Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Higher poverty rates due to systematic oppressionYes. THe strongest indicator for a child to have "dysfunction" is to be born out of wedlock.
Not poverty, not "oppression" whatever you mean by that, not "fear", not "lack of resources".
You forgot to include the links to your proof of this.
Didn't forget. This was pretty much settled science well before the internet became a big deal, thus...
When you try to search for this on the net, you get tons of shit on investigating details of this, such as comparing illegitimacy/crime increases during different decades, with the link between illegitimacy and crime treated as a given, not something to be supported.
Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
"ROLE OF SOCIAL STIGMA
While Kendall and Tamura found that more out-of-wedlock births are associated with higher subsequent crime rates over the last 45 years, they found just the opposite for years prior to 1965. In the 1940s and 1950s, small increases out-of-wedlock births actually correlated to lower subsequent murder rates.
Why did the association change? Kendall and Tamura argue that changing social attitudes toward unwed motherhood are the primary reason. In the 1940s and 1950s, social stigma against unwed mothers was intense, and as a result most pregnant couples ended up getting married—even couples who were very poorly matched. Some of those marriages would have been so bad that the children involved might have been better off—and less inclined to commit crimes as adults—if their parents had never married. So a moderate increase in out-of-wedlock births during this period meant that fewer poorly matched couples were forced to marry, thus exposing fewer children to damaging marriages.
In the 1960s and 1970s, however, social attitudes toward unwed motherhood changed rapidly and rates of out-of-wedlock births skyrocketed. Many of the marriages foregone during this period would have been relatively well-matched couples, Kendall and Tamura argue. “The children of these higher-quality matches are worse off because of their parents’ failure to marry, and have higher risks of adult criminality,” they write."
Read more at: Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
This doesn't prove your claim.
What's your explanation for higher Black crime rates?
Haven't you heard? White pseudo scientists have dubbed them Caucasoids no matter how dark their skin color. For all intents and purposes our system accepts them as whites. We know better but pseudoscience rules.The general standard is if you aren't White the system is going to treat you and yours harsher.An overwhelming number of all public school students placed in handcuffs by New York Police Department officers in 2016 were black or Hispanic ― a whopping 99 percent, to be exact.
NYCLU Executive Director Donna Lieberman told the New York Daily News that police action in school has a big impact on kids’ academic and emotional well-being.
“When a child is handcuffed, the child is humiliated,” Lieberman said. “It’s incompatible with the safe and supportive learning environment a school is supposed to provide."
In the report, Lieberman emphasized that the use of harsh police tactics in school “is neither necessary nor effective to keep children and staff safe.”
Despite the progress that’s been made in reducing school-based arrests in the city, 99 percent is beyond a troubling number. The figure only emphasizes the fact that black and Latinx children, who are disciplined more often and more severely throughout their years in school than white students, face an all too real school-to-prison pipeline. And too often, it puts students’ livelihoods at risk (see: 2015 assault at Spring Valley High School).
The NYCLU recommended that New York City move to limit the role of police in school discipline and “operate in a manner consistent with the best interests of children.”
99% Of Students Handcuffed In School By NYPD In 2016 Were Black Or Latinx | HuffPost
But, Asian Indians in the U.S.A are now the highest income earning group in the U.S.A, they are virtually gang free, and have the same skin color as African Americans on the whole.
Higher poverty rates due to systematic oppressionYes. THe strongest indicator for a child to have "dysfunction" is to be born out of wedlock.
Not poverty, not "oppression" whatever you mean by that, not "fear", not "lack of resources".
You forgot to include the links to your proof of this.
Didn't forget. This was pretty much settled science well before the internet became a big deal, thus...
When you try to search for this on the net, you get tons of shit on investigating details of this, such as comparing illegitimacy/crime increases during different decades, with the link between illegitimacy and crime treated as a given, not something to be supported.
Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
"ROLE OF SOCIAL STIGMA
While Kendall and Tamura found that more out-of-wedlock births are associated with higher subsequent crime rates over the last 45 years, they found just the opposite for years prior to 1965. In the 1940s and 1950s, small increases out-of-wedlock births actually correlated to lower subsequent murder rates.
Why did the association change? Kendall and Tamura argue that changing social attitudes toward unwed motherhood are the primary reason. In the 1940s and 1950s, social stigma against unwed mothers was intense, and as a result most pregnant couples ended up getting married—even couples who were very poorly matched. Some of those marriages would have been so bad that the children involved might have been better off—and less inclined to commit crimes as adults—if their parents had never married. So a moderate increase in out-of-wedlock births during this period meant that fewer poorly matched couples were forced to marry, thus exposing fewer children to damaging marriages.
