All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[Sixties Fan]

They gather a bunch of people who hate Israel and those people "testify." Surprise, surprise: the "investigation" finds everything everyone says to be credible and accurate.

The committee whose entire purpose is to investigate Israel - the only such committee in the UN - doesn't even investigate Israel. It just regurgitates anti-Israel propaganda, and there is no shortage of people willing to "testify" on that score, since they know that no one will actually do any fact-checking.

So for example, some unnamed "journalists" testified that they were "targeted" by Israel while covering protests. Were they, perhaps, also participants? The UN doesn't care.

Even though Israel doesn't cooperate with this farce, that is not reason to rubber stamp any anti-Israel statement that is made without a modicum of checking newspaper accounts or official Israeli press releases. Or the veracity of the "testifiers."

This committee was created in 1968. That's Which means that there has been 49 years of obvious vilification of Israel at the UN.

But when it was created, it had a different name. The UNGA resolution that created this committee, 2443, called it the "Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Population of the Occupied Territories."

Because in 1968, no one - not even the UN - ever heard of the "Palestinian people."

(full article online)

The UN's anti-Israel kangaroo court ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

The usual Zionist propaganda that is so easily debunked. The Palestinians were calling themselves the people of Palestine, in writing in official correspondence with the British Colonial Office.

"PALESTINE.

CORRESPONDENCE
WITH THE
PALESTINE ARAB DELEGATION
AND THE
ZIONIST ORGANISATION.

Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty.
JUNE, 1922.
LONDON:

Sir,

We wish to express our thanks to the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the Colonies, for his courtesy in allowing us to see the draft of a proposed Palestine Order in Council embodying a scheme of Government for Palestine, and to discuss the same in our capacity of representatives of the Arab People of Palestine.

• 
  
  
  • 
    
    We would, therefore, submit the following observations:—

Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable.
If the British Government would revise their present policy in Palestine, end the Zionist con-dominium, put a stop to all alien immigration and grant the People of Palestine — who by Right and Experience are the best judges of what is good and bad to their country — Executive and Legislative powers, the terms of a constitution could be discussed in a different atmosphere. If to-day the People of Palestine assented to any constitution which fell short of giving them full control of their own affairs they would be in the position of agreeing to an instrument of Government which might, and probably would, be used to smother their national life under a flood of alien immigration."

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)

Mandatory Palestine was a geopolitical entity under British administration, carved out of Ottoman Southern Syria after World War I. British civil administration in Palestine operated from 1920 until 1948.Wikipedia

----------------
In other words, by 1922 when this letter was written, the region was already under the Mandate, and the Palestine the Arabs were referring to was the region, the Mandate, and not a country they had ever control over, or ever thought about before that Mandate occurred.

This letter was after taking away any and all lands from ever becoming sovereign of the rightful indigenous people, the Jewish Nation.

These Arabs had no issues with the Ottoman Occupying Forces for the 400 years before this letter. They reached out to no one. But then, the Arabs had been one of the invading occupying forces which took over from the Byzantine from the 7th Century on.
What was there for the Muslim Arabs to complain about as long as they were being occupied by Muslims?


What, Monti?

No document, book, report, letter, etc with any Arab referring to the whole area as Palestine, or themselves as the People of Palestine?

No European visitors before WWI ever referring to them as such, even after speaking to any one of them?

LOL. You mean like the Manual for Palestinian Arabic published in 1906, for English speakers Europeans included. You people crack me up with your propaganda. And you are the funniest of the lot. I think you actually believe the bullshit propaganda you post. That's the saddest part of it.

"Palestinian Arabic" is still Arabic. It does not refer to the Arab people
living there as a distinct people. As Palestinians.

The stamp refers to the region of Palestine, as the Ottomans and others sometimes referred to the land.

Still, no distinct Palestinian people, Arab, Druze, Bedouine, Jewish, or otherwise.

The Arabs were always referred to as Arabs. As Christians or Muslims.
And not as a distinct people, indigenous of the land.

The only people referred to by everyone as the indigenous people of the Land, and that includes the invading Muslims, Crusaders, Ottomans or British, are the Jewish People.

The Palestinian People/Nation continues to be missing from your evidence.

 

[P F Tinmore]

I never understood how a nation that is so hell-bent on expansionism and hegemony has given away the Sinai, the Gaza Strip, southern Lebanon and much of the West Bank - far more than half the territory it once controlled.

Interesting how Israel claims to give away what was never theirs.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The stamp refers to the region of Palestine, as the Ottomans and others sometimes referred to the land.

Indeed.

