3/5 Of A Human Being

[Nosmo King]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

 

[danielpalos]

You know how the lying propagandists love to claim that the Founders didn't acknowledge the humanity of the slaves, and counted them as only 3/5 of a person for the census?

Of course, the truth is that the anti-slavers knew that the slave owners wanted to use the numbers to increase their political power in the Congress, and the abolitionists knew that if they did, slavery would never be abolished. So....the 3/5 compromise to get the union formed.



"Just three years after ratification, in the census of 1790, the numbers were determined according to the Constitution proscription of “adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years…three-fifths of all other Persons.”

Rather than this representing racial animus, this compromise prevented the South from having the representation to always outvote the North on the issue of slavery.

In 1790, the slave population of South Carolina was 77% of the white population. By 1820, slaves outnumbered whites, 265,000 to 237,000, and by 1860, 412,000 to 291,000. Georgia and Virginia, similarly."
Full text of "Heads of families at the first census of the United States taken in the year 1790 .."






Well......the Democrats are using the same plan, but now that they own the judiciary, they get their way:

"Judges halt plan to exclude unauthorized immigrants from count used to award seats in Congress"

Judges halt plan to exclude unauthorized immigrants from count used to award seats in Congress

Since the first census was taken, the U.S. has counted non-citizens for the purposes of awarding seats in the House of Representatives.

www.cbsnews.com

Why was it necessary......Obama just told them to go and vote: "When you vote, you're a citizen yourself."

One day i will understand you, then promptly jump

It's really easy to understand instead of allowing the slaveholding state unbalanced representation through slaves the actual representation number for slaves was reduced to 3/5th

3/5 of what?

Representation in the house of representatives

Slaves were not 3/5 of anything at the time

did slaves have voting rights before 1866?

How does 3/5 of a person go to the polls?

It was for Census purposes and representation in the House.

 

[danielpalos]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You know how the lying propagandists love to claim that the Founders didn't acknowledge the humanity of the slaves, and counted them as only 3/5 of a person for the census?

Of course, the truth is that the anti-slavers knew that the slave owners wanted to use the numbers to increase their political power in the Congress, and the abolitionists knew that if they did, slavery would never be abolished. So....the 3/5 compromise to get the union formed.



"Just three years after ratification, in the census of 1790, the numbers were determined according to the Constitution proscription of “adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years…three-fifths of all other Persons.”

Rather than this representing racial animus, this compromise prevented the South from having the representation to always outvote the North on the issue of slavery.

In 1790, the slave population of South Carolina was 77% of the white population. By 1820, slaves outnumbered whites, 265,000 to 237,000, and by 1860, 412,000 to 291,000. Georgia and Virginia, similarly."
Full text of "Heads of families at the first census of the United States taken in the year 1790 .."






Well......the Democrats are using the same plan, but now that they own the judiciary, they get their way:

"Judges halt plan to exclude unauthorized immigrants from count used to award seats in Congress"

Judges halt plan to exclude unauthorized immigrants from count used to award seats in Congress

Since the first census was taken, the U.S. has counted non-citizens for the purposes of awarding seats in the House of Representatives.

www.cbsnews.com

Why was it necessary......Obama just told them to go and vote: "When you vote, you're a citizen yourself."

One day i will understand you, then promptly jump

It's really easy to understand instead of allowing the slaveholding state unbalanced representation through slaves the actual representation number for slaves was reduced to 3/5th

3/5 of what?

Representation in the house of representatives

Slaves were not 3/5 of anything at the time

did slaves have voting rights before 1866?

How does 3/5 of a person go to the polls?

You really don't

You know how the lying propagandists love to claim that the Founders didn't acknowledge the humanity of the slaves, and counted them as only 3/5 of a person for the census?

Of course, the truth is that the anti-slavers knew that the slave owners wanted to use the numbers to increase their political power in the Congress, and the abolitionists knew that if they did, slavery would never be abolished. So....the 3/5 compromise to get the union formed.



"Just three years after ratification, in the census of 1790, the numbers were determined according to the Constitution proscription of “adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years…three-fifths of all other Persons.”

