Yet Another Rightwing Lie: ‘Sanctuary’ Cities

[miketx]

More lies from the regressive liars club.

 

[Harry Dresden]

another useless thread from NO_reply_jones....this stroonge also thinks political correctness is a myth....

 

[WillowTree]

Even if a city or state declares themselves 'sanctuary', the federal government can take no action based on such a statement. It can only act on individual cases when they happen. Drumpf can't play king and say 'well you said this so we're giving your federal money to Mississippi because we don't like what you said'. And again drumpf will run up against the courts who aren't having any of his or sessions playing king.

Pucker up cons, your entire belief system is based on bloviating bullshit. Once it gets to court you lose your ass. Smile for the camera!

I disagree, if you declare yourself a sanctuary city and do not uphold federal immigration law you should lose federal funding.

 

[miketx]

Even if a city or state declares themselves 'sanctuary', the federal government can take no action based on such a statement. It can only act on individual cases when they happen. Drumpf can't play king and say 'well you said this so we're giving your federal money to Mississippi because we don't like what you said'. And again drumpf will run up against the courts who aren't having any of his or sessions playing king.

Pucker up cons, your entire belief system is based on bloviating bullshit. Once it gets to court you lose your ass. Smile for the camera!

I disagree, if you declare yourself a sanctuary city and do not uphold federal immigration law you should lose federal funding.

Don't forget about prosecuting the SOB's

 

[IsaacNewton]

Even if a city or state declares themselves 'sanctuary', the federal government can take no action based on such a statement. It can only act on individual cases when they happen. Drumpf can't play king and say 'well you said this so we're giving your federal money to Mississippi because we don't like what you said'. And again drumpf will run up against the courts who aren't having any of his or sessions playing king.

Pucker up cons, your entire belief system is based on bloviating bullshit. Once it gets to court you lose your ass. Smile for the camera!

I disagree, if you declare yourself a sanctuary city and do not uphold federal immigration law you should lose federal funding.

The feds have to prove their allegations in court, not just say "your a poopy face for not doing what we tell you so we're taking your jacks away".

A city could declare themselves the new Atlantis. It's just a word. The feds have to litigate every single case. Refusing a city or state federal taxpayer money first of all is something Congress would have to do. drumpf and his gathering of human colostomy bags don't get to fuck with anyone they feel like f'ing with.

Or if they can, then think forward to when the Democrats hold the reigns of power. What mood do you think they'll be in?

drumpf is setting precedents that conservatives are going to be terrified of when he's gone.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

It was VERY important that mexican gang bangers be able to kill black boys in Los Angeles. That's why ICE was never notified when illegal alien Pedro Espinosa was about to be released. No way was LAPD going to tell the feds that an illegal was going to be put back on the streets. That's how Jamile Shaw Jr. was killed.

Sanctuary no matter who dies! It's better if it's some random white, but a black will do.

 

[yiostheoy]

“The Iowa House of Representatives is considering House File 265, which would prohibit state, county, city, and educational institutions from limiting or restricting enforcement of federal immigration laws. The bill is based on the myth of sanctuary cities and campuses, raises major Fourth Amendment issues, and will cost counties and cities money they could otherwise invest in their communities.

Legal sanctuaries are a myth. There are zones, within 100 miles of a border, in which some constitutional provisions are applied in a limited manner to enforce immigration law, but none in which federal immigration law does not apply. To be clear, there is no part of the United States in which federal immigration law is not in force.”

The myth of the 'sanctuary city'

Needless to say, Trump and other ignorant, hateful bigots on the right will continue to attempt to propagate this ridiculous lie as the administration threatens to pursue the reckless, irresponsible, and unwarranted policy of punishing mythical ‘sanctuary cities,’ when in fact no such jurisdictions exist.

You said "right wing" but didn't you really mean "far left" instead ???