 

[montelatici]

They gather a bunch of people who hate Israel and those people "testify." Surprise, surprise: the "investigation" finds everything everyone says to be credible and accurate.

The committee whose entire purpose is to investigate Israel - the only such committee in the UN - doesn't even investigate Israel. It just regurgitates anti-Israel propaganda, and there is no shortage of people willing to "testify" on that score, since they know that no one will actually do any fact-checking.

So for example, some unnamed "journalists" testified that they were "targeted" by Israel while covering protests. Were they, perhaps, also participants? The UN doesn't care.

Even though Israel doesn't cooperate with this farce, that is not reason to rubber stamp any anti-Israel statement that is made without a modicum of checking newspaper accounts or official Israeli press releases. Or the veracity of the "testifiers."

This committee was created in 1968. That's Which means that there has been 49 years of obvious vilification of Israel at the UN.

But when it was created, it had a different name. The UNGA resolution that created this committee, 2443, called it the "Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Population of the Occupied Territories."

Because in 1968, no one - not even the UN - ever heard of the "Palestinian people."

(full article online)

The UN's anti-Israel kangaroo court ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

The usual Zionist propaganda that is so easily debunked. The Palestinians were calling themselves the people of Palestine, in writing in official correspondence with the British Colonial Office.

"PALESTINE.

CORRESPONDENCE
WITH THE
PALESTINE ARAB DELEGATION
AND THE
ZIONIST ORGANISATION.

Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty.
JUNE, 1922.
LONDON:

Sir,

We wish to express our thanks to the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the Colonies, for his courtesy in allowing us to see the draft of a proposed Palestine Order in Council embodying a scheme of Government for Palestine, and to discuss the same in our capacity of representatives of the Arab People of Palestine.

• 
  
  
  • 
    
    We would, therefore, submit the following observations:—

Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable.
If the British Government would revise their present policy in Palestine, end the Zionist con-dominium, put a stop to all alien immigration and grant the People of Palestine — who by Right and Experience are the best judges of what is good and bad to their country — Executive and Legislative powers, the terms of a constitution could be discussed in a different atmosphere. If to-day the People of Palestine assented to any constitution which fell short of giving them full control of their own affairs they would be in the position of agreeing to an instrument of Government which might, and probably would, be used to smother their national life under a flood of alien immigration."

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)

Mandatory Palestine was a geopolitical entity under British administration, carved out of Ottoman Southern Syria after World War I. British civil administration in Palestine operated from 1920 until 1948.Wikipedia

----------------
In other words, by 1922 when this letter was written, the region was already under the Mandate, and the Palestine the Arabs were referring to was the region, the Mandate, and not a country they had ever control over, or ever thought about before that Mandate occurred.

This letter was after taking away any and all lands from ever becoming sovereign of the rightful indigenous people, the Jewish Nation.

These Arabs had no issues with the Ottoman Occupying Forces for the 400 years before this letter. They reached out to no one. But then, the Arabs had been one of the invading occupying forces which took over from the Byzantine from the 7th Century on.
What was there for the Muslim Arabs to complain about as long as they were being occupied by Muslims?


What, Monti?

No document, book, report, letter, etc with any Arab referring to the whole area as Palestine, or themselves as the People of Palestine?

No European visitors before WWI ever referring to them as such, even after speaking to any one of them?

LOL. You mean like the Manual for Palestinian Arabic published in 1906, for English speakers Europeans included. You people crack me up with your propaganda. And you are the funniest of the lot. I think you actually believe the bullshit propaganda you post. That's the saddest part of it.

"Palestinian Arabic" is still Arabic. It does not refer to the Arab people
living there as a distinct people. As Palestinians.

The stamp refers to the region of Palestine, as the Ottomans and others sometimes referred to the land.

Still, no distinct Palestinian people, Arab, Druze, Bedouine, Jewish, or otherwise.

The Arabs were always referred to as Arabs. As Christians or Muslims.
And not as a distinct people, indigenous of the land.

The only people referred to by everyone as the indigenous people of the Land, and that includes the invading Muslims, Crusaders, Ottomans or British, are the Jewish People.

The Palestinian People/Nation continues to be missing from your evidence.

You are cracking me up. So, the people that speak Palestinian Arabic are not Palestinian people. How about the manuscript by Eusebius of Caesarea (Palestine) dated 411 AD:

"Martiri palestinesi nell’Occidente latino."
(Palestinian martyrs in the Latin West.)

Martiri palestinesi nell’Occidente latino. I casi della Passio Theo...

 

[sealybobo]

The U.N. "apartheid" document was written by two AMERICANS. Doncha just love it?

