Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lots of things may be wise investments. They may be theoretically good items for consideration on their own merits. That doesn’t mean they belong in a massive deficit spending bill under the false label of “infrastructure.”That is your right
It also contains Infrastructure for EV Charging
You may not like it, but it is a wise investment
Maybe if Republicans cosponsored the bill and actually voted for it, there would be more to your liking
Well, againLots of things may be wise investments. They may be theoretically good items for consideration on their own merits. That doesn’t mean they belong in a massive deficit spending bill under the false label of “infrastructure.”
Maybe the Republicans were right to oppose the falsely labeled bit of fiscal irresponsibility.
Let’s all pretend that the Dims didn’t have the majority to include all that bullshit pork.Well, again
If you didn’t want a bill crafted solely by Democrats, then Republicans should have participated.
Since they didn’t, they can’t really complain
So we end up with a bill that I like better than you do
And of course you like a massive spending bill. What kind of lib would you be if you didn’t love spending other people’s money which we can’t afford?
I like the fact that after more than 30 years we are finally doing something about much neglected InfrastructureLet’s all pretend that the Dims didn’t have the majority to include all that bullshit pork.
I would prefer a bill that actually focuses primarily (perhaps exclusively) on actual infrastructure. But with the nut bags in your Party, that wasn’t going to happen.I like the fact that after more than 30 years we are finally doing something about much neglected Infrastructure
I do not like the fact that Republicans put party loyalty above what is badly needed by the country
Roads, Bridges, Rail, Ports, Water Systems, Power Grid ….I would prefer a bill that actually focuses primarily (perhaps exclusively) on actual infrastructure. But with the nut bags in your Party, that wasn’t going to happen.
However, they're wrong.
View attachment 593963
Wonder how the Congressional delegation from PA voted on the bills.
www.foxbusiness.com
www.foxnews.com
$110 billion is dedicated to roads and bridgesAnyone who has driven the roads today knows that many of our highways are crumbling, our bridges are unsafe for the amount of traffic they endure on a daily basis,
Nor is it in addressing supply chain disruptions that are leaving our store shelves looking like 1980's ers Soviet markets
No. Again, it’s you. I never said that it didn’t contain any infrastructure. Why do you struggle so much with honesty?Roads, Bridges, Rail, Ports, Water Systems, Power Grid ….
Are not actual infrastructure?
You are being deceptive again
I thought that the former 1-term president fixed everything everywhere….Pittsburgh bridge that collapsed wasn't on list for infrastructure law funding
The Pittsburgh bridge that collapsed Friday morning ahead of President Biden's arrival in the Iron City was not known to be compromised and was not scheduled for maintenance via the federal infrastructure bill, according to government records.
Buttigieg responds to criticism over racist roads comment: ‘The point is not to make America feel guilty’
During an appearance on MSNBC’s "The Sunday Show," Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg responded to criticism over his comments that some U.S. infrastructure was built with racist intentions.
Anyone who has driven the roads today knows that many of our highways are crumbling, our bridges are unsafe for the amount of traffic they endure on a daily basis, and while Buttagieg just got over a trillion dollars, his focus is not on fixing these problems. Nor is it in addressing supply chain disruptions that are leaving our store shelves looking like 1980's ers Soviet markets. No, HIS focus is on playing to the SJW crowd with this "equity" nonsense that fixes nothing, and wastes money....
You’re a dolt and behind the curve. I not only read the shit* but I even posted the link. You have no idea what’s in it. Try being honest for a change, otter.I know what’s in it, you however don’t in your blind rejection of it.
Go right ahead with your crushing stupidity.You’re a dolt and behind the curve. I not only read the shit* but I even posted the link. You have no idea what’s in it. Try being honest for a change, otter.
* It is massively long and written in legislative gibberish. Plus. as an added bonus, it cross-references numerous other United States Code Titles and Sections along with a number of Administrative Rules and Regs. But it can be puzzled through to a fair extent. So, I’m quite sure you don’t know what’s in it, or you wouldn’t be making your idiotic and incorrect claims about it.
I already have. You remain far behind the curve, you drooling retard. Go back and read. It’s already written right here in this very thread.Go right ahead with your crushing stupidity.
Here's what's in the bipartisan infrastructure package
Now tell us what you don’t like in the bill.
You’re a moron. You’re the idiot who won’t show your work. I simply questioned your comment. Now you either show your work or shut the fuck up dip-shit.Either show that it is or shut the fuck up.
Come on Bluto you had a 0.0 GPA and can name one things that you don't like in the bill.I already have. You remain far behind the curve, you drooling retard. Go back and read. It’s already written right here in this very thread.
If you’re too lazy to do that, we’ll ok: then go fuck yourself, you tool.
You’re a retard.Come on Bluto you had a 0.0 GPA and can name one things that you don't like in the bill.