 

[EvilCat Breath]

“The Iowa House of Representatives is considering House File 265, which would prohibit state, county, city, and educational institutions from limiting or restricting enforcement of federal immigration laws. The bill is based on the myth of sanctuary cities and campuses, raises major Fourth Amendment issues, and will cost counties and cities money they could otherwise invest in their communities.

Legal sanctuaries are a myth. There are zones, within 100 miles of a border, in which some constitutional provisions are applied in a limited manner to enforce immigration law, but none in which federal immigration law does not apply. To be clear, there is no part of the United States in which federal immigration law is not in force.”

The myth of the 'sanctuary city'

Needless to say, Trump and other ignorant, hateful bigots on the right will continue to attempt to propagate this ridiculous lie as the administration threatens to pursue the reckless, irresponsible, and unwarranted policy of punishing mythical ‘sanctuary cities,’ when in fact no such jurisdictions exist.

You said "right wing" but didn't you really mean "far left" instead ???

The left is trying to run away from being the left, by calling all leftist goals "right".

 

[ShootSpeeders]

They have been renamed and are now called OUTLAW CITIES.

 

[WillowTree]

Even if a city or state declares themselves 'sanctuary', the federal government can take no action based on such a statement. It can only act on individual cases when they happen. Drumpf can't play king and say 'well you said this so we're giving your federal money to Mississippi because we don't like what you said'. And again drumpf will run up against the courts who aren't having any of his or sessions playing king.

Pucker up cons, your entire belief system is based on bloviating bullshit. Once it gets to court you lose your ass. Smile for the camera!

I disagree, if you declare yourself a sanctuary city and do not uphold federal immigration law you should lose federal funding.

The feds have to prove their allegations in court, not just say "your a poopy face for not doing what we tell you so we're taking your jacks away".

A city could declare themselves the new Atlantis. It's just a word. The feds have to litigate every single case. Refusing a city or state federal taxpayer money first of all is something Congress would have to do. drumpf and his gathering of human colostomy bags don't get to fuck with anyone they feel like f'ing with.

Or if they can, then think forward to when the Democrats hold the reigns of power. What mood do you think they'll be in?

drumpf is setting precedents that conservatives are going to be terrified of when he's gone.

Wtf have you been for eight years! Withholding federal funds was obummer's favorite trick, from school funds, to SS payments to military pay. You weren't bitching about that were ewe?

 

[IsaacNewton]

Even if a city or state declares themselves 'sanctuary', the federal government can take no action based on such a statement. It can only act on individual cases when they happen. Drumpf can't play king and say 'well you said this so we're giving your federal money to Mississippi because we don't like what you said'. And again drumpf will run up against the courts who aren't having any of his or sessions playing king.

Pucker up cons, your entire belief system is based on bloviating bullshit. Once it gets to court you lose your ass. Smile for the camera!

I disagree, if you declare yourself a sanctuary city and do not uphold federal immigration law you should lose federal funding.

The feds have to prove their allegations in court, not just say "your a poopy face for not doing what we tell you so we're taking your jacks away".

A city could declare themselves the new Atlantis. It's just a word. The feds have to litigate every single case. Refusing a city or state federal taxpayer money first of all is something Congress would have to do. drumpf and his gathering of human colostomy bags don't get to fuck with anyone they feel like f'ing with.

Or if they can, then think forward to when the Democrats hold the reigns of power. What mood do you think they'll be in?

drumpf is setting precedents that conservatives are going to be terrified of when he's gone.

Wtf have you been for eight years! Withholding federal funds was obummer's favorite trick, from school funds, to SS payments to military pay. You weren't bitching about that were ewe?

Post up the links thanks. Alex Jones, NotTooBreitbart, and all the other alt-right fake news sites do not count. They sell lies for profit.

 

[WillowTree]

Even if a city or state declares themselves 'sanctuary', the federal government can take no action based on such a statement. It can only act on individual cases when they happen. Drumpf can't play king and say 'well you said this so we're giving your federal money to Mississippi because we don't like what you said'. And again drumpf will run up against the courts who aren't having any of his or sessions playing king.