Were they JEWISH?

 

[montelatici]

Darn, there was Palestinian tobacco but no Palestinian people.

 

[montelatici]

The U.N. "apartheid" document was written by two AMERICANS. Doncha just love it?

Were they JEWISH?

One of the American authors is Jewish, Richard Falk, the other, Virginia Tilley is Christian.

 

[P F Tinmore]

They gather a bunch of people who hate Israel and those people "testify." Surprise, surprise: the "investigation" finds everything everyone says to be credible and accurate.

The committee whose entire purpose is to investigate Israel - the only such committee in the UN - doesn't even investigate Israel. It just regurgitates anti-Israel propaganda, and there is no shortage of people willing to "testify" on that score, since they know that no one will actually do any fact-checking.

So for example, some unnamed "journalists" testified that they were "targeted" by Israel while covering protests. Were they, perhaps, also participants? The UN doesn't care.

Even though Israel doesn't cooperate with this farce, that is not reason to rubber stamp any anti-Israel statement that is made without a modicum of checking newspaper accounts or official Israeli press releases. Or the veracity of the "testifiers."

This committee was created in 1968. That's Which means that there has been 49 years of obvious vilification of Israel at the UN.

But when it was created, it had a different name. The UNGA resolution that created this committee, 2443, called it the "Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Population of the Occupied Territories."

Because in 1968, no one - not even the UN - ever heard of the "Palestinian people."

(full article online)

The UN's anti-Israel kangaroo court ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

The usual Zionist propaganda that is so easily debunked. The Palestinians were calling themselves the people of Palestine, in writing in official correspondence with the British Colonial Office.

"PALESTINE.

CORRESPONDENCE
WITH THE
PALESTINE ARAB DELEGATION
AND THE
ZIONIST ORGANISATION.

Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty.
JUNE, 1922.
LONDON:

Sir,

We wish to express our thanks to the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the Colonies, for his courtesy in allowing us to see the draft of a proposed Palestine Order in Council embodying a scheme of Government for Palestine, and to discuss the same in our capacity of representatives of the Arab People of Palestine.

• 
  
  
  • 
    
    We would, therefore, submit the following observations:—

Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable.
If the British Government would revise their present policy in Palestine, end the Zionist con-dominium, put a stop to all alien immigration and grant the People of Palestine — who by Right and Experience are the best judges of what is good and bad to their country — Executive and Legislative powers, the terms of a constitution could be discussed in a different atmosphere. If to-day the People of Palestine assented to any constitution which fell short of giving them full control of their own affairs they would be in the position of agreeing to an instrument of Government which might, and probably would, be used to smother their national life under a flood of alien immigration."

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)

Mandatory Palestine was a geopolitical entity under British administration, carved out of Ottoman Southern Syria after World War I. British civil administration in Palestine operated from 1920 until 1948.Wikipedia

----------------
In other words, by 1922 when this letter was written, the region was already under the Mandate, and the Palestine the Arabs were referring to was the region, the Mandate, and not a country they had ever control over, or ever thought about before that Mandate occurred.

This letter was after taking away any and all lands from ever becoming sovereign of the rightful indigenous people, the Jewish Nation.

These Arabs had no issues with the Ottoman Occupying Forces for the 400 years before this letter. They reached out to no one. But then, the Arabs had been one of the invading occupying forces which took over from the Byzantine from the 7th Century on.
What was there for the Muslim Arabs to complain about as long as they were being occupied by Muslims?


What, Monti?

No document, book, report, letter, etc with any Arab referring to the whole area as Palestine, or themselves as the People of Palestine?

No European visitors before WWI ever referring to them as such, even after speaking to any one of them?

LOL. You mean like the Manual for Palestinian Arabic published in 1906, for English speakers Europeans included. You people crack me up with your propaganda. And you are the funniest of the lot. I think you actually believe the bullshit propaganda you post. That's the saddest part of it.

"Palestinian Arabic" is still Arabic. It does not refer to the Arab people
living there as a distinct people. As Palestinians.

The stamp refers to the region of Palestine, as the Ottomans and others sometimes referred to the land.

Still, no distinct Palestinian people, Arab, Druze, Bedouine, Jewish, or otherwise.

The Arabs were always referred to as Arabs. As Christians or Muslims.
And not as a distinct people, indigenous of the land.

The only people referred to by everyone as the indigenous people of the Land, and that includes the invading Muslims, Crusaders, Ottomans or British, are the Jewish People.

The Palestinian People/Nation continues to be missing from your evidence.

You need to get your timeline in order. Britain occupied Ottoman/Turkish territory until the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne.

