Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
when a dem/lib makes an accusation/statement, it is intelligently phrased as an opinion.
when a troglodyte republican/neocon makes an accusation, it is inaccurately phrased as a fact.
it's all about basic intelligence and understanding the colorful and nuanced nature of our language. Some people use words like an artist uses paint.... some people use words like a housepainter uses paint.
Dividing it up along ethnic lines would NOT be tyrannical. In fact, that is what the British and the French should have done in the first place when they created those countries. Same with Africa. Instead, they had tribes and ideologies that were always going to bash heads. If they had been divided up along ethnic/tribal/religious lines in the first place, there would have been nowhere near the amount of bloodshed there has been. Nothing liberal about it.
Isnt that just sooo typical for a liberal. SCREAM that we have no business being over there, then say how their idea to be there and divide it up is so great.
Isn't that so typical of a dumbass; to put words into somebody's mouth....
when a dem/lib makes an accusation/statement, it is intelligently phrased as an opinion.
when a troglodyte republican/neocon makes an accusation, it is inaccurately phrased as a fact.
it's all about basic intelligence and understanding the colorful and nuanced nature of our language. Some people use words like an artist uses paint.... some people use words like a housepainter uses paint.
A stable Iraqi government is not a US MILITARY goal, anymore than fixing your fucked up looking face is the goal of your podiatrist. The short term US military goal is to stamp down sectarian violence so that Iraqis can attempt to reach THEIR goal of a stable Iraqi government. The long term US military goal is to train the Iraqi security forces to keep that sectarian violence stamped down so we can get out of there. While the US military is succeeding in its goals, the Iraqi people are not. Democrats are suggesting that there be some sort of time limit as to how long we will continue to babysit the Iraqi sectarian intransigence and ascertain that, at some point, it is the Iraqi's problem and none of our own.
And for you to suggest that politics trumps sectarian differences and apply the example of American Christians as some sort of proof that similar priorities are in play with muslims in Iraq or anywhere else in the middle east only serves to glaringly highlight your profound ignorance concerning the area and the religion.
and it was grump who brought up Bush's drunkeness, not me. And Teddy is - and will always be - irrelevant to the discussion of the ineptitude of our current commander in chief.
Once again you have resorted to personal insults, and have no substantive reply to the issues raised, both clear indications that you have lost the debate.
When did I say that kennedy was guilty of murder?Yeah, you did. You have now decided that Kennedy is guilty of murder. Therefore you have changed the definition because his actions never met the definition...thanks for playing!
Its called "freedom of speech".Not at all. Nothing to do with a trantrum or even close. Just wondering why you think you have the right to call into question somebody's bonafides when you are unwilling to put yours on the line
Conclusion:when a dem/lib makes an accusation/statement, it is intelligently phrased as an opinion.
Conclusion:when a troglodyte republican/neocon makes an accusation, it is inaccurately phrased as a fact.
Once again you have resorted to personal insults, and have no substantive reply to the issues raised, both clear indications that you have lost the debate.
Standard fare for some. Maineman thinks he can force responses along HIS chosen schematic and he always is dismissive of anyone that disagrees with him. He resorts to personal attacks out of the chute and plays the " I am so smart you haven't a chance" card the whole time.
By the way don't insult him back or you will be told just how rude that is and how unacceptable such tactics are when used by anyone except Maineman.
He isn't alone though, it is a basic staple of all liberals. They are after all our Intellectual Superiors and are just astounded we can't see that they just want to order us about for our own good. And of course laws are meant to protect US, not to impede their efforts, so when they ignore, avoid or abuse them, it is simply because they are our betters after all.
and I see that you are joining your little buddy glock in ignoring the content of the post and pulling the righteous indignation act as a sleight of hand trick to attempt to get everyone to forget about what was said.
You can and have insulted me and belittled my service and the knowledge I gained whilst performing it for months now.... but that is fine with me.
And I am your intellectual superior on only a few specific areas of inquiry. I am sure that there are a whole host of things that you know a lot more about than I do. As a matter of practice, I would not enter into a debate with you about those issues. Do you ever wonder how cordial our relationship might have been if you had followed a similar protocol?
Of course you are! You say so yourself!!And I am your intellectual superior on only a few specific areas of inquiry.
You mean like calling people 'fucking assholes'?Do you ever wonder how cordial our relationship might have been if you had followed a similar protocol?
There ya go again. Setting up a strawman argument and then insisting your poor behavior and antics are not your fault but everyone else's.
not so...I take full responsibility for every word I type.
I only posed a rhetorical question. Certainly, we will never be able to go back in time and figure out how we would have interacted had you not suggested that my service in Lebanon made me no more knowledgeable about the political dynamics of Islam that you....because you did suggest precisely that.
and then you whine when I am less than flattering to you - or your buddies.
::yawn::
In other words you can not handle having someone tell you your opinion is no more important than any others. Talk about whining and crying. You not I have made repeated claims others opinions mean nothing because your so much smarter then them.
Standard fare for some. Maineman thinks he can force responses along HIS chosen schematic and he always is dismissive of anyone that disagrees with him. He resorts to personal attacks out of the chute and plays the " I am so smart you haven't a chance" card the whole time.
By the way don't insult him back or you will be told just how rude that is and how unacceptable such tactics are when used by anyone except Maineman.
He isn't alone though, it is a basic staple of all liberals. They are after all our Intellectual Superiors and are just astounded we can't see that they just want to order us about for our own good. And of course laws are meant to protect US, not to impede their efforts, so when they ignore, avoid or abuse them, it is simply because they are our betters after all.
