Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ayers and his group admit what they did. Ayers thought it was funny that the cops messed up and didn't have paperwork in order, so they couldn't use the evidence they had on him. He admitted he was guilty as sin and free as a bird, then added 'only in America.' Defend him all you want, but his terrorist group didn't care who they hurt or killed. They intended to kill military members and their wives at Ft. Dix and I'm glad the idiots blew themselves up transporting the bomb.
You seem to have gotten your story twisted. They targeted property, not people and the accidental detonation was during assembly in a NYC townhouse, not transport. I think you need to check your sources. They may have been talking about someone else or are just totally wrong. If they get those kinds of details wrong, there's no telling what else they got wrong. You'd better think about getting your info from a different source.
i really have to laugh my ass of at libs trying to justify violence and destruction as being ok. Priceless!
You seem to have gotten your story twisted. They targeted property, not people and the accidental detonation was during assembly in a NYC townhouse, not transport. I think you need to check your sources. They may have been talking about someone else or are just totally wrong. If they get those kinds of details wrong, there's no telling what else they got wrong. You'd better think about getting your info from a different source.
i really have to laugh my ass of at libs trying to justify violence and destruction as being ok. Priceless!
No one is justifying violence, just not allowing the Rubes to say that the violent radicals of the 60's and the bombing of government buildings is equal to the radical Islamics targeting innocent civilans.
Ayers and his group admit what they did. Ayers thought it was funny that the cops messed up and didn't have paperwork in order, so they couldn't use the evidence they had on him. He admitted he was guilty as sin and free as a bird, then added 'only in America.' Defend him all you want, but his terrorist group didn't care who they hurt or killed. They intended to kill military members and their wives at Ft. Dix and I'm glad the idiots blew themselves up transporting the bomb.
You seem to have gotten your story twisted. They targeted property, not people and the accidental detonation was during assembly in a NYC townhouse, not transport. I think you need to check your sources. They may have been talking about someone else or are just totally wrong. If they get those kinds of details wrong, there's no telling what else they got wrong. You'd better think about getting your info from a different source.
i really have to laugh my ass of at libs trying to justify violence and destruction as being ok. Priceless!
i really have to laugh my ass of at libs trying to justify violence and destruction as being ok. Priceless!
No one is justifying violence, just not allowing the Rubes to say that the violent radicals of the 60's and the bombing of government buildings is equal to the radical Islamics targeting innocent civilans.
IOW...you support liberal terrorists
It was a crime then too.
But so were illegal wire taps.......
no actually they were only ruled illlegal after the fact by the supreme court.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in the 1928 case of Olmstead v. United States 277 U.S. 438, 48 S. Ct. 564, 72 L. Ed. 944, held that the tapping of a telephone line did not violate the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unlawful searches and seizures, so long as the police had not trespassed on the property of the person whose line was tapped. Justice Louis D. Brandeis argued in a dissenting opinion that the Court had employed an outdated mechanical and spatial approach to the Fourth Amendment and failed to consider the interests in privacy that the amendment was designed to protect.
For almost 40 years the Supreme Court maintained that wiretapping was permissible in the absence of a trespass. When police did trespass in federal investigations, the evidence was excluded in federal court. The Supreme Court reversed course in 1967, with its decision in Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S. Ct. 507, 19 L. Ed. 2d 576. The Court abandoned the Olmstead approach of territorial trespass and adopted one based on the reasonable expectation of privacy of the victim of the wiretapping. Where an individual has an expectation of privacy, the government is required to obtain a warrant for wiretapping.
Wiretapping - lawbrain.com
No one said that, I was debunking the statement that there were innocent victims involved.
Cool, does this mean I can make any innuendo I want, as long as it bolsters my bias?
why not? thats pretty much all you do anyway. why change your style
Do I? The fact that none of the bombings resulted in deaths isn't innuendo, it's FACT. Suggesting that I believe one can do anything as long as no one dies, IS innuendo. Once again you're misconstruing what's said, just like the OP did when he said Obama and Ayers were pals. You understand 'misconstrue', don't you? That's the polite way of saying you're lying, just in case you have any other comprehension problems.
You seem to have gotten your story twisted. They targeted property, not people and the accidental detonation was during assembly in a NYC townhouse, not transport. I think you need to check your sources. They may have been talking about someone else or are just totally wrong. If they get those kinds of details wrong, there's no telling what else they got wrong. You'd better think about getting your info from a different source.
i really have to laugh my ass of at libs trying to justify violence and destruction as being ok. Priceless!
No one is justifying violence, just not allowing the Rubes to say that the violent radicals of the 60's and the bombing of government buildings is equal to the radical Islamics targeting innocent civilans.
How many more innocent people did GW Bush kill with bombs than Bill Ayers did?
No one is justifying violence, just not allowing the Rubes to say that the violent radicals of the 60's and the bombing of government buildings is equal to the radical Islamics targeting innocent civilans.
IOW...you support liberal terrorists
Well, I can tell you I didn't support the Vietnam war. I was 12 when they killed those 4 students in Ohio. Too young to ever be drafted but old enough to know several friends whose brothers or fathers never came back.
This isn't the 60's anymore, idiot.
The most dangerous people out there these days are right-wing extremists blowing up women's healthcare clinics and shooting and blowing up other Americans, and Islamic terrorists.
A left-wing fanatic nowadays is the kind of person who wishes to smoke pot after a lascivious afternoon of gay sex.
Weird how all the mass shootings end up being mentally ill left wing city dwellers.
On September 23, 2010 William Ayers was unanimously denied emeritus status by the University of Illinois, after a speech by the university's board chair Christopher G. Kennedy (son of assassinated U.S. Senator Robert Kennedy), containing the quote "I intend to vote against conferring the honorific title of our university to a man whose body of work includes a book dedicated in part to the man who murdered my father, Robert F. Kennedy."[42] He added, "There is nothing more antithetical to the hopes for a university that is lively and yet civil...than to permanently seal off debate with one's opponents by killing them".[43] Kennedy referred to a 1974 book Prairie Fire: The Politics of Revolutionary Anti-Imperialism, written by Ayers and other Weather Underground members, which includes a dedication to a list of over 200 revolutionary figures, musicians and others, including Sirhan Sirhan, who is currently serving a life sentence for Robert Kennedy's assassination in 1968.[44] Ayers said he has never dedicated any book, including Prairie Fire, the book in question, to assassins.
After Boston, do Libs start to understand why Obama's pal Ayers bother us?
intersting. according to liberals a few psycho's with a couple of guns represnts all gun owners
Theyre incapable of logical thought.
i have never seen a group that uses more double standards in their arguments
I lived in NYC when William Ayers was blowing us up, and on 9/11/01 the scumbag gave an interview regretting that he didn't do more of it. After Boston, do you Libs start to understand why Obama's pal Ayers bother us?
Was Ayers ever convicted of setting a bomb off?
Theyre incapable of logical thought.
i have never seen a group that uses more double standards in their arguments
If they didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have any standards at all.
I am just wondering when the left will embrace Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, and Bill Ayers will take him under his wing and have him become a future teacher at a college.