Drawing up the framework of nationality, Article 30 of the Treaty of Lausanne stated:

“Turkish subjects habitually resident in territory which in accordance with the provisions of the present Treaty is detached from Turkey will become ipso facto, in the conditions laid down by the local law, nationals of the State to which such territory is transferred.”​

As you can see, the territory was ceded to the new state of Palestine and the Palestinians legally became Palestinians.

The Mandate for Palestine did not start until three months after the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne. Although the Mandate had been pre planned it could not start operations until after the state of Palestine was created. It could not be the Mandate for Palestine until there was a Palestine.

 

[Hollie]

They gather a bunch of people who hate Israel and those people "testify." Surprise, surprise: the "investigation" finds everything everyone says to be credible and accurate.

The committee whose entire purpose is to investigate Israel - the only such committee in the UN - doesn't even investigate Israel. It just regurgitates anti-Israel propaganda, and there is no shortage of people willing to "testify" on that score, since they know that no one will actually do any fact-checking.

So for example, some unnamed "journalists" testified that they were "targeted" by Israel while covering protests. Were they, perhaps, also participants? The UN doesn't care.

Even though Israel doesn't cooperate with this farce, that is not reason to rubber stamp any anti-Israel statement that is made without a modicum of checking newspaper accounts or official Israeli press releases. Or the veracity of the "testifiers."

This committee was created in 1968. That's Which means that there has been 49 years of obvious vilification of Israel at the UN.

But when it was created, it had a different name. The UNGA resolution that created this committee, 2443, called it the "Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Population of the Occupied Territories."

Because in 1968, no one - not even the UN - ever heard of the "Palestinian people."

(full article online)

The UN's anti-Israel kangaroo court ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

The usual Zionist propaganda that is so easily debunked. The Palestinians were calling themselves the people of Palestine, in writing in official correspondence with the British Colonial Office.

"PALESTINE.

CORRESPONDENCE
WITH THE
PALESTINE ARAB DELEGATION
AND THE
ZIONIST ORGANISATION.

Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty.
JUNE, 1922.
LONDON:

Sir,

We wish to express our thanks to the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the Colonies, for his courtesy in allowing us to see the draft of a proposed Palestine Order in Council embodying a scheme of Government for Palestine, and to discuss the same in our capacity of representatives of the Arab People of Palestine.

• 
  
  
  • 
    
    We would, therefore, submit the following observations:—

Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable.
If the British Government would revise their present policy in Palestine, end the Zionist con-dominium, put a stop to all alien immigration and grant the People of Palestine — who by Right and Experience are the best judges of what is good and bad to their country — Executive and Legislative powers, the terms of a constitution could be discussed in a different atmosphere. If to-day the People of Palestine assented to any constitution which fell short of giving them full control of their own affairs they would be in the position of agreeing to an instrument of Government which might, and probably would, be used to smother their national life under a flood of alien immigration."

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)

Mandatory Palestine was a geopolitical entity under British administration, carved out of Ottoman Southern Syria after World War I. British civil administration in Palestine operated from 1920 until 1948.Wikipedia

----------------
In other words, by 1922 when this letter was written, the region was already under the Mandate, and the Palestine the Arabs were referring to was the region, the Mandate, and not a country they had ever control over, or ever thought about before that Mandate occurred.

This letter was after taking away any and all lands from ever becoming sovereign of the rightful indigenous people, the Jewish Nation.

These Arabs had no issues with the Ottoman Occupying Forces for the 400 years before this letter. They reached out to no one. But then, the Arabs had been one of the invading occupying forces which took over from the Byzantine from the 7th Century on.
What was there for the Muslim Arabs to complain about as long as they were being occupied by Muslims?


What, Monti?

No document, book, report, letter, etc with any Arab referring to the whole area as Palestine, or themselves as the People of Palestine?

No European visitors before WWI ever referring to them as such, even after speaking to any one of them?

LOL. You mean like the Manual for Palestinian Arabic published in 1906, for English speakers Europeans included. You people crack me up with your propaganda. And you are the funniest of the lot. I think you actually believe the bullshit propaganda you post. That's the saddest part of it.

"Palestinian Arabic" is still Arabic. It does not refer to the Arab people
living there as a distinct people. As Palestinians.

The stamp refers to the region of Palestine, as the Ottomans and others sometimes referred to the land.

Still, no distinct Palestinian people, Arab, Druze, Bedouine, Jewish, or otherwise.

The Arabs were always referred to as Arabs. As Christians or Muslims.
And not as a distinct people, indigenous of the land.

