"You have humiliated us"

[eagle1462010]

Time after time, Trump makes some really stupid statements, really dumb decisions, and he spends hours coming up with moronic, infantile, vindictive tweets that feed his many obsessions. It does no good for the media to focus on these. Actually, it does a great deal of harm.

How many times have we heard the media say Trump has "doubled down" on some foolish decision, some foolish tweet? That's because, if he has something that really pisses off the media, he will "double down" making it even more foolish. He does this because all the media attention feeds his monster super ego and he is enjoying it.

You can tell he is enjoying himself because of his facial expressions and his demeanor. He loves the attention.

It is incomprehensible that a President would offer his opinion of an ongoing trial. What does Trump do? He tells a national television audience that Manafort is a really nice guy and his trial is a disgrace. Trump loves the attention that one got.

He got a tremendous amount of attention when he revoked Brennan's security clearance, nearly all of it negative. What does Trump do? He says he will probably do the same with nine other critics of his administration. Trump absolutely loves all the attention he got with that announcement.

Mueller really does not care if Trump refuses to present his side of the Russian probe, and no way will he get involved in litigation concerning a subpoena that will last until Christmas, Christmas of '19. Trump and his lawyer, Giuliani, have been making hay of this non-controversy for months. They argue against themselves and change their stories much to the delight of an American audience. And much to the delight of an audience of one in the Oval Office. Trump absolutely loves it.

I could go on all day, but the reader gets my point. When Trump issues a statement, makes a decision, writes a tweet, the more un-Presidential it is, the more controversial it is, the more anal-retentive it is, the more ill-advised it is the better. The longer the controversy goes on the better.

That is because, if the media is talking about something he did or said that was incomprehensibly stupid, then they are not talking about his collaboration with Russia during the 2016 election.

This very topic is about collaboration with intel officials to get FISA warrants...Right smack in the middle of an election.........Steele was fired for leaking the information to the Press. The same guy Comey almost paid for LOL

Then after he got fired the Clap Trap and Brennan did an end run............and LEAKED the same information that Steele got fired for..............

And your side complains that we have problems.......

Your star witnesses have gotten busted for lying under oath........No charges.......and you think they should keep security clearances...........LOL

New jobs as talking heads with CNN.

Dream on..........

 

[Correll]

"Why?" The President is the Commander In Chief. He is like the CEO of your company. You have a problem with your boss, you maybe take it to him behind closed doors but you don't trash talk him before the entire world. That would get your ass CANNED in any job on the planet! All this jackal did was weaken the country he was supposed to serve. Disgraceful.

No. He is absolutely not like a CEO. And wait...are you saying Brennan is working for Trump? Or ever did?

Loyalty to Trump and loyalty to the country are two different things.

You guys pretend to glorify Trump for telling it like it is. Brennan told it like it is. Guess you don’t like that.

Brennan has lied about spying on Congress to the public and the media. And WORSE he marketed the phony as shit Hillary/Russian document to the public 2 weeks before the election as an official "intel document". His role in that will be proved to be seditious in short order. "Telling it like it is" my ass.. He can rant all he wants. Only reason he's on TV daily is because his ass is gonna get put into interrogation soon.

I love the way you on Left now LOVE the CIA operating domestically in the USA. You hypocrites have come a LONG way since you ENDED Domestic American spying and pranking by the Intel agencies in the 70s. Now they are your friendly political pitbull..

I love how you Little Trumpsters almost ejaculate accusing anyone who highlights Trump’s incompetence and dishonesty, but completely ignore Trump verified pathological lies.
You have zero credibility and live in the land of hypocrisy.

I think equating exaggerating the size of his audiences PALLS COMPLETELY in comparison to an organized by you own US Intel agencies to influence an election..

I can survive a politician or entreprenuer lying and exaggerating. What Brennan was part this country MIGHT NOT survive. Orders of magnitude more troubling to find a concerted effort to stymie an opposition candidate using the awesome Intel powers of this country and then COORDINATING with the media and the opposition party to bring him down.

