WTF? Democrat House Judiciary Committee Takes First Step to Hold Bill Barr in Contempt of Congress

[toomuchtime_]

That was not within his jurisdiction, and it was improper and perhaps unethical for him to have suggested it.

Based on what? He was a special investigator, why was it NOT within his juristiction?

He was not a special investigator, he was a special counsel, working for the Justice Department under the supervision of the AG. He has no authority to decide what happens to his report once he turns it over to the AG.

Mueller DIDN'T descide what happened to the report. Barr released it if you recall.

However within the report he is surely entitled to state why he felt he could not make a prosecuratorial descision and why it is up to Congress, not DOJ to ultimately hold a sitting president accountable.

When Mueller sent the report to Barr, his job was over. What happened to the report after than was above his pay grade, so for him to suggest that Congress should make the decision on obstruction, was improper and perhaps cowardly.

Stop spinning up nonsense, It's perfectly in his perview to state a legal opinion that holding a sitting president responsible is ultimately a job of Congress. Wether of not Congress WANTS TO is a different matter.

No, it's not. His job was to investigate and then make a decision on guilt or innocence and nothing else. He was expected to make a decision and he failed in his duties when he chose not to.

 

[AntonToo]

Based on what? He was a special investigator, why was it NOT within his juristiction?

He was not a special investigator, he was a special counsel, working for the Justice Department under the supervision of the AG. He has no authority to decide what happens to his report once he turns it over to the AG.

Mueller DIDN'T descide what happened to the report. Barr released it if you recall.

However within the report he is surely entitled to state why he felt he could not make a prosecuratorial descision and why it is up to Congress, not DOJ to ultimately hold a sitting president accountable.

When Mueller sent the report to Barr, his job was over. What happened to the report after than was above his pay grade, so for him to suggest that Congress should make the decision on obstruction, was improper and perhaps cowardly.

Stop spinning up nonsense, It's perfectly in his perview to state a legal opinion that holding a sitting president responsible is ultimately a job of Congress. Wether of not Congress WANTS TO is a different matter.

No, it's not. His job was to investigate and then make a decision on guilt or innocence and nothing else.

Source that.

(your ass doesn't count)

 

[toomuchtime_]

When Mueller sent the report to Barr, his job was over. What happened to the report after than was above his pay grade, so for him to suggest that Congress should make the decision on obstruction, was improper and perhaps cowardly.

Wrong.

Are you brain damaged?

No, but you are.

If you are not brain damaged then why is it you seem unable to support any of your post with arguments?

I do it all the time. But in this case you are wrong and that is all needed to be said. Barr had not even read the report so his opinion is negligent and should not be considered. And congress doesn't need Barrs permission to ask Mueller for anything. The congress will decide when things end, not Barr and not Trump.

In other words, you are brain damaged.

 

[Flopper]

This is getting out of hand. I mean how dare AG Barr release redacted Grand Jury material which in itself a federal crime. Nadler is nuts!


BREAKING: Dem-Controlled House Judiciary Committee Takes First Step to Hold Bill Barr in Contempt of Congress

Holding a person in contempt of Congress is the next step after a person ignores a subpoena. The fact that the redacted material is grand jury material is no excuse. The law specifies a close session with 4 members to review such material. Ignoring congressional subpoenas is good way to get impeached.

 

[IM2]

BULLFUCKINGSHIT. Did you READ THE LETTER? Nothing about any media in it.

And hey I've got a very simple way for us, and the rest of America to fully settle this one - HAVE MUELLER TESTIFY.

The fact that Trump's admin is fighting tooth and nail to prevent that from happenning should tell you all you need to know.

Mueller did testify to what he believed to be true in his report

You need to stop doing drugs son, Mueller never testified.

His testimony on these issues is in his report. There is no plausible reason for him not to have stated he thought Trump was guilty of obstruction if he believed the evidence supported that conclusion.

He did state that Trump was guilty of obstruction, he just didn't use those exact words.

It only seems that way to crazy people. Other people listen to what is actually said and not the voices in their heads.

Some people read the evidence in the report and see that what was said doesn't match.

 

[toomuchtime_]

He was not a special investigator, he was a special counsel, working for the Justice Department under the supervision of the AG. He has no authority to decide what happens to his report once he turns it over to the AG.

Mueller DIDN'T descide what happened to the report. Barr released it if you recall.

However within the report he is surely entitled to state why he felt he could not make a prosecuratorial descision and why it is up to Congress, not DOJ to ultimately hold a sitting president accountable.

When Mueller sent the report to Barr, his job was over. What happened to the report after than was above his pay grade, so for him to suggest that Congress should make the decision on obstruction, was improper and perhaps cowardly.

