- Moderator
- #161
I think you need to change you handle to Dr. Dopey.
If you think that Hillary is as white as driven snow, all you have to do is do a Google search using the term "hillary's corruption scandals". You will get 1,210,000 hits.
Read a few of the articles, come back and try to convince us again.
I don't think Hillary is white as the driven snow. No politician is.
I just typed "Trump" and "pedophile" into Google and got 2,250,000 hits. Using your dumb logic Trump is a pedo. And you call me dopey.
I don't have to prove shit. The accuser has to prove their POV...
Kind of hard when they don't indict her...
Which is kind of the main point. Either you believe the justice system mainly works - and a lack of indictment means a lack of sufficient evidence or, you believe it doesn't work and go along with trial by public opinion.
It's not the point when you get that high different rules.
.
I don't agree - Trump and Clinton occupy the same level. Why different rules in how each was treated by the FBI?
Pretty much every investigation on Hillary Clinton was pushed by Republicans. Even when there was insufficient evidence, they continued to attempt special investigations and more and more hearings. Given that - if there was something indictable, it would have come out.
You really can't justify the fact that Comey treated Clinton's investigation completely differently then Trumps.