According to new research, Crazy Bernie's Medicare for All plan would cost $33trillion over 10 years

Bernie’s "Medicare for All" predicted to cost nearly $33 trillion

So about 90% of the federal budget would go towards this single entitlement

The source is a Libertarian estimate, and thus suspect as a paper/study which began with the theme that a single payer system was too costly.

I'm not going to read the paper, but I do have a question for the author of the OP:

Q. Does the paper discuss on cost-deficits, or does it discuss cost-benefits

Or, why troll if you haven't read the entire study and can't answer this Q.
the liberal estimates are also at 30 trillion. look it up
 
the post office was awful until FedEx provided competition.

socialism sucks
 
Bernie’s "Medicare for All" predicted to cost nearly $33 trillion

So about 90% of the federal budget would go towards this single entitlement

The source is a Libertarian estimate, and thus suspect as a paper/study which began with the theme that a single payer system was too costly.

I'm not going to read the paper, but I do have a question for the author of the OP:

Q. Does the paper discuss on cost-deficits, or does it discuss cost-benefits

Or, why troll if you haven't read the entire study and can't answer this Q.
the liberal estimates are also at 30 trillion. look it up

What do we , the fed and local governments pay for healthcare now?
 
Bernie’s "Medicare for All" predicted to cost nearly $33 trillion

So about 90% of the federal budget would go towards this single entitlement

The source is a Libertarian estimate, and thus suspect as a paper/study which began with the theme that a single payer system was too costly.

I'm not going to read the paper, but I do have a question for the author of the OP:

Q. Does the paper discuss on cost-deficits, or does it discuss cost-benefits

Or, why troll if you haven't read the entire study and can't answer this Q.

the liberal estimates are also at 30 trillion. look it up

You made the claim, and it appears you didn't read the link you provided. Once again, did the paper include cost-benefits or only those which proved their narrative, i.e. cost-deficits?
 
Last edited:
the post office was awful until FedEx provided competition.

socialism sucks

Fed Ex drivers are independent contractors; UPS Drivers are members of the Teamster's Union and have great benefits; USPS are civil servants.

When someone writes, "socialism sucks" they are advocates for Plutocracy, which seeks to create a fully private sector economy. It began with attacks on Labor Unions, and using talking points which belie reality, such as, Right to Work.

It seems the GOP has forgotten the lessons of history, and reality seems to be ready to bite them at the voting booths:

In re-election bid, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker trails Democrat by 13 points, poll says

Not only have women coalesced, teachers across the nation have too, as well as those blue collar workers who see the promises made by Trump as hollow, as their wages remain stagnant and their employer's has grown.

See and consider:

Labor Movement - Facts & Summary - HISTORY.com

Yes, it can happen here, again.
 
Bernie’s "Medicare for All" predicted to cost nearly $33 trillion

So about 90% of the federal budget would go towards this single entitlement

The source is a Libertarian estimate, and thus suspect as a paper/study which began with the theme that a single payer system was too costly.

I'm not going to read the paper, but I do have a question for the author of the OP:

Q. Does the paper discuss on cost-deficits, or does it discuss cost-benefits

Or, why troll if you haven't read the entire study and can't answer this Q.
the liberal estimates are also at 30 trillion. look it up

What do we , the fed and local governments pay for healthcare now?
See post #7.
This is why links were provided.
 
Bernie’s "Medicare for All" predicted to cost nearly $33 trillion

So about 90% of the federal budget would go towards this single entitlement

The source is a Libertarian estimate, and thus suspect as a paper/study which began with the theme that a single payer system was too costly.

I'm not going to read the paper, but I do have a question for the author of the OP:

Q. Does the paper discuss on cost-deficits, or does it discuss cost-benefits

Or, why troll if you haven't read the entire study and can't answer this Q.
the liberal estimates are also at 30 trillion. look it up

What do we , the fed and local governments pay for healthcare now?
See post #7.
This is why links were provided.

Missed your post. Thank you.
 
What a 'plan.' I mean hey, we're only $22 Trillion in Debt right now. Communists love spending other peoples' money. The ones making these kinds of insane proposals, are personally filthy rich. Sanders is a very wealthy guy. And much of his wealth was created by corruption.

Communists like Sanders, know they'll never suffer from their disastrous policies. He'll always be filthy rich. So will Pelosi, Schumer, Boxer, and the rest. Only average folks suffer under Communist-rule.
 
What a 'plan.' I mean hey, we're only $22 Trillion in Debt right now. Communists love spending other peoples' money. The ones making these kinds of insane proposals, are personally filthy rich. Sanders is a very wealthy guy. And much of his wealth was created by corruption.

Communists like Sanders, know they'll never suffer from their disastrous policies. He'll always be filthy rich. So will Pelosi, Schumer, Boxer, and the rest. Only average folks suffer under Communist-rule.

Yet you don't mind subsiding corps and farms.
 
200 million Americans make less than 20K a year. that's more than 50 percent of Americans.
 
What a 'plan.' I mean hey, we're only $22 Trillion in Debt right now. Communists love spending other peoples' money. The ones making these kinds of insane proposals, are personally filthy rich. Sanders is a very wealthy guy. And much of his wealth was created by corruption.

Communists like Sanders, know they'll never suffer from their disastrous policies. He'll always be filthy rich. So will Pelosi, Schumer, Boxer, and the rest. Only average folks suffer under Communist-rule.

Yet you don't mind subsiding corps and farms.

I don't support Corporate Welfare. I never have. I opposed it long before it became fashionable to do so.
 
What a 'plan.' I mean hey, we're only $22 Trillion in Debt right now. Communists love spending other peoples' money. The ones making these kinds of insane proposals, are personally filthy rich. Sanders is a very wealthy guy. And much of his wealth was created by corruption.

Communists like Sanders, know they'll never suffer from their disastrous policies. He'll always be filthy rich. So will Pelosi, Schumer, Boxer, and the rest. Only average folks suffer under Communist-rule.

Communism does not exist in the 21st Century. The RED SCARE died with the death of the Domino Theory and the Collapse of the Soviet Union.

Today, despots and totalitarian regimes are run by Billionaires and supported by Plutocrats, and those include Russia, China and the United States.
 

Forum List

Back
Top