Stop spinning up nonsense, It's perfectly in his perview to state a legal opinion that holding a sitting president responsible is ultimately a job of Congress. Wether of not Congress WANTS TO is a different matter.

No, it's not. His job was to investigate and then make a decision on guilt or innocence and nothing else.

Source that.

(your ass doesn't count)

During the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing Wednesday morning, Barr said that he believed the special counsel should have stated whether his 22-month probe found enough evidence to show whether Trump had committed an obstruction crime.

“I think if he felt that he should not go down the path of making a traditional prosecutive decision, then he should not have investigated,” Barr said.

“That was the time to pull up.”

Barr told Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, that he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein both believe it was Mueller’s responsibility to come to a decision on obstruction — “not just charging, but to determine whether or not the conduct was criminal,” Barr said, adding that “the president could not be charged as long as he was in office.”

Attorney General William Barr criticizes special counsel Robert Mueller for not saying whether Trump obstructed justice

 

[IM2]

Wrong.

Are you brain damaged?

No, but you are.

If you are not brain damaged then why is it you seem unable to support any of your post with arguments?

I do it all the time. But in this case you are wrong and that is all needed to be said. Barr had not even read the report so his opinion is negligent and should not be considered. And congress doesn't need Barrs permission to ask Mueller for anything. The congress will decide when things end, not Barr and not Trump.

In other words, you are brain damaged.

No, that would be you.

 

[Papageorgio]

laws do not apply to Trump or anyone in his cartel -

Were you pissed off with Obama and Holder when congress found Holder in contempt of congress? Did you “laws do not apply to Obama or anyone in his cartel?”

Go ahead and justify the same behavior, I expect no less.

 

[IM2]

Mueller DIDN'T descide what happened to the report. Barr released it if you recall.

However within the report he is surely entitled to state why he felt he could not make a prosecuratorial descision and why it is up to Congress, not DOJ to ultimately hold a sitting president accountable.

When Mueller sent the report to Barr, his job was over. What happened to the report after than was above his pay grade, so for him to suggest that Congress should make the decision on obstruction, was improper and perhaps cowardly.

Stop spinning up nonsense, It's perfectly in his perview to state a legal opinion that holding a sitting president responsible is ultimately a job of Congress. Wether of not Congress WANTS TO is a different matter.

No, it's not. His job was to investigate and then make a decision on guilt or innocence and nothing else.

Source that.

(your ass doesn't count)

During the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing Wednesday morning, Barr said that he believed the special counsel should have stated whether his 22-month probe found enough evidence to show whether Trump had committed an obstruction crime.

“I think if he felt that he should not go down the path of making a traditional prosecutive decision, then he should not have investigated,” Barr said.

“That was the time to pull up.”

Barr told Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, that he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein both believe it was Mueller’s responsibility to come to a decision on obstruction — “not just charging, but to determine whether or not the conduct was criminal,” Barr said, adding that “the president could not be charged as long as he was in office.”

Attorney General William Barr criticizes special counsel Robert Mueller for not saying whether Trump obstructed justice

William Barr has no credibility. Neither does your opinion.

 

[toomuchtime_]

This is getting out of hand. I mean how dare AG Barr release redacted Grand Jury material which in itself a federal crime. Nadler is nuts!


BREAKING: Dem-Controlled House Judiciary Committee Takes First Step to Hold Bill Barr in Contempt of Congress

Holding a person in contempt of Congress is the next step after a person ignores a subpoena. The fact that the redacted material is grand jury material is no excuse. The law specifies a close session with 4 members to review such material. Ignoring congressional subpoenas is good way to get impeached.

More political theater from the Democrats. If Barr is impeached, he will not be convicted by the Senate, so why bother?

 

[IM2]

laws do not apply to Trump or anyone in his cartel -

Were you pissed off with Obama and Holder when congress found Holder in contempt of congress? Did you “laws do not apply to Obama or anyone in his cartel?”

Go ahead and justify the same behavior, I expect no less.

False equivalence. Try again.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Mueller did testify to what he believed to be true in his report

You need to stop doing drugs son, Mueller never testified.

His testimony on these issues is in his report. There is no plausible reason for him not to have stated he thought Trump was guilty of obstruction if he believed the evidence supported that conclusion.

He did state that Trump was guilty of obstruction, he just didn't use those exact words.

It only seems that way to crazy people. Other people listen to what is actually said and not the voices in their heads.

Some people read the evidence in the report and see that what was said doesn't match.

lol Clearly you are too brain damaged to be specific.

 

[IM2]

This is getting out of hand. I mean how dare AG Barr release redacted Grand Jury material which in itself a federal crime. Nadler is nuts!