Priorities man. Priorities. Not even a Trump fan. If holdover Intel Imbeds in the Intel area did these things to punk OBAMA as he ran and got elected --- there'd Still be riots and blood in the streets. But you got the heavy artillery of the MSMedia on your side. Only reason you don't know shit about the seriousness of the situation...You've been kept in the dark and FED daily shit about Bunnies and porn stars and Omarosa.. Like GOOD mushrooms..,.

Clearly I disagree. IMO Brennan is a patriot, and seeks to protect our democracy and its people from the "Evil Empire". There is no doubt in my mind that Russia attempted and succeeded in influencing our election by demeaning HRC, and supporting Trump.

The theory that Putin & his agents worded to have HRC lose is obvious; she was a hawk and stood up to Putin in his quest to expand Russia to its past empire.

The theory that Putin has something on Trump is very credible too, given Trump's money issues and lounge lizard behavior.

maga! Mueller ain't going anywhere, so none of us ought to pretend we know what his investigation will tell; one thing for sure, it maybe a "witch hunt" in Trump's mind, and the minds of his supporters, but I suspect several more warlocks will be found before the 2020 general election.

Holes in your scenario.

1. Russia's alleged actions were pretty minor. A few trolls and some leaked emails. Hardly the stuff to sway many votes.

2. Hillary was an heavy favorite. Given what everyone knew prior to the election, it would have been very unlikely that a few trolls and a few leaked emails could have effected the outcome. It is not likely that Putin would have considered that an achievable goal.


3. Putin does not have anything on Trump.

 

[Coyote]

No. He is absolutely not like a CEO. And wait...are you saying Brennan is working for Trump? Or ever did?

Loyalty to Trump and loyalty to the country are two different things.

You guys pretend to glorify Trump for telling it like it is. Brennan told it like it is. Guess you don’t like that.

Brennan has lied about spying on Congress to the public and the media. And WORSE he marketed the phony as shit Hillary/Russian document to the public 2 weeks before the election as an official "intel document". His role in that will be proved to be seditious in short order. "Telling it like it is" my ass.. He can rant all he wants. Only reason he's on TV daily is because his ass is gonna get put into interrogation soon.

I love the way you on Left now LOVE the CIA operating domestically in the USA. You hypocrites have come a LONG way since you ENDED Domestic American spying and pranking by the Intel agencies in the 70s. Now they are your friendly political pitbull..

I love how you Little Trumpsters almost ejaculate accusing anyone who highlights Trump’s incompetence and dishonesty, but completely ignore Trump verified pathological lies.
You have zero credibility and live in the land of hypocrisy.

I think equating exaggerating the size of his audiences PALLS COMPLETELY in comparison to an organized by you own US Intel agencies to influence an election..

I can survive a politician or entreprenuer lying and exaggerating. What Brennan was part this country MIGHT NOT survive. Orders of magnitude more troubling to find a concerted effort to stymie an opposition candidate using the awesome Intel powers of this country and then COORDINATING with the media and the opposition party to bring him down.

Priorities man. Priorities. Not even a Trump fan. If holdover Intel Imbeds in the Intel area did these things to punk OBAMA as he ran and got elected --- there'd Still be riots and blood in the streets. But you got the heavy artillery of the MSMedia on your side. Only reason you don't know shit about the seriousness of the situation...You've been kept in the dark and FED daily shit about Bunnies and porn stars and Omarosa.. Like GOOD mushrooms..,.

Clearly I disagree. IMO Brennan is a patriot, and seeks to protect our democracy and its people from the "Evil Empire". There is no doubt in my mind that Russia attempted and succeeded in influencing our election by demeaning HRC, and supporting Trump.

The theory that Putin & his agents worded to have HRC lose is obvious; she was a hawk and stood up to Putin in his quest to expand Russia to its past empire.