Pucker up cons, your entire belief system is based on bloviating bullshit. Once it gets to court you lose your ass. Smile for the camera!

I disagree, if you declare yourself a sanctuary city and do not uphold federal immigration law you should lose federal funding.

The feds have to prove their allegations in court, not just say "your a poopy face for not doing what we tell you so we're taking your jacks away".

A city could declare themselves the new Atlantis. It's just a word. The feds have to litigate every single case. Refusing a city or state federal taxpayer money first of all is something Congress would have to do. drumpf and his gathering of human colostomy bags don't get to fuck with anyone they feel like f'ing with.

Or if they can, then think forward to when the Democrats hold the reigns of power. What mood do you think they'll be in?

drumpf is setting precedents that conservatives are going to be terrified of when he's gone.

Wtf have you been for eight years! Withholding federal funds was obummer's favorite trick, from school funds, to SS payments to military pay. You weren't bitching about that were ewe?

Post up the links thanks. Alex Jones, NotTooBreitbart, and all the other alt-right fake news sites do not count. They sell lies for profit.

Then post your own links. I am not a hoop jumper!

 

[Zoom-boing]

“The Iowa House of Representatives is considering House File 265, which would prohibit state, county, city, and educational institutions from limiting or restricting enforcement of federal immigration laws. The bill is based on the myth of sanctuary cities and campuses, raises major Fourth Amendment issues, and will cost counties and cities money they could otherwise invest in their communities.

Legal sanctuaries are a myth. There are zones, within 100 miles of a border, in which some constitutional provisions are applied in a limited manner to enforce immigration law, but none in which federal immigration law does not apply. To be clear, there is no part of the United States in which federal immigration law is not in force.”

The myth of the 'sanctuary city'

Needless to say, Trump and other ignorant, hateful bigots on the right will continue to attempt to propagate this ridiculous lie as the administration threatens to pursue the reckless, irresponsible, and unwarranted policy of punishing mythical ‘sanctuary cities,’ when in fact no such jurisdictions exist.

You're a special kind of stupid.

That's it? That's all you got? Pathetic.

And you're his sister, dumbass.

 

[Iceweasel]

Article 6 section 2: Any state law that conflicts with federal law is unconstitutional.
The very act of providing sanctuary to criminals is illegal. A sanctuary city or state has no way to keep their criminals from migrating to other cities and states. They are putting the rest of us at risk. Shut them down.

The term Sanctuary means that the local authorities will not assist the Federal Authorities. The Federal Authorities are still able to affect arrests. What the locals are saying is that ICE is on its own.

That's like saying the DEA is on it's own when they go after heroin shipments. Federal agencies need co-operation from local agencies to be effective. Knowingly harboring lawlessness is illegal. Mayors need to be in the federal pen and no federal dollars until the outlaw cities get with the program. Immigration law is not supposed to be dictated to us by left wing activists.

 

[Iceweasel]

A city could declare themselves the new Atlantis. It's just a word. The feds have to litigate every single case. Refusing a city or state federal taxpayer money first of all is something Congress would have to do. drumpf and his gathering of human colostomy bags don't get to fuck with anyone they feel like f'ing with.

Or if they can, then think forward to when the Democrats hold the reigns of power. What mood do you think they'll be in?

drumpf is setting precedents that conservatives are going to be terrified of when he's gone.

You speak like a toddler then expect to be taken seriously?

 

[rightwinger]

at first when i saw the title of this thread i thought it was about USMBs resident troll,the biggest troll of them all rightwinger,which the real name that fits him best is WRONGWINGER the fact he can NEVER admit when he is proven wrong.

its no wonder he chose that user name since he can NEVER open up his mouth without telling an outtight lie.

Do I own this guy, or what?

 

[SavannahMann]

Article 6 section 2: Any state law that conflicts with federal law is unconstitutional.
The very act of providing sanctuary to criminals is illegal. A sanctuary city or state has no way to keep their criminals from migrating to other cities and states. They are putting the rest of us at risk. Shut them down.

