All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[montelatici]

Actually, he is very strong having both Shia and Christian support. Hezbollah are the only military power that can deter the Israelis from occupying Lebanon again. The Lebanese people rely on Hezbollah as they are the most effective and experienced fighting force in Lebanon.

Why would Israel try to occupy Southern Lebanon again? Especially now that the Christian allies of Israel are a minority in Muslim-dominated Hezbollah Lebanon. The Christian Maronites were decimated and driven out by the Muslims during Lebanon's civil war.

The Auon, the President, and his Christian supporters are Maronites. Sheesh, what ignorance.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

Actually, he is very strong having both Shia and Christian support. Hezbollah are the only military power that can deter the Israelis from occupying Lebanon again. The Lebanese people rely on Hezbollah as they are the most effective and experienced fighting force in Lebanon.

Why would Israel try to occupy Southern Lebanon again? Especially now that the Christian allies of Israel are a minority in Muslim-dominated Hezbollah Lebanon. The Christian Maronites were decimated and driven out by the Muslims during Lebanon's civil war.

The Auon, the President, and his Christian supporters are Maronites. Sheesh, what ignorance.

Christians used to be the majority in Lebanon. Not anymore. Christians used to have the power in Lebanon. Not anymore, thanks to Iran and Hezbollah. Yes, the President is still Christian by law, but how much power does he have? It seems that you're the ignorant one, not knowing that the balance of power in Lebanon has changed, and that Lebanon is more of a Muslim, rather than Christian, nation these days.

 

[Hollie]

Actually, he is very strong having both Shia and Christian support. Hezbollah are the only military power that can deter the Israelis from occupying Lebanon again. The Lebanese people rely on Hezbollah as they are the most effective and experienced fighting force in Lebanon.

Why would Israel try to occupy Southern Lebanon again? Especially now that the Christian allies of Israel are a minority in Muslim-dominated Hezbollah Lebanon. The Christian Maronites were decimated and driven out by the Muslims during Lebanon's civil war.

The Auon, the President, and his Christian supporters are Maronites. Sheesh, what ignorance.

The fact is, Christians of all versions are a clear minority.

Lebanon Religion Facts & Stats

 

[ForeverYoung436]

Actually, he is very strong having both Shia and Christian support. Hezbollah are the only military power that can deter the Israelis from occupying Lebanon again. The Lebanese people rely on Hezbollah as they are the most effective and experienced fighting force in Lebanon.

Why would Israel try to occupy Southern Lebanon again? Especially now that the Christian allies of Israel are a minority in Muslim-dominated Hezbollah Lebanon. The Christian Maronites were decimated and driven out by the Muslims during Lebanon's civil war.

The Auon, the President, and his Christian supporters are Maronites. Sheesh, what ignorance.

Christians used to be the majority in Lebanon. Not anymore. Christians used to have the power in Lebanon. Not anymore, thanks to Iran and Hezbollah. Yes, the President is still Christian by law, but how much power does he have? It seems that you're the ignorant one, not knowing that the balance of power in Lebanon has changed, and that Lebanon is more of a Muslim, rather than Christian, nation these days.

Your enemies, the Israelis, would have kept Lebanon more of a Christian nation. Once again, you prove you are a traitor to your faith.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Actually, he is very strong having both Shia and Christian support. Hezbollah are the only military power that can deter the Israelis from occupying Lebanon again. The Lebanese people rely on Hezbollah as they are the most effective and experienced fighting force in Lebanon.

Why would Israel try to occupy Southern Lebanon again? Especially now that the Christian allies of Israel are a minority in Muslim-dominated Hezbollah Lebanon. The Christian Maronites were decimated and driven out by the Muslims during Lebanon's civil war.

The Auon, the President, and his Christian supporters are Maronites. Sheesh, what ignorance.

