BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 95,896
- 31,942
That is what I was referencing, Sargent goober. Get someone to read his post to you. You have no right to control women's reproduction.
The woman is controlling the life of another human being and the unborn who are deemed to be aborted don't even have their own mother protecting them. Someone has to be their voice.
Can I assume you will care about them just as much after birth, or will you want to cut more funding for hungry kids?
One would assume that the mother and father would care for their child. Their child. If not, they can put the baby up for adoption. I'm find with helping those who truly cannot help themselves. Cut welfare for those who can and are able to work but chose not to and use those monies to feed the babbies.
I'm sure it's your religious convictions that causes you to think you should be able to make those hard choices for others.