6 Black Churches burned

[Statistikhengst]

same as they have always been?

link?

This is the "Southern Heritage" your flag represents

one example does not define all church arsonists.

all churchs attract pyros..

How about 6 of them? With a sprinkle of 9 dead? And a side of history of church bombings and burnings?

I bet you still say "who knows"? While pretending to be fair.

The jig is up...everyone can see what you're doing man.

rw is trying to imply that church arsonists are generally white racists attacking blacks.

i just want him to support that.

he has one example from 1963.

that is not very convincing.

I find it odd that you spend so much time whining about how unfair the loss of your beloved Confederate Flag is.....all the while you make excuses and demand more proof of the racist events that led to its downfall




.

This, however, is a common technique among dyed-in-the-wool racists...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Ravi]

One would think that if someone were genuinely concerned of how their black president speaks to racial divides in America, that they would certainly want to hear what he had to say in response to the overtly racial attacks against nine innocent black folks. I suppose I could be wrong, but I don't think so. You have no genuine interest at all.

For those of us who believe that each side should clean its own house before attacking the other, a little more balance would be helpful.

He doesn't have to, of course. As long as we're not concerned with actually improving race relations.

.

He obviously isn't concerned at all. Neither were you. My post applied to you as well.
It's pretty difficult to be " balanced" when you won't even listen to your pres speak directly to the very points you accuse him of not addressing.

The fact that we're not going to sit through a 37-minute video does not mean that we're not interested in improving race relations.

I can't believe I actually just typed that.

I'm sure he challenges both sides to look in the mirror and clean their own houses. I'm sure he exhorts both sides to come together. Just tell me where it is in the video and I'll be very happy to check it out.

Looking forward to it.

.

LOL, this is the guy that can't come up with a single example of him trying to bring people together and telling me to read his posts to find one. LMAO

You folks are humping my leg, not the other way around.

But your ongoing absolute fixation on my posts is noted.

I make a point, you folks make it personal and nasty.



.

When have I ever been nasty to you? Or personal, for that matter. Unless you consider asking you to explain your posts personal and nasty.

 

[Ravi]

He was rehired.

only because he was luckily part of a traditionally disadvantage group that mobilized to defend him.

that being said, will you answer my question?

what do you call it when an accusation is all that is needed to prove guilt?

because that is what happened to him, one moron made an accusation and he was fired.

I call it stupidity.

it's a witch hunt.

Nope, it's stupidity. People are too stupid to know that niggardly has an actual meaning that has nothing to do with the n word.

and the accusation is all that is needed for a white person to be judged as guilty of racism.

and fired.

that is a witch hunt.

that the accusation was clearly stupid just makes my point stronger, not weaker.

we have a witch hunt mentality when it comes to racism in this country, and have for quite some time.

If he hadn't been rehired you'd have a point, but he wasn't, so you don't.

 

[Ravi]

For those of us who believe that each side should clean its own house before attacking the other, a little more balance would be helpful.

He doesn't have to, of course. As long as we're not concerned with actually improving race relations.

.

He obviously isn't concerned at all. Neither were you. My post applied to you as well.
It's pretty difficult to be " balanced" when you won't even listen to your pres speak directly to the very points you accuse him of not addressing.

The fact that we're not going to sit through a 37-minute video does not mean that we're not interested in improving race relations.

I can't believe I actually just typed that.

I'm sure he challenges both sides to look in the mirror and clean their own houses. I'm sure he exhorts both sides to come together. Just tell me where it is in the video and I'll be very happy to check it out.

Looking forward to it.

.

LOL, this is the guy that can't come up with a single example of him trying to bring people together and telling me to read his posts to find one. LMAO

You folks are humping my leg, not the other way around.

But your ongoing absolute fixation on my posts is noted.

I make a point, you folks make it personal and nasty.



.

Personal attacks is all they've got, friendo. The Progs don't have a rational ideology - it's all nasty identity politics.

Hi Dicca. Did you know that what you just posted was an attack?

 

[Ravi]

The fact that we're not going to sit through a 37-minute video does not mean that we're not interested in improving race relations.

I can't believe I actually just typed that.

I'm sure he challenges both sides to look in the mirror and clean their own houses. I'm sure he exhorts both sides to come together. Just tell me where it is in the video and I'll be very happy to check it out.