Christians used to be the majority in Lebanon. Not anymore. Christians used to have the power in Lebanon. Not anymore, thanks to Iran and Hezbollah. Yes, the President is still Christian by law, but how much power does he have? It seems that you're the ignorant one, not knowing that the balance of power in Lebanon has changed, and that Lebanon is more of a Muslim, rather than Christian, nation these days.

OK, and???

 

[Hollie]

Actually, he is very strong having both Shia and Christian support. Hezbollah are the only military power that can deter the Israelis from occupying Lebanon again. The Lebanese people rely on Hezbollah as they are the most effective and experienced fighting force in Lebanon.

Why would Israel try to occupy Southern Lebanon again? Especially now that the Christian allies of Israel are a minority in Muslim-dominated Hezbollah Lebanon. The Christian Maronites were decimated and driven out by the Muslims during Lebanon's civil war.

The Auon, the President, and his Christian supporters are Maronites. Sheesh, what ignorance.

Christians used to be the majority in Lebanon. Not anymore. Christians used to have the power in Lebanon. Not anymore, thanks to Iran and Hezbollah. Yes, the President is still Christian by law, but how much power does he have? It seems that you're the ignorant one, not knowing that the balance of power in Lebanon has changed, and that Lebanon is more of a Muslim, rather than Christian, nation these days.

OK, and???

And... it's only a matter of time for the Christians to pushed out by the muhammedan majority thus creating another Islamist apartheid paradise.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

Actually, he is very strong having both Shia and Christian support. Hezbollah are the only military power that can deter the Israelis from occupying Lebanon again. The Lebanese people rely on Hezbollah as they are the most effective and experienced fighting force in Lebanon.

Why would Israel try to occupy Southern Lebanon again? Especially now that the Christian allies of Israel are a minority in Muslim-dominated Hezbollah Lebanon. The Christian Maronites were decimated and driven out by the Muslims during Lebanon's civil war.

The Auon, the President, and his Christian supporters are Maronites. Sheesh, what ignorance.

Christians used to be the majority in Lebanon. Not anymore. Christians used to have the power in Lebanon. Not anymore, thanks to Iran and Hezbollah. Yes, the President is still Christian by law, but how much power does he have? It seems that you're the ignorant one, not knowing that the balance of power in Lebanon has changed, and that Lebanon is more of a Muslim, rather than Christian, nation these days.

OK, and???

I was talking to monte, who presents himself as a great Christian patriot, and who wants to resurrect the Crusader Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Actually, he is very strong having both Shia and Christian support. Hezbollah are the only military power that can deter the Israelis from occupying Lebanon again. The Lebanese people rely on Hezbollah as they are the most effective and experienced fighting force in Lebanon.

Why would Israel try to occupy Southern Lebanon again? Especially now that the Christian allies of Israel are a minority in Muslim-dominated Hezbollah Lebanon. The Christian Maronites were decimated and driven out by the Muslims during Lebanon's civil war.

The Auon, the President, and his Christian supporters are Maronites. Sheesh, what ignorance.

Christians used to be the majority in Lebanon. Not anymore. Christians used to have the power in Lebanon. Not anymore, thanks to Iran and Hezbollah. Yes, the President is still Christian by law, but how much power does he have? It seems that you're the ignorant one, not knowing that the balance of power in Lebanon has changed, and that Lebanon is more of a Muslim, rather than Christian, nation these days.

OK, and???

And... it's only a matter of time for the Christians to pushed out by the muhammedan majority thus creating another Islamist apartheid paradise.

You have a very sick view of governance.

 

[montelatici]

Actually, he is very strong having both Shia and Christian support. Hezbollah are the only military power that can deter the Israelis from occupying Lebanon again. The Lebanese people rely on Hezbollah as they are the most effective and experienced fighting force in Lebanon.

Why would Israel try to occupy Southern Lebanon again? Especially now that the Christian allies of Israel are a minority in Muslim-dominated Hezbollah Lebanon. The Christian Maronites were decimated and driven out by the Muslims during Lebanon's civil war.