The theory that Putin has something on Trump is very credible too, given Trump's money issues and lounge lizard behavior.

maga! Mueller ain't going anywhere, so none of us ought to pretend we know what his investigation will tell; one thing for sure, it maybe a "witch hunt" in Trump's mind, and the minds of his supporters, but I suspect several more warlocks will be found before the 2020 general election.

Holes in your scenario.

1. Russia's alleged actions were pretty minor. A few trolls and some leaked emails. Hardly the stuff to sway many votes.

2. Hillary was an heavy favorite. Given what everyone knew prior to the election, it would have been very unlikely that a few trolls and a few leaked emails could have effected the outcome. It is not likely that Putin would have considered that an achievable goal.


3. Putin does not have anything on Trump.

I don't consider hacking minor.

 

[toobfreak]

"Why?" The President is the Commander In Chief. He is like the CEO of your company. You have a problem with your boss, you maybe take it to him behind closed doors but you don't trash talk him before the entire world. That would get your ass CANNED in any job on the planet! All this jackal did was weaken the country he was supposed to serve. Disgraceful.

No. He is absolutely not like a CEO. And wait...are you saying Brennan is working for Trump? Or ever did?

Loyalty to Trump and loyalty to the country are two different things.

You guys pretend to glorify Trump for telling it like it is. Brennan told it like it is. Guess you don’t like that.

Brennan has lied about spying on Congress to the public and the media. And WORSE he marketed the phony as shit Hillary/Russian document to the public 2 weeks before the election as an official "intel document". His role in that will be proved to be seditious in short order. "Telling it like it is" my ass.. He can rant all he wants. Only reason he's on TV daily is because his ass is gonna get put into interrogation soon.

I love the way you on Left now LOVE the CIA operating domestically in the USA. You hypocrites have come a LONG way since you ENDED Domestic American spying and pranking by the Intel agencies in the 70s. Now they are your friendly political pitbull..

I love how you Little Trumpsters almost ejaculate accusing anyone who highlights Trump’s incompetence and dishonesty, but completely ignore Trump verified pathological lies.
You have zero credibility and live in the land of hypocrisy.

I think equating exaggerating the size of his audiences PALLS COMPLETELY in comparison to an organized by you own US Intel agencies to influence an election..

I can survive a politician or entreprenuer lying and exaggerating. What Brennan was part this country MIGHT NOT survive. Orders of magnitude more troubling to find a concerted effort to stymie an opposition candidate using the awesome Intel powers of this country and then COORDINATING with the media and the opposition party to bring him down.

Priorities man. Priorities. Not even a Trump fan. If holdover Intel Imbeds in the Intel area did these things to punk OBAMA as he ran and got elected --- there'd Still be riots and blood in the streets. But you got the heavy artillery of the MSMedia on your side. Only reason you don't know shit about the seriousness of the situation...You've been kept in the dark and FED daily shit about Bunnies and porn stars and Omarosa.. Like GOOD mushrooms..,.

<snip> There is no doubt in my mind that Russia attempted and succeeded in influencing our election by demeaning HRC, so none of us ought to pretend we know what his investigation will tell.

Let's get a few things straight, Wry-- -- when you say "there is no doubt in your mind," what you are actually saying is that you have no actual facts, and are merely /convinced/ of something based on exposure to the media-- -- a media with a vested interest in discrediting Trump. And are content with the conclusions given you.

