Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No need to prove the obviousNo but that's what you want to be said .also false !False!
Since you shown none, you have none. A definition is not proof.
In North Charleston, Jim Crow lives on in routine traffic stops, residents say
Are you saying that's proof for the entire state and everyone in it? That would be false.
If you claim not to be one . You're lying
If you claim that I am, you must prove it for the claim to be valid. You've provided no proof, therefore, your claim is dismissed for lack of evidence.
No need to prove the obviousNo but that's what you want to be said .also false !Since you shown none, you have none. A definition is not proof.
In North Charleston, Jim Crow lives on in routine traffic stops, residents say
Are you saying that's proof for the entire state and everyone in it? That would be false.
If you claim not to be one . You're lying
If you claim that I am, you must prove it for the claim to be valid. You've provided no proof, therefore, your claim is dismissed for lack of evidence.
It's selfevident.
For someone who claims never to have done nothing stupid or wrong you have the criminal dodge wired
It's based on real life experiences .
What do you expect a bunch of people whose automatic assumption anytime a white person in authority says something to them is to claim "the only reason you (fill in the blank) to me is because I'm black"?
Subjective and evading.No need to prove the obviousNo but that's what you want to be said .
Are you saying that's proof for the entire state and everyone in it? That would be false.
If you claim not to be one . You're lying
If you claim that I am, you must prove it for the claim to be valid. You've provided no proof, therefore, your claim is dismissed for lack of evidence.
It's selfevident.
For someone who claims never to have done nothing stupid or wrong you have the criminal dodge wired
To whom, you? A housebreaker has already proven he can't be trusted.
As far as the doing something stupid claim you made, you still haven't proven it. You call that I disagree with your claim as proof of your claim. Not how it works.
It's based on real life experiences .
What do you expect a bunch of people whose automatic assumption anytime a white person in authority says something to them is to claim "the only reason you (fill in the blank) to me is because I'm black"?
I've seen it first hand .
If you claim race doesn't count , then why would the race of the person or persons matter?
Subjective and evading.No need to prove the obviousNo but that's what you want to be said .Are you saying that's proof for the entire state and everyone in it? That would be false.
If you claim not to be one . You're lying
If you claim that I am, you must prove it for the claim to be valid. You've provided no proof, therefore, your claim is dismissed for lack of evidence.
It's selfevident.
For someone who claims never to have done nothing stupid or wrong you have the criminal dodge wired
To whom, you? A housebreaker has already proven he can't be trusted.
As far as the doing something stupid claim you made, you still haven't proven it. You call that I disagree with your claim as proof of your claim. Not how it works.
Dodge!It's based on real life experiences .
What do you expect a bunch of people whose automatic assumption anytime a white person in authority says something to them is to claim "the only reason you (fill in the blank) to me is because I'm black"?
I've seen it first hand .
If you claim race doesn't count , then why would the race of the person or persons matter?
Do you have video of your claimed experiences?
False! it's proof of my honesty.it's also not objective proof .Subjective and evading.No need to prove the obviousNo but that's what you want to be said .
If you claim not to be one . You're lying
If you claim that I am, you must prove it for the claim to be valid. You've provided no proof, therefore, your claim is dismissed for lack of evidence.
It's selfevident.
For someone who claims never to have done nothing stupid or wrong you have the criminal dodge wired
To whom, you? A housebreaker has already proven he can't be trusted.
As far as the doing something stupid claim you made, you still haven't proven it. You call that I disagree with your claim as proof of your claim. Not how it works.
You admitted to breaking into a house. That's proof you can't be trusted. Objective proof.
Still no objective evidence to support your claim I've done something stupid? Just one?
What? I don't need to know the exact % to know black communities have higher crime rates than ours. ...Here's why I feel bad. I'm here in a laundromat doing my blankets. Lots of nice blacks Hispanics and Muslims not bothering anyone. Lovely.It doesn't matter if you're a saint. Your political philosophy is wackSays the one that makes claims he's sure of then can't provide one bit of evidence to back it up. Because you did stupid things doesn't mean I did. You stated you broke into someone else's house. Are you claiming that wasn't stupid?
Wack? Lol! You are dating yourself.
If 95% of white society is good, so is 91% of black society. Of course I'm making up the percentages but you get the point. And while I understand being born into poverty isn't fair it is also within their own abilities to get their numbers up to our levels.
I'll keep saying it even though it sounds like eugenics but in the future hopefully parents won't be as ignorant as some of these dindu people would stop having children. Having kids is a big responsibility and if your kids a burglar you got him killed by not teaching him right. That person should have never had that child. It's one reason I favor abortion. I want abortion to be an option for dindos
If you're making up the percentages, you have no point.
Give them a coat hanger.
St. Con. LolNo need to prove the obviousNo but that's what you want to be said .
Are you saying that's proof for the entire state and everyone in it? That would be false.
If you claim not to be one . You're lying
If you claim that I am, you must prove it for the claim to be valid. You've provided no proof, therefore, your claim is dismissed for lack of evidence.
It's selfevident.