The Auon, the President, and his Christian supporters are Maronites. Sheesh, what ignorance.

Christians used to be the majority in Lebanon. Not anymore. Christians used to have the power in Lebanon. Not anymore, thanks to Iran and Hezbollah. Yes, the President is still Christian by law, but how much power does he have? It seems that you're the ignorant one, not knowing that the balance of power in Lebanon has changed, and that Lebanon is more of a Muslim, rather than Christian, nation these days.

Lebanon is more democratic than Israel. No confession rules over another. The Shia ally themselves with the Christians to maintain either a ruling coalition or a strong opposition to the Sunni and their allies, when not in power. Lebanon is a secular multi-ethnic state. Something Israel is not.

 

[Hollie]

Why would Israel try to occupy Southern Lebanon again? Especially now that the Christian allies of Israel are a minority in Muslim-dominated Hezbollah Lebanon. The Christian Maronites were decimated and driven out by the Muslims during Lebanon's civil war.

The Auon, the President, and his Christian supporters are Maronites. Sheesh, what ignorance.

Christians used to be the majority in Lebanon. Not anymore. Christians used to have the power in Lebanon. Not anymore, thanks to Iran and Hezbollah. Yes, the President is still Christian by law, but how much power does he have? It seems that you're the ignorant one, not knowing that the balance of power in Lebanon has changed, and that Lebanon is more of a Muslim, rather than Christian, nation these days.

OK, and???

And... it's only a matter of time for the Christians to pushed out by the muhammedan majority thus creating another Islamist apartheid paradise.

You have a very sick view of governance.

I have the historical perspective of Islamist fascism and it's affect on the minority religions. You have no willingness to accept the history that defines the fascistic nature of Islamist ideology.

Now would be the expected introduction of one or more of your conspiracy theories.

 

[Hollie]

Actually, he is very strong having both Shia and Christian support. Hezbollah are the only military power that can deter the Israelis from occupying Lebanon again. The Lebanese people rely on Hezbollah as they are the most effective and experienced fighting force in Lebanon.

Why would Israel try to occupy Southern Lebanon again? Especially now that the Christian allies of Israel are a minority in Muslim-dominated Hezbollah Lebanon. The Christian Maronites were decimated and driven out by the Muslims during Lebanon's civil war.

The Auon, the President, and his Christian supporters are Maronites. Sheesh, what ignorance.

Christians used to be the majority in Lebanon. Not anymore. Christians used to have the power in Lebanon. Not anymore, thanks to Iran and Hezbollah. Yes, the President is still Christian by law, but how much power does he have? It seems that you're the ignorant one, not knowing that the balance of power in Lebanon has changed, and that Lebanon is more of a Muslim, rather than Christian, nation these days.

Lebanon is more democratic than Israel. No confession rules over another. The Shia ally themselves with the Christians to maintain either a ruling coalition or a strong opposition to the Sunni and their allies, when not in power. Lebanon is a secular multi-ethnic state. Something Israel is not.

Yes, yes. The Monty has proclaimed that "Lebanon is more democratic than Israel."

That must be why hizbollocks unilaterally (and "democratically"), instigated a war with Israel. How "democratic" of the Iranian stooges i.e., hizbollocks, to cause such death and destruction.

Those dead Christians must be grateful to the Shia Iranian Islamists.

 

[Sixties Fan]

They gather a bunch of people who hate Israel and those people "testify." Surprise, surprise: the "investigation" finds everything everyone says to be credible and accurate.

The committee whose entire purpose is to investigate Israel - the only such committee in the UN - doesn't even investigate Israel. It just regurgitates anti-Israel propaganda, and there is no shortage of people willing to "testify" on that score, since they know that no one will actually do any fact-checking.

So for example, some unnamed "journalists" testified that they were "targeted" by Israel while covering protests. Were they, perhaps, also participants? The UN doesn't care.

