eagle1462010
Diamond Member
- May 17, 2013
- 69,410
- 34,460
Men died trying to save this worthless POS!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He left his post in a combat zone during a War!There isn't enough evidence to convict him. The military basically has to argue that a US soldier wanted to be captured by the Taliban.
Who the f#$k would believe that under any circumstances.
The guy was maybe confused, had bad judgement, blah blah blah. But court-martial? It won't happen. The military will likely just trying to dishonorably discharge him and that will be it.
He left his post in a combat zone during a War!There isn't enough evidence to convict him. The military basically has to argue that a US soldier wanted to be captured by the Taliban.
Who the f#$k would believe that under any circumstances.
The guy was maybe confused, had bad judgement, blah blah blah. But court-martial? It won't happen. The military will likely just trying to dishonorably discharge him and that will be it.
CHECK MATE
Bergdahl is a no-good traitor. He walked away from his post in a time of war and that cowardly act caused the death of six soldiers
He needs to be found guilty then executed.
Your full of it..................His unit pretty much laid it out already............He hauled ass and men died trying to save his ass.He left his post in a combat zone during a War!There isn't enough evidence to convict him. The military basically has to argue that a US soldier wanted to be captured by the Taliban.
Who the f#$k would believe that under any circumstances.
The guy was maybe confused, had bad judgement, blah blah blah. But court-martial? It won't happen. The military will likely just trying to dishonorably discharge him and that will be it.
CHECK MATE
Doesn't matter, his lawyer will argue he wandered too far from base. There is no evidence to the contrary. I know cons love to see soldiers suffer but it isn't going to happen this time Spaz.
He left his post in a combat zone during a War!There isn't enough evidence to convict him. The military basically has to argue that a US soldier wanted to be captured by the Taliban.
Who the f#$k would believe that under any circumstances.
The guy was maybe confused, had bad judgement, blah blah blah. But court-martial? It won't happen. The military will likely just trying to dishonorably discharge him and that will be it.
CHECK MATE
Timmy has fell...Timmy has fell too many times to be considered sane...Yes, Timmy, they used to shoot deserters. 5 good soldiers died looking for the scumbag, now we find out he left as a protest. The military isn't where you protest."No soildier left behind" has an asterick ? Who knew !
That story was debunked on the deaths thing .
You can at least wait for the trial to convict the guy . He wanders off for a walk and suddenly he's worse than hitler !?
He wanders off for a walk and suddenly he's worse than hitler !?
Timmy did it again.
![]()
He's deserter who took up with the Taliban, converted to Islam, and changed his name to "Abdullah"...Bergdahl is a no-good traitor. He walked away from his post in a time of war and that cowardly act caused the death of six soldiers
He needs to be found guilty then executed.
That's not true .
The investigator recommended misdomeanor charges . He didn't get people killed , he didn't betray the country . He's a doofus who went AWOL for a day and got his ass captured .
The whole point of the THREAD though was the gross incompetence of Obama!
He hired the people that said "Hey let's bring Bergdahl's parents for a Rose Garden ceremony!"
Oh yea that was such a GREAT optic!
Why is it so hard to get people to recognize Obama had NO experience in hiring people. He hired people that thought the same way he did!
Obama hired incompetent people as Obama was grossly incompetent. NO one seems to jump on this aspect!
You just don't see stupidity of this magnitude!
90%+ of the respondents in your thread are rw'ers and life-long civilians as well no doubt.The whole point of the THREAD though was the gross incompetence of Obama!
He hired the people that said "Hey let's bring Bergdahl's parents for a Rose Garden ceremony!"
Oh yea that was such a GREAT optic!
Why is it so hard to get people to recognize Obama had NO experience in hiring people. He hired people that thought the same way he did!
Obama hired incompetent people as Obama was grossly incompetent. NO one seems to jump on this aspect!
You just don't see stupidity of this magnitude!
Your full of it..................His unit pretty much laid it out already............He hauled ass and men died trying to save his ass.He left his post in a combat zone during a War!There isn't enough evidence to convict him. The military basically has to argue that a US soldier wanted to be captured by the Taliban.
Who the f#$k would believe that under any circumstances.
The guy was maybe confused, had bad judgement, blah blah blah. But court-martial? It won't happen. The military will likely just trying to dishonorably discharge him and that will be it.