Rather than this representing racial animus, this compromise prevented the South from having the representation to always outvote the North on the issue of slavery.

In 1790, the slave population of South Carolina was 77% of the white population. By 1820, slaves outnumbered whites, 265,000 to 237,000, and by 1860, 412,000 to 291,000. Georgia and Virginia, similarly."
Full text of "Heads of families at the first census of the United States taken in the year 1790 .."






Well......the Democrats are using the same plan, but now that they own the judiciary, they get their way:

"Judges halt plan to exclude unauthorized immigrants from count used to award seats in Congress"

Judges halt plan to exclude unauthorized immigrants from count used to award seats in Congress

Since the first census was taken, the U.S. has counted non-citizens for the purposes of awarding seats in the House of Representatives.

www.cbsnews.com

Why was it necessary......Obama just told them to go and vote: "When you vote, you're a citizen yourself."

One day i will understand you, then promptly jump

It's really easy to understand instead of allowing the slaveholding state unbalanced representation through slaves the actual representation number for slaves was reduced to 3/5th

3/5 of what?

Representation in the house of representatives

Slaves were not 3/5 of anything at the time

did slaves have voting rights before 1866?

How does 3/5 of a person go to the polls?

The year of the discussion is 1787 blacks slaver or otherwise do not have rights but you want them counted so the slave owners can have more power in the house and continue slavery.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.

You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

Yet it stopped slave states from getting more power in the house. Imagine without that 1787 compromise slavery might still exist today. Just like today's illegal immigrants we need to count them as 3/5th

 

[danielpalos]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.

You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.

Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.

 

[danielpalos]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

Yet it stopped slave states from getting more power in the house. Imagine without that 1787 compromise slavery might still exist today. Just like today's illegal immigrants we need to count them as 3/5th

We could be doing that by faithfully executing our supreme law of the land instead of right wing policy that only proves they are lousy Capitalists.

 

[Nosmo King]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

Yet it stopped slave states from getting more power in the house. Imagine without that 1787 compromise slavery might still exist today. Just like today's illegal immigrants we need to count them as 3/5th

The purpose of the census is to count "the whole number of persons". Not create non-people when there are actual people to be counted. You're argument says not all men are created equal. How does that square up with the founding fathers?

Or are you saying racism and bigotry must govern our nation?

 

[Nosmo King]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

Yet it stopped slave states from getting more power in the house. Imagine without that 1787 compromise slavery might still exist today. Just like today's illegal immigrants we need to count them as 3/5th

The moral imperative against slavery would have prevailed nonetheless. We were a moral nation prior to Trumpism..

 

[PoliticalChic]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

Yet it stopped slave states from getting more power in the house. Imagine without that 1787 compromise slavery might still exist today. Just like today's illegal immigrants we need to count them as 3/5th

The purpose of the census is to count "the whole number of persons". Not create non-people when there are actual people to be counted. You're argument says not all men are created equal. How does that square up with the founding fathers?

Or are you saying racism and bigotry must govern our nation?

"The purpose of the census is to count "the whole number of persons".


And, as usual, Democrats/Liberals have corrupted the intent.


They follow Lucifer's press agent, Saul Alinsky, a brilliant exponent of the worst elements of human nature, and intend it to increase their power- power to destroy America.


"Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."
Alinsky


Obama was far more open about the plan, telling illegal aliens to go and vote: "When you vote, you're a citizen yourself."


Either you are out to destroy America, or you are as dumb as asphalt.
Which is it?

 

[PoliticalChic]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

Yet it stopped slave states from getting more power in the house. Imagine without that 1787 compromise slavery might still exist today. Just like today's illegal immigrants we need to count them as 3/5th

The moral imperative against slavery would have prevailed nonetheless. We were a moral nation prior to Trumpism..

"The moral imperative against slavery would have prevailed nonetheless. We were a moral nation prior to Trumpism.. "



Let's check:

Democrat’s Bountiful Gifts To Out Black Brethren

1.Doubling down on their support for slavery and segregation, the Democrat Party blocked every anti-lynching to come to the Senate.