Even though Israel doesn't cooperate with this farce, that is not reason to rubber stamp any anti-Israel statement that is made without a modicum of checking newspaper accounts or official Israeli press releases. Or the veracity of the "testifiers."

This committee was created in 1968. That's Which means that there has been 49 years of obvious vilification of Israel at the UN.

But when it was created, it had a different name. The UNGA resolution that created this committee, 2443, called it the "Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Population of the Occupied Territories."

Because in 1968, no one - not even the UN - ever heard of the "Palestinian people."

(full article online)

The UN's anti-Israel kangaroo court ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

 

[Sixties Fan]

I never understood how a nation that is so hell-bent on expansionism and hegemony has given away the Sinai, the Gaza Strip, southern Lebanon and much of the West Bank - far more than half the territory it once controlled.

But it is all part of the evil plan.

A Palestinian official can make statements like this without the slightest fear that any newspaper or politician will make fun of him for saying such inanities. On the contrary, if anyone would criticize Barghouti, they would be the ones who would be criticized and ostracized by mainstream Palestinian opinion!

It cannot be emphasized enough: truth is not a Palestinian value.

At the meeting I attended last week hosted by Phyllis Chesler, author Tuvia Tenenbom said that he once heard a Palestinian official talk about the "10,000 year history of Palestinians" in the region. Tenenbom (pretending to be a non-Jewish sympathizer) acted offended and said, "How dare you say that! It is a 30,000 year history!" The official agreed, of course, it was 30,000 years, he was sorry he misspoke.

How can one make peace with people who have literally no idea of what truth even means?

(full article online)

Palestinian official says Israel plans to impose its hegemony on the entire Arab world ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

 

[montelatici]

They gather a bunch of people who hate Israel and those people "testify." Surprise, surprise: the "investigation" finds everything everyone says to be credible and accurate.

The committee whose entire purpose is to investigate Israel - the only such committee in the UN - doesn't even investigate Israel. It just regurgitates anti-Israel propaganda, and there is no shortage of people willing to "testify" on that score, since they know that no one will actually do any fact-checking.

So for example, some unnamed "journalists" testified that they were "targeted" by Israel while covering protests. Were they, perhaps, also participants? The UN doesn't care.

Even though Israel doesn't cooperate with this farce, that is not reason to rubber stamp any anti-Israel statement that is made without a modicum of checking newspaper accounts or official Israeli press releases. Or the veracity of the "testifiers."

This committee was created in 1968. That's Which means that there has been 49 years of obvious vilification of Israel at the UN.

But when it was created, it had a different name. The UNGA resolution that created this committee, 2443, called it the "Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Population of the Occupied Territories."

Because in 1968, no one - not even the UN - ever heard of the "Palestinian people."

(full article online)

The UN's anti-Israel kangaroo court ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

The usual Zionist propaganda that is so easily debunked. The Palestinians were calling themselves the people of Palestine, in writing in official correspondence with the British Colonial Office.

"PALESTINE.

CORRESPONDENCE
WITH THE
PALESTINE ARAB DELEGATION
AND THE
ZIONIST ORGANISATION.

Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty.
JUNE, 1922.
LONDON:

Sir,

We wish to express our thanks to the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the Colonies, for his courtesy in allowing us to see the draft of a proposed Palestine Order in Council embodying a scheme of Government for Palestine, and to discuss the same in our capacity of representatives of the Arab People of Palestine.

• 
  
  We would, therefore, submit the following observations:—

Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable.
If the British Government would revise their present policy in Palestine, end the Zionist con-dominium, put a stop to all alien immigration and grant the People of Palestine — who by Right and Experience are the best judges of what is good and bad to their country — Executive and Legislative powers, the terms of a constitution could be discussed in a different atmosphere. If to-day the People of Palestine assented to any constitution which fell short of giving them full control of their own affairs they would be in the position of agreeing to an instrument of Government which might, and probably would, be used to smother their national life under a flood of alien immigration."

