Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did you photoshop that chart or domething?I'd like to see your numbers on that.Higher poverty rates due to systematic oppressionThis doesn't prove your claim.
What's your explanation for higher Black crime rates?
There's some White people, who will laugh at you for you thinking this.
Many Ukrainians would for eample.
Ukraine experienced far worse systematic oppression, and is far poorer than African Americans are.
While, Ukraine's murder rate is quite high for a White nation, it's still about 4 x lower than the African American murder rate/
As of 2015 the black American homicide perp rate stood at 11 per 100, 000.
Black. Homeycide =5173 in 2015
Black population =46, 282, 080
Rate per 100, 000=11.18825
Dayum...I thought it would be around 30 per 100, 000 to hear you haters talk.
That low assed rate doesn't even make the top 10. Compare that measly 11 points to
that 90 point rate sported by Honduras. The10th lowest homicide ratein Colombia is more than 2.5 times that of the us homies.
But let's take a look at Russia. The overall homicide rate hovers around 9 per 100k. But Russian satellites, or federal subjects, show myriad variations that suffer homicide rates as high as 33 per 100k. Take a look:
List of federal subjects of Russia by murder rate - Wikipedia
Did you photoshop that chart or domething?I'd like to see your numbers on that.Higher poverty rates due to systematic oppressionWhat's your explanation for higher Black crime rates?
There's some White people, who will laugh at you for you thinking this.
Many Ukrainians would for eample.
Ukraine experienced far worse systematic oppression, and is far poorer than African Americans are.
While, Ukraine's murder rate is quite high for a White nation, it's still about 4 x lower than the African American murder rate/
As of 2015 the black American homicide perp rate stood at 11 per 100, 000.
Black. Homeycide =5173 in 2015
Black population =46, 282, 080
Rate per 100, 000=11.18825
Dayum...I thought it would be around 30 per 100, 000 to hear you haters talk.
That low assed rate doesn't even make the top 10. Compare that measly 11 points to
that 90 point rate sported by Honduras. The10th lowest homicide ratein Colombia is more than 2.5 times that of the us homies.
But let's take a look at Russia. The overall homicide rate hovers around 9 per 100k. But Russian satellites, or federal subjects, show myriad variations that suffer homicide rates as high as 33 per 100k. Take a look:
List of federal subjects of Russia by murder rate - Wikipedia
Your"masterpiece" puts the overall Black homicide rate at 18.03 (per 100k?) But what year? That's important to know. My stats were calculated from 2015 data.
Here is the real puzzle. The bigot who constructed that piece of garbage isolated black males from the black collective
I'd like to see you try. Go for it. But most Blacks and Hispanics are not criminals.tehehe I am kind of a hippieAnd what do you think plays into those social dysfunctions. Will you argue they are born dysfunctional or will you admit that there are societal factors involved.
Will you admit the result is the same? And the policing problem is the same? What are you a hippie?
"He mugged and robbed that old man because society made him do it"
Does it matter WHY he did it? The cops handcuff them for a reason. You can argue being criminally inclined isnt their fault. I dont care. Nor should a cop. Cops aren't social workers. So long as the cops get the criminals I'll let the liberals take care of them at home.
"There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery. Then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved."
Jesse Jackson Operation PUSH in Chicago (27 November 1993)
I just think if we would like to decrease crime we should consider the causing factors and eliminate them. Silly me.
.
If we want to decrease crime, and the causing factors, and eliminate them.
Then obviously we have to get Blacks, and Hispanics out of our society.
Are you really that dumb? Look at the FBI UCR for 2015 if you need validation. SinceDid you photoshop that chart or domething?I'd like to see your numbers on that.Higher poverty rates due to systematic oppression
There's some White people, who will laugh at you for you thinking this.
Many Ukrainians would for eample.
Ukraine experienced far worse systematic oppression, and is far poorer than African Americans are.
While, Ukraine's murder rate is quite high for a White nation, it's still about 4 x lower than the African American murder rate/
As of 2015 the black American homicide perp rate stood at 11 per 100, 000.
Black. Homeycide =5173 in 2015
Black population =46, 282, 080
Rate per 100, 000=11.18825
Dayum...I thought it would be around 30 per 100, 000 to hear you haters talk.
