Abortion Is Finally Illegal -- And I Can't Wait To Sue

The bill bans abortions after a fetal heartbeat has been detected. It includes cases where the woman was impregnated as a result of rape or incest. There is an exception for medical emergencies.

so if you rape someone or have a child by incest, no worries, the women have to carry your fetus until birth.

They obviously do not believe in HIPAA or right to privacy.

Its a republican bill and men all white men (and all white women) stood behind the gov signing it.

They are like the Taliban, look what they are doing to healthcare.

Taliban= Republican.
 
The bill bans abortions after a fetal heartbeat has been detected. It includes cases where the woman was impregnated as a result of rape or incest. There is an exception for medical emergencies.

so if you rape someone or have a child by incest, no worries, the women have to carry your fetus until birth.

They obviously do not believe in HIPAA or right to privacy.

Its a republican bill and men all white men (and all white women) stood behind the gov signing it.

They are like the Taliban, look what they are doing to healthcare.

Taliban= Republican.
geezus.....
 
The bill bans abortions after a fetal heartbeat has been detected. It includes cases where the woman was impregnated as a result of rape or incest. There is an exception for medical emergencies.

so if you rape someone or have a child by incest, no worries, the women have to carry your fetus until birth.

They obviously do not believe in HIPAA or right to privacy.

Its a republican bill and men all white men (and all white women) stood behind the gov signing it.

They are like the Taliban, look what they are doing to healthcare.

Taliban= Republican.
 
The bill bans abortions after a fetal heartbeat has been detected. It includes cases where the woman was impregnated as a result of rape or incest. There is an exception for medical emergencies.

so if you rape someone or have a child by incest, no worries, the women have to carry your fetus until birth.

They obviously do not believe in HIPAA or right to privacy.

Its a republican bill and men all white men (and all white women) stood behind the gov signing it.

They are like the Taliban, look what they are doing to healthcare.

Taliban= Republican.
Oh, brother. Here she goes AGAIN..............
 
The bill bans abortions after a fetal heartbeat has been detected. It includes cases where the woman was impregnated as a result of rape or incest. There is an exception for medical emergencies.

so if you rape someone or have a child by incest, no worries, the women have to carry your fetus until birth.

They obviously do not believe in HIPAA or right to privacy.

Its a republican bill and men all white men (and all white women) stood behind the gov signing it.

They are like the Taliban, look what they are doing to healthcare.

Taliban= Republican.


OMG... the inside of your skull must be a scary place.

LOL!
 
So what ends does murdering babies serve?

.

Woman had a desired, planned pregnancy. At 18 weeks, diagnosed with triploidy. It will probably die in utero but before it does has higher risk of eclampsia and hemorrhage. If it survives to birth, it will die within several days after suffering from its considerable malformations.

A woman should have the opportunity to end that pregnancy.
 
The bill bans abortions after a fetal heartbeat has been detected. It includes cases where the woman was impregnated as a result of rape or incest. There is an exception for medical emergencies.

so if you rape someone or have a child by incest, no worries, the women have to carry your fetus until birth.

They obviously do not believe in HIPAA or right to privacy.

Its a republican bill and men all white men (and all white women) stood behind the gov signing it.

They are like the Taliban, look what they are doing to healthcare.

Taliban= Republican.

If a man is raped then maybe he shouldn't have been prancing around like a sissy.
 
Abortions must not occur after the babies heart starts beating.

Since a heartbeat medically determines life and death, I can’t see any argument.

85% drop in abortions in Texas now.
Such is the authoritarian right: more government, bigger government at the expense of individual liberty.
 
Abortions must not occur after the babies heart starts beating.

Since a heartbeat medically determines life and death, I can’t see any argument.

85% drop in abortions in Texas now.
XZtkSno.jpg
 
The Freak out Begins After Texas Abortion Law Goes Into Effect!!

https://redstate.com ^
| Bonchie | Sep 01, 2021 12:15 PM ET


A lot of good things are happening in Texas lately, and while the focus has been on the passage of an election integrity bill, the biggest victory for decency and good has come via a new abortion law. The law in question essentially bans abortion after six weeks and provides mechanisms for violations to be reported.

That has the ACLU losing its mind, and you just hate to see it.

The law doesn’t just allow these lawsuits — it actively encourages private individuals to act as bounty hunters by awarding them at least $10,000 if they are successful.

— ACLU (@ACLU) September 1, 2021

The ACLU went on to claim the law is a “racial” catastrophe, which is code for “we are really mad more black babies won’t be killed.” It’s astonishing how so many abortion supporters have somehow convinced themselves they aren’t the bad guy in this equation.

(related Simone Biles Dives Head-First Into the Abortion Debate)

Take CBS News’ former “reproductive rights” reporter. In an absolutely shocking twist, she turned out to be a rabid pro-abortion activist.