2. Dragging their feet on post-war freedom for their slaves, they imposed poll taxes and Jim Crow laws.

3. The Obama ‘Promise Program’ made it almost impossible to remove thugs and criminals from ghetto schools, to make certain that learning was impeded.

4. Authored gun laws that only law abiding citizens would obey, preventing black citizens in crime ridden neighborhood from protecting themselves.

5. Promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years

6. In nearing a century of Democrat welfare, blacks remain as the lowest income racial group.

7. Allied with the International Left, the Democrat party makes certain that racial animosity never dies down.

8. The Democrats made and make certain that religion and morality is barred from the schools and from the public arena. “…will America be made better by curbing religion in the name of secularism, of vice versa?” Ben Shapiro


9. The Democrat judicial system is based on the idea that all blacks are felons, so felons must be released from jails. Carter-appointed judge Norma Shapiro “ is one of the worst offenders among that influential cadre of federal judges who have substituted the ACLU's prisoners' rights wish list for the Bill of Rights and have trifled with public safety concerns. …” In 1992, black youths were nine times more likely to be murdered than white youths. Democrats lied, kids died.

10. But wait…..they did manage to ban one single word from common parlance.



Is this the party you support?

 

[danielpalos]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

Yet it stopped slave states from getting more power in the house. Imagine without that 1787 compromise slavery might still exist today. Just like today's illegal immigrants we need to count them as 3/5th

The purpose of the census is to count "the whole number of persons". Not create non-people when there are actual people to be counted. You're argument says not all men are created equal. How does that square up with the founding fathers?

Or are you saying racism and bigotry must govern our nation?

"The purpose of the census is to count "the whole number of persons".


And, as usual, Democrats/Liberals have corrupted the intent.


They follow Lucifer's press agent, Saul Alinsky, a brilliant exponent of the worst elements of human nature, and intend it to increase their power- power to destroy America.


"Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."
Alinsky


Obama was far more open about the plan, telling illegal aliens to go and vote: "When you vote, you're a citizen yourself."


Either you are out to destroy America, or you are as dumb as asphalt.
Which is it?

Right wingers are worse. They just make up right wing fantasy and keep repeating it.

 

[danielpalos]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

Yet it stopped slave states from getting more power in the house. Imagine without that 1787 compromise slavery might still exist today. Just like today's illegal immigrants we need to count them as 3/5th

The moral imperative against slavery would have prevailed nonetheless. We were a moral nation prior to Trumpism..

"The moral imperative against slavery would have prevailed nonetheless. We were a moral nation prior to Trumpism.. "



Let's check:

Democrat’s Bountiful Gifts To Out Black Brethren

1.Doubling down on their support for slavery and segregation, the Democrat Party blocked every anti-lynching to come to the Senate.

2. Dragging their feet on post-war freedom for their slaves, they imposed poll taxes and Jim Crow laws.

3. The Obama ‘Promise Program’ made it almost impossible to remove thugs and criminals from ghetto schools, to make certain that learning was impeded.

4. Authored gun laws that only law abiding citizens would obey, preventing black citizens in crime ridden neighborhood from protecting themselves.

5. Promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years

6. In nearing a century of Democrat welfare, blacks remain as the lowest income racial group.

7. Allied with the International Left, the Democrat party makes certain that racial animosity never dies down.

8. The Democrats made and make certain that religion and morality is barred from the schools and from the public arena. “…will America be made better by curbing religion in the name of secularism, of vice versa?” Ben Shapiro


9. The Democrat judicial system is based on the idea that all blacks are felons, so felons must be released from jails. Carter-appointed judge Norma Shapiro “ is one of the worst offenders among that influential cadre of federal judges who have substituted the ACLU's prisoners' rights wish list for the Bill of Rights and have trifled with public safety concerns. …” In 1992, black youths were nine times more likely to be murdered than white youths. Democrats lied, kids died.

10. But wait…..they did manage to ban one single word from common parlance.



Is this the party you support?

