Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why on Earth would he say he veto a bill that wouldn’t pass constitutional muster anyway?All Trump had to do was say he would veto an abortion ban, but he couldn’t.
He is weak.
He's constitutionally incapable (pun intended), of admitting he's wrongAll Trump had to do was say he would veto an abortion ban, but he couldn’t.
He is weak.
Well, if he actually believed that then all he would say is that he’d veto the bill because it’s unconstitutional.Why on Earth would he say he veto a bill that wouldn’t pass constitutional muster anyway?
back to playing constitutional scholar again?Why on Earth would he say he veto a bill that wouldn’t pass constitutional muster anyway?
It's always a balancing act.Why on Earth would he say he veto a bill that wouldn’t pass constitutional muster anyway?
He couldn't. He wouldn't.Well, if he actually believed that then all he would say is that he’d veto the bill because it’s unconstitutional.
But he didn’t say that either.
He’s weak.
good pointsIt's always a balancing act.
Talk about missed opportunities.
He should have repeated the names Gorsuch, Kavenaugh, Barrett over and over again. And talked about how Dobbs is getting back to constitutional balance. Not a word.
He could then mention Jackson and her failure as a judge on so many fronts.
Missed opportunty.
back to playing constitutional scholar again?
too funny
Bills don't get sent to the court. The courts get in much later.
You cannot expect any debate moderators, anywhere at anytime, to know everything about all of the issues.Such as, the debunked story of Trump's 'bloodbath' and 'there are good people on both sides' comments. They have been repeatedly debunked, and when Harris repeated the lies, they didn't step in to correct her.
They have to become law first.Look at you playing legal scholar.
Courts often stop enforcement of laws until issues are resolved.
If the federal government were stupid enough to pass a ban, it's pretty sure that lower courts would be engaged immediately.
No need to. Youre the tools who want abortion to be a GOO stumbling block.Well, if he actually believed that then all he would say is that he’d veto the bill because it’s unconstitutional.
But he didn’t say that either.
He’s weak.
The dainty keeps exposing his abundant ignorance. Such a weak troll he is.back to playing constitutional scholar again?
too funny
Bills don't get sent to the court. The courts get in much later.
...The dainty keeps exposing his abundant ignorance. Such a weak troll he is.
Bills obviously don’t go to court. Hell, even abject imbeciles like you know that much.
so make some more arguments countering shit I never said.
You’re a joke.
Bills which we know in advance are certain to get scuttled as unconstitutional don’t need to get passed or signed, you dipshit.
Take your weak sauce to where it might be welcomed. Maybe the Dumbocrap Underground.
Stop lying. There were far more people there to just protest the removing of the statues and had nothing to do with white supremacy. Your lies have been debunked by even far left Snopes, so you really look stupid continuing to lie.He was talking about the two sides at Charlottesville that day. One side was there to attend a white supremacist rally.
He was talking about the two sides at Charlottesville that day. One side was there to attend a white supremacist rally.