Looking forward to it.

.

LOL, this is the guy that can't come up with a single example of him trying to bring people together and telling me to read his posts to find one. LMAO

You folks are humping my leg, not the other way around.

But your ongoing absolute fixation on my posts is noted.

I make a point, you folks make it personal and nasty.



.

Personal attacks is all they've got, friendo. The Progs don't have a rational ideology - it's all nasty identity politics.

Yeah.

This is like clockwork now: I make a general point, and they fly in and make it personal. A good sign.

My goring of their precious PC sacred cow makes them very, very angry, so they go after me personally.

I haven't just struck a nerve, I've pummeled it.



.

Well, the Special Snowflake nervous system is Quite Fragile.

Prolly why Mac has so many people on ignore.

 

[Statistikhengst]

rw is trying to imply that church arsonists are generally white racists attacking blacks.

i just want him to support that.

he has one example from 1963.

that is not very convincing.

I find it odd that you spend so much time whining about how unfair the loss of your beloved Confederate Flag is.....all the while you make excuses and demand more proof of the racist events that led to its downfall

you have stated that you know these church burnings are racist attacks because they have always been racist attacks.

i have asked you to support that and you have not.

one example from 1963 does not prove that church arsonists are generally white racists attacking blacks.

I am not buying into your obfuscation...it does not help your cause

Racists killed your beloved flag...trying to defend or mitigate their deeds will not bring it back

no, you made the claim that these church arsonists are the same people they always were.

so, show me who they always were.

one example does't do that.

you are trying to distract with the confederate flag. we have discussed that before and will again.

but right now the topic is church arsonists.

please support your claim that they are generally white racists attacking blacks.

a link to a fbi data sheet would be good.

What I find most offensive about your posts is the effort you spend defending a 150 year old flag and trying to excuse the actions of racists while you ignore the fact that 9 people were slaughtered and it was followed up by the burning of six black churches

Attitudes like yours are why you lost your fucking flag

Amen.

Face it: KKKorell is an avowed racist, every bit as disgusting as all other racists. He just works a tad harder at giving it a nice looking package.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Statistikhengst]

you are speculating on the motive of the arsonists.

To protest the flying of the Confederate flag, blacks peacefully demonstrated, petitioned their representatives and engaged the media

To protest the flag coming down, flag lovers burned black churches

Speaks volumes about the true meaning of that flag

you are speculating on the motive of the arsonists.

The arsonists are the same as they have always been

Cowards who are upset that their lily white south is a thing of the past. They have used your beloved flag to represent your southern heritage

Why aren't you outraged at that?

They always misplace their hatred, rage and outrage.

Bush lied us, or at the very least, led us to two disastrous wars. Obama gave us health care and tried to get out of the wars. Guess who gets their rage.

That's rightwing radicals for you.

*SMDH*

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Obama gave us ISIS and opened our borders to drug cartels.....long with letting hackers do whatever the Hell they want and steal our Social Security numbers.

So, how did the LSD paper taste?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[LoneLaugher]

You're right, if only Obama were less wordy , you might have been able to understand his message. Thanks Obama, thanks for dividing us with our short attention spans.

i generally don't listen to speeches. from anyone.

to much filler and low information content bs.

the points can almost always be summed up in a few bullet points.

37 minutes of obama?

no fucking way.

One would think that if someone were genuinely concerned of how their black president speaks to racial divides in America, that they would certainly want to hear what he had to say in response to the overtly racial attacks against nine innocent black folks. I suppose I could be wrong, but I don't think so. You have no genuine interest at all.

For those of us who believe that each side should clean its own house before attacking the other, a little more balance would be helpful.

He doesn't have to, of course. As long as we're not concerned with actually improving race relations.

.

Both sides need to clean house. Absolutely. Both sides are to blame for one side being bigots.

The racists and bigots need to clean house. But Mac hasn't said how. They are waiting on the negroes to clean house first. How can they be expected to abandon their bigotry until the negroes do their house cleaning.

What is the negro house cleaning? Why....it's to stop asking to be treated equally. It's to stay home and be nice when they are gunned down in the streets by police officers. It's to look at the past....a past in which they have been oppressed and discriminated against....both legally and otherwise.....and offer absolute forgiveness. It's to accept their portion of the blame for being hated by bigots.