In the 1960s and 1970s, however, social attitudes toward unwed motherhood changed rapidly and rates of out-of-wedlock births skyrocketed. Many of the marriages foregone during this period would have been relatively well-matched couples, Kendall and Tamura argue. “The children of these higher-quality matches are worse off because of their parents’ failure to marry, and have higher risks of adult criminality,” they write."
Read more at: Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
This doesn't prove your claim.
What's your explanation for higher Black crime rates?
Haven't you heard? White pseudo scientists have dubbed them Caucasoids no matter how dark their skin color. For all intents and purposes our system accepts them as whites. We know better but pseudoscience rules.The general standard is if you aren't White the system is going to treat you and yours harsher.An overwhelming number of all public school students placed in handcuffs by New York Police Department officers in 2016 were black or Hispanic ― a whopping 99 percent, to be exact.
NYCLU Executive Director Donna Lieberman told the New York Daily News that police action in school has a big impact on kids’ academic and emotional well-being.
“When a child is handcuffed, the child is humiliated,” Lieberman said. “It’s incompatible with the safe and supportive learning environment a school is supposed to provide."
In the report, Lieberman emphasized that the use of harsh police tactics in school “is neither necessary nor effective to keep children and staff safe.”
Despite the progress that’s been made in reducing school-based arrests in the city, 99 percent is beyond a troubling number. The figure only emphasizes the fact that black and Latinx children, who are disciplined more often and more severely throughout their years in school than white students, face an all too real school-to-prison pipeline. And too often, it puts students’ livelihoods at risk (see: 2015 assault at Spring Valley High School).
The NYCLU recommended that New York City move to limit the role of police in school discipline and “operate in a manner consistent with the best interests of children.”
99% Of Students Handcuffed In School By NYPD In 2016 Were Black Or Latinx | HuffPost
But, Asian Indians in the U.S.A are now the highest income earning group in the U.S.A, they are virtually gang free, and have the same skin color as African Americans on the whole.
The general standard is if you aren't White the system is going to treat you and yours harsher.An overwhelming number of all public school students placed in handcuffs by New York Police Department officers in 2016 were black or Hispanic ― a whopping 99 percent, to be exact.
NYCLU Executive Director Donna Lieberman told the New York Daily News that police action in school has a big impact on kids’ academic and emotional well-being.
“When a child is handcuffed, the child is humiliated,” Lieberman said. “It’s incompatible with the safe and supportive learning environment a school is supposed to provide."
In the report, Lieberman emphasized that the use of harsh police tactics in school “is neither necessary nor effective to keep children and staff safe.”
Despite the progress that’s been made in reducing school-based arrests in the city, 99 percent is beyond a troubling number. The figure only emphasizes the fact that black and Latinx children, who are disciplined more often and more severely throughout their years in school than white students, face an all too real school-to-prison pipeline. And too often, it puts students’ livelihoods at risk (see: 2015 assault at Spring Valley High School).
The NYCLU recommended that New York City move to limit the role of police in school discipline and “operate in a manner consistent with the best interests of children.”
99% Of Students Handcuffed In School By NYPD In 2016 Were Black Or Latinx | HuffPost
And what do you think plays into those social dysfunctions. Will you argue they are born dysfunctional or will you admit that there are societal factors involved.
I'd like to see your numbers on that.Higher poverty rates due to systematic oppressionYou forgot to include the links to your proof of this.
Didn't forget. This was pretty much settled science well before the internet became a big deal, thus...
When you try to search for this on the net, you get tons of shit on investigating details of this, such as comparing illegitimacy/crime increases during different decades, with the link between illegitimacy and crime treated as a given, not something to be supported.
Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
"ROLE OF SOCIAL STIGMA
While Kendall and Tamura found that more out-of-wedlock births are associated with higher subsequent crime rates over the last 45 years, they found just the opposite for years prior to 1965. In the 1940s and 1950s, small increases out-of-wedlock births actually correlated to lower subsequent murder rates.
Why did the association change? Kendall and Tamura argue that changing social attitudes toward unwed motherhood are the primary reason. In the 1940s and 1950s, social stigma against unwed mothers was intense, and as a result most pregnant couples ended up getting married—even couples who were very poorly matched. Some of those marriages would have been so bad that the children involved might have been better off—and less inclined to commit crimes as adults—if their parents had never married. So a moderate increase in out-of-wedlock births during this period meant that fewer poorly matched couples were forced to marry, thus exposing fewer children to damaging marriages.