That low assed rate doesn't even make the top 10. Compare that measly 11 points to
that 90 point rate sported by Honduras. The10th lowest homicide ratein Colombia is more than 2.5 times that of the us homies.
But let's take a look at Russia. The overall homicide rate hovers around 9 per 100k. But Russian satellites, or federal subjects, show myriad variations that suffer homicide rates as high as 33 per 100k. Take a look:
List of federal subjects of Russia by murder rate - Wikipedia
Your"masterpiece" puts the overall Black homicide rate at 18.03 (per 100k?) But what year? That's important to know. My stats were calculated from 2015 data.
Here is the real puzzle. The bigot who constructed that piece of garbage isolated black males from the black collective
That's data from 2015... I suspect either you're using data of only Black males, or of only Blacks who were convicted.
tehehe I am kind of a hippieAnd what do you think plays into those social dysfunctions. Will you argue they are born dysfunctional or will you admit that there are societal factors involved.
Will you admit the result is the same? And the policing problem is the same? What are you a hippie?
"He mugged and robbed that old man because society made him do it"
Does it matter WHY he did it? The cops handcuff them for a reason. You can argue being criminally inclined isnt their fault. I dont care. Nor should a cop. Cops aren't social workers. So long as the cops get the criminals I'll let the liberals take care of them at home.
"There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery. Then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved."
Jesse Jackson Operation PUSH in Chicago (27 November 1993)
I just think if we would like to decrease crime we should consider the causing factors and eliminate them. Silly me.
.
If we want to decrease crime, and the causing factors, and eliminate them.
Then obviously we have to get Blacks, and Hispanics out of our society.
Are you really that dumb? Look at the FBI UCR for 2015 if you need validation. SinceDid you photoshop that chart or domething?I'd like to see your numbers on that.There's some White people, who will laugh at you for you thinking this.
Many Ukrainians would for eample.
Ukraine experienced far worse systematic oppression, and is far poorer than African Americans are.
While, Ukraine's murder rate is quite high for a White nation, it's still about 4 x lower than the African American murder rate/
As of 2015 the black American homicide perp rate stood at 11 per 100, 000.
Black. Homeycide =5173 in 2015
Black population =46, 282, 080
Rate per 100, 000=11.18825
Dayum...I thought it would be around 30 per 100, 000 to hear you haters talk.
That low assed rate doesn't even make the top 10. Compare that measly 11 points to
that 90 point rate sported by Honduras. The10th lowest homicide ratein Colombia is more than 2.5 times that of the us homies.
But let's take a look at Russia. The overall homicide rate hovers around 9 per 100k. But Russian satellites, or federal subjects, show myriad variations that suffer homicide rates as high as 33 per 100k. Take a look:
List of federal subjects of Russia by murder rate - Wikipedia
Your"masterpiece" puts the overall Black homicide rate at 18.03 (per 100k?) But what year? That's important to know. My stats were calculated from 2015 data.
Here is the real puzzle. The bigot who constructed that piece of garbage isolated black males from the black collective
That's data from 2015... I suspect either you're using data of only Black males, or of only Blacks who were convicted.
You didn't bother to link your source for that chart I am not going to be accomodating either....look it up.
I'd like to see you try. Go for it. But most Blacks and Hispanics are not criminals.tehehe I am kind of a hippieAnd what do you think plays into those social dysfunctions. Will you argue they are born dysfunctional or will you admit that there are societal factors involved.
Will you admit the result is the same? And the policing problem is the same? What are you a hippie?
"He mugged and robbed that old man because society made him do it"
Does it matter WHY he did it? The cops handcuff them for a reason. You can argue being criminally inclined isnt their fault. I dont care. Nor should a cop. Cops aren't social workers. So long as the cops get the criminals I'll let the liberals take care of them at home.
"There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery. Then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved."
Jesse Jackson Operation PUSH in Chicago (27 November 1993)
I just think if we would like to decrease crime we should consider the causing factors and eliminate them. Silly me.
.
If we want to decrease crime, and the causing factors, and eliminate them.
Then obviously we have to get Blacks, and Hispanics out of our society.