• When you say: "influencing our election by demeaning HRC," I understand some money was spent saying unflattering things about Hillary in Facebook and there appears to be ties to those ads to Russia, but I read 10,000 unflattering and demeaning things written here against Trump every week-- -- yet I agree to only allow these statements influence my perception of him-- -- or Hillary, as far as I agree to let them. Put another way, just because something was printed demeaning Hillary, that doesn't mean that the limited number of people who actually read that crap on Facebook TOOK it in a demeaning way! People EXPECT to read demeaning stuff of candidates during elections, so much so that most of us tune most of it out. And that totally ignores the fact that an UNPRECEDENTED amount of demeaning things were said against Trump the WORLD OVER, perhaps a RECORD AMOUNT, on television, radio, live, in newspapers, magazines, the internet and websites; far FAR more said against Trump than ever was said against Hillary! Why do you count that little said against Hillary more so than the MOUNTAINS said against Trump? Had Hillary won, would you be championing a recount of the votes on the basis that Trump was unfairly biased against by all the attacks against him? (of course not)

• Indeed, she had an OVERWHELMING amount of the media fighting in SUPPORT of her! So when I reads people argue that she lost because of a few obscure ads run in Facebook-- -- REGARDLESS of WHO was behind their authorship-- -- all I see is SNOWFLAKE WHINING TEARS AND EXCUSES.

• Fact is that had Trump not had so much unfair press and likely illegal and criminal efforts made by half of Obama's team trying to thwart him on top of continued obstruction of voter ID, Trump likely-- -- very likely, would have easily won the popular vote as well. And we all know that had Trump lost, you couldn't give a shit about whether all the tons of seedy and crooked stuff done against him had "influenced" the election. There were 10,000 things done to influence people's votes -- -- BILLIONS of dollars spent -- -- and those Facebook ads were a DROP IN THE BUCKET.

• And lastly: you start out admitting a media bias as to your "lack of doubt" (credibility in what you CHOOSE to believe), then conclude your statement by lecturing us that none of us should "pretend we know what his investigation will tell," all the while CONSTANTLY pretending you already know! In your statements about where Mueller is going or isn't, about the impact of Facebook ads, and so on. We're honestly sick and tired of your infantile whining.

 

[toobfreak]

Brennan has lied about spying on Congress to the public and the media. And WORSE he marketed the phony as shit Hillary/Russian document to the public 2 weeks before the election as an official "intel document". His role in that will be proved to be seditious in short order. "Telling it like it is" my ass.. He can rant all he wants. Only reason he's on TV daily is because his ass is gonna get put into interrogation soon.

I love the way you on Left now LOVE the CIA operating domestically in the USA. You hypocrites have come a LONG way since you ENDED Domestic American spying and pranking by the Intel agencies in the 70s. Now they are your friendly political pitbull..

I love how you Little Trumpsters almost ejaculate accusing anyone who highlights Trump’s incompetence and dishonesty, but completely ignore Trump verified pathological lies.
You have zero credibility and live in the land of hypocrisy.

I think equating exaggerating the size of his audiences PALLS COMPLETELY in comparison to an organized by you own US Intel agencies to influence an election..

I can survive a politician or entreprenuer lying and exaggerating. What Brennan was part this country MIGHT NOT survive. Orders of magnitude more troubling to find a concerted effort to stymie an opposition candidate using the awesome Intel powers of this country and then COORDINATING with the media and the opposition party to bring him down.

Priorities man. Priorities. Not even a Trump fan. If holdover Intel Imbeds in the Intel area did these things to punk OBAMA as he ran and got elected --- there'd Still be riots and blood in the streets. But you got the heavy artillery of the MSMedia on your side. Only reason you don't know shit about the seriousness of the situation...You've been kept in the dark and FED daily shit about Bunnies and porn stars and Omarosa.. Like GOOD mushrooms..,.

Clearly I disagree. IMO Brennan is a patriot, and seeks to protect our democracy and its people from the "Evil Empire". There is no doubt in my mind that Russia attempted and succeeded in influencing our election by demeaning HRC, and supporting Trump.

The theory that Putin & his agents worded to have HRC lose is obvious; she was a hawk and stood up to Putin in his quest to expand Russia to its past empire.

The theory that Putin has something on Trump is very credible too, given Trump's money issues and lounge lizard behavior.

maga! Mueller ain't going anywhere, so none of us ought to pretend we know what his investigation will tell; one thing for sure, it maybe a "witch hunt" in Trump's mind, and the minds of his supporters, but I suspect several more warlocks will be found before the 2020 general election.