In the 1960s and 1970s, however, social attitudes toward unwed motherhood changed rapidly and rates of out-of-wedlock births skyrocketed. Many of the marriages foregone during this period would have been relatively well-matched couples, Kendall and Tamura argue. “The children of these higher-quality matches are worse off because of their parents’ failure to marry, and have higher risks of adult criminality,” they write."
Read more at: Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
This doesn't prove your claim.
What's your explanation for higher Black crime rates?
There's some White people, who will laugh at you for you thinking this.
Many Ukrainians would for eample.
Ukraine experienced far worse systematic oppression, and is far poorer than African Americans are.
While, Ukraine's murder rate is quite high for a White nation, it's still about 4 x lower than the African American murder rate/
Higher poverty rates due to systematic oppressionYes. THe strongest indicator for a child to have "dysfunction" is to be born out of wedlock.
Not poverty, not "oppression" whatever you mean by that, not "fear", not "lack of resources".
You forgot to include the links to your proof of this.
Didn't forget. This was pretty much settled science well before the internet became a big deal, thus...
When you try to search for this on the net, you get tons of shit on investigating details of this, such as comparing illegitimacy/crime increases during different decades, with the link between illegitimacy and crime treated as a given, not something to be supported.
Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
"ROLE OF SOCIAL STIGMA
While Kendall and Tamura found that more out-of-wedlock births are associated with higher subsequent crime rates over the last 45 years, they found just the opposite for years prior to 1965. In the 1940s and 1950s, small increases out-of-wedlock births actually correlated to lower subsequent murder rates.
Why did the association change? Kendall and Tamura argue that changing social attitudes toward unwed motherhood are the primary reason. In the 1940s and 1950s, social stigma against unwed mothers was intense, and as a result most pregnant couples ended up getting married—even couples who were very poorly matched. Some of those marriages would have been so bad that the children involved might have been better off—and less inclined to commit crimes as adults—if their parents had never married. So a moderate increase in out-of-wedlock births during this period meant that fewer poorly matched couples were forced to marry, thus exposing fewer children to damaging marriages.
In the 1960s and 1970s, however, social attitudes toward unwed motherhood changed rapidly and rates of out-of-wedlock births skyrocketed. Many of the marriages foregone during this period would have been relatively well-matched couples, Kendall and Tamura argue. “The children of these higher-quality matches are worse off because of their parents’ failure to marry, and have higher risks of adult criminality,” they write."
Read more at: Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
This doesn't prove your claim.
What's your explanation for higher Black crime rates?
None of those imagined wrongs have done much to close the wealth gap between Blacks and whites. The White employment rate stays well above that of Blacks as well.Is that why much of the prejudices from the media, and Hollywood are directed at Italians, Poles, and Southern Whites?
Is that what Affirmative Action, Black History Month, the Minority Business Development Agency do?
Hmm no...most rape in this country is commited by White males.Higher poverty rates due to systematic oppressionYou forgot to include the links to your proof of this.
Didn't forget. This was pretty much settled science well before the internet became a big deal, thus...
When you try to search for this on the net, you get tons of shit on investigating details of this, such as comparing illegitimacy/crime increases during different decades, with the link between illegitimacy and crime treated as a given, not something to be supported.
Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
"ROLE OF SOCIAL STIGMA
While Kendall and Tamura found that more out-of-wedlock births are associated with higher subsequent crime rates over the last 45 years, they found just the opposite for years prior to 1965. In the 1940s and 1950s, small increases out-of-wedlock births actually correlated to lower subsequent murder rates.
Why did the association change? Kendall and Tamura argue that changing social attitudes toward unwed motherhood are the primary reason. In the 1940s and 1950s, social stigma against unwed mothers was intense, and as a result most pregnant couples ended up getting married—even couples who were very poorly matched. Some of those marriages would have been so bad that the children involved might have been better off—and less inclined to commit crimes as adults—if their parents had never married. So a moderate increase in out-of-wedlock births during this period meant that fewer poorly matched couples were forced to marry, thus exposing fewer children to damaging marriages.
In the 1960s and 1970s, however, social attitudes toward unwed motherhood changed rapidly and rates of out-of-wedlock births skyrocketed. Many of the marriages foregone during this period would have been relatively well-matched couples, Kendall and Tamura argue. “The children of these higher-quality matches are worse off because of their parents’ failure to marry, and have higher risks of adult criminality,” they write."
