A Better Subdivisioning of the Three-part Model will Provide Better Checks & Balances

The checks and balances is a valid theory, and so is the three-part separation theory. The problem is that the subsisting governing system has deployed the three-part separation theory incorrectly, and that adversely effects the checks and balances theory. Correctly deploy the three-part separation theory and the checks and balances will be deployed correctly, and that will prevent corruption; because the entities that are supposed to separate and "competing" will be correctly separated and will have their respective hierarchies that will prevent the members from over-desiring for the almighty presidency. Representatives and Senators desire to be president, because the system is flawed. Federal jurists are practically denied access to the presidency, and that causes problems, if it is not unequal to the legislature.

A correct separation of the entities will redistribute the powers of the presidency, which is wrapped up in the security departments. The security departments are supposed to be aligned with the appropriate legislatures and (appeals) courts; but the subsisting system was not designed to organize new legislatures as the security departments were expanded from the original three to the hundred that we have now that the president presides over.

The system that I have deliberated and presented, here, suggests that the president is the overseer of the Intelligence Community, and is thus the senior advisor for the rest of the government.

The Supreme Court is the overseer of the military and is inclined to survey the senate of state jurists for military issues such as promulgating a war.

The Senate of State Jurists is the overseer of the State Department, because embassies are courts.

The Board of Commerce is made up of the state commerce commissioners, and oversees the Commerce Department, which includes the federal reserve.

The League of Attorneys is made up of state attorneys general and is the overseer of the Trust Department, which is the former Justice Department. The whole government is supposed to be the establishment of justice - not a sub-department of the government. Because they are from each state there will be no need to find an independent prosecutor, because several state AGs can be assigned to prosecute any corruption; which is not going to happen.

The Network of Representatives is made up of the six senior council members from each municipalities and they are the overseer of the Interior Department, which includes the Treasury, which has a investigation unit, possibly the FBI.
 
Last edited:

The US Constitution is fine. It is the politicians, on both sides of the aisle, that have ignored it too often that are the problem.
If “they are not following the Constitution,” that means the checks and balances do not work, because the checks and balances are supposed to prevent that, as well. The checks and balances do not work, and it is probably because the three-part separation theory is improperly deployed. The three-part separation theory is probably a valid theory, but if there is any error in its deployment, then the distribution of government powers is probably not balanced, and the checks on power are probably not in accordance with expectations. It is very unlikely that the checks and balances are going to work correctly if the separation of government is not properly constructed.
 
It was written and enacted by people. People are human and less than perfect. That doesn't mean it requires any tampering with. But if it did need changing the methods for doing so are clearly described.
The only way to correctly separate the government and coordinate the balance of power is by a complete reordering of the three-level charter system. Amendments will not suffice, because the separation of the government entities is hard wired to the outline of the charter; and the checks on power and the coordination of the three levels has to be constructed without compromise with any remnants of the flawed system. Furthermore, government charters are best to be considered similar to computer programs, and that means that they have to be correctly formatted and arranged in an efficient order for them to work correctly. As mentioned in the previous article, if there is any error in the demarcation of the balance of power, then the checks on power are adversely affected. If there is not a science to it, then there is a notable hierarchy art to it. The sophistication of hierarchy formatting is a recent development in document technology. Hyper-Text Markup Language is what has been needed to construct the cascading hierarchical directive systems that government charters are, and HTML was just released a decade or two ago, and its implementation for solving document and knowledge management problems is just beginning to be realized. And this publication is the premier introduction to such utility for organizing reliable government charters.
 

Forum List

Back
Top