The only people referred to by everyone as the indigenous people of the Land, and that includes the invading Muslims, Crusaders, Ottomans or British, are the Jewish People.

The Palestinian People/Nation continues to be missing from your evidence.

You need to get your timeline in order. Britain occupied Ottoman/Turkish territory until the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne.

Drawing up the framework of nationality, Article 30 of the Treaty of Lausanne stated:

“Turkish subjects habitually resident in territory which in accordance with the provisions of the present Treaty is detached from Turkey will become ipso facto, in the conditions laid down by the local law, nationals of the State to which such territory is transferred.”​

As you can see, the territory was ceded to the new state of Palestine and the Palestinians legally became Palestinians.

The Mandate for Palestine did not start until three months after the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne. Although the Mandate had been pre planned it could not start operations until after the state of Palestine was created. It could not be the Mandate for Palestine until there was a Palestine.

You have cut and pasted that attempt at fraud before. The treaty of Lausanne makes not a single mention of Pal'istan.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The usual Zionist propaganda that is so easily debunked. The Palestinians were calling themselves the people of Palestine, in writing in official correspondence with the British Colonial Office.

"PALESTINE.

CORRESPONDENCE
WITH THE
PALESTINE ARAB DELEGATION
AND THE
ZIONIST ORGANISATION.

Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty.
JUNE, 1922.
LONDON:

Sir,

We wish to express our thanks to the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the Colonies, for his courtesy in allowing us to see the draft of a proposed Palestine Order in Council embodying a scheme of Government for Palestine, and to discuss the same in our capacity of representatives of the Arab People of Palestine.

• 
  
  
  • 
    
    We would, therefore, submit the following observations:—

Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable.
If the British Government would revise their present policy in Palestine, end the Zionist con-dominium, put a stop to all alien immigration and grant the People of Palestine — who by Right and Experience are the best judges of what is good and bad to their country — Executive and Legislative powers, the terms of a constitution could be discussed in a different atmosphere. If to-day the People of Palestine assented to any constitution which fell short of giving them full control of their own affairs they would be in the position of agreeing to an instrument of Government which might, and probably would, be used to smother their national life under a flood of alien immigration."

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)

Mandatory Palestine was a geopolitical entity under British administration, carved out of Ottoman Southern Syria after World War I. British civil administration in Palestine operated from 1920 until 1948.Wikipedia

----------------
In other words, by 1922 when this letter was written, the region was already under the Mandate, and the Palestine the Arabs were referring to was the region, the Mandate, and not a country they had ever control over, or ever thought about before that Mandate occurred.

This letter was after taking away any and all lands from ever becoming sovereign of the rightful indigenous people, the Jewish Nation.

These Arabs had no issues with the Ottoman Occupying Forces for the 400 years before this letter. They reached out to no one. But then, the Arabs had been one of the invading occupying forces which took over from the Byzantine from the 7th Century on.
What was there for the Muslim Arabs to complain about as long as they were being occupied by Muslims?


What, Monti?

No document, book, report, letter, etc with any Arab referring to the whole area as Palestine, or themselves as the People of Palestine?

No European visitors before WWI ever referring to them as such, even after speaking to any one of them?

LOL. You mean like the Manual for Palestinian Arabic published in 1906, for English speakers Europeans included. You people crack me up with your propaganda. And you are the funniest of the lot. I think you actually believe the bullshit propaganda you post. That's the saddest part of it.

"Palestinian Arabic" is still Arabic. It does not refer to the Arab people
living there as a distinct people. As Palestinians.

The stamp refers to the region of Palestine, as the Ottomans and others sometimes referred to the land.

Still, no distinct Palestinian people, Arab, Druze, Bedouine, Jewish, or otherwise.

The Arabs were always referred to as Arabs. As Christians or Muslims.
And not as a distinct people, indigenous of the land.

The only people referred to by everyone as the indigenous people of the Land, and that includes the invading Muslims, Crusaders, Ottomans or British, are the Jewish People.

The Palestinian People/Nation continues to be missing from your evidence.

You need to get your timeline in order. Britain occupied Ottoman/Turkish territory until the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne.

Drawing up the framework of nationality, Article 30 of the Treaty of Lausanne stated:

“Turkish subjects habitually resident in territory which in accordance with the provisions of the present Treaty is detached from Turkey will become ipso facto, in the conditions laid down by the local law, nationals of the State to which such territory is transferred.”​

As you can see, the territory was ceded to the new state of Palestine and the Palestinians legally became Palestinians.

The Mandate for Palestine did not start until three months after the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne. Although the Mandate had been pre planned it could not start operations until after the state of Palestine was created. It could not be the Mandate for Palestine until there was a Palestine.