This society belongs to them too. Blacks and Hispanics have paid a price in bloody wars abroad while many white RW pseudo-patriots have refused to participate. So..go on... just try to pull a "final solution" scenario if you have the balls. It probably won't be through armed force this time though. Cowards like you will likely resort to more subtle devices. Genetic engineering...nano-pathology and other laboratory horrors are manufactured even as we converse.
Did you say ARRESTS? Arrests don't equate to the number of convictions or actual murders commited by blacks within within that 15000 total. You need to find the actual number of known black homicide offendersAre you really that dumb? Look at the FBI UCR for 2015 if you need validation. SinceDid you photoshop that chart or domething?I'd like to see your numbers on that.
As of 2015 the black American homicide perp rate stood at 11 per 100, 000.
Black. Homeycide =5173 in 2015
Black population =46, 282, 080
Rate per 100, 000=11.18825
Dayum...I thought it would be around 30 per 100, 000 to hear you haters talk.
That low assed rate doesn't even make the top 10. Compare that measly 11 points to
that 90 point rate sported by Honduras. The10th lowest homicide ratein Colombia is more than 2.5 times that of the us homies.
But let's take a look at Russia. The overall homicide rate hovers around 9 per 100k. But Russian satellites, or federal subjects, show myriad variations that suffer homicide rates as high as 33 per 100k. Take a look:
List of federal subjects of Russia by murder rate - Wikipedia
Your"masterpiece" puts the overall Black homicide rate at 18.03 (per 100k?) But what year? That's important to know. My stats were calculated from 2015 data.
Here is the real puzzle. The bigot who constructed that piece of garbage isolated black males from the black collective
That's data from 2015... I suspect either you're using data of only Black males, or of only Blacks who were convicted.
You didn't bother to link your source for that chart I am not going to be accomodating either....look it up.
That site admits in 2015 51% of those arrested of murder were Black, and that there were over 15,000 murders in 2015.
Therefor we can include that the number of Black murders is closer to 8,000.
I don't know what social anthropology book you've read or where you formed your warped opinions. But I do know you are decidedly prejudiced and woefully misinformed about Blacks on the whole.I'd like to see you try. Go for it. But most Blacks and Hispanics are not criminals.tehehe I am kind of a hippieAnd what do you think plays into those social dysfunctions. Will you argue they are born dysfunctional or will you admit that there are societal factors involved.
Will you admit the result is the same? And the policing problem is the same? What are you a hippie?
"He mugged and robbed that old man because society made him do it"
Does it matter WHY he did it? The cops handcuff them for a reason. You can argue being criminally inclined isnt their fault. I dont care. Nor should a cop. Cops aren't social workers. So long as the cops get the criminals I'll let the liberals take care of them at home.
"There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery. Then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved."
Jesse Jackson Operation PUSH in Chicago (27 November 1993)
I just think if we would like to decrease crime we should consider the causing factors and eliminate them. Silly me.
.
If we want to decrease crime, and the causing factors, and eliminate them.
Then obviously we have to get Blacks, and Hispanics out of our society.
This society belongs to them too. Blacks and Hispanics have paid a price in bloody wars abroad while many white RW pseudo-patriots have refused to participate. So..go on... just try to pull a "final solution" scenario if you have the balls. It probably won't be through armed force this time though. Cowards like you will likely resort to more subtle devices. Genetic engineering...nano-pathology and other laboratory horrors are manufactured even as we converse.
But, I thought that Black criminality was from their oppression?
So, why are some criminals, and some are not if they are all oppressed at similar rates?
Maybe because some are more genetically prone, than others?
Blacks, and Hispanics have long been underrepresented in our military, actually.
But, that's besides the point.
Much of our wars have been items of brutality.
Hey...where did you go? Come on back and give me credit for all the knowledge I have given you.... Here is that table 3 data you should have found by now...Did you say ARRESTS? Arrests don't equate to the number of convictions or actual murders commited by blacks within within that 15000 total. You need to find the actual number of known black homicide offendersAre you really that dumb? Look at the FBI UCR for 2015 if you need validation. SinceDid you photoshop that chart or domething?