Holes in your scenario.

1. Russia's alleged actions were pretty minor. A few trolls and some leaked emails. Hardly the stuff to sway many votes.

2. Hillary was an heavy favorite. Given what everyone knew prior to the election, it would have been very unlikely that a few trolls and a few leaked emails could have effected the outcome. It is not likely that Putin would have considered that an achievable goal.


3. Putin does not have anything on Trump.

I don't consider hacking minor.

You would had Hillary won. Minor, and JUSTIFIED?

 

[Coyote]

I love how you Little Trumpsters almost ejaculate accusing anyone who highlights Trump’s incompetence and dishonesty, but completely ignore Trump verified pathological lies.
You have zero credibility and live in the land of hypocrisy.

I think equating exaggerating the size of his audiences PALLS COMPLETELY in comparison to an organized by you own US Intel agencies to influence an election..

I can survive a politician or entreprenuer lying and exaggerating. What Brennan was part this country MIGHT NOT survive. Orders of magnitude more troubling to find a concerted effort to stymie an opposition candidate using the awesome Intel powers of this country and then COORDINATING with the media and the opposition party to bring him down.

Priorities man. Priorities. Not even a Trump fan. If holdover Intel Imbeds in the Intel area did these things to punk OBAMA as he ran and got elected --- there'd Still be riots and blood in the streets. But you got the heavy artillery of the MSMedia on your side. Only reason you don't know shit about the seriousness of the situation...You've been kept in the dark and FED daily shit about Bunnies and porn stars and Omarosa.. Like GOOD mushrooms..,.

Clearly I disagree. IMO Brennan is a patriot, and seeks to protect our democracy and its people from the "Evil Empire". There is no doubt in my mind that Russia attempted and succeeded in influencing our election by demeaning HRC, and supporting Trump.

The theory that Putin & his agents worded to have HRC lose is obvious; she was a hawk and stood up to Putin in his quest to expand Russia to its past empire.

The theory that Putin has something on Trump is very credible too, given Trump's money issues and lounge lizard behavior.

maga! Mueller ain't going anywhere, so none of us ought to pretend we know what his investigation will tell; one thing for sure, it maybe a "witch hunt" in Trump's mind, and the minds of his supporters, but I suspect several more warlocks will be found before the 2020 general election.

Holes in your scenario.

1. Russia's alleged actions were pretty minor. A few trolls and some leaked emails. Hardly the stuff to sway many votes.

2. Hillary was an heavy favorite. Given what everyone knew prior to the election, it would have been very unlikely that a few trolls and a few leaked emails could have effected the outcome. It is not likely that Putin would have considered that an achievable goal.


3. Putin does not have anything on Trump.

I don't consider hacking minor.

You would had Hillary won. Minor, and JUSTIFIED?

Huh?

No.

I would not.

 

[edward37]

Can I give my opinion that Trump is a vile bully unfit for office ?? I'd like to make it informed but haven't the time or inclination to do so

This isn't Obama's Regime, you are free to speak. We are under Trump, freedom for all.

And the pos can call Manafort a good man letting him know if he keeps his mouth shut he gets a pardon???

 

[deanrd]

60 more ex-CIA officials criticize Trump for yanking John Brennan's clearance

What kind of a job do you think our intelligence agencies are doing right now to protect this country with Trump as Commander in Chief?

They are his eyes and ears

Hard to understand why Trump would want to destroy his intelligence community......unless he trusts Putin more

I believe he trusts Putin more.

I really do.

 

[Flopper]

And what was that interference?

Did they hack the system? No, did they change any votes? No (that is according to the intelligence agencies).

So what did they really do? The same thing the far left propaganda press did?

What was the interference?

And if there was any real collusion it would have leaked long ago.