You have cut and pasted that attempt at fraud before. The treaty of Lausanne makes not a single mention of Pal'istan.

Standard Israeli bullshit talking point. It did not mention Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, or Jordan either.

 

[Hollie]

Mandatory Palestine was a geopolitical entity under British administration, carved out of Ottoman Southern Syria after World War I. British civil administration in Palestine operated from 1920 until 1948.Wikipedia

----------------
In other words, by 1922 when this letter was written, the region was already under the Mandate, and the Palestine the Arabs were referring to was the region, the Mandate, and not a country they had ever control over, or ever thought about before that Mandate occurred.

This letter was after taking away any and all lands from ever becoming sovereign of the rightful indigenous people, the Jewish Nation.

These Arabs had no issues with the Ottoman Occupying Forces for the 400 years before this letter. They reached out to no one. But then, the Arabs had been one of the invading occupying forces which took over from the Byzantine from the 7th Century on.
What was there for the Muslim Arabs to complain about as long as they were being occupied by Muslims?


What, Monti?

No document, book, report, letter, etc with any Arab referring to the whole area as Palestine, or themselves as the People of Palestine?

No European visitors before WWI ever referring to them as such, even after speaking to any one of them?

LOL. You mean like the Manual for Palestinian Arabic published in 1906, for English speakers Europeans included. You people crack me up with your propaganda. And you are the funniest of the lot. I think you actually believe the bullshit propaganda you post. That's the saddest part of it.

"Palestinian Arabic" is still Arabic. It does not refer to the Arab people
living there as a distinct people. As Palestinians.

The stamp refers to the region of Palestine, as the Ottomans and others sometimes referred to the land.

Still, no distinct Palestinian people, Arab, Druze, Bedouine, Jewish, or otherwise.

The Arabs were always referred to as Arabs. As Christians or Muslims.
And not as a distinct people, indigenous of the land.

The only people referred to by everyone as the indigenous people of the Land, and that includes the invading Muslims, Crusaders, Ottomans or British, are the Jewish People.

The Palestinian People/Nation continues to be missing from your evidence.

You need to get your timeline in order. Britain occupied Ottoman/Turkish territory until the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne.

Drawing up the framework of nationality, Article 30 of the Treaty of Lausanne stated:

“Turkish subjects habitually resident in territory which in accordance with the provisions of the present Treaty is detached from Turkey will become ipso facto, in the conditions laid down by the local law, nationals of the State to which such territory is transferred.”​

As you can see, the territory was ceded to the new state of Palestine and the Palestinians legally became Palestinians.

The Mandate for Palestine did not start until three months after the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne. Although the Mandate had been pre planned it could not start operations until after the state of Palestine was created. It could not be the Mandate for Palestine until there was a Palestine.

You have cut and pasted that attempt at fraud before. The treaty of Lausanne makes not a single mention of Pal'istan.

Standard Israeli bullshit talking point. It did not mention Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, or Jordan either.

Typical Tinmore fraud. This has been addressed for you in a dedicated thread. There is no need in this thread for your usual cut and paste fraud on the alleged creation of your invented "country of Pally'land"

 

[P F Tinmore]

LOL. You mean like the Manual for Palestinian Arabic published in 1906, for English speakers Europeans included. You people crack me up with your propaganda. And you are the funniest of the lot. I think you actually believe the bullshit propaganda you post. That's the saddest part of it.

"Palestinian Arabic" is still Arabic. It does not refer to the Arab people
living there as a distinct people. As Palestinians.

The stamp refers to the region of Palestine, as the Ottomans and others sometimes referred to the land.

Still, no distinct Palestinian people, Arab, Druze, Bedouine, Jewish, or otherwise.

The Arabs were always referred to as Arabs. As Christians or Muslims.
And not as a distinct people, indigenous of the land.

The only people referred to by everyone as the indigenous people of the Land, and that includes the invading Muslims, Crusaders, Ottomans or British, are the Jewish People.

The Palestinian People/Nation continues to be missing from your evidence.

You need to get your timeline in order. Britain occupied Ottoman/Turkish territory until the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne.

Drawing up the framework of nationality, Article 30 of the Treaty of Lausanne stated:

“Turkish subjects habitually resident in territory which in accordance with the provisions of the present Treaty is detached from Turkey will become ipso facto, in the conditions laid down by the local law, nationals of the State to which such territory is transferred.”​

As you can see, the territory was ceded to the new state of Palestine and the Palestinians legally became Palestinians.

The Mandate for Palestine did not start until three months after the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne. Although the Mandate had been pre planned it could not start operations until after the state of Palestine was created. It could not be the Mandate for Palestine until there was a Palestine.

You have cut and pasted that attempt at fraud before. The treaty of Lausanne makes not a single mention of Pal'istan.

Standard Israeli bullshit talking point. It did not mention Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, or Jordan either.

Typical Tinmore fraud. This has been addressed for you in a dedicated thread. There is no need in this thread for your usual cut and paste fraud on the alleged creation of your invented "country of Pally'land"

This has been addressed for you in a dedicated thread.

Indeed, lots of smoke, dancing, and lies, but nobody has ever proven me to be incorrect.

 

[Hollie]

"Palestinian Arabic" is still Arabic. It does not refer to the Arab people
living there as a distinct people. As Palestinians.

The stamp refers to the region of Palestine, as the Ottomans and others sometimes referred to the land.

Still, no distinct Palestinian people, Arab, Druze, Bedouine, Jewish, or otherwise.

The Arabs were always referred to as Arabs. As Christians or Muslims.
And not as a distinct people, indigenous of the land.

The only people referred to by everyone as the indigenous people of the Land, and that includes the invading Muslims, Crusaders, Ottomans or British, are the Jewish People.

The Palestinian People/Nation continues to be missing from your evidence.

You need to get your timeline in order. Britain occupied Ottoman/Turkish territory until the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne.

Drawing up the framework of nationality, Article 30 of the Treaty of Lausanne stated:

“Turkish subjects habitually resident in territory which in accordance with the provisions of the present Treaty is detached from Turkey will become ipso facto, in the conditions laid down by the local law, nationals of the State to which such territory is transferred.”​

As you can see, the territory was ceded to the new state of Palestine and the Palestinians legally became Palestinians.

The Mandate for Palestine did not start until three months after the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne. Although the Mandate had been pre planned it could not start operations until after the state of Palestine was created. It could not be the Mandate for Palestine until there was a Palestine.

You have cut and pasted that attempt at fraud before. The treaty of Lausanne makes not a single mention of Pal'istan.

Standard Israeli bullshit talking point. It did not mention Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, or Jordan either.

Typical Tinmore fraud. This has been addressed for you in a dedicated thread. There is no need in this thread for your usual cut and paste fraud on the alleged creation of your invented "country of Pally'land"

This has been addressed for you in a dedicated thread.

Indeed, lots of smoke, dancing, and lies, but nobody has ever proven me to be incorrect.

Indeed, you just invent some rather comical versions of history.

 

[Hollie]

Just when you think the Arab-islamist Death Cult can't possibly do anything more depraved, they find a way to surpass their most despicable acts.

It's as though those people breed like rabbits to present a steady supply of little islamo-bots as ready made, disposable items.


PA official glorifies Martyrdom: "Our child Martyrs, Allah willing, are birds in Paradise” - PMW Bulletins

PA official honors terrorist
who threw Molotov cocktails at civilians:
"Our child Martyrs, Allah willing,
are birds in Paradise"

Rather than matriculation certificate,
terrorist "achieved the highest Martyrdom"

Itamar Marcus and Nan Jacques Zilberdik

 

[P F Tinmore]

You need to get your timeline in order. Britain occupied Ottoman/Turkish territory until the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne.

Drawing up the framework of nationality, Article 30 of the Treaty of Lausanne stated:

“Turkish subjects habitually resident in territory which in accordance with the provisions of the present Treaty is detached from Turkey will become ipso facto, in the conditions laid down by the local law, nationals of the State to which such territory is transferred.”​

As you can see, the territory was ceded to the new state of Palestine and the Palestinians legally became Palestinians.

The Mandate for Palestine did not start until three months after the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne. Although the Mandate had been pre planned it could not start operations until after the state of Palestine was created. It could not be the Mandate for Palestine until there was a Palestine.

You have cut and pasted that attempt at fraud before. The treaty of Lausanne makes not a single mention of Pal'istan.

Standard Israeli bullshit talking point. It did not mention Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, or Jordan either.

Typical Tinmore fraud. This has been addressed for you in a dedicated thread. There is no need in this thread for your usual cut and paste fraud on the alleged creation of your invented "country of Pally'land"

This has been addressed for you in a dedicated thread.

Indeed, lots of smoke, dancing, and lies, but nobody has ever proven me to be incorrect.

Indeed, you just invent some rather comical versions of history.

I invented the Treaty of Lausanne?

WOW, am I good.

 

[Sixties Fan]

The first video documents how Hezbollah avoids running afoul of UNIFIL through the use of a front organization, 'Green without Borders.'

The second video documents the intelligence-gathering operations of Hezbollah.

(full article online)

Proof Hezbollah is preparing for war

 

[Sixties Fan]

'You are the proof of the failure of BDS'

 

[montelatici]

As BDS turns 12 this week, here are 12 indicators of our movement’s growing impact from 2017 to mark the occasion:

A UN report established that Israel has imposed a system of apartheid on the entire Palestinian people and called for BDS measures to end this apartheid regime.

The Mennonite Church USA just voted by a 98% majority to divest from companies that profit from the Israeli occupation, following several mainline churches that have adopted similar policies in recent years, including the Presbyterian Church USA, the United Church of Christ and the United Methodist Church. The Mennonite resolution also urges church members to boycott products produced in illegal Israeli settlements built on stolen Palestinian land.

Right to Boycott wins: The Spanish parliament affirmed that the right to advocate for Palestinian rights through BDS is protected under freedom of speech and association. The UK government was defeated in court by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign and its allies in a ruling that deems it unlawful for the government to restrict the right of local authorities to divest from companies complicit in Israel’s violations of Palestinian human rights. The Swiss parliament blocked Israel lobby efforts to criminalize support for BDS.

Norway’s largest trade union federation, representing close to one million workers, endorsed a full boycott of Israel to achieve Palestinian rights under international law.

The Lebanese doctors’ syndicate dropped G4S, the world’s largest private security company, following a campaign by boycott activists in Lebanon concerned with the company’s ongoing complicity in Israeli violations of Palestinian human rights.

G4S also suffered its first loss in Ecuador, where a research institute dropped its contract with the company following a BDS campaign. A California transportation board dropped its contract with G4S after a human rights and labor coalition, including BDS activists, highlighted the company’s role in violating human rights in Palestine and the United States.

These developments follow many BDS successes in previous years against G4S in Jordan, Colombia, Finland, UK, South Africa, the European Parliament, among other countries and institutions, which compelled the company to sell most of its illegal Israeli operations.

Israel’s largest public transportation operator lost a 190 million euro contract to run public transportation in the Netherlands.

The Barcelona city council adopted ethical procurement guidelines that exclude companies involved in Israel’s military occupation. In the past year, dozens of city councils across the Spanish state declared themselves Israeli “Apartheid Free Zones.”

A Palestinian coalition of Christian organizations called on the World Council of Churches to support the BDS movement for Palestinian human rights.

A wave of boycotts hit the Tel Aviv International LGBT Film Festival as artists from around the world showed respect for the Palestinian cultural boycott picket line. An award-winning South African filmmaker, whose film was scheduled to be the festival’s opening film, was among the artists who canceled their participation in the festival.

Two Chilean universities cancelled events sponsored by the Israeli embassy, and students governments in several US and other universities passed various BDS measures.

The Israeli government suffered an embarrassing blow after six out of eleven National Football League (NFL) players in the US turned down an all-expenses paid propaganda trip organized to improve Israel’s fast deteriorating image.

BDS campaigns grow among Palestinian citizens of Israel. In coordination with BDS partners in South Korea, the BDS Committee of Palestinian Citizens of Israel (BDS48) launched a campaign to boycott and divest from Hyundai Heavy Industries (HHI) until the company ends its complicity in Israel’s violations of Palestinian human rights, particularly in Jerusalem and the Naqab (Negev).

10 Indicators of Success As BDS Movements Turns 12

 

[Sixties Fan]

An important battle just played out in Canada at the intersection of geopolitical territorial disputes and international trade law. The issue was the labeling of Israel products produced in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria). On July 6, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) issued a notice that wines produced in this region cannot be labeled “Made in Israel,” as they had long been.

Within a day, the Canadian government reversed the decision, and in doing made an important statement about such labeling controversies, which have been cropping up around the world. Canada’s decision to repeal its short-lived ban on “Made in Israel” labels for such products should give impetus to the United States to reexamine its labeling policy.

(full article online)

Opinion | Canada corrects its ‘Made in Israel’ policy. Now it is time for the U.S. to do the same.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Tauber also noted that the Arab stories about the battle of Deir Yassin later reached delusional levels, while abroad the story is presented in such a way as to turn the Jews into Nazis. Nevertheless, he mentioned a blunt quote from an Arab interviewee who was asked whether there had been rape incidents in the village. He responded that this claim was false. “And the interviewer, who understands the effect of this rumor, says 'In other words, the Jews are free of guilt on these matters, but we still have lost our lands.’”

(full article online)

'There was no massacre at Deir Yassin'