LoneLaugher Why havent you responded to my post on how Pres Obama could help ease a lot of the racial tension by helping to end the war on drugs I'm waiting

Patience.

We agree on the need for ending the war on drugs. I'm for ending all criminality in regards to drug use.

It isn't something the man can do on his own though....is it? It requires legislation.

By the way....if the drug laws were equitably enforced....it would be less of a racial issue, wouldn't it. The POTUS has called for this, I believe.

 

[boedicca]

He obviously isn't concerned at all. Neither were you. My post applied to you as well.
It's pretty difficult to be " balanced" when you won't even listen to your pres speak directly to the very points you accuse him of not addressing.

The fact that we're not going to sit through a 37-minute video does not mean that we're not interested in improving race relations.

I can't believe I actually just typed that.

I'm sure he challenges both sides to look in the mirror and clean their own houses. I'm sure he exhorts both sides to come together. Just tell me where it is in the video and I'll be very happy to check it out.

Looking forward to it.

.

LOL, this is the guy that can't come up with a single example of him trying to bring people together and telling me to read his posts to find one. LMAO

You folks are humping my leg, not the other way around.

But your ongoing absolute fixation on my posts is noted.

I make a point, you folks make it personal and nasty.



.

Personal attacks is all they've got, friendo. The Progs don't have a rational ideology - it's all nasty identity politics.

Hi Dicca. Did you know that what you just posted was an attack?

Hello Raving. Accurately describing the nature of Prog Ideology is not a personal attack. I suggest you review grammar in regards to my post. The use of "it's" is singular and describes the singular known "ideology".

I suspect you will not grok this, but I will not give up the cause of Proper Grammar!

EDIT: It does occur to me that perhaps you are being inadvertently honest by associating Progs with It's There certainly is merit in viewing Progs as The Prog given all of the collectivist nonsense you (all) promote.

 

[Statistikhengst]

I would say the President has addressed it, quite eloquently as well.

So, seven years into his presidency, he says this (whatever he said on your 37-minute video).

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that, during that speech, he challenged both ends of the issue to seriously and sincerely look in the mirror and work diligently to clean their own house before pointing the finger at the other, yes? Let me know where that is in the speech, I'd be happy to see him saying that at such an important moment.

Seven years - that is my point.

.

If you aren't willing to watch the entire video and honestly try to understand the context of his messages to America, then you have no credibility to speak to what the pres has said or not said.
It is exactly that sort of willful ignorance and baseless assertions about the actions of the pres that brings racist recriminations upon you.

37 minutes?

post a link to the transcripts. cut and paste the bits you consider so relevant.

You're right, if only Obama were less wordy , you might have been able to understand his message. Thanks Obama, thanks for dividing us with our short attention spans.

i generally don't listen to speeches. from anyone.

to much filler and low information content bs.

the points can almost always be summed up in a few bullet points.

37 minutes of obama?

no fucking way.

Thank you for admitting your ignorance.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Ravi]

The fact that we're not going to sit through a 37-minute video does not mean that we're not interested in improving race relations.

I can't believe I actually just typed that.

I'm sure he challenges both sides to look in the mirror and clean their own houses. I'm sure he exhorts both sides to come together. Just tell me where it is in the video and I'll be very happy to check it out.

Looking forward to it.

.

LOL, this is the guy that can't come up with a single example of him trying to bring people together and telling me to read his posts to find one. LMAO

You folks are humping my leg, not the other way around.

But your ongoing absolute fixation on my posts is noted.

I make a point, you folks make it personal and nasty.



.

Personal attacks is all they've got, friendo. The Progs don't have a rational ideology - it's all nasty identity politics.

Hi Dicca. Did you know that what you just posted was an attack?

Hello Raving. Accurately describing the nature of Prog Ideology is not a personal attack. I suggest you review grammar in regards to my post. The use of "it's" is singular and describes the singular known "ideology".

I suspect you will not grok this, but I will not give up the cause of Proper Grammar!

LOL! Now that was a personal attack, lame as it was.

 

[Statistikhengst]

i generally don't listen to speeches. from anyone.

to much filler and low information content bs.

the points can almost always be summed up in a few bullet points.

37 minutes of obama?

no fucking way.