CHECK MATE
Doesn't matter, his lawyer will argue he wandered too far from base. There is no evidence to the contrary. I know cons love to see soldiers suffer but it isn't going to happen this time Spaz.
Your full of it..................His unit pretty much laid it out already............He hauled ass and men died trying to save his ass.He left his post in a combat zone during a War!There isn't enough evidence to convict him. The military basically has to argue that a US soldier wanted to be captured by the Taliban.
Who the f#$k would believe that under any circumstances.
The guy was maybe confused, had bad judgement, blah blah blah. But court-martial? It won't happen. The military will likely just trying to dishonorably discharge him and that will be it.
CHECK MATE
Doesn't matter, his lawyer will argue he wandered too far from base. There is no evidence to the contrary. I know cons love to see soldiers suffer but it isn't going to happen this time Spaz.
Your emotion will have no place in court. People get these things confused all the time. It doesn't matter what you think, what you feel, what anyone else thinks or feels, it only matters what can be proven. Opinions about his intentions are not evidence, they are here-say and opinion.
You can flail around all you want, in court evidence rules. He will testify on the stand WHY he was off base, and it won't be "I was deserting". He's already stated in an interview recently he wanted to feel like some super soldier and when he had wandered too far from base he knew he had made a mistake.
Emote all you want if it helps you. Evidence ignores emotion. Sorry.
Your full of it..................His unit pretty much laid it out already............He hauled ass and men died trying to save his ass.He left his post in a combat zone during a War!There isn't enough evidence to convict him. The military basically has to argue that a US soldier wanted to be captured by the Taliban.
Who the f#$k would believe that under any circumstances.
The guy was maybe confused, had bad judgement, blah blah blah. But court-martial? It won't happen. The military will likely just trying to dishonorably discharge him and that will be it.
CHECK MATE
Doesn't matter, his lawyer will argue he wandered too far from base. There is no evidence to the contrary. I know cons love to see soldiers suffer but it isn't going to happen this time Spaz.
Your emotion will have no place in court. People get these things confused all the time. It doesn't matter what you think, what you feel, what anyone else thinks or feels, it only matters what can be proven. Opinions about his intentions are not evidence, they are here-say and opinion.
You can flail around all you want, in court evidence rules. He will testify on the stand WHY he was off base, and it won't be "I was deserting". He's already stated in an interview recently he wanted to feel like some super soldier and when he had wandered too far from base he knew he had made a mistake.
Emote all you want if it helps you. Evidence ignores emotion. Sorry.
It won't matter how he "felt".
Leaving base without permission is AWOL. His buddying up to terrorists - treason.Your full of it..................His unit pretty much laid it out already............He hauled ass and men died trying to save his ass.He left his post in a combat zone during a War!
CHECK MATE
Doesn't matter, his lawyer will argue he wandered too far from base. There is no evidence to the contrary. I know cons love to see soldiers suffer but it isn't going to happen this time Spaz.
Your emotion will have no place in court. People get these things confused all the time. It doesn't matter what you think, what you feel, what anyone else thinks or feels, it only matters what can be proven. Opinions about his intentions are not evidence, they are here-say and opinion.
You can flail around all you want, in court evidence rules. He will testify on the stand WHY he was off base, and it won't be "I was deserting". He's already stated in an interview recently he wanted to feel like some super soldier and when he had wandered too far from base he knew he had made a mistake.
Emote all you want if it helps you. Evidence ignores emotion. Sorry.
It won't matter how he "felt".
You're pretty dense aren't you dumbo. Reread and try again.
He left his post in a combat zone during a War!There isn't enough evidence to convict him. The military basically has to argue that a US soldier wanted to be captured by the Taliban.
Who the f#$k would believe that under any circumstances.
The guy was maybe confused, had bad judgement, blah blah blah. But court-martial? It won't happen. The military will likely just trying to dishonorably discharge him and that will be it.
CHECK MATE
Doesn't matter, his lawyer will argue he wandered too far from base. There is no evidence to the contrary. I know cons love to see soldiers suffer but it isn't going to happen this time Spaz.
There is no evidence to the contrary.
If they have charged him, then the court martial is already on the docket.There isn't enough evidence to convict him. The military basically has to argue that a US soldier wanted to be captured by the Taliban.
Who the f#$k would believe that under any circumstances.
The guy was maybe confused, had bad judgement, blah blah blah. But court-martial? It won't happen. The military will likely just trying to dishonorably discharge him and that will be it.
This is one time where I don't understand