BREAKING: Dem-Controlled House Judiciary Committee Takes First Step to Hold Bill Barr in Contempt of Congress

Holding a person in contempt of Congress is the next step after a person ignores a subpoena. The fact that the redacted material is grand jury material is no excuse. The law specifies a close session with 4 members to review such material. Ignoring congressional subpoenas is good way to get impeached.

More political theater from the Democrats. If Barr is impeached, he will not be convicted by the Senate, so why bother?

This is not political theatre fool. This is a president/AG trying to subvert the constitution and the rule of law.

 

[IM2]

You need to stop doing drugs son, Mueller never testified.

His testimony on these issues is in his report. There is no plausible reason for him not to have stated he thought Trump was guilty of obstruction if he believed the evidence supported that conclusion.

He did state that Trump was guilty of obstruction, he just didn't use those exact words.

It only seems that way to crazy people. Other people listen to what is actually said and not the voices in their heads.

Some people read the evidence in the report and see that what was said doesn't match.

lol Clearly you are too brain damaged to be specific.

Apparently you can't read.

 

[toomuchtime_]

This is getting out of hand. I mean how dare AG Barr release redacted Grand Jury material which in itself a federal crime. Nadler is nuts!


BREAKING: Dem-Controlled House Judiciary Committee Takes First Step to Hold Bill Barr in Contempt of Congress

Holding a person in contempt of Congress is the next step after a person ignores a subpoena. The fact that the redacted material is grand jury material is no excuse. The law specifies a close session with 4 members to review such material. Ignoring congressional subpoenas is good way to get impeached.

More political theater from the Democrats. If Barr is impeached, he will not be convicted by the Senate, so why bother?

This is not political theatre fool. This is a president/AG trying to subvert the constitution and the rule of law.

Were you born with this deficit or did you suffer a traumatic brain injury?

 

[Crepitus]

This is getting out of hand. I mean how dare AG Barr release redacted Grand Jury material which in itself a federal crime. Nadler is nuts!


BREAKING: Dem-Controlled House Judiciary Committee Takes First Step to Hold Bill Barr in Contempt of Congress

I think you're confused. Which side of this do you think you're on?

 

[Dragonlady]

BULLFUCKINGSHIT. Did you READ THE LETTER? Nothing about any media in it.

And hey I've got a very simple way for us, and the rest of America to fully settle this one - HAVE MUELLER TESTIFY.

The fact that Trump's admin is fighting tooth and nail to prevent that from happenning should tell you all you need to know.

Mueller did testify to what he believed to be true in his report

You need to stop doing drugs son, Mueller never testified.

His testimony on these issues is in his report. There is no plausible reason for him not to have stated he thought Trump was guilty of obstruction if he believed the evidence supported that conclusion.

He did state that Trump was guilty of obstruction, he just didn't use those exact words.

It only seems that way to crazy people. Other people listen to what is actually said and not the voices in their heads.

If you're listening to what is said, you're being lied to. Mueller hasn't SAID anything. He wrote it in his report. If you bothered to read the fucking report, you wouldn't make the mistake of telling those who did read the report, what you were told about it.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Mueller did testify to what he believed to be true in his report

You need to stop doing drugs son, Mueller never testified.

His testimony on these issues is in his report. There is no plausible reason for him not to have stated he thought Trump was guilty of obstruction if he believed the evidence supported that conclusion.

He did state that Trump was guilty of obstruction, he just didn't use those exact words.

It only seems that way to crazy people. Other people listen to what is actually said and not the voices in their heads.

If you're listening to what is said, you're being lied to. Mueller hasn't SAID anything. He wrote it in his report. If you bothered to read the fucking report, you wouldn't make the mistake of telling those who did read the report, what you were told about it.

You just claimed Mueller said Trump was guilty of obstruction and now you are saying Mueller never said anything. Make up your mind.

 

[Crepitus]

Gee wasn't Holder charged with Contempt of Congress over Fast and Furieous??

As I recall nothing happened to that POS.

I doubt anything will happen to Barr either.

Don't bet on it. This is not the mature democrat Party we grew up on, Soros owns it and he's committed to seeing "Death to America" in his lifetime

 

[Papageorgio]

laws do not apply to Trump or anyone in his cartel -

Were you pissed off with Obama and Holder when congress found Holder in contempt of congress? Did you “laws do not apply to Obama or anyone in his cartel?”

Go ahead and justify the same behavior, I expect no less.

False equivalence. Try again.

No it’s not, Holder did

laws do not apply to Trump or anyone in his cartel -

Were you pissed off with Obama and Holder when congress found Holder in contempt of congress? Did you “laws do not apply to Obama or anyone in his cartel?”

Go ahead and justify the same behavior, I expect no less.

False equivalence. Try again.

So Barr won’t go before the House to testify about the Mueller report. Holder won’t go before the Senate to testify about Fast and Furious.

How is it a false equivalency?