Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Was the doctor a democrat? Most men of his stature and money vote Republican.
Please provide "credible" proof that taxpayer funds are used for legal abortions.
Please provide "credible" proof that taxpayer funds are used for legal abortions.
It's like saying the Holocaust operated without consent of the Nazis. The Planned Parenthood (eugenic society) is the business end of the abortion industry and amazingly PP is funded by taxpayers who would be shocked at what goes on in the abortion industry. The perverts are running the asylum.Please provide "credible" proof that taxpayer funds are used for legal abortions.
HIPPA regulations prohibit that being done without your written consent to publish your records.
187-What does the HIPAA Privacy Rule do
Please provide "credible" proof that taxpayer funds are used for legal abortions.
HIPPA regulations prohibit that being done without your written consent to publish your records.
187-What does the HIPAA Privacy Rule do
The one thing upon which we can rely:Please provide "credible" proof that taxpayer funds are used for legal abortions.
HIPPA regulations prohibit that being done without your written consent to publish your records.
187-What does the HIPAA Privacy Rule do
Complete and utter horseshit . HIPPA protests the privacy of patients, not funding sources
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What the fuck are you talking about? HIPPA does t do deal with funding sources .Plain and simple. Are you trying to gaslight me? Not workingThe one thing upon which we can rely:Please provide "credible" proof that taxpayer funds are used for legal abortions.
HIPPA regulations prohibit that being done without your written consent to publish your records.
187-What does the HIPAA Privacy Rule do
Complete and utter horseshit . HIPPA protests the privacy of patients, not funding sources
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Liberal reading comprehension failure.
Please re-read and consider the proof that would appear in one person's medical records.
Or.....
Ask an adult to sound out the words as written, perhaps applying emphasis to help you grasp.
...says the person who believes it's okay to kill inconvenient human beings.What does improper disposal of medical waste have to do with the ethics of abortion?
Even for pro-lifers, this is a retarded thread, and that's saying something. Pro-lifers are so fixated on finding reasons to hate, they've abandoned even the pretense of possessing common sense. They want to hate, they get off on hating, so nothing will stop them from hating. Just look at this thread. I hope none of them stroke out from the hate.
Should we pity the pro-lifers? Yes? Living a joyless bitter hate-filled life isn't what I'd wish on anyone. However, that doesn't mean we'll let down our guard. You can feel pity for junky, but you still have to watch your back when around the junky, and pro-lifers are hate-junkies.
So, in one case, people will ignore the law and seek that which is heavily regulated -- but in the other case, people will obey the law and not seek that which is heavily regulated.Of course I see the parallel! IN both cases, regulation will not stop what is happening, The difference is that in the case of abortion, regulation will cost lives. It will not stop people from getting abortions and will surely result in the deaths of women who go the back ally rout. In the case of guns, regulations are likely to save at least some lives by reducing the number of the most deadly weapons on the street, and reducing the number of all guns that wind up in the hands of those who should not have themDo you really not see the parallel to the calls for gun control here, and how your arguments against one are identical to the arguments against the other?Complete and utter horseshit which is exactly what I have come to expect of you. Gosnell was a crazy person who hade no regard for the law and operated under the radar. What you propose would only penalize legitimate provider, not to mention women and still not prevent this sort of atrocity. If you claim that it would, you're even more of an idiot that I thought. Or just a liar.Yes, Yes, I read your screed on abortion regulations. We already have sufficient regulations. Additional regulations that Republican's want are for the sole purpose of restricting access to abortion-like requiring clinics to have admitting rights- and I think that you might actually be smart enough to know it. No amount of regulations are going to stop a Gosnell or this guy who collected fetuses . Bank robbery is illegal but it still happens. Once again, the more you restrict abortion, the more you will put women at risk AND see abortions of viable fetuses because it will all be forced underground.The hell it doesn't. The story shows the need for Common Sense Abortion regulations and licensing requirements.
Libs have been fighting common sense for years.
No we don't have sufficient regulations on abortion.
If we did, we wouldn't have situations like this.
Could a proper regulatory environment prevented Gosnell?
Of course.
