Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't see it happening. I think the comb of 9/11 and Trump have tilted us into "full retard" territory.If the pseudo-science heart-beat test becomes the norm in Red States, women need help take over enough states governments to pass a new Constitutional amendment specifically for Abortion Rights for all American women.
I may think I have a right to kill you. Because you are an asshole. However, the government takes that right away from me. For you that is a good thing. You get to live.Of course - it's different when you do it. Because you have reasons!
Once again, it doesn't matter what you might think is in my body, it's none of your business. Understand?I may think I have a right to kill you. Because you are an asshole. However, the government takes that right away from me. For you that is a good thing. You get to live.
Killing a child for the sake of convenience is an absolute despicable thing to do. A right of a child to live supersedes any reason a woman would have to kill the child for her own convenience. Any moral person would think so. Stupid hate filled Libtards don't. Thank god that the Supreme Court finally had the balls to do the right thing and protect the children.
Once a woman gets knocked up there are two distinctly separate human beings. A mother should not have the right kill the other person just because the other person may inconvenience her.
Is that moral clarity too complicated for you to understand?
It has.
Stopping abortion however is a relatively new concep
The two are not the same
Great. Then we should force everyone to get vaccinated and wear masks under penalty of law.
Get back to me when there’s a possibility that you might get pregnant and this would apply to youI may think I have a right to kill you. Because you are an asshole. However, the government takes that right away from me. For you that is a good thing. You get to live.
Killing a child for the sake of convenience is an absolute despicable thing to do. A right of a child to live supersedes any reason a woman would have to kill the child for her own convenience. Any moral person would think so. Stupid hate filled Libtards don't. Thank god that the Supreme Court finally had the balls to do the right thing and protect the children.
Once a woman gets knocked up there are two distinctly separate human beings. A mother should not have the right kill the other person just because the other person may inconvenience her.
Is that moral clarity too complicated for you to understand?
Once again, it doesn't matter what you might think is in my body, it's none of your business. Understand?
There might be an entire civilization living in my bowels - and it's still none of your business. To say otherwise is to grant government sovereignty it should never have. We are not owned by the government. It's the other way around.
They corrected nothing.It was immoral for the Supreme Court to side with the abortionists in Roe V Wade. Thank god this ruling corrects some of it.
They corrected nothing.
They refused to hear the case
No need. It doesn't matter what you think is in my body. It's none of your business. Keep out.See you are having a difficult time understanding simple Biology.
I'll explain it to you..
They corrected nothing.
They refused to hear the case
No need. It doesn't matter what you think is in my body. It's none of your business. Keep out.
Biology and ethics are irrelevant. The contents of my body are not up for debate. They are, utterly and completely, none of your concern.Go take a course in Biology and Ethics and then maybe you will learn something and you won't be so damn confused.
We'll see.I don't see it happening. I think the comb of 9/11 and Trump have tilted us into "full retard" territory.
Yup. They took the cowardly way out.As the song says, "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice"
The death cult are the republicans, after they force women to have their babies, republicans could give a fuck about them.
I’m a LOT Leary of extremists that would force a rape or incest victim to bear the result of that heinous actI am pro-life, and I think the Texas law is a little harsh. Particularly for not making exceptions for rape and incest.
However, rape and incest make up only about 1 percent of all abortions. I am weary of pro-abortion people using these victims of the most heinous of crimes as human shields to protect the 99 percent of abortions which are convenience abortions.
As for abortions due to rape, this can and is mitigated by the availability of the "morning after pill" which can be administered immediately following the rape.
I believe abortions would be greatly reduced if people would just use birth control. Nearly half of all abortions are the result of NO birth control being used or the improper use of birth control. This is flat out ridiculous considering the wide availability and low cost of birth control. Low income people can get birth control for free.
It is incredibly irresponsible to have sex without using birth control if you don't want to get pregnant. The onus of an unwanted pregnancy is entirely on the woman. There simply is no excuse, so I don't have much pity if they get pregnant and demand an abortion.
Biology and ethics are irrelevant. The contents of my body are not up for debate. They are, utterly and completely, none of your concern.