Your"masterpiece" puts the overall Black homicide rate at 18.03 (per 100k?) But what year? That's important to know. My stats were calculated from 2015 data.
Here is the real puzzle. The bigot who constructed that piece of garbage isolated black males from the black collective
That's data from 2015... I suspect either you're using data of only Black males, or of only Blacks who were convicted.
You didn't bother to link your source for that chart I am not going to be accomodating either....look it up.
That site admits in 2015 51% of those arrested of murder were Black, and that there were over 15,000 murders in 2015.
Therefor we can include that the number of Black murders is closer to 8,000.
as stipulated in table.3. We dont want to confuse the arrest rate with the homicide rate. that won't match.
I'd like to see you try. Go for it. But most Blacks and Hispanics are not criminals.tehehe I am kind of a hippieAnd what do you think plays into those social dysfunctions. Will you argue they are born dysfunctional or will you admit that there are societal factors involved.
Will you admit the result is the same? And the policing problem is the same? What are you a hippie?
"He mugged and robbed that old man because society made him do it"
Does it matter WHY he did it? The cops handcuff them for a reason. You can argue being criminally inclined isnt their fault. I dont care. Nor should a cop. Cops aren't social workers. So long as the cops get the criminals I'll let the liberals take care of them at home.
"There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery. Then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved."
Jesse Jackson Operation PUSH in Chicago (27 November 1993)
I just think if we would like to decrease crime we should consider the causing factors and eliminate them. Silly me.
.
If we want to decrease crime, and the causing factors, and eliminate them.
Then obviously we have to get Blacks, and Hispanics out of our society.
This society belongs to them too. Blacks and Hispanics have paid a price in bloody wars abroad while many white RW pseudo-patriots have refused to participate. So..go on... just try to pull a "final solution" scenario if you have the balls. It probably won't be through armed force this time though. Cowards like you will likely resort to more subtle devices. Genetic engineering...nano-pathology and other laboratory horrors are manufactured even as we converse.
But, I thought that Black criminality was from their oppression?
So, why are some criminals, and some are not if they are all oppressed at similar rates?
Maybe because some are more genetically prone, than others?
Blacks, and Hispanics have long been underrepresented in our military, actually.
But, that's besides the point.
Much of our wars have been items of brutality.
Sounds like your personal spin more than anything else in that post.I'd like to see you try. Go for it. But most Blacks and Hispanics are not criminals.tehehe I am kind of a hippieWill you admit the result is the same? And the policing problem is the same? What are you a hippie?
"He mugged and robbed that old man because society made him do it"
Does it matter WHY he did it? The cops handcuff them for a reason. You can argue being criminally inclined isnt their fault. I dont care. Nor should a cop. Cops aren't social workers. So long as the cops get the criminals I'll let the liberals take care of them at home.
"There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery. Then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved."
Jesse Jackson Operation PUSH in Chicago (27 November 1993)
I just think if we would like to decrease crime we should consider the causing factors and eliminate them. Silly me.
.
If we want to decrease crime, and the causing factors, and eliminate them.
Then obviously we have to get Blacks, and Hispanics out of our society.
This society belongs to them too. Blacks and Hispanics have paid a price in bloody wars abroad while many white RW pseudo-patriots have refused to participate. So..go on... just try to pull a "final solution" scenario if you have the balls. It probably won't be through armed force this time though. Cowards like you will likely resort to more subtle devices. Genetic engineering...nano-pathology and other laboratory horrors are manufactured even as we converse.
But, I thought that Black criminality was from their oppression?
So, why are some criminals, and some are not if they are all oppressed at similar rates?
Maybe because some are more genetically prone, than others?
Blacks, and Hispanics have long been underrepresented in our military, actually.
But, that's besides the point.
Much of our wars have been items of brutality.
She has admitted black and Hispanic criminality is a problem. She just seems to think cops should pretend otherwise because society did it to them.
tehehe I am kind of a hippieAnd what do you think plays into those social dysfunctions. Will you argue they are born dysfunctional or will you admit that there are societal factors involved.
Will you admit the result is the same? And the policing problem is the same? What are you a hippie?
