2016 Election Prediction Thread

[kaz]

So you want more and more government, which you say is controlled by money. Liar, you don't believe congress is controlled by money, if you did, you'd want less government, not more.

She wants more Democrats elected and more rich people thrown in jail.

Ah, so she doesn't think congress is controlled by money, she just thinks Republicans are... I knew that, I just wanted her to say it. Democrats of course don't do anything for the money that flows in to their coffers you know. LOL, yeah.

GOP money flows from those nasty Koch Brothers and those racist sexist Chik-Fil-A people.
Democrat money comes pure as the driven snow.

Yes, Soros just cares about people. As do the unions that fill Democrat coffers. They aren't in it for any personal gain.

So how do you feel about the news that Soros is teaming up with one of the Koch brothers?

Republicans and Democrats, Tweedledum and Tweedledee, what difference does it make?

 

[JimH52]

Hillary will run, if her health holds.

Whether she can beat Jeb or Chris or Rand will be the problem. Anyone else she and she will take 55% of the vote.

She's not even getting the nomination

It is hers if she wants it. Warren and Webb in the wings. Bush will get the GOP nod and will have the far right turn their back on him. GOP loses again.

Warren isn't even on most people's radar

Neither was Obama.

and here you parade around your ignorance. in January 2007?

Hillary will run, if her health holds.

Whether she can beat Jeb or Chris or Rand will be the problem. Anyone else she and she will take 55% of the vote.

She's not even getting the nomination

It is hers if she wants it. Warren and Webb in the wings. Bush will get the GOP nod and will have the far right turn their back on him. GOP loses again.

Warren isn't even on most people's radar

Neither was Obama.

and here you parade around your ignorance. in January 2007?

Obama hijacked the election from Hillary. We all know that. Stop waking up in the morning looking for your stupid pill.

 

[JimH52]

Bush v Clinton again.....same results

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

She's not even getting the nomination

It is hers if she wants it. Warren and Webb in the wings. Bush will get the GOP nod and will have the far right turn their back on him. GOP loses again.

Warren isn't even on most people's radar

Neither was Obama.

and here you parade around your ignorance. in January 2007?

She's not even getting the nomination

It is hers if she wants it. Warren and Webb in the wings. Bush will get the GOP nod and will have the far right turn their back on him. GOP loses again.

Warren isn't even on most people's radar

Neither was Obama.

and here you parade around your ignorance. in January 2007?

Obama hijacked the election from Hillary. We all know that. Stop waking up in the morning looking for your stupid pill.

Hello? posting "Obama hijacked the election from Hillary" does not refute anything posted previously. Obama was not under the radar of most people as Warren is now. Dante posted a news article to prove this. There are many others.

take a break from posting. your memory has deteriorated to the point of embarrassment

 

[Faun]

Palin is a big part of the reason why McCain lost to President Obama by 7.26% in 2008.

Poll after poll after poll showed that once here true stupidity was revealed, far more than 2/3 of most polling respondents did not want to have her as VP, fearing what damage she could do were McCain to croak in office.

Enjoy your weird fantasies, sheygetz.

McCain lost because of McCain. You suck at political analysis.

Actually, no. You are way out of your league, here, and have no idea how much data flowed that showed that Palin sunk and already damaged ship.

You are right, McCain was campaigning in grocery stores when Palin came along and gave him a slight bump. Crowds were nowhere near Obama's but she did okay until she started doing interviews. People began to think about McCain's age and her being first in line of succession and attitudes toward her changed in a big hurry.

Absolutely correct. The 10 latest polls leading up to McCain announcing Palin as his running mate, Obama lead McCain by an average of just 2.2 percentage points. Compare that to the last 10 polls taken just one month later ... Obama's lead stretched to an average of 5.3 points.

Only the truly brain dead thinks that Palin didn't sink McCain.

and as I just wrote, as soon as Princess Statalina is soundly snoozing, I will present ALL of the data, and let the fake Rabbi turn to a pile of goo.

According to CNN/ORC, John McCain's favorability rating remained unchanged at 61% between 8.8.2008 and 11.9.2008. Compared to Palin who fell from 57% to 49% during that same period.

Crazy Palin sunk McCain.

 

[Statistikhengst]

It's not she didn't interview well. It's that her knowledge base, a base of things to know that are absolutely essential for any pol running for high office, had more holes than swiss cheese. A Republican Vice-Presidential candidate who had know idea what the "Bush Doctrine" was, when even the sitting President of her own Party clearly enumerated it and there was considerable press buzz about it? Please, that is absolutely bottom of the barrel.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

Remind me how Obama got grilled on foreign policy in 2008. Yeah, he didnt.

He did interviews with O'Reilly twice, Chris Wallace, and Bret Baer.