Waking up in shock today. Access to abortion just got decimated in one of the most populous states in the country.

If Texas’ six-week abortion ban eventually gets blocked or overturned, it won’t matter. The damage is done.

Wake up folks, this is real.

— Kate Smith (@byKateSmith) September 1, 2021

Pay special attention to the assertion that the “damage is done” even if the law eventually gets blocked. What she’s talking about are the babies that will now get a chance at life for some period of time until a court possibly strikes down the law. To Smith, that’s irreparable damage because the children can’t be executed after birth. The sheer evil of such a comment is hard to critique in this setting as there are limits to how animated I can get in my wording.

Notably, Smith blocked me after I responded to her comments because these snowflakes can stump for killing children but they can’t handle any pushback of their ghoulish behavior. Guilty conscience, perhaps? For her sake, I hope so she still has the ability to feel at that level.

Then there was Rep. Cori Bush, queen of bad takes, who let it be known that this abortion ban (and yes, I’m perfectly fine calling it that) will disproportionately affect “queer” folks.

I’m thinking about the Black, brown, low-income, queer, and young folks in Texas. The folks this abortion health care ban will disproportionately harm.

Wealthy white folks will have the means to access abortion care. Our communities won’t.

— Cori Bush (@CoriBush) September 1, 2021

Now, I’m no biology expert, but I’m pretty sure “queer” folks are not disproportionately affected by this ban because I’m pretty sure they aren’t affected at all. You see, when someone is gay, they lose the ability to reproduce outside of artificial insemination, and no one has an abortion after artificial insemination. So what is Bush even talking about here?

I’ll tell you what she’s talking about. She’s a woke automaton, just spewing words without any meaning or thought. She’s also disapproving of the fact that fewer “black” and “brown” babies will be killed due to this law, which is odd considering her entire schtick is to scream “black lives matter” at every issue.

Frankly, as someone who is unabashedly pro-life and completely confident in my assessment, I love seeing these people squirm. They need to be made to face the realities of what they support, and laws like the one in Texas make them take a position they might otherwise obfuscate from. Want to kill babies because of some selfish, distorted idea of racial and economic justice? Then they should be made to own every bit of that position. Do not give these ghouls an inch.
It comes as no surprise that the authoritarian right makes light of citizens’ fundamental rights being violated.
 
The bill bans abortions after a fetal heartbeat has been detected. It includes cases where the woman was impregnated as a result of rape or incest. There is an exception for medical emergencies.

so if you rape someone or have a child by incest, no worries, the women have to carry your fetus until birth.

They obviously do not believe in HIPAA or right to privacy.

Its a republican bill and men all white men (and all white women) stood behind the gov signing it.

They are like the Taliban, look what they are doing to healthcare.

Taliban= Republican.
Now all you funny guys can rape, the jews had incest, why not the christians.
 
You're certainly entitled to your opinion.

But not to your own facts.

I was right about Obama, both times. I was right about Obamacare remaining the law of the land. I was right about the ass kicking Democrats dished out in the 2018 midterms, I was right about Trump being a one term President, I was right about the Democrats taking back both Houses of Congress.

And listen very carefully.

I will be right about all of the pissed off women, that will be voting a lot of Republicans out of office in state, local, and national elections beginning next year.

Son YOU are the one who disappeared when Hillary lost....for 2 weeks. You also forgot to mention you were wrong about keeping Congress in Bambi's midterm....nobody thought Bambi would lose in either race. I know you think your poop doesn't stink but seriously, you aren't the superior intellect you see yourself as.
 
It’s such a weird bill. A private individual can now sue another private individual for $10k if that private individual helped someone get an abortion.

I dare anyone to make a case that this is logical.
The logic is that it makes it almost impossible to file suit in opposition to the measure.

As we know, only government has the potential to violate citizens’ rights, not private persons.

Because the measure is being ‘enforced’ by private persons through civil suits and not agents of the state, the claim can be made that the right to privacy has not been violated and the courts have no authority to enjoin the implementation of the measure.
 
Woman had a desired, planned pregnancy. At 18 weeks, diagnosed with triploidy. It will probably die in utero but before it does has higher risk of eclampsia and hemorrhage. If it survives to birth, it will die within several days after suffering from its considerable malformations.

A woman should have the opportunity to end that pregnancy.


So you deflect from the vast majority of elective abortions by pointing to ONE that may be a medical necessity. Deflection equals LOSER. LMAO

.
 
Who benefits most from abortions? It surely isn't the woman. She might suffer from guilt and symptoms like PTSD for the rest of her life not to mention physical problems associated with the procedure. The liberal media won't talk about it because they are in on it. The faction of society that benefits from abortion is the same faction that is promoting it today, liberal men who coerce women to end the life inside them in order to see their future responsibilities disappear at the stroke of a scalpel.
 

Forum List

Back
Top