We already know what the Russians did on social media. We haven't heard from the investigation yet on the rest. Not knowing yet doesn't mean nothing happened. It means we don't know yet because Mueller hasn't reported on it yet.

So.....are you at all worried about the Huber investigation?

No.

Oh c'mon.....that was pretty good.

Trump has revoked the security clearance of a guy who served this country for decades. I'm no huge fan of the CIA but I don't think they take sides and try to put one candidate or another into office. That's just crazy talk. Yet that seems to be about the only defense the Trumpsters have for this one. That Brennan and all his employees are corrupt deep staters who are attempting to pull down the President.
If anyone is criticizing the President, it is because he is acting like a two bit tin pot dictator and he DESERVES to be criticized. I think Brennan gets a little carried away some times--he almost sounds like a Democratic senator at times--but as an analyst, he has a right to voice his understanding of the President's actions. He has been punished for that with an unprecedented abuse of power by Trump because -- he admits -- Brennan was involved in beginning the Russia investigation. Yeah, imagine the Director of the CIA having anything to do with looking into a known Russian hack into the DNC and the leak of Clinton's emails to wikileaks. How dare he, huh?
To me, this is just madness.

And Sarah Sanders on Wednesday, said Trump took away the courtesy of allowing a former administration official to retain security clearance because it has been "outweighed by the risk posed by his erratic conduct and behavior." Apparently criticizing the president is now erratic conduct.

The only erratic behavior is that of the president as the Mueller noose begins to tighten.

 

[Flopper]

We already know what the Russians did on social media. We haven't heard from the investigation yet on the rest. Not knowing yet doesn't mean nothing happened. It means we don't know yet because Mueller hasn't reported on it yet.

So.....are you at all worried about the Huber investigation?

No.

Oh c'mon.....that was pretty good.

Trump has revoked the security clearance of a guy who served this country for decades. I'm no huge fan of the CIA but I don't think they take sides and try to put one candidate or another into office. That's just crazy talk. Yet that seems to be about the only defense the Trumpsters have for this one. That Brennan and all his employees are corrupt deep staters who are attempting to pull down the President.
If anyone is criticizing the President, it is because he is acting like a two bit tin pot dictator and he DESERVES to be criticized. I think Brennan gets a little carried away some times--he almost sounds like a Democratic senator at times--but as an analyst, he has a right to voice his understanding of the President's actions. He has been punished for that with an unprecedented abuse of power by Trump because -- he admits -- Brennan was involved in beginning the Russia investigation. Yeah, imagine the Director of the CIA having anything to do with looking into a known Russian hack into the DNC and the leak of Clinton's emails to wikileaks. How dare he, huh?
To me, this is just madness.

I've already shown that Brennan spied on the Senate Intelligence Committee and that he hacked the computers of reporters. He LIED to Congress during his hearings. Brennan is a hack who in the end will get what he deserves.

re you worried at all about the Huber investigation?

But that had no barring on Trump revoking his security clearance. It was erratic conduct, (criticizing the president). Apparently, that made him unfit to consult with other Intelligence officials.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

No matter how Trump apologists and conservatives try to twist this, no matter their lies and spin – the fact remains that Trump is attempting to intimidate and silence those engaged in appropriate, warranted, and accurate criticism of Trump; what Trump is doing is wrong, reckless, and irresponsible.

 

[beagle9]

No matter how Trump apologists and conservatives try to twist this, no matter their lies and spin – the fact remains that Trump is attempting to intimidate and silence those engaged in appropriate, warranted, and accurate criticism of Trump; what Trump is doing is wrong, reckless, and irresponsible.

Good grief, seriously ??? You discard all the vile attacks by the left on Trump and his family, and then spew your biased bullcrap as if Trump is the only one guilty of slinging it in the room ??? Get help.