The term Sanctuary means that the local authorities will not assist the Federal Authorities. The Federal Authorities are still able to affect arrests. What the locals are saying is that ICE is on its own.

That's like saying the DEA is on it's own when they go after heroin shipments. Federal agencies need co-operation from local agencies to be effective. Knowingly harboring lawlessness is illegal. Mayors need to be in the federal pen and no federal dollars until the outlaw cities get with the program. Immigration law is not supposed to be dictated to us by left wing activists.

The DEA is on their own regarding marijuana in states that have legalized it. The local cops do not participate. The DEA can still arrest people. The States haven't changed federal law.

In the case Arizona Versus the United States the Supreme Court affirmed what the rest of us have always known. The Federal Government has the power regarding immigration. They struck down three of the four challenged parts. The only thing they left was that the right of police to ask about immigration status. The police could detain a person for a while, but not indefinitely.

Arizona v. United States - Wikipedia

The Supreme Court said Immigration was the Federal Governments to enforce and implement.

Sanctuary Cities is an inaccurate name. Like the term Civil War for the United States. The Sanctuary Cities are just doing the opposite of Arizona. They are taking a don't ask don't tell approach to immigration.

Now the Feds can cut the grants to the cities and states that don't want to comply with their requests. But as for bringing the hammer down, that just isn't going to happen. The chances of getting a conviction by a jury is virtually nil.

You are right about one thing. The Federal Agents need the assistance of the local cops. There aren't many Federal Agents in most cities and without that local help the cases drop to tiny fractions of cases.

The ICE agents are still able to arrest people. They just don't have a dozen local cops assisting in the raids. Which is why the DEA has virtually ceased enforcement of Marijuana laws in states that have legalized it.

 

[Iceweasel]

Article 6 section 2: Any state law that conflicts with federal law is unconstitutional.
The very act of providing sanctuary to criminals is illegal. A sanctuary city or state has no way to keep their criminals from migrating to other cities and states. They are putting the rest of us at risk. Shut them down.

The term Sanctuary means that the local authorities will not assist the Federal Authorities. The Federal Authorities are still able to affect arrests. What the locals are saying is that ICE is on its own.

That's like saying the DEA is on it's own when they go after heroin shipments. Federal agencies need co-operation from local agencies to be effective. Knowingly harboring lawlessness is illegal. Mayors need to be in the federal pen and no federal dollars until the outlaw cities get with the program. Immigration law is not supposed to be dictated to us by left wing activists.

The DEA is on their own regarding marijuana in states that have legalized it. The local cops do not participate. The DEA can still arrest people. The States haven't changed federal law.

In the case Arizona Versus the United States the Supreme Court affirmed what the rest of us have always known. The Federal Government has the power regarding immigration. They struck down three of the four challenged parts. The only thing they left was that the right of police to ask about immigration status. The police could detain a person for a while, but not indefinitely.

Arizona v. United States - Wikipedia

The Supreme Court said Immigration was the Federal Governments to enforce and implement.

Sanctuary Cities is an inaccurate name. Like the term Civil War for the United States. The Sanctuary Cities are just doing the opposite of Arizona. They are taking a don't ask don't tell approach to immigration.

Now the Feds can cut the grants to the cities and states that don't want to comply with their requests. But as for bringing the hammer down, that just isn't going to happen. The chances of getting a conviction by a jury is virtually nil.

You are right about one thing. The Federal Agents need the assistance of the local cops. There aren't many Federal Agents in most cities and without that local help the cases drop to tiny fractions of cases.

The ICE agents are still able to arrest people. They just don't have a dozen local cops assisting in the raids. Which is why the DEA has virtually ceased enforcement of Marijuana laws in states that have legalized it.

Problem is being a US citizen is not a state issue. The DEA could go after pot if they wanted to though.

 

[Mac1958]

More lies from the regressive liars club.

This is the same person who denies the very existence of political correctness, so...
.

 

[miketx]

I never once claimed that. Stop lying.