"He mugged and robbed that old man because society made him do it"
Does it matter WHY he did it? The cops handcuff them for a reason. You can argue being criminally inclined isnt their fault. I dont care. Nor should a cop. Cops aren't social workers. So long as the cops get the criminals I'll let the liberals take care of them at home.
"There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery. Then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved."
Jesse Jackson Operation PUSH in Chicago (27 November 1993)
I just think if we would like to decrease crime we should consider the causing factors and eliminate them. Silly me.
I think that in this case, of the kids being handcuffed... there is no way that 99.9% of them should be minorities.
I have worked in low income schools/daycares/afterschool programs/coached basketball teams etc. and I can tell you these behavioral problems are much more economic than racial. The white kids acted out just as much, if not more (to get extra "street cred")
If there is such a discrepancy in kids being handcuffed it is much more likely that minority kids are being treated/punished more harshly than their white counterparts.
I haven't told you blacks are economically and socially driven to crime. You came up with that fallacy on your own. 75% of our black population lives above the poverty level, most are hard working, God fearing Christians. You've been brainwashed to believe otherwise.tehehe I am kind of a hippieAnd what do you think plays into those social dysfunctions. Will you argue they are born dysfunctional or will you admit that there are societal factors involved.
Will you admit the result is the same? And the policing problem is the same? What are you a hippie?
"He mugged and robbed that old man because society made him do it"
Does it matter WHY he did it? The cops handcuff them for a reason. You can argue being criminally inclined isnt their fault. I dont care. Nor should a cop. Cops aren't social workers. So long as the cops get the criminals I'll let the liberals take care of them at home.
"There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery. Then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved."
Jesse Jackson Opcrime...on PUSH in Chicago (27 November 1993)
I just think if we would like to decrease crime we should consider the causing factors and eliminate them. Silly me.
I think that in this case, of the kids being handcuffed... there is no way that 99.9% of them should be minorities.
I have worked in low income schools/daycares/afterschool programs/coached basketball teams etc. and I can tell you these behavioral problems are much more economic than racial. The white kids acted out just as much, if not more (to get extra "street cred")
If there is such a discrepancy in kids being handcuffed it is much more likely that minority kids are being treated/punished more harshly than their white counterparts.
Your missing the point. I don't care if the thug beating people in the park and grabbing purses is doing it for economic reasons or not.
Your telling me blacks are economically and socially driven to crime tells me we need to watch blacks closer.
If you want to work on economics to preclude the next generation of blacks being criminal fine. But in the meantime public safety demands some honesty.
Yes. THe strongest indicator for a child to have "dysfunction" is to be born out of wedlock.
Not poverty, not "oppression" whatever you mean by that, not "fear", not "lack of resources".
You forgot to include the links to your proof of this.
Didn't forget. This was pretty much settled science well before the internet became a big deal, thus...
When you try to search for this on the net, you get tons of shit on investigating details of this, such as comparing illegitimacy/crime increases during different decades, with the link between illegitimacy and crime treated as a given, not something to be supported.
Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
"ROLE OF SOCIAL STIGMA
While Kendall and Tamura found that more out-of-wedlock births are associated with higher subsequent crime rates over the last 45 years, they found just the opposite for years prior to 1965. In the 1940s and 1950s, small increases out-of-wedlock births actually correlated to lower subsequent murder rates.
Why did the association change? Kendall and Tamura argue that changing social attitudes toward unwed motherhood are the primary reason. In the 1940s and 1950s, social stigma against unwed mothers was intense, and as a result most pregnant couples ended up getting married—even couples who were very poorly matched. Some of those marriages would have been so bad that the children involved might have been better off—and less inclined to commit crimes as adults—if their parents had never married. So a moderate increase in out-of-wedlock births during this period meant that fewer poorly matched couples were forced to marry, thus exposing fewer children to damaging marriages.
In the 1960s and 1970s, however, social attitudes toward unwed motherhood changed rapidly and rates of out-of-wedlock births skyrocketed. Many of the marriages foregone during this period would have been relatively well-matched couples, Kendall and Tamura argue. “The children of these higher-quality matches are worse off because of their parents’ failure to marry, and have higher risks of adult criminality,” they write."
Read more at: Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
This doesn't prove your claim.
Depends on your standard of proof.
If you want "proof" by scientific method, it can't be done ......?
Then stop talking out your ass.
You forgot to include the links to your proof of this.
Didn't forget. This was pretty much settled science well before the internet became a big deal, thus...
When you try to search for this on the net, you get tons of shit on investigating details of this, such as comparing illegitimacy/crime increases during different decades, with the link between illegitimacy and crime treated as a given, not something to be supported.
Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
"ROLE OF SOCIAL STIGMA
While Kendall and Tamura found that more out-of-wedlock births are associated with higher subsequent crime rates over the last 45 years, they found just the opposite for years prior to 1965. In the 1940s and 1950s, small increases out-of-wedlock births actually correlated to lower subsequent murder rates.
Why did the association change? Kendall and Tamura argue that changing social attitudes toward unwed motherhood are the primary reason. In the 1940s and 1950s, social stigma against unwed mothers was intense, and as a result most pregnant couples ended up getting married—even couples who were very poorly matched. Some of those marriages would have been so bad that the children involved might have been better off—and less inclined to commit crimes as adults—if their parents had never married. So a moderate increase in out-of-wedlock births during this period meant that fewer poorly matched couples were forced to marry, thus exposing fewer children to damaging marriages.
In the 1960s and 1970s, however, social attitudes toward unwed motherhood changed rapidly and rates of out-of-wedlock births skyrocketed. Many of the marriages foregone during this period would have been relatively well-matched couples, Kendall and Tamura argue. “The children of these higher-quality matches are worse off because of their parents’ failure to marry, and have higher risks of adult criminality,” they write."
Read more at: Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
This doesn't prove your claim.
Depends on your standard of proof.
If you want "proof" by scientific method, it can't be done ......?
Then stop talking out your ass.
Your dishonest cutting of my post ....
Didn't forget. This was pretty much settled science well before the internet became a big deal, thus...
When you try to search for this on the net, you get tons of shit on investigating details of this, such as comparing illegitimacy/crime increases during different decades, with the link between illegitimacy and crime treated as a given, not something to be supported.
Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
"ROLE OF SOCIAL STIGMA
While Kendall and Tamura found that more out-of-wedlock births are associated with higher subsequent crime rates over the last 45 years, they found just the opposite for years prior to 1965. In the 1940s and 1950s, small increases out-of-wedlock births actually correlated to lower subsequent murder rates.
Why did the association change? Kendall and Tamura argue that changing social attitudes toward unwed motherhood are the primary reason. In the 1940s and 1950s, social stigma against unwed mothers was intense, and as a result most pregnant couples ended up getting married—even couples who were very poorly matched. Some of those marriages would have been so bad that the children involved might have been better off—and less inclined to commit crimes as adults—if their parents had never married. So a moderate increase in out-of-wedlock births during this period meant that fewer poorly matched couples were forced to marry, thus exposing fewer children to damaging marriages.
In the 1960s and 1970s, however, social attitudes toward unwed motherhood changed rapidly and rates of out-of-wedlock births skyrocketed. Many of the marriages foregone during this period would have been relatively well-matched couples, Kendall and Tamura argue. “The children of these higher-quality matches are worse off because of their parents’ failure to marry, and have higher risks of adult criminality,” they write."
Read more at: Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
This doesn't prove your claim.
Depends on your standard of proof.
If you want "proof" by scientific method, it can't be done ......?
Then stop talking out your ass.
Your dishonest cutting of my post ....
You admitted you couldn't prove your claim.
This doesn't prove your claim.
Depends on your standard of proof.
If you want "proof" by scientific method, it can't be done ......?
Then stop talking out your ass.
Your dishonest cutting of my post ....
You admitted you couldn't prove your claim.
ANd you did it again.
Your belief system that you can have a family without a primary bread winner and half the parents without any additional problems is delusional.
Depends on your standard of proof.
If you want "proof" by scientific method, it can't be done ......?
Then stop talking out your ass.
Your dishonest cutting of my post ....
You admitted you couldn't prove your claim.
ANd you did it again.
Your belief system that you can have a family without a primary bread winner and half the parents without any additional problems is delusional.
When did I say that was my "belief system," liar? You go from 0 to kindergarten really fast when caught being illogical.