One would think that if someone were genuinely concerned of how their black president speaks to racial divides in America, that they would certainly want to hear what he had to say in response to the overtly racial attacks against nine innocent black folks. I suppose I could be wrong, but I don't think so. You have no genuine interest at all.

For those of us who believe that each side should clean its own house before attacking the other, a little more balance would be helpful.

He doesn't have to, of course. As long as we're not concerned with actually improving race relations.

.

He obviously isn't concerned at all. Neither were you. My post applied to you as well.
It's pretty difficult to be " balanced" when you won't even listen to your pres speak directly to the very points you accuse him of not addressing.

The fact that we're not going to sit through a 37-minute video does not mean that we're not interested in improving race relations.

I can't believe I actually just typed that.

I'm sure he challenges both sides to look in the mirror and clean their own houses. I'm sure he exhorts both sides to come together. Just tell me where it is in the video and I'll be very happy to check it out.

Looking forward to it.

.

You have no genuine interest either. Too black for you to tolerate for 40 min?

Bingo.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[boedicca]

LOL, this is the guy that can't come up with a single example of him trying to bring people together and telling me to read his posts to find one. LMAO

You folks are humping my leg, not the other way around.

But your ongoing absolute fixation on my posts is noted.

I make a point, you folks make it personal and nasty.



.

Personal attacks is all they've got, friendo. The Progs don't have a rational ideology - it's all nasty identity politics.

Hi Dicca. Did you know that what you just posted was an attack?

Hello Raving. Accurately describing the nature of Prog Ideology is not a personal attack. I suggest you review grammar in regards to my post. The use of "it's" is singular and describes the singular known "ideology".

I suspect you will not grok this, but I will not give up the cause of Proper Grammar!

LOL! Now that was a personal attack, lame as it was.

No, but if you take comfort in viewing it as such, then that is you prerogative.

 

[Darkwind]

How is burning down churches a sincere mistake?

Huh?

Who said that?

Jeez, you people.

Read what I wrote, again. Read the second paragraph. That's what I'm talking about.

Or are you just being obtuse?
.

Perhaps you should be more clear. Stick to the topic instead of going off on one of your butthurt rants about PC.

Too funny. I fucked up, so I'm going to blame you.

 

[Mac1958]

One would think that if someone were genuinely concerned of how their black president speaks to racial divides in America, that they would certainly want to hear what he had to say in response to the overtly racial attacks against nine innocent black folks. I suppose I could be wrong, but I don't think so. You have no genuine interest at all.

For those of us who believe that each side should clean its own house before attacking the other, a little more balance would be helpful.

He doesn't have to, of course. As long as we're not concerned with actually improving race relations.

.

He obviously isn't concerned at all. Neither were you. My post applied to you as well.
It's pretty difficult to be " balanced" when you won't even listen to your pres speak directly to the very points you accuse him of not addressing.

The fact that we're not going to sit through a 37-minute video does not mean that we're not interested in improving race relations.

I can't believe I actually just typed that.

I'm sure he challenges both sides to look in the mirror and clean their own houses. I'm sure he exhorts both sides to come together. Just tell me where it is in the video and I'll be very happy to check it out.

Looking forward to it.

.

You have no genuine interest either. Too black for you to tolerate for 40 min?

Bingo.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

Another member of the PC Police chimes in.

You don't want to watch a 37-minute video, so you're a racist.

You folks prove my point, time after time.

.

 

[Statistikhengst]

the niggardly example was just to show a very clear example of a gratuitous accusation of racism.


what do you call a mindset where an accusation is all that is required to prove guilt?

that's what happened to that guy.

one moron made an accusation and he was fired.


you realize that that mindset is not limited to the word niggardly, right?

He was rehired.

only because he was luckily part of a traditionally disadvantage group that mobilized to defend him.

that being said, will you answer my question?

what do you call it when an accusation is all that is needed to prove guilt?

because that is what happened to him, one moron made an accusation and he was fired.

I call it stupidity.

it's a witch hunt.

Nope, it's stupidity. People are too stupid to know that niggardly has an actual meaning that has nothing to do with the n word.

Also because the word is an uncommon word, very rarely used, and since the first six letters are almost identical to the "N" word, this word is excellent material for a "gotcha"moment.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Statistikhengst]

I see you are honing your debating skills, yet setting the bar very low for yourself.

