A perfect example of Media Gaslighting: The "crowd size" narrative.

MarathonMike

Diamond Member
Dec 30, 2014
47,991
66,893
3,645
The Southwestern Desert
It would be childishly simple to provide the public with an honest view of Trump or Harris rally crowd sizes. Just fly a drone over the venue right before either Trump or Harris is about to speak which would be peak crowd size. Then let the public decide for themselves what the crowd sizes are. But they never do that! Why? You always have ONE FIXED CAMERA with a very narrow field of view focused on either Trump or Harris. That is the definition of CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE.

By doing that, they can make vague statements and generalizations and skew the crowd size and enthusiasm however they want. And clearly the Media is using crowd size to generate excitement about the Harris campaign. And of course they twist the narrative when it comes to Trump and use phrases like "Trump furious about Kamala's crowd size".

Do people really not get what the Media is doing? What American would not want to see an aerial view of both candidates' crowd size at the next rally events? :dunno:
 
It would be childishly simple to provide the public with an honest view of Trump or Harris rally crowd sizes. Just fly a drone over the venue right before either Trump or Harris is about to speak which would be peak crowd size. Then let the public decide for themselves what the crowd sizes are. But they never do that! Why? You always have ONE FIXED CAMERA with a very narrow field of view focused on either Trump or Harris. That is the definition of CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE.

By doing that, they can make vague statements and generalizations and skew the crowd size and enthusiasm however they want. And clearly the Media is using crowd size to generate excitement about the Harris campaign. And of course they twist the narrative when it comes to Trump and use phrases like "Trump furious about Kamala's crowd size".

Do people really not get what the Media is doing? What American would not want to see an aerial view of both candidates' crowd size at the next rally events? :dunno:
There is no free press anymore in America. RIP journalism. Dick Tracy isn't pleased.
The 1st Dick Tracy:
dcfinal.jpg
 
It would be childishly simple to provide the public with an honest view of Trump or Harris rally crowd sizes. Just fly a drone over the venue right before either Trump or Harris is about to speak which would be peak crowd size. Then let the public decide for themselves what the crowd sizes are. But they never do that! Why? You always have ONE FIXED CAMERA with a very narrow field of view focused on either Trump or Harris. That is the definition of CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE.

By doing that, they can make vague statements and generalizations and skew the crowd size and enthusiasm however they want. And clearly the Media is using crowd size to generate excitement about the Harris campaign. And of course they twist the narrative when it comes to Trump and use phrases like "Trump furious about Kamala's crowd size".

Do people really not get what the Media is doing? What American would not want to see an aerial view of both candidates' crowd size at the next rally events? :dunno:
nobody cares about trumps crowd size or his ratings. those are TRUMP's obsessions.
 
It would be childishly simple to provide the public with an honest view of Trump or Harris rally crowd sizes. Just fly a drone over the venue right before either Trump or Harris is about to speak which would be peak crowd size. Then let the public decide for themselves what the crowd sizes are. But they never do that! Why? You always have ONE FIXED CAMERA with a very narrow field of view focused on either Trump or Harris. That is the definition of CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE.

By doing that, they can make vague statements and generalizations and skew the crowd size and enthusiasm however they want. And clearly the Media is using crowd size to generate excitement about the Harris campaign. And of course they twist the narrative when it comes to Trump and use phrases like "Trump furious about Kamala's crowd size".

Do people really not get what the Media is doing? What American would not want to see an aerial view of both candidates' crowd size at the next rally events? :dunno:

The media does not control the images of crowd size
Every member of that crowd has a camera and video capability and access to the internet

If the media is lying, it will be quickly disproven
 
The media does not control the images of crowd size
Every member of that crowd has a camera and video capability and access to the internet

If the media is lying, it will be quickly disproven
It would be childishly simple to provide the public with an honest view of Trump or Harris rally crowd sizes. Just fly a drone over the venue right before either Trump or Harris is about to speak which would be peak crowd size. Then let the public decide for themselves what the crowd sizes are. But they never do that! Why? You always have ONE FIXED CAMERA with a very narrow field of view focused on either Trump or Harris. That is the definition of CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE.

By doing that, they can make vague statements and generalizations and skew the crowd size and enthusiasm however they want. And clearly the Media is using crowd size to generate excitement about the Harris campaign. And of course they twist the narrative when it comes to Trump and use phrases like "Trump furious about Kamala's crowd size".

Do people really not get what the Media is doing? What American would not want to see an aerial view of both candidates' crowd size at the next rally events? :dunno:
freud would diagnose trump's crowd size obsession as a stage 4 case of penis envy.
 
YOUR Democratic Party cares A LOT about crowd size obviously. So you object to the idea of flying a drone over EVERY campaign rally?
these little trolls really bother dear leader, don't they? he'll be rolling ball bearings like bogart before we're done.
 
It would be childishly simple to provide the public with an honest view of Trump or Harris rally crowd sizes. Just fly a drone over the venue right before either Trump or Harris is about to speak which would be peak crowd size. Then let the public decide for themselves what the crowd sizes are. But they never do that! Why? You always have ONE FIXED CAMERA with a very narrow field of view focused on either Trump or Harris. That is the definition of CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE.

By doing that, they can make vague statements and generalizations and skew the crowd size and enthusiasm however they want. And clearly the Media is using crowd size to generate excitement about the Harris campaign. And of course they twist the narrative when it comes to Trump and use phrases like "Trump furious about Kamala's crowd size".

Do people really not get what the Media is doing? What American would not want to see an aerial view of both candidates' crowd size at the next rally events? :dunno:
You're obsessions with crowd sizes is just plain weird. It's a MAGA/Trump thing. If he were to stop throwing hissy fits over somebody other than himself getting attention...

:auiqs.jpg:
 
Uh.. .I do not suggest trying to fly drones over the two presidential candidates unless you want to find yourself arrested. Although the Butler police wouldnt mind.
That is a dodge. What is YOUR objection to having a drone fly over BOTH Trump and Harris rallies? The drone would obviously be authorized and controlled by a trusted operator.
 
The media does not control the images of crowd size
Every member of that crowd has a camera and video capability and access to the internet

If the media is lying, it will be quickly disproven
Wedo not believe you anymore. Why you do not understand it should not surprise you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top