He did no interviews with MSNBC.

So who failed to ask him about foreign policy?

I agree. The press was complicit in covering up his incompetence and painting him into the SuperNegro.

It's always fun to watch you let your racist side hang out. Please carry one.

Still waiting for your blowout proof that McCain would have won without Palin.

I never said that McCain would have won without Palin. I said that she sunk his ship. There is a difference. This means that his margin of loss was WORSE with her on the ticket than it would have been had he picked a competent VP candidate. In five minutes, you will see why.

 

[JimH52]

It is hers if she wants it. Warren and Webb in the wings. Bush will get the GOP nod and will have the far right turn their back on him. GOP loses again.

Warren isn't even on most people's radar

Neither was Obama.

and here you parade around your ignorance. in January 2007?

It is hers if she wants it. Warren and Webb in the wings. Bush will get the GOP nod and will have the far right turn their back on him. GOP loses again.

Warren isn't even on most people's radar

Neither was Obama.

and here you parade around your ignorance. in January 2007?

Obama hijacked the election from Hillary. We all know that. Stop waking up in the morning looking for your stupid pill.

Hello? posting "Obama hijacked the election from Hillary" does not refute anything posted previously. Obama was not under the radar of most people as Warren is now. Dante posted a news article to prove this. There are many others.

take a break from posting. your memory has deteriorated to the point of embarrassment

Try using first person

McCain lost because of McCain. You suck at political analysis.

Actually, no. You are way out of your league, here, and have no idea how much data flowed that showed that Palin sunk and already damaged ship.

You are right, McCain was campaigning in grocery stores when Palin came along and gave him a slight bump. Crowds were nowhere near Obama's but she did okay until she started doing interviews. People began to think about McCain's age and her being first in line of succession and attitudes toward her changed in a big hurry.

Absolutely correct. The 10 latest polls leading up to McCain announcing Palin as his running mate, Obama lead McCain by an average of just 2.2 percentage points. Compare that to the last 10 polls taken just one month later ... Obama's lead stretched to an average of 5.3 points.

Only the truly brain dead thinks that Palin didn't sink McCain.

and as I just wrote, as soon as Princess Statalina is soundly snoozing, I will present ALL of the data, and let the fake Rabbi turn to a pile of goo.

According to CNN/ORC, John McCain's favorability rating remained unchanged at 61% between 8.8.2008 and 11.9.2008. Compared to Palin who fell from 57% to 49% during that same period.

Crazy Palin sunk McCain.

Yup, didn't take voters long to realize she was a loon. The recent family feud with neighbors proves her instability. Voters, all except the far right, saw her for what she is.

 

[Carib Gyal]

By my count: 4,896

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

You can't even count two to.

 

[The Rabbi]

Remind me how Obama got grilled on foreign policy in 2008. Yeah, he didnt.

He did interviews with O'Reilly twice, Chris Wallace, and Bret Baer.

He did no interviews with MSNBC.

So who failed to ask him about foreign policy?

I agree. The press was complicit in covering up his incompetence and painting him into the SuperNegro.

It's always fun to watch you let your racist side hang out. Please carry one.

Still waiting for your blowout proof that McCain would have won without Palin.

I never said that McCain would have won without Palin. I said that she sunk his ship. There is a difference. This means that his margin of loss was WORSE with her on the ticket than it would have been had he picked a competent VP candidate. In five minutes, you will see why.

Moving the goalposts and making impossible claims, Herr Shgutz.
It doesnt matter. In about an hour I'll be off line for 25 hours. And by that point no one will care about your bullshit.

 

[Statistikhengst]

So, fake Rabbi, enjoy your humble pie:

Point of Clarification - Sarah Palin 2008 GE US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Don't say I didn't warn you.

 

[Statistikhengst]

He did interviews with O'Reilly twice, Chris Wallace, and Bret Baer.

He did no interviews with MSNBC.

So who failed to ask him about foreign policy?

I agree. The press was complicit in covering up his incompetence and painting him into the SuperNegro.

It's always fun to watch you let your racist side hang out. Please carry one.

Still waiting for your blowout proof that McCain would have won without Palin.

I never said that McCain would have won without Palin. I said that she sunk his ship. There is a difference. This means that his margin of loss was WORSE with her on the ticket than it would have been had he picked a competent VP candidate. In five minutes, you will see why.

Moving the goalposts and making impossible claims, Herr Shgutz.
It doesnt matter. In about an hour I'll be off line for 25 hours. And by that point no one will care about your bullshit.

You won't have guts enought to read and realize what a fuckup you are.

 

[The Rabbi]

I agree. The press was complicit in covering up his incompetence and painting him into the SuperNegro.