 

[Flopper]

No matter how Trump apologists and conservatives try to twist this, no matter their lies and spin – the fact remains that Trump is attempting to intimidate and silence those engaged in appropriate, warranted, and accurate criticism of Trump; what Trump is doing is wrong, reckless, and irresponsible.

So true. Trump can't even come up with any valid reason for his actions. How can a nut like Trump accuse these people of erratic behavior, talk about calling the kettle black.

 

[DrLove]

Brennan needs the needle. He is every bit as much a traitor as McVeigh was.

THIS statement ^ qualifies as fucking TREASON - AKA providing aide and comfort to the enemy.
REAL Americans will be happy to buy you a one way ticket to Moscow -
PACK YOUR BAGS

You're an imbecile. Contradicting Dim party dogma is not treason.

Oh really?

Brennan needs the needle. He is every bit as much a traitor as McVeigh was.

You want to give a man the needle who has served under 3 R and two D presidents, oversaw the killing of bin Ladan, did little if anything political while in government and now as a private citizen voices his concerns over a runaway autocrat president - An then you compare him to McVeigh

You have redefined imbecilic angry little man.

 

[Rustic]

...and still no Russian connection

 

[danielpalos]

...i guess only the left can command economize our command economy to prosperity!

 

[Rustic]

...i guess only the left can command economize our command economy to prosperity!

Lol
That’s the blind leading the blind

 

[Wry Catcher]

How about posting two more sources, that's what a MSM journalist/reporter would be told by their editor before broadcast or publication.

For the Reader:

Judicial Watch - Media Bias/Fact Check

From the LINK:

Bias: Extreme Right, Conspiracy, Propaganda

History

Founded in 1994 by Larry Klayman, Judicial Watch (JW) is an American conservative activist group that files Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to investigate alleged misconduct by government officials. They primarily target Democrats such as the Clinton’s, Obama and climate scientists as they label climate science, “fraud science.” Judicial Watch has made numerous false and unsubstantiated claims, with a “vast majority” of their lawsuits dismissed. They describe themselves as “a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.” The current President of JW is Tom Fitton.

You insist that eagle1462010 post two sources to support his claims, and then you post one source to support yours.

How beautifully liberal!

I perused 14 pages, in 90% of the comments were by Judicial Watch. Reading the front page in the link provided was clear and convincing to me that the JW is a Right Wing Propaganda Machine.

My question is this, is JW funded by President Putin? It's the type of tabloid one might see in a Supermarket Line.

We know you believe the truth to be a Russian plot.

I believe that is true, we were attacked and Putin wanted Trump to be elected POTUS.

You don't believe that, and I wouldn't waste my time trying to convince you. I also believe enough evidence has been uncovered to prove a conspiracy between Russian agents and Trump's insiders to impact our election. Maybe The President knew, maybe he did not, but as a patriot I want to know, and Mueller ain't going away (MAGA).

He should read "house of trump house of Putin " and all the money coming to trump after he was 4 billion in the hole

Thank you, here is a review of "House of Trump House of Putin" for those interested. The willfully ignorant are now invited to push the funny button:

Review | Signs of Trump-Putin collaboration, starting years before the campaign?

 

[AsherN]

Back in 2013, when Obama broached the subject, Clapper said: "When it is determined that access to classified information is no longer required, the department or agency shall terminate such access and debrief the individual."

Yes, access.

One more time, because it seems to be a hard concept to understand

Clearance does not equal access.

 

[AsherN]

He's retired, he doesn't need clearance, revoke it

Are you going to revoke clearance on EVERY soldier who leaves the military?

It will prevent them from getting jobs once they enter the civilian workforce

For most military, clearance is revoked immediately upon separation. My son had a top secret clearance. It was gone on his last day. I worked on an air force project. I had a secret clearance. It was gone the second the project was over and I handed in my ID badge.

Did you really think that every soldier retains that clearance?

For up to 2 years, yes. What you lose immediately is access. The clearance is still valid. So you can walk into another job requiring that level of clearance and not haveto go through the whole investigation again.