At this rate, even ants are very confident of being above your bar!!

?

i admit that is did not misrepresent your argument before i insulted you.

but is that really a failing?

it really isn't my thing.

you insulted me. i insulted you back.

what did you expect?

dummy.

Poor KKKorell, all dressed up with no where to go.

The similarities to Muslim women wearing a Burkah are, well, interesting...

lol!

you have the nerve to complain about my level of debating, and when i point out that i was just returning an insult, what is your answer?

to call me a racist!

lol!

it is amazing to me that your inflated self image can survive your idiotic asshole behavior.

do you have anything to say about the topic, asshole?

Your deeds betray you.

Your very first day in USMB, you made a beeline straight for the race/racism subforum. You have made plenty of comments demeaning blacks. And now you must live with your deeds.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

i call you on your whining about my insulting you, by pointing out that you insulted me.


i ask if you have anything to say about the topic and you accuse me of being a racist.

asshole.

You seem angry. Racists often become angry. I recommend counseling for you.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Statistikhengst]

One would think that if someone were genuinely concerned of how their black president speaks to racial divides in America, that they would certainly want to hear what he had to say in response to the overtly racial attacks against nine innocent black folks. I suppose I could be wrong, but I don't think so. You have no genuine interest at all.

For those of us who believe that each side should clean its own house before attacking the other, a little more balance would be helpful.

He doesn't have to, of course. As long as we're not concerned with actually improving race relations.

.

He obviously isn't concerned at all. Neither were you. My post applied to you as well.
It's pretty difficult to be " balanced" when you won't even listen to your pres speak directly to the very points you accuse him of not addressing.

The fact that we're not going to sit through a 37-minute video does not mean that we're not interested in improving race relations.

I can't believe I actually just typed that.

I'm sure he challenges both sides to look in the mirror and clean their own houses. I'm sure he exhorts both sides to come together. Just tell me where it is in the video and I'll be very happy to check it out.

Looking forward to it.

.

LOL, this is the guy that can't come up with a single example of him trying to bring people together and telling me to read his posts to find one. LMAO

You folks are humping my leg, not the other way around.

But your ongoing absolute fixation on my posts is noted.

I make a point, you folks make it personal and nasty.



.

Your leg doesn't interest me in the slightest, but your brain-functions could be interesting to study.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[reconmark]

No these incidents will not cause a race war. The stupidity of the white racists and some Conservatives is that Black people have nothing better to do than react to the obvious shenanigans of white racists.
The majority of Black people are trying to make a better life for themselves and their children, they don't have time to slither around at night like snakes burning other people churches in an attempt to re-establish apartheid in this country.

Nope. Democrats did it in our history and liberals and anarchists in the Democrat party are probably doing it now.

Sure....

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You're right, if only Obama were less wordy , you might have been able to understand his message. Thanks Obama, thanks for dividing us with our short attention spans.

i generally don't listen to speeches. from anyone.

to much filler and low information content bs.

the points can almost always be summed up in a few bullet points.

37 minutes of obama?

no fucking way.

One would think that if someone were genuinely concerned of how their black president speaks to racial divides in America, that they would certainly want to hear what he had to say in response to the overtly racial attacks against nine innocent black folks. I suppose I could be wrong, but I don't think so. You have no genuine interest at all.

For those of us who believe that each side should clean its own house before attacking the other, a little more balance would be helpful.

He doesn't have to, of course. As long as we're not concerned with actually improving race relations.

.

Both sides need to clean house. Absolutely. Both sides are to blame for one side being bigots.

The racists and bigots need to clean house. But Mac hasn't said how. They are waiting on the negroes to clean house first. How can they be expected to abandon their bigotry until the negroes do their house cleaning.

What is the negro house cleaning? Why....it's to stop asking to be treated equally. It's to stay home and be nice when they are gunned down in the streets by police officers. It's to look at the past....a past in which they have been oppressed and discriminated against....both legally and otherwise.....and offer absolute forgiveness. It's to accept their portion of the blame for being hated by bigots.

LoneLaugher Why havent you responded to my post on how Pres Obama could help ease a lot of the racial tension by helping to end the war on drugs I'm waiting

Good point.

Eric Holder seeks to cut mandatory minimum drug sentences - CNNPolitics.com

I wonder why the congress hasn't addressed this with their majority.