If massive taxation and regulation had been placed for Gosnell, he would have given up his abortion trade many years ago.
Overview
Kermit Barron Gosnell (born February 9, 1941) is an American physician and former abortion provider who was convicted of murdering three infants who were born alive during attempted abortion procedures; he was also convicted of involuntary manslaughter of one woman during an abortion procedure.Gosnell owned and operated the Women's Medical Society clinic in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and he was a prolific prescriber of OxyContin. In 2011, Gosnell and various co-defendant employees were charged with eight counts of murder, 24 felony counts of performing illegal abortions beyond the state o…
Read moreView attachment 279295
Lakhota rated this post as "funny".But were the abortions legal? What he did with the remains is a different story.
This was legal according to German Law. Does that make it okay?
Democrats are no better than Nazis. Just substitute babies for these Jews.
No! That is not what I'm saying. And, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt by also saying that I think that you are smart enough to know that . In both cases, there will be those who obey the law and those who do not. What I am saying is the, for the reason that I've stated, the outcomes in terms of lives lost will be different in each case.So, in one case, people will ignore the law and seek that which is heavily regulated -- but in the other case, people will obey the law and not seek that which is heavily regulated.Of course I see the parallel! IN both cases, regulation will not stop what is happening, The difference is that in the case of abortion, regulation will cost lives. It will not stop people from getting abortions and will surely result in the deaths of women who go the back ally rout. In the case of guns, regulations are likely to save at least some lives by reducing the number of the most deadly weapons on the street, and reducing the number of all guns that wind up in the hands of those who should not have themDo you really not see the parallel to the calls for gun control here, and how your arguments against one are identical to the arguments against the other?Complete and utter horseshit which is exactly what I have come to expect of you. Gosnell was a crazy person who hade no regard for the law and operated under the radar. What you propose would only penalize legitimate provider, not to mention women and still not prevent this sort of atrocity. If you claim that it would, you're even more of an idiot that I thought. Or just a liar.Yes, Yes, I read your screed on abortion regulations. We already have sufficient regulations. Additional regulations that Republican's want are for the sole purpose of restricting access to abortion-like requiring clinics to have admitting rights- and I think that you might actually be smart enough to know it. No amount of regulations are going to stop a Gosnell or this guy who collected fetuses . Bank robbery is illegal but it still happens. Once again, the more you restrict abortion, the more you will put women at risk AND see abortions of viable fetuses because it will all be forced underground.
No we don't have sufficient regulations on abortion.
If we did, we wouldn't have situations like this.
Could a proper regulatory environment prevented Gosnell?
Of course.
If massive taxation and regulation had been placed for Gosnell, he would have given up his abortion trade many years ago.
Overview
Kermit Barron Gosnell (born February 9, 1941) is an American physician and former abortion provider who was convicted of murdering three infants who were born alive during attempted abortion procedures; he was also convicted of involuntary manslaughter of one woman during an abortion procedure.Gosnell owned and operated the Women's Medical Society clinic in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and he was a prolific prescriber of OxyContin. In 2011, Gosnell and various co-defendant employees were charged with eight counts of murder, 24 felony counts of performing illegal abortions beyond the state o…
Read moreView attachment 279295
You were so close to having a breakthrough, too. Good thing I wasn't holding my breath.
No! That is not what I'm saying. And, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt by also saying that I think that you are smart enough to know that . In both cases, there will be those who obey the law and those who do not. What I am saying is the, for the reason that I've stated, the outcomes in terms of lives lost will be different in each case.So, in one case, people will ignore the law and seek that which is heavily regulated -- but in the other case, people will obey the law and not seek that which is heavily regulated.Of course I see the parallel! IN both cases, regulation will not stop what is happening, The difference is that in the case of abortion, regulation will cost lives. It will not stop people from getting abortions and will surely result in the deaths of women who go the back ally rout. In the case of guns, regulations are likely to save at least some lives by reducing the number of the most deadly weapons on the street, and reducing the number of all guns that wind up in the hands of those who should not have themDo you really not see the parallel to the calls for gun control here, and how your arguments against one are identical to the arguments against the other?Complete and utter horseshit which is exactly what I have come to expect of you. Gosnell was a crazy person who hade no regard for the law and operated under the radar. What you propose would only penalize legitimate provider, not to mention women and still not prevent this sort of atrocity. If you claim that it would, you're even more of an idiot that I thought. Or just a liar.No we don't have sufficient regulations on abortion.