For someone who claims never to have done nothing stupid or wrong you have the criminal dodge wired
To whom, you? A housebreaker has already proven he can't be trusted.
As far as the doing something stupid claim you made, you still haven't proven it. You call that I disagree with your claim as proof of your claim. Not how it works.
Usually if you find out enough these hypocrites always expose their hypocrisyFalse! it's proof of my honesty.it's also not objective proof .Subjective and evading.No need to prove the obviousIf you claim that I am, you must prove it for the claim to be valid. You've provided no proof, therefore, your claim is dismissed for lack of evidence.
It's selfevident.
For someone who claims never to have done nothing stupid or wrong you have the criminal dodge wired
To whom, you? A housebreaker has already proven he can't be trusted.
As far as the doing something stupid claim you made, you still haven't proven it. You call that I disagree with your claim as proof of your claim. Not how it works.
You admitted to breaking into a house. That's proof you can't be trusted. Objective proof.
Still no objective evidence to support your claim I've done something stupid? Just one?
Your claim of not to be trusted is about as subjective as is possible.
I've already provided objective proof of your stupidity, you are alive (technically anyway)
St. Con. LolNo need to prove the obviousNo but that's what you want to be said .Are you saying that's proof for the entire state and everyone in it? That would be false.
If you claim not to be one . You're lying
If you claim that I am, you must prove it for the claim to be valid. You've provided no proof, therefore, your claim is dismissed for lack of evidence.
It's selfevident.
For someone who claims never to have done nothing stupid or wrong you have the criminal dodge wired
To whom, you? A housebreaker has already proven he can't be trusted.
As far as the doing something stupid claim you made, you still haven't proven it. You call that I disagree with your claim as proof of your claim. Not how it works.
As kids we went into neighbors garage refrigerators and took beers. ....
Like you never did anything wrong or stupid either.St. Con. LolNo need to prove the obviousNo but that's what you want to be said .
If you claim not to be one . You're lying
If you claim that I am, you must prove it for the claim to be valid. You've provided no proof, therefore, your claim is dismissed for lack of evidence.
It's selfevident.
For someone who claims never to have done nothing stupid or wrong you have the criminal dodge wired
To whom, you? A housebreaker has already proven he can't be trusted.
As far as the doing something stupid claim you made, you still haven't proven it. You call that I disagree with your claim as proof of your claim. Not how it works.
As kids we went into neighbors garage refrigerators and took beers. ....
Figures you were a scumbag even then.
Like you never did anything wrong or stupid either.St. Con. LolNo need to prove the obviousIf you claim that I am, you must prove it for the claim to be valid. You've provided no proof, therefore, your claim is dismissed for lack of evidence.
It's selfevident.
For someone who claims never to have done nothing stupid or wrong you have the criminal dodge wired
To whom, you? A housebreaker has already proven he can't be trusted.
As far as the doing something stupid claim you made, you still haven't proven it. You call that I disagree with your claim as proof of your claim. Not how it works.
As kids we went into neighbors garage refrigerators and took beers. ....
Figures you were a scumbag even then.
Rationalizing.Like you never did anything wrong or stupid either.St. Con. LolNo need to prove the obvious
It's selfevident.
For someone who claims never to have done nothing stupid or wrong you have the criminal dodge wired
To whom, you? A housebreaker has already proven he can't be trusted.
As far as the doing something stupid claim you made, you still haven't proven it. You call that I disagree with your claim as proof of your claim. Not how it works.
As kids we went into neighbors garage refrigerators and took beers. ....
Figures you were a scumbag even then.
breaking into neighbor's homes and stealing from them? No.
Rationalizing.Like you never did anything wrong or stupid either.St. Con. LolTo whom, you? A housebreaker has already proven he can't be trusted.
As far as the doing something stupid claim you made, you still haven't proven it. You call that I disagree with your claim as proof of your claim. Not how it works.
As kids we went into neighbors garage refrigerators and took beers. ....
Figures you were a scumbag even then.
breaking into neighbor's homes and stealing from them? No.
Simply you are rationalizing that because you didn't do a certain kind bad act you are some how less guilty of the stupid shit you've done.Rationalizing.Like you never did anything wrong or stupid either.St. Con. Lol
As kids we went into neighbors garage refrigerators and took beers. ....
Figures you were a scumbag even then.
breaking into neighbor's homes and stealing from them? No.
How so?
Simply you are rationalizing that because you didn't do a certain kind bad act you are some how less guilty of the stupid shit you've done.Rationalizing.Like you never did anything wrong or stupid either.Figures you were a scumbag even then.
breaking into neighbor's homes and stealing from them? No.
How so?
I never understood that kind of scaling
False the issue s you are talking about are false equivalentsSimply you are rationalizing that because you didn't do a certain kind bad act you are some how less guilty of the stupid shit you've done.Rationalizing.Like you never did anything wrong or stupid either.
breaking into neighbor's homes and stealing from them? No.
How so?
I never understood that kind of scaling
You can't understand how killing someone is different than spitting on the sidewalk? How doing 70 in a 55 zone is different than arson? Are you really so devoid of critical thinking skills?