It's always fun to watch you let your racist side hang out. Please carry one.

Still waiting for your blowout proof that McCain would have won without Palin.

I never said that McCain would have won without Palin. I said that she sunk his ship. There is a difference. This means that his margin of loss was WORSE with her on the ticket than it would have been had he picked a competent VP candidate. In five minutes, you will see why.

Moving the goalposts and making impossible claims, Herr Shgutz.
It doesnt matter. In about an hour I'll be off line for 25 hours. And by that point no one will care about your bullshit.

You won't have guts enought to read and realize what a fuckup you are.

Tough talk from a little man.
All your posts convince me you are all bark and no tree.

 

[The Rabbi]

So, fake Rabbi, enjoy your humble pie:

Point of Clarification - Sarah Palin 2008 GE US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Don't say I didn't warn you.

Wow the longest logical fallacy seen on this board.
I had no idea you were that talented, Herr Schvantzsucker.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Jeb bush will be the next President.

Andrew Cuomo will be the Democrat choice.

Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren will not even run.

 

[The Rabbi]

Jeb bush will be the next President.

Andrew Cuomo will be the Democrat choice.

Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren will not even run.

Few people mention Cuomo. I hope they run him. His obviously anti gun record will turn off half the voters in this country just for starters. His opposition to fracking--the most successful non-government economic policy this decade--will turn off another 25%. And of course he wont get the inner city Negroes to turn out en masse like Obama did, tipping the scales in key states.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

I never assume the voters think like me and go off what I feel at the moment. I believe Cuomo is a stronger candidate than Elizabeth Warren but any Democrat running will have a hard time winning unless they're facing someone like Ted Cruz.

So I figure Jeb will win and eight years of another Bush.

 

[Redfish]

Jeb bush will be the next President.

Andrew Cuomo will be the Democrat choice.

Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren will not even run.

Bush/Paul vs Cuomo/Warren ????????????????

 

[JimH52]

[/uQUOTE]
Moving the goalposts and making impossible claims, Herr Shgutz.
It doesnt matter. In about an hour[/QUOTE]

I never assume the voters think like me and go off what I feel at the moment. I believe Cuomo is a stronger candidate than Elizabeth Warren but any Democrat running will have a hard time winning unless they're facing someone like Ted Cruz.

So I figure Jeb will win and eight years of another Bush.

And another Bush recession? COOL!

 

[FA_Q2]

OK, try this insteadL
Hillary will not run as her negatives inside the Democrat Party are too great.
Dems will push Warren as Obama perfected. A Warren-Holder ticket will hit all the Dem strongpoints.
It will be utterly overwhelmed by a Walker-Cruz ticket, pitting the accomplished well spoken against the inexperienced radicals.

The GOP will work cleverly with dissident Dems, unhappy with their party's electoral performance, and come up with legislation that will easily get 2/3rds votes to override the veto, making Obama look like a blustering fool.

Wow.....I gotta hand it to you.....that seems like the most least likely scenario I've ever heard, and I'm impressed, because my worst fears are not as bad as that.

Were you joking?

It was every but as likely as yours.
At this point in 2008 if someone had said a one term junior senator from Illinois would be the next president he'd be laughed off the forum.
Lots can happen. Campaigns can blow up in 48 hours. Stars can emerge based on one dynamite performance.
Personally I think Obama will tip his hat to Deval Patrick and he will win the nomination. Dems have a winning formula. Why change?

I'm only thinking about the Cruz part of your ticket. I had forgotten about Walker actually being a viable candidate. Maybe a Walker/Rubio ticket...that might work. Ted Cruz though?...have you seen his national approval numbers with swing voters and Democrats?...they are the worst

And here is a possibility.

The worst thing the GOP can do is nominate Cruz and I wouldn't be surprised one bit if they managed to do it. Romney did get the last election though so perhaps the GOP will not go off the deep end.


Whoever runs on the republican side, I think the dems are going to take the next one with Hillary. its unfortunate - I cant think of anyone I would want to take the presidency less - but I think that is how things will eventually play out.

Nobody on the GOP side is within range of Hillary, and they've already done their worst to her publicity wize. They think Benghazi has weight, but it doesn't.

The fact is...IMO...that when the average Joe/Jane voter goes to the booth in Nov 2016...they'll have certain imagery in their heads......Hillary in the white house back in the 90's, when things were hunky dory, and her in the white house as Secretary of State...and that other guy.....

No one in range of Hillary at this point in time is totally irrelevant.

There is 2 years to get in range and it will happen, that is a given.

 

[JakeStarkey]

We have lost twice in a row because of the stance of the TPM and the The Rabbis.

Won't let it happen again. The far right is dead in the water with an engine of now power.