Read more at: Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
This doesn't prove your claim.
What's your explanation for higher Black crime rates?
When you are getting raped keep that in mind.
Illegitimacy? Care to elaborate?Illegitimacy leads to dysfunction.
Poverty causes dysfunction
Oppression causes dysfunction
Fear causes dysfunction
Lack of resources causes dysfunction
Among many many other things....
Yes. THe strongest indicator for a child to have "dysfunction" is to be born out of wedlock.
Not poverty, not "oppression" whatever you mean by that, not "fear", not "lack of resources".
You forgot to include the links to your proof of this.
Didn't forget. This was pretty much settled science well before the internet became a big deal, thus...
When you try to search for this on the net, you get tons of shit on investigating details of this, such as comparing illegitimacy/crime increases during different decades, with the link between illegitimacy and crime treated as a given, not something to be supported.
Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
"ROLE OF SOCIAL STIGMA
While Kendall and Tamura found that more out-of-wedlock births are associated with higher subsequent crime rates over the last 45 years, they found just the opposite for years prior to 1965. In the 1940s and 1950s, small increases out-of-wedlock births actually correlated to lower subsequent murder rates.
Why did the association change? Kendall and Tamura argue that changing social attitudes toward unwed motherhood are the primary reason. In the 1940s and 1950s, social stigma against unwed mothers was intense, and as a result most pregnant couples ended up getting married—even couples who were very poorly matched. Some of those marriages would have been so bad that the children involved might have been better off—and less inclined to commit crimes as adults—if their parents had never married. So a moderate increase in out-of-wedlock births during this period meant that fewer poorly matched couples were forced to marry, thus exposing fewer children to damaging marriages.
In the 1960s and 1970s, however, social attitudes toward unwed motherhood changed rapidly and rates of out-of-wedlock births skyrocketed. Many of the marriages foregone during this period would have been relatively well-matched couples, Kendall and Tamura argue. “The children of these higher-quality matches are worse off because of their parents’ failure to marry, and have higher risks of adult criminality,” they write."
Read more at: Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
This doesn't prove your claim.
Illegitimacy? Care to elaborate?
Poverty causes dysfunction
Oppression causes dysfunction
Fear causes dysfunction
Lack of resources causes dysfunction
Among many many other things....
Yes. THe strongest indicator for a child to have "dysfunction" is to be born out of wedlock.
Not poverty, not "oppression" whatever you mean by that, not "fear", not "lack of resources".
You forgot to include the links to your proof of this.
Didn't forget. This was pretty much settled science well before the internet became a big deal, thus...
When you try to search for this on the net, you get tons of shit on investigating details of this, such as comparing illegitimacy/crime increases during different decades, with the link between illegitimacy and crime treated as a given, not something to be supported.
Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
"ROLE OF SOCIAL STIGMA
While Kendall and Tamura found that more out-of-wedlock births are associated with higher subsequent crime rates over the last 45 years, they found just the opposite for years prior to 1965. In the 1940s and 1950s, small increases out-of-wedlock births actually correlated to lower subsequent murder rates.
Why did the association change? Kendall and Tamura argue that changing social attitudes toward unwed motherhood are the primary reason. In the 1940s and 1950s, social stigma against unwed mothers was intense, and as a result most pregnant couples ended up getting married—even couples who were very poorly matched. Some of those marriages would have been so bad that the children involved might have been better off—and less inclined to commit crimes as adults—if their parents had never married. So a moderate increase in out-of-wedlock births during this period meant that fewer poorly matched couples were forced to marry, thus exposing fewer children to damaging marriages.
In the 1960s and 1970s, however, social attitudes toward unwed motherhood changed rapidly and rates of out-of-wedlock births skyrocketed. Many of the marriages foregone during this period would have been relatively well-matched couples, Kendall and Tamura argue. “The children of these higher-quality matches are worse off because of their parents’ failure to marry, and have higher risks of adult criminality,” they write."
Read more at: Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
This doesn't prove your claim.
Depends on your standard of proof.
If you want "proof" by scientific method, it can't be done ......?
tehehe I am kind of a hippieAnd what do you think plays into those social dysfunctions. Will you argue they are born dysfunctional or will you admit that there are societal factors involved.
Will you admit the result is the same? And the policing problem is the same? What are you a hippie?
"He mugged and robbed that old man because society made him do it"
Does it matter WHY he did it? The cops handcuff them for a reason. You can argue being criminally inclined isnt their fault. I dont care. Nor should a cop. Cops aren't social workers. So long as the cops get the criminals I'll let the liberals take care of them at home.
"There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery. Then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved."
Jesse Jackson Operation PUSH in Chicago (27 November 1993)
You can not stay on topic can you?Higher poverty rates due to systematic oppressionYou forgot to include the links to your proof of this.
Didn't forget. This was pretty much settled science well before the internet became a big deal, thus...
When you try to search for this on the net, you get tons of shit on investigating details of this, such as comparing illegitimacy/crime increases during different decades, with the link between illegitimacy and crime treated as a given, not something to be supported.
Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
"ROLE OF SOCIAL STIGMA
While Kendall and Tamura found that more out-of-wedlock births are associated with higher subsequent crime rates over the last 45 years, they found just the opposite for years prior to 1965. In the 1940s and 1950s, small increases out-of-wedlock births actually correlated to lower subsequent murder rates.
Why did the association change? Kendall and Tamura argue that changing social attitudes toward unwed motherhood are the primary reason. In the 1940s and 1950s, social stigma against unwed mothers was intense, and as a result most pregnant couples ended up getting married—even couples who were very poorly matched. Some of those marriages would have been so bad that the children involved might have been better off—and less inclined to commit crimes as adults—if their parents had never married. So a moderate increase in out-of-wedlock births during this period meant that fewer poorly matched couples were forced to marry, thus exposing fewer children to damaging marriages.
In the 1960s and 1970s, however, social attitudes toward unwed motherhood changed rapidly and rates of out-of-wedlock births skyrocketed. Many of the marriages foregone during this period would have been relatively well-matched couples, Kendall and Tamura argue. “The children of these higher-quality matches are worse off because of their parents’ failure to marry, and have higher risks of adult criminality,” they write."
Read more at: Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
This doesn't prove your claim.
What's your explanation for higher Black crime rates?
Trinidad, and Tobago, or the Bahamas are quite wealthy Black dominated nations.... Surprise, surprise, they have very high murder rates too.
But, who's systematically oppressing them, when they run these nations overwhelmingly?
again, you need to stay on topic. Ukraine is not in the US last I checked. All countries have DIFFERENT pasts that affect their present situations. This conversation is about NYC, it is about USA. Focus or get lost.Higher poverty rates due to systematic oppressionYou forgot to include the links to your proof of this.
Didn't forget. This was pretty much settled science well before the internet became a big deal, thus...
When you try to search for this on the net, you get tons of shit on investigating details of this, such as comparing illegitimacy/crime increases during different decades, with the link between illegitimacy and crime treated as a given, not something to be supported.
Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
"ROLE OF SOCIAL STIGMA
While Kendall and Tamura found that more out-of-wedlock births are associated with higher subsequent crime rates over the last 45 years, they found just the opposite for years prior to 1965. In the 1940s and 1950s, small increases out-of-wedlock births actually correlated to lower subsequent murder rates.
Why did the association change? Kendall and Tamura argue that changing social attitudes toward unwed motherhood are the primary reason. In the 1940s and 1950s, social stigma against unwed mothers was intense, and as a result most pregnant couples ended up getting married—even couples who were very poorly matched. Some of those marriages would have been so bad that the children involved might have been better off—and less inclined to commit crimes as adults—if their parents had never married. So a moderate increase in out-of-wedlock births during this period meant that fewer poorly matched couples were forced to marry, thus exposing fewer children to damaging marriages.
In the 1960s and 1970s, however, social attitudes toward unwed motherhood changed rapidly and rates of out-of-wedlock births skyrocketed. Many of the marriages foregone during this period would have been relatively well-matched couples, Kendall and Tamura argue. “The children of these higher-quality matches are worse off because of their parents’ failure to marry, and have higher risks of adult criminality,” they write."
Read more at: Study: Crime rates linked to out-of-wedlock births
This doesn't prove your claim.
What's your explanation for higher Black crime rates?
There's some White people, who will laugh at you for you thinking this.
Many Ukrainians would for eample.
Ukraine experienced far worse systematic oppression, and is far poorer than African Americans are.
While, Ukraine's murder rate is quite high for a White nation, it's still about 4 x lower than the African American murder rate/
apples and oranges, get lost.Even though the majority Black Prince George's County, Maryland has a income level about 7 times higher than Ukraine, Prince George's County, Maryland has a murder rate about 2 times higher than Ukraine.