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)

 

[Sixties Fan]

Unsurprisingly – given the BBC’s record of double standards in the language used when reporting terror attacks in different locations – in none the ten versions of that article did the writer/s use the word terror to describe the incident he or she was reporting.

From the second version onward readers found a paragraph that has been frequently seen in previous BBC reporting on terror attacks against Israelis since October 2015.

(full article online)

BBC coverage of the Jerusalem terror attack – part one: BBC News website

 

[Sixties Fan]

As we see, Radio 4 listeners were also not provided with a full picture of the sequence of events including the fact that the terrorists were on Temple Mount – apparently with their weapons – before they launched their attack and that they returned there afterwards. Like World Service audiences, listeners to Radio 4 would therefore be unable to appreciate the context to the next part of Bateman’s report.

(full article online)

BBC coverage of the Jerusalem terror attack – part two: BBC radio

 

[Sixties Fan]

They gather a bunch of people who hate Israel and those people "testify." Surprise, surprise: the "investigation" finds everything everyone says to be credible and accurate.

The committee whose entire purpose is to investigate Israel - the only such committee in the UN - doesn't even investigate Israel. It just regurgitates anti-Israel propaganda, and there is no shortage of people willing to "testify" on that score, since they know that no one will actually do any fact-checking.

So for example, some unnamed "journalists" testified that they were "targeted" by Israel while covering protests. Were they, perhaps, also participants? The UN doesn't care.

Even though Israel doesn't cooperate with this farce, that is not reason to rubber stamp any anti-Israel statement that is made without a modicum of checking newspaper accounts or official Israeli press releases. Or the veracity of the "testifiers."

This committee was created in 1968. That's Which means that there has been 49 years of obvious vilification of Israel at the UN.

But when it was created, it had a different name. The UNGA resolution that created this committee, 2443, called it the "Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Population of the Occupied Territories."

Because in 1968, no one - not even the UN - ever heard of the "Palestinian people."

(full article online)

The UN's anti-Israel kangaroo court ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

The usual Zionist propaganda that is so easily debunked. The Palestinians were calling themselves the people of Palestine, in writing in official correspondence with the British Colonial Office.

"PALESTINE.

CORRESPONDENCE
WITH THE
PALESTINE ARAB DELEGATION
AND THE
ZIONIST ORGANISATION.

Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty.
JUNE, 1922.
LONDON:

Sir,

We wish to express our thanks to the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the Colonies, for his courtesy in allowing us to see the draft of a proposed Palestine Order in Council embodying a scheme of Government for Palestine, and to discuss the same in our capacity of representatives of the Arab People of Palestine.

• 
  
  
  • 
    
    We would, therefore, submit the following observations:—

Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable.
If the British Government would revise their present policy in Palestine, end the Zionist con-dominium, put a stop to all alien immigration and grant the People of Palestine — who by Right and Experience are the best judges of what is good and bad to their country — Executive and Legislative powers, the terms of a constitution could be discussed in a different atmosphere. If to-day the People of Palestine assented to any constitution which fell short of giving them full control of their own affairs they would be in the position of agreeing to an instrument of Government which might, and probably would, be used to smother their national life under a flood of alien immigration."

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)

Mandatory Palestine was a geopolitical entity under British administration, carved out of Ottoman Southern Syria after World War I. British civil administration in Palestine operated from 1920 until 1948.Wikipedia

----------------
In other words, by 1922 when this letter was written, the region was already under the Mandate, and the Palestine the Arabs were referring to was the region, the Mandate, and not a country they had ever control over, or ever thought about before that Mandate occurred.

This letter was after taking away any and all lands from ever becoming sovereign of the rightful indigenous people, the Jewish Nation.

These Arabs had no issues with the Ottoman Occupying Forces for the 400 years before this letter. They reached out to no one. But then, the Arabs had been one of the invading occupying forces which took over from the Byzantine from the 7th Century on.
What was there for the Muslim Arabs to complain about as long as they were being occupied by Muslims?


What, Monti?