Typical of right wing misdirection and misleading. Right wingers vote republican, now. They changed from voting democrat after the civil rights acts. To much equality for right wingers to handle, I guess.

 

[Nosmo King]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

Yet it stopped slave states from getting more power in the house. Imagine without that 1787 compromise slavery might still exist today. Just like today's illegal immigrants we need to count them as 3/5th

The moral imperative against slavery would have prevailed nonetheless. We were a moral nation prior to Trumpism..

"The moral imperative against slavery would have prevailed nonetheless. We were a moral nation prior to Trumpism.. "



Let's check:

Democrat’s Bountiful Gifts To Out Black Brethren

1.Doubling down on their support for slavery and segregation, the Democrat Party blocked every anti-lynching to come to the Senate.

2. Dragging their feet on post-war freedom for their slaves, they imposed poll taxes and Jim Crow laws.

3. The Obama ‘Promise Program’ made it almost impossible to remove thugs and criminals from ghetto schools, to make certain that learning was impeded.

4. Authored gun laws that only law abiding citizens would obey, preventing black citizens in crime ridden neighborhood from protecting themselves.

5. Promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years

6. In nearing a century of Democrat welfare, blacks remain as the lowest income racial group.

7. Allied with the International Left, the Democrat party makes certain that racial animosity never dies down.

8. The Democrats made and make certain that religion and morality is barred from the schools and from the public arena. “…will America be made better by curbing religion in the name of secularism, of vice versa?” Ben Shapiro


9. The Democrat judicial system is based on the idea that all blacks are felons, so felons must be released from jails. Carter-appointed judge Norma Shapiro “ is one of the worst offenders among that influential cadre of federal judges who have substituted the ACLU's prisoners' rights wish list for the Bill of Rights and have trifled with public safety concerns. …” In 1992, black youths were nine times more likely to be murdered than white youths. Democrats lied, kids died.

10. But wait…..they did manage to ban one single word from common parlance.



Is this the party you support?

My political alignment is primarily to the United States of America. My political ideology is toward liberal democracy and a political liberal outlook. My party is irrelevant.

If you believe that today's Democrats are aligned with the Democrats of the South in the 19th through the mid 20th century, you must also believe that today's Republicans also align with the Republicans of the same period. Are Trump republicans ideologically in agreement with Theodore Roosevelt Republicans? Eisenhower Republicans?

 

[PoliticalChic]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

Yet it stopped slave states from getting more power in the house. Imagine without that 1787 compromise slavery might still exist today. Just like today's illegal immigrants we need to count them as 3/5th

The moral imperative against slavery would have prevailed nonetheless. We were a moral nation prior to Trumpism..

"The moral imperative against slavery would have prevailed nonetheless. We were a moral nation prior to Trumpism.. "



Let's check:

Democrat’s Bountiful Gifts To Out Black Brethren

1.Doubling down on their support for slavery and segregation, the Democrat Party blocked every anti-lynching to come to the Senate.

2. Dragging their feet on post-war freedom for their slaves, they imposed poll taxes and Jim Crow laws.

3. The Obama ‘Promise Program’ made it almost impossible to remove thugs and criminals from ghetto schools, to make certain that learning was impeded.

4. Authored gun laws that only law abiding citizens would obey, preventing black citizens in crime ridden neighborhood from protecting themselves.

5. Promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years

6. In nearing a century of Democrat welfare, blacks remain as the lowest income racial group.

7. Allied with the International Left, the Democrat party makes certain that racial animosity never dies down.

8. The Democrats made and make certain that religion and morality is barred from the schools and from the public arena. “…will America be made better by curbing religion in the name of secularism, of vice versa?” Ben Shapiro


9. The Democrat judicial system is based on the idea that all blacks are felons, so felons must be released from jails. Carter-appointed judge Norma Shapiro “ is one of the worst offenders among that influential cadre of federal judges who have substituted the ACLU's prisoners' rights wish list for the Bill of Rights and have trifled with public safety concerns. …” In 1992, black youths were nine times more likely to be murdered than white youths. Democrats lied, kids died.

10. But wait…..they did manage to ban one single word from common parlance.



Is this the party you support?

My political alignment is primarily to the United States of America. My political ideology is toward liberal democracy and a political liberal outlook. My party is irrelevant.

If you believe that today's Democrats are aligned with the Democrats of the South in the 19th through the mid 20th century, you must also believe that today's Republicans also align with the Republicans of the same period. Are Trump republicans ideologically in agreement with Theodore Roosevelt Republicans? Eisenhower Republicans?

"If you believe that today's Democrats are aligned with the Democrats of the South in the 19th through the mid 20th century, ...."


Believe it????


I proved it......here:

Democrat’s Bountiful Gifts To Out Black Brethren

1.Doubling down on their support for slavery and segregation, the Democrat Party blocked every anti-lynching to come to the Senate.

2. Dragging their feet on post-war freedom for their slaves, they imposed poll taxes and Jim Crow laws.

3. The Obama ‘Promise Program’ made it almost impossible to remove thugs and criminals from ghetto schools, to make certain that learning was impeded.

4. Authored gun laws that only law abiding citizens would obey, preventing black citizens in crime ridden neighborhood from protecting themselves.

5. Promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years

6. In nearing a century of Democrat welfare, blacks remain as the lowest income racial group.

7. Allied with the International Left, the Democrat party makes certain that racial animosity never dies down.

8. The Democrats made and make certain that religion and morality is barred from the schools and from the public arena. “…will America be made better by curbing religion in the name of secularism, of vice versa?” Ben Shapiro


9. The Democrat judicial system is based on the idea that all blacks are felons, so felons must be released from jails. Carter-appointed judge Norma Shapiro “ is one of the worst offenders among that influential cadre of federal judges who have substituted the ACLU's prisoners' rights wish list for the Bill of Rights and have trifled with public safety concerns. …” In 1992, black youths were nine times more likely to be murdered than white youths. Democrats lied, kids died.

10. But wait…..they did manage to ban one single word from common parlance.



Now......is this the party you support?

 

[PoliticalChic]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

Yet it stopped slave states from getting more power in the house. Imagine without that 1787 compromise slavery might still exist today. Just like today's illegal immigrants we need to count them as 3/5th

The moral imperative against slavery would have prevailed nonetheless. We were a moral nation prior to Trumpism..

"The moral imperative against slavery would have prevailed nonetheless. We were a moral nation prior to Trumpism.. "



Let's check:

Democrat’s Bountiful Gifts To Out Black Brethren

1.Doubling down on their support for slavery and segregation, the Democrat Party blocked every anti-lynching to come to the Senate.

2. Dragging their feet on post-war freedom for their slaves, they imposed poll taxes and Jim Crow laws.

3. The Obama ‘Promise Program’ made it almost impossible to remove thugs and criminals from ghetto schools, to make certain that learning was impeded.

4. Authored gun laws that only law abiding citizens would obey, preventing black citizens in crime ridden neighborhood from protecting themselves.

5. Promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years

6. In nearing a century of Democrat welfare, blacks remain as the lowest income racial group.

7. Allied with the International Left, the Democrat party makes certain that racial animosity never dies down.

8. The Democrats made and make certain that religion and morality is barred from the schools and from the public arena. “…will America be made better by curbing religion in the name of secularism, of vice versa?” Ben Shapiro


9. The Democrat judicial system is based on the idea that all blacks are felons, so felons must be released from jails. Carter-appointed judge Norma Shapiro “ is one of the worst offenders among that influential cadre of federal judges who have substituted the ACLU's prisoners' rights wish list for the Bill of Rights and have trifled with public safety concerns. …” In 1992, black youths were nine times more likely to be murdered than white youths. Democrats lied, kids died.

10. But wait…..they did manage to ban one single word from common parlance.



Is this the party you support?

My political alignment is primarily to the United States of America. My political ideology is toward liberal democracy and a political liberal outlook. My party is irrelevant.

If you believe that today's Democrats are aligned with the Democrats of the South in the 19th through the mid 20th century, you must also believe that today's Republicans also align with the Republicans of the same period. Are Trump republicans ideologically in agreement with Theodore Roosevelt Republicans? Eisenhower Republicans?

"My party is irrelevant."


It appears you are afraid to admit that this is what you support:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

See if you recognize the similarity in this Margaret Mead, anthropologist, quote: The natives are superficially agreeable, but they go in for cannibalism, headhunting, infanticide, incest, avoidance and joking relationships, and biting lice in half with their teeth.

One wonders, if she were still alive, what her views of this Democrat Party would be.
Democrats, the anti-America party, anti-police, pro-anarchy, anti-military, anti-history. Keeps ‘em busy.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

The argument is we have a naturalization clause not any form of Immigration clause. Right wingers simply have a moral problem being legal to our own laws.

You just got a stupid problem. . In accordance with laws of the 18th and mid 19th century law blacks and slaves had not citizenship rights.

Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land. All those other laws were unconstitutional after 1808. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are both gender and race neutral.

Where in the Constitution before 1866 did the constitution mention citizenship for anyone other than white males? Be specific and not opinionated.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

Yet it stopped slave states from getting more power in the house. Imagine without that 1787 compromise slavery might still exist today. Just like today's illegal immigrants we need to count them as 3/5th

The moral imperative against slavery would have prevailed nonetheless. We were a moral nation prior to Trumpism..

"The moral imperative against slavery would have prevailed nonetheless. We were a moral nation prior to Trumpism.. "



Let's check:

Democrat’s Bountiful Gifts To Out Black Brethren

1.Doubling down on their support for slavery and segregation, the Democrat Party blocked every anti-lynching to come to the Senate.

2. Dragging their feet on post-war freedom for their slaves, they imposed poll taxes and Jim Crow laws.

3. The Obama ‘Promise Program’ made it almost impossible to remove thugs and criminals from ghetto schools, to make certain that learning was impeded.

4. Authored gun laws that only law abiding citizens would obey, preventing black citizens in crime ridden neighborhood from protecting themselves.

5. Promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years

6. In nearing a century of Democrat welfare, blacks remain as the lowest income racial group.

7. Allied with the International Left, the Democrat party makes certain that racial animosity never dies down.

8. The Democrats made and make certain that religion and morality is barred from the schools and from the public arena. “…will America be made better by curbing religion in the name of secularism, of vice versa?” Ben Shapiro


9. The Democrat judicial system is based on the idea that all blacks are felons, so felons must be released from jails. Carter-appointed judge Norma Shapiro “ is one of the worst offenders among that influential cadre of federal judges who have substituted the ACLU's prisoners' rights wish list for the Bill of Rights and have trifled with public safety concerns. …” In 1992, black youths were nine times more likely to be murdered than white youths. Democrats lied, kids died.

10. But wait…..they did manage to ban one single word from common parlance.



Is this the party you support?

Typical of right wing misdirection and misleading. Right wingers vote republican, now. They changed from voting democrat after the civil rights acts. To much equality for right wingers to handle, I guess.

Link

 

[bigrebnc1775]

"counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” The WHOLE NUMBER OF PERSONS.

Pretty cut and dried, no matter the bigotry of the reader.

For folks who are willing to watch us get slaughtered just so they can play with the gun of their choice because the constitution says so, the rest of the document seems worthless.

So you're saying slave states should get equal representation in the house of representatives even though they had fewer free whites within their state?

I'm saying as slavery is unconstitutional but the census is, when the census is held, WVERYONE living in the United States MUST be counted.

You are confusing history with the present
When was slavery considered unconstitutional what year?

Well, the 13th amendment was ratified in 1865 so, there's that.

Do you know anything about the 3/5th compromise?

I know it has nothing to do with any argument that undocumented immigrants should not be counted.

Yet it stopped slave states from getting more power in the house. Imagine without that 1787 compromise slavery might still exist today. Just like today's illegal immigrants we need to count them as 3/5th

The moral imperative against slavery would have prevailed nonetheless. We were a moral nation prior to Trumpism..

Your morals are corrupt.