If we did, we wouldn't have situations like this.
Could a proper regulatory environment prevented Gosnell?
Of course.
If massive taxation and regulation had been placed for Gosnell, he would have given up his abortion trade many years ago.
Overview
Kermit Barron Gosnell (born February 9, 1941) is an American physician and former abortion provider who was convicted of murdering three infants who were born alive during attempted abortion procedures; he was also convicted of involuntary manslaughter of one woman during an abortion procedure.Gosnell owned and operated the Women's Medical Society clinic in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and he was a prolific prescriber of OxyContin. In 2011, Gosnell and various co-defendant employees were charged with eight counts of murder, 24 felony counts of performing illegal abortions beyond the state o…
Read moreView attachment 279295
You were so close to having a breakthrough, too. Good thing I wasn't holding my breath.
I wouldn't be too sure. People have been killed because they were legally prevented from defending themselves. If you make firearms harder to get legally, even more people will die.No! That is not what I'm saying. And, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt by also saying that I think that you are smart enough to know that . In both cases, there will be those who obey the law and those who do not. What I am saying is the, for the reason that I've stated, the outcomes in terms of lives lost will be different in each case.So, in one case, people will ignore the law and seek that which is heavily regulated -- but in the other case, people will obey the law and not seek that which is heavily regulated.Of course I see the parallel! IN both cases, regulation will not stop what is happening, The difference is that in the case of abortion, regulation will cost lives. It will not stop people from getting abortions and will surely result in the deaths of women who go the back ally rout. In the case of guns, regulations are likely to save at least some lives by reducing the number of the most deadly weapons on the street, and reducing the number of all guns that wind up in the hands of those who should not have themDo you really not see the parallel to the calls for gun control here, and how your arguments against one are identical to the arguments against the other?Complete and utter horseshit which is exactly what I have come to expect of you. Gosnell was a crazy person who hade no regard for the law and operated under the radar. What you propose would only penalize legitimate provider, not to mention women and still not prevent this sort of atrocity. If you claim that it would, you're even more of an idiot that I thought. Or just a liar.No we don't have sufficient regulations on abortion.
If we did, we wouldn't have situations like this.
Could a proper regulatory environment prevented Gosnell?
Of course.
If massive taxation and regulation had been placed for Gosnell, he would have given up his abortion trade many years ago.
Overview
Kermit Barron Gosnell (born February 9, 1941) is an American physician and former abortion provider who was convicted of murdering three infants who were born alive during attempted abortion procedures; he was also convicted of involuntary manslaughter of one woman during an abortion procedure.Gosnell owned and operated the Women's Medical Society clinic in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and he was a prolific prescriber of OxyContin. In 2011, Gosnell and various co-defendant employees were charged with eight counts of murder, 24 felony counts of performing illegal abortions beyond the state o…
Read moreView attachment 279295
You were so close to having a breakthrough, too. Good thing I wasn't holding my breath.
Complete and utter horseshit . HIPPA protests the privacy of patients, not funding sources
1. I am suspecting that there is something seriously wrong with the way you process information if you think that your post is an appropriate response to what I said.Complete and utter horseshit . HIPPA protests the privacy of patients, not funding sources
Lets use common sense then. The government funds Planned Parenthood and PP provides abortions. Hellooooo
The ridiculous sop that there are two divisions in PP and the abortion section does not use government funds is something that only a complete idiot would buy into. Funds that benefit one side benefit the other, from marketing & ads to new buildings to hiring personnel to whatever.
That is ridiculous! Your link does not in any way support your claim.Please provide "credible" proof that taxpayer funds are used for legal abortions.
HIPPA regulations prohibit that being done without your written consent to publish your records.
187-What does the HIPAA Privacy Rule do
...says the person who believes it's okay to kill inconvenient human beings.