No document, book, report, letter, etc with any Arab referring to the whole area as Palestine, or themselves as the People of Palestine?

No European visitors before WWI ever referring to them as such, even after speaking to any one of them?

 

[Sixties Fan]

UN CEIRPP “50 Years of Occupation” Event: BDS, Antisemitism, and Demonization

 

[montelatici]

They gather a bunch of people who hate Israel and those people "testify." Surprise, surprise: the "investigation" finds everything everyone says to be credible and accurate.

The committee whose entire purpose is to investigate Israel - the only such committee in the UN - doesn't even investigate Israel. It just regurgitates anti-Israel propaganda, and there is no shortage of people willing to "testify" on that score, since they know that no one will actually do any fact-checking.

So for example, some unnamed "journalists" testified that they were "targeted" by Israel while covering protests. Were they, perhaps, also participants? The UN doesn't care.

Even though Israel doesn't cooperate with this farce, that is not reason to rubber stamp any anti-Israel statement that is made without a modicum of checking newspaper accounts or official Israeli press releases. Or the veracity of the "testifiers."

This committee was created in 1968. That's Which means that there has been 49 years of obvious vilification of Israel at the UN.

But when it was created, it had a different name. The UNGA resolution that created this committee, 2443, called it the "Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Population of the Occupied Territories."

Because in 1968, no one - not even the UN - ever heard of the "Palestinian people."

(full article online)

The UN's anti-Israel kangaroo court ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

The usual Zionist propaganda that is so easily debunked. The Palestinians were calling themselves the people of Palestine, in writing in official correspondence with the British Colonial Office.

"PALESTINE.

CORRESPONDENCE
WITH THE
PALESTINE ARAB DELEGATION
AND THE
ZIONIST ORGANISATION.

Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty.
JUNE, 1922.
LONDON:

Sir,

We wish to express our thanks to the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the Colonies, for his courtesy in allowing us to see the draft of a proposed Palestine Order in Council embodying a scheme of Government for Palestine, and to discuss the same in our capacity of representatives of the Arab People of Palestine.

• 
  
  
  • 
    
    We would, therefore, submit the following observations:—

Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable.
If the British Government would revise their present policy in Palestine, end the Zionist con-dominium, put a stop to all alien immigration and grant the People of Palestine — who by Right and Experience are the best judges of what is good and bad to their country — Executive and Legislative powers, the terms of a constitution could be discussed in a different atmosphere. If to-day the People of Palestine assented to any constitution which fell short of giving them full control of their own affairs they would be in the position of agreeing to an instrument of Government which might, and probably would, be used to smother their national life under a flood of alien immigration."

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)

Mandatory Palestine was a geopolitical entity under British administration, carved out of Ottoman Southern Syria after World War I. British civil administration in Palestine operated from 1920 until 1948.Wikipedia

----------------
In other words, by 1922 when this letter was written, the region was already under the Mandate, and the Palestine the Arabs were referring to was the region, the Mandate, and not a country they had ever control over, or ever thought about before that Mandate occurred.

This letter was after taking away any and all lands from ever becoming sovereign of the rightful indigenous people, the Jewish Nation.

These Arabs had no issues with the Ottoman Occupying Forces for the 400 years before this letter. They reached out to no one. But then, the Arabs had been one of the invading occupying forces which took over from the Byzantine from the 7th Century on.
What was there for the Muslim Arabs to complain about as long as they were being occupied by Muslims?


What, Monti?

No document, book, report, letter, etc with any Arab referring to the whole area as Palestine, or themselves as the People of Palestine?

No European visitors before WWI ever referring to them as such, even after speaking to any one of them?

LOL. You mean like the Manual for Palestinian Arabic published in 1906, for English speakers Europeans included. You people crack me up with your propaganda. And you are the funniest of the lot. I think you actually believe the bullshit propaganda you post. That's the saddest part of it.

 

[montelatici]

Or an Ottoman stamp. LOL

ottoman palestine stamps - Google Search: