombardment, in an unreported war that saw 1,337 weapons dropped last year alone – a 40% rise on 2015.

Afghan civilian casualties have been high, with the United Nations (UN) reporting at least 85 deaths in 2016. The Bureau recorded 65 to 105 civilian deaths during this period. We did not start collecting data on Afghanistan until 2015.

Pakistan was the hub of drone operations during Obama’s first term. The pace of attacks had accelerated in the second half of 2008 at the end of Bush’s term, after four years pocked by occasional strikes. However in the year after taking office, Obama ordered more drone strikes than Bush did during his entire presidency. The 54 strikes in 2009 all took place in Pakistan.

563
Strikes in Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen during Obama’s two terms

57
Strikes in those countries under George W. Bush

Strikes in the country peaked in 2010, with 128 CIA drone attacks and at least 89 civilians killed, at the same time US troop numbers surged in Afghanistan. Pakistan strikes have since fallen with just three conducted in the country last year.

Obama also began an air campaign targeting Yemen. His first strike was a catastrophe: commanders thought they were targeting al Qaeda but instead hit a tribe with cluster munitions, killing 55 people. Twenty-one were children – 10 of them under five. Twelve were women, five of them pregnant.

Through 2010 and the first half of 2011 US strikes in Yemen continued sporadically. The air campaign then began in earnest, with the US using its drones and jets to help Yemeni ground forces oust al Qaeda forces who had taken advantage of the country’s Arab Spring to seize a swath of territory in the south of the country.

In Somalia, US Special Operations Forces and gunships had been fighting al Qaeda and its al Shabaab allies since January 2007. The US sent drones to Djibouti in 2010 to support American operations in Yemen, but did not start striking in Somalia until 2011.

The number of civilian casualties increased alongside the rise in strikes. However reported civilian casualties began to fall as Obama’s first term progressed, both in real terms and as a rate of civilians reported killed per strike.

In Yemen, where there has been a minimum of 65 civilian deaths since 2002, the Bureau recorded no instances of civilian casualties last year. There were three non-combatants reportedly killed in 2016 in Somalia, where the US Air Force has been given broader authority to target al Shabaab – in previous years there were no confirmed civilian deaths.

Strikes in Yemen, Pakistan and Somalia have always been dwarfed by the frequency of air attacks on battlefields such as Afghanistan.

December 2014 saw the end of Nato combat operations there, and the frequency of air attacks plummeted in 2015. Strikes are now increasing again, with a 40% rise in 2016, though numbers remain below the 2011 peak.

The number of countries being simultaneously bombed by the US increased to seven last year as a new front opened up in the fight against Islamic State (IS). The US has been leading a coalition of countries in the fight against IS in Iraq and Syria since August 2014, conducting a total of 13,501 strikes across both countries, according to monitoring group Airwars.

In August US warplanes started hitting the group hard in Libya. The US declared 495 strikes in the country between August 1 and December 5 as part of efforts to stop IS gaining more ground, Airwars data shows."

Obama’s covert drone war in numbers: ten times more strikes than Bush

Oops! My bad. I thought this thread was about Trump. So sorry.

 

[ChrisL]

There’s no doubt that Hillary is the candidate of Wall Street. Even more dangerous, though, is that she is the candidate of the military-industrial complex. The idea that she is bad on the corporate issues but good on national security has it wrong. Her so-called foreign policy “experience” has been to support every war demanded by the US deep security state run by the military and the CIA.

Hillary and Bill Clinton’s close relations with Wall Street helped to stoke two financial bubbles (1999-2000 and 2005-8) and the Great Recession that followed Lehman’s collapse. In the 1990s they pushed financial deregulation for their campaign backers that in turn let loose the worst demons of financial manipulation, toxic assets, financial fraud, and eventually collapse. In the process they won elections and got mighty rich.

Yet Hillary’s connections with the military-industrial complex are also alarming. It is often believed that the Republicans are the neocons and the Democrats act as restraints on the warmongering. This is not correct. Both parties are divided between neocon hawks and cautious realists who don’t want the US in unending war. Hillary is a staunch neocon whose record of favoring American war adventures explains much of our current security danger.

Just as the last Clinton presidency set the stage for financial collapse, it also set the stage for unending war. On October 31, 1998 President Clinton signed the Iraq Liberation Actthat made it official US policy to support “regime change” in Iraq.

It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime.

Thus were laid the foundations for the Iraq War in 2003.

Of course, by 2003, Hillary was a Senator and a staunch supporter of the Iraq War, which has cost the US trillions of dollars, thousands of lives, and done more to create ISIS and Middle East instability than any other single decision of modern foreign policy. In defending her vote, Hillary parroted the phony propaganda of the CIA:

“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members... “

After the Iraq Liberation Act came the 1999 Kosovo War, in which Bill Clinton called in NATO to bomb Belgrade, in the heart of Europe, and unleashing another decade of unrest in the Balkans. Hillary, traveling in Africa, called Bill: “I urged him to bomb,” she told reporter Lucinda Frank.

Hillary’s record as Secretary of State is among the most militaristic, and disastrous, of modern US history. Some experience. Hilary was a staunch defender of the military-industrial-intelligence complex at every turn, helping to spread the Iraq mayhem over a swath of violence that now stretches from Mali to Afghanistan. Two disasters loom largest: Libya and Syria.

Hillary has been much attacked for the deaths of US diplomats in Benghazi, but her tireless promotion of the overthrow Muammar Qaddafi by NATO bombing is the far graver disaster. Hillary strongly promoted NATO-led regime change in Libya, not only in violation of international law but counter to the most basic good judgment. After the NATO bombing, Libya descended into civil war while the paramilitaries and unsecured arms stashes in Libya quickly spread west across the African Sahel and east to Syria. The Libyan disaster has spawned war in Mali, fed weapons to Boko Haram in Nigeria, and fueled ISIS in Syria and Iraq. In the meantime, Hillary found it hilarious to declare of Qaddafi: “We came, we saw, he died.”

Perhaps the crowning disaster of this long list of disasters has been Hillary’s relentless promotion of CIA-led regime change in Syria. Once again Hillary bought into the CIA propaganda that regime change to remove Bashir al-Assad would be quick, costless, and surely successful. In August 2011, Hillary led the US into disaster with her declaration Assad must “get out of the way,” backed by secret CIA operations.

Five years later, no place on the planet is more ravaged by unending war, and no place poses a great threat to US security. More than 10 million Syrians are displaced, and the refugees are drowning in the Mediterranean or undermining the political stability of Greece, Turkey, and the European Union. Into the chaos created by the secret CIA-Saudi operations to overthrow Assad, ISIS has filled the vacuum, and has used Syria as the base for worldwide terrorist attacks.

The list of her incompetence and warmongering goes on. Hillary’s support at every turn for NATO expansion, including even into Ukraine and Georgia against all common sense, was a trip wire that violated the post-Cold War settlement in Europe in 1991 and that led to Russia’s violent counter-reactions in both Georgia and Ukraine. As Senator in 2008, Hilary co-sponsored 2008-SR439, to include Ukraine and Georgia in NATO. As Secretary of State, she then presided over the restart of the Cold War with Russia.

It is hard to know the roots of this record of disaster. Is it chronically bad judgment? Is it her preternatural faith in the lying machine of the CIA? Is it a repeated attempt to show that as a Democrat she would be more hawkish than the Republicans? Is it to satisfy her hardline campaign financiers? Who knows? Maybe it’s all of the above. But whatever the reasons, hers is a record of disaster. Perhaps more than any other person, Hillary can lay claim to having stoked the violence that stretches from West Africa to Central Asia and that threatens US security.

Hillary Is the Candidate of the War Machine | HuffPost

 

[ChrisL]

You have already been asked once and then ran away

I will ask again.

What war did Trump start?

Dickhead. The post was discussing the future. If it was discussing the past, it was poorly worded.

Not responding to retarded questions does not equal "running away". Try harder.

Ok, so what future war will Trump create?

Now THAT is an awesome question. You are really catching on!

The only possible answer that you will accept for that retarded question is:

None. Trump will not start any war. If a war starts it will be due to things that happened before Trump was president or because of things that might happen when he is no longer president. Perhaps it will be the fault of Congress or the fake media.

Trump will never start a war. But, he will prevent them by the very fact that he exists and he will end them with his masterful military mind.

Oh, well thanks for letting us know that you plan on blaming FUTURE wars on Trump. You are aware that Hillary and Obama are/were (since they are HISTORY now), the war mongers?

So, if you like Obama and if you voted for Hillary, you like war and killing innocent civilians.



"The Obama administration has insisted that drone strikes are so “exceptionally surgical and precise” that they pluck off terror suspects while not putting “innocent men, women and children in danger”. This claim has been contested by numerous human rights groups, however, and the Bureau’s figures on civilian casualties also demonstrate that this is often not the case.

The White House released long-awaited figures last July on the number of people killed in drone strikes between January 2009 and the end of 2015, an announcement which insiders said was a direct response to pressure from the Bureau and other organisations that collect data. However the US’s estimate of the number of civilians killed – between 64 and 116 – contrasted strongly with the number recorded by the Bureau, which at 380 to 801 was six times higher.

That figure does not include deaths in active battlefields including Afghanistan – where US air attacks have shot up since Obama withdrew the majority of his troops at the end of 2014. The country has since come under frequent US bombardment, in an unreported war that saw 1,337 weapons dropped last year alone – a 40% rise on 2015.

Afghan civilian casualties have been high, with the United Nations (UN) reporting at least 85 deaths in 2016. The Bureau recorded 65 to 105 civilian deaths during this period. We did not start collecting data on Afghanistan until 2015.

Pakistan was the hub of drone operations during Obama’s first term. The pace of attacks had accelerated in the second half of 2008 at the end of Bush’s term, after four years pocked by occasional strikes. However in the year after taking office, Obama ordered more drone strikes than Bush did during his entire presidency. The 54 strikes in 2009 all took place in Pakistan.

563
Strikes in Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen during Obama’s two terms

57
Strikes in those countries under George W. Bush

Strikes in the country peaked in 2010, with 128 CIA drone attacks and at least 89 civilians killed, at the same time US troop numbers surged in Afghanistan. Pakistan strikes have since fallen with just three conducted in the country last year.

Obama also began an air campaign targeting Yemen. His first strike was a catastrophe: commanders thought they were targeting al Qaeda but instead hit a tribe with cluster munitions, killing 55 people. Twenty-one were children – 10 of them under five. Twelve were women, five of them pregnant.

Through 2010 and the first half of 2011 US strikes in Yemen continued sporadically. The air campaign then began in earnest, with the US using its drones and jets to help Yemeni ground forces oust al Qaeda forces who had taken advantage of the country’s Arab Spring to seize a swath of territory in the south of the country.

In Somalia, US Special Operations Forces and gunships had been fighting al Qaeda and its al Shabaab allies since January 2007. The US sent drones to Djibouti in 2010 to support American operations in Yemen, but did not start striking in Somalia until 2011.

The number of civilian casualties increased alongside the rise in strikes. However reported civilian casualties began to fall as Obama’s first term progressed, both in real terms and as a rate of civilians reported killed per strike.

In Yemen, where there has been a minimum of 65 civilian deaths since 2002, the Bureau recorded no instances of civilian casualties last year. There were three non-combatants reportedly killed in 2016 in Somalia, where the US Air Force has been given broader authority to target al Shabaab – in previous years there were no confirmed civilian deaths.

Strikes in Yemen, Pakistan and Somalia have always been dwarfed by the frequency of air attacks on battlefields such as Afghanistan.

December 2014 saw the end of Nato combat operations there, and the frequency of air attacks plummeted in 2015. Strikes are now increasing again, with a 40% rise in 2016, though numbers remain below the 2011 peak.

The number of countries being simultaneously bombed by the US increased to seven last year as a new front opened up in the fight against Islamic State (IS). The US has been leading a coalition of countries in the fight against IS in Iraq and Syria since August 2014, conducting a total of 13,501 strikes across both countries, according to monitoring group Airwars.

In August US warplanes started hitting the group hard in Libya. The US declared 495 strikes in the country between August 1 and December 5 as part of efforts to stop IS gaining more ground, Airwars data shows."

Obama’s covert drone war in numbers: ten times more strikes than Bush

Oops! My bad. I thought this thread was about Trump. So sorry.

Well, not anymore since you want to talk about war now! Let's talk about the candidates who actually ARE proven warmongers instead of imagining.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

UN Secretary-General Puts World On 'Red Alert' In Somber New Year's Eve Address

You heard it here first, we are all on red alert!!!

UN Secretary blah, blah, blah has recently said that conflict is likely due to heightened tensions around the globe and increased "xenophobia" and "nationalism" that has increased around the globe. Oh, and global warming is as bad as ever!

Translation: Trump.

The funny part here is, it may be the first year in a very long time that the US does not start a war.

Hilarious!

Hopefully Trump can destroy North Korea and free it's people who are selling their own poop for money

Never happen. Sanctions will only starve the people. That fat little bastard leader of theirs will always eat. The people would have to overthrow the government themselves.

 

[ChrisL]

jillian thinks it's funny that she's such a hypocritical dunce for her party. Me too. It's hilarious.

 

[LoneLaugher]

And ChrisL, I'm impressed by your research. We are all much better off now that Trump has suspended all drone strikes and has declared that the US will never again kill a single civilian.

Thank God!

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

UN Secretary-General Puts World On 'Red Alert' In Somber New Year's Eve Address

You heard it here first, we are all on red alert!!!

UN Secretary blah, blah, blah has recently said that conflict is likely due to heightened tensions around the globe and increased "xenophobia" and "nationalism" that has increased around the globe. Oh, and global warming is as bad as ever!

Translation: Trump.

The funny part here is, it may be the first year in a very long time that the US does not start a war.

Hilarious!

OH NO! Red alert???

I guess we now need the UN more than ever. Quick, quick, write to the White House and tell them not to withdraw funds from the UN.

 

[Theowl32]

You’d never accuse Trump of starting a war. Who the fuck are you trying to fool?

You are a Trombie. Trombies will believe what Trump tells them to believe. And, believe me, Trump will never admit to being responsible for starting a war.

What war did Trump start?

Jilian laughed. Wow, she sure is stupid. Typical of white liberal women. All of them are morons. I mean real morons. They are hairy and usually smell too.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

And ChrisL, I'm impressed by your research. We are all much better off now that Trump has suspended all drone strikes and has declared that the US will never again kill a single civilian.

Thank God!

Think they will offer him a peace prize????

 

[LoneLaugher]

Dickhead. The post was discussing the future. If it was discussing the past, it was poorly worded.

Not responding to retarded questions does not equal "running away". Try harder.

Ok, so what future war will Trump create?

Now THAT is an awesome question. You are really catching on!

The only possible answer that you will accept for that retarded question is:

None. Trump will not start any war. If a war starts it will be due to things that happened before Trump was president or because of things that might happen when he is no longer president. Perhaps it will be the fault of Congress or the fake media.

Trump will never start a war. But, he will prevent them by the very fact that he exists and he will end them with his masterful military mind.

Oh, well thanks for letting us know that you plan on blaming FUTURE wars on Trump. You are aware that Hillary and Obama are/were (since they are HISTORY now), the war mongers?

So, if you like Obama and if you voted for Hillary, you like war and killing innocent civilians.



"The Obama administration has insisted that drone strikes are so “exceptionally surgical and precise” that they pluck off terror suspects while not putting “innocent men, women and children in danger”. This claim has been contested by numerous human rights groups, however, and the Bureau’s figures on civilian casualties also demonstrate that this is often not the case.

The White House released long-awaited figures last July on the number of people killed in drone strikes between January 2009 and the end of 2015, an announcement which insiders said was a direct response to pressure from the Bureau and other organisations that collect data. However the US’s estimate of the number of civilians killed – between 64 and 116 – contrasted strongly with the number recorded by the Bureau, which at 380 to 801 was six times higher.

That figure does not include deaths in active battlefields including Afghanistan – where US air attacks have shot up since Obama withdrew the majority of his troops at the end of 2014. The country has since come under frequent US bombardment, in an unreported war that saw 1,337 weapons dropped last year alone – a 40% rise on 2015.

Afghan civilian casualties have been high, with the United Nations (UN) reporting at least 85 deaths in 2016. The Bureau recorded 65 to 105 civilian deaths during this period. We did not start collecting data on Afghanistan until 2015.

Pakistan was the hub of drone operations during Obama’s first term. The pace of attacks had accelerated in the second half of 2008 at the end of Bush’s term, after four years pocked by occasional strikes. However in the year after taking office, Obama ordered more drone strikes than Bush did during his entire presidency. The 54 strikes in 2009 all took place in Pakistan.

563
Strikes in Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen during Obama’s two terms

57
Strikes in those countries under George W. Bush

Strikes in the country peaked in 2010, with 128 CIA drone attacks and at least 89 civilians killed, at the same time US troop numbers surged in Afghanistan. Pakistan strikes have since fallen with just three conducted in the country last year.

Obama also began an air campaign targeting Yemen. His first strike was a catastrophe: commanders thought they were targeting al Qaeda but instead hit a tribe with cluster munitions, killing 55 people. Twenty-one were children – 10 of them under five. Twelve were women, five of them pregnant.

Through 2010 and the first half of 2011 US strikes in Yemen continued sporadically. The air campaign then began in earnest, with the US using its drones and jets to help Yemeni ground forces oust al Qaeda forces who had taken advantage of the country’s Arab Spring to seize a swath of territory in the south of the country.

In Somalia, US Special Operations Forces and gunships had been fighting al Qaeda and its al Shabaab allies since January 2007. The US sent drones to Djibouti in 2010 to support American operations in Yemen, but did not start striking in Somalia until 2011.

The number of civilian casualties increased alongside the rise in strikes. However reported civilian casualties began to fall as Obama’s first term progressed, both in real terms and as a rate of civilians reported killed per strike.

In Yemen, where there has been a minimum of 65 civilian deaths since 2002, the Bureau recorded no instances of civilian casualties last year. There were three non-combatants reportedly killed in 2016 in Somalia, where the US Air Force has been given broader authority to target al Shabaab – in previous years there were no confirmed civilian deaths.

Strikes in Yemen, Pakistan and Somalia have always been dwarfed by the frequency of air attacks on battlefields such as Afghanistan.

December 2014 saw the end of Nato combat operations there, and the frequency of air attacks plummeted in 2015. Strikes are now increasing again, with a 40% rise in 2016, though numbers remain below the 2011 peak.

The number of countries being simultaneously bombed by the US increased to seven last year as a new front opened up in the fight against Islamic State (IS). The US has been leading a coalition of countries in the fight against IS in Iraq and Syria since August 2014, conducting a total of 13,501 strikes across both countries, according to monitoring group Airwars.

In August US warplanes started hitting the group hard in Libya. The US declared 495 strikes in the country between August 1 and December 5 as part of efforts to stop IS gaining more ground, Airwars data shows."

Obama’s covert drone war in numbers: ten times more strikes than Bush

Oops! My bad. I thought this thread was about Trump. So sorry.

Well, not anymore since you want to talk about war now! Let's talk about the candidates who actually ARE proven warmongers instead of imagining.

I'm sorry. I will continue to discuss Trump in this thread. That's what the thread is about. We already know that anything Trump does with our military was brought about by the actions of his predecessor. Trump will simply clean up the mess that Obama made, silly.

 

[ChrisL]

And ChrisL, I'm impressed by your research. We are all much better off now that Trump has suspended all drone strikes and has declared that the US will never again kill a single civilian.

Thank God!

Think they will offer him a peace prize????

Now that would be funny!