M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
- Thread starter
- #101
Except that in both cases you're talking about the same thing - depriving someone of a liberty. If the suggestion in question is sufficient due process to deprive someone of -a-liberty, then it is sufficient to deprive them of -any- liberty.That's called the "Slippery Slope Fallacy" for a reason.Yes. Someone petitions a court with cause, and the court (possibly) issues a temporary restriction of your rights. That's exceptionally different than the idea presented here.If you have a restraining order against you you lose your rights to firearms as well. There is no due process there as well. That is the Lautenburg Amendment.
Except for the due process clause.But it appears that he is simply fixing on a method of enforcing what is already law
if you can lose your right to arms in this manner, then you can be jailed in this manner.