Almost half of Americans work in low paid jobs

[HereWeGoAgain]

So you retract your statement two posts later?
You're a Fuken mental midget.

you'll see when the Democrats get in and give us a living wage, brainwashed functional moron. I didn't retract anything.

you'll see when the Democrats get in and give us a living wage,

Like Clinton and Obama did?

Moron.

several of the democratic candidates are talking about using the nuclear option to break the corrupt total obstruction GOP log jam. the GOP passed reconciliation in 1974 so they can cut taxes on the rich with 51 votes in the Senate. Quite a scam. At any rate when we get anything good you can be sure it will be done by democrats.

the GOP passed reconciliation in 1974 so they can cut taxes on the rich

Dems controlled both the House and Senate in 1974, you stupid twat.

It was a republican idea and its meaning changed under Reagan... At any rate it is used for cutting taxes on the rich and screwing everyone else. Cuts in taxes and cuts in services great idea if you're a rich a******.

Than I guess I'm rich.
Eat your heart out lib.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Is it class warfare to point out a growing disconnect between the compensation of workers and the profits of employers?

No, it is class warfare to pretend it is a some evil plan of the rich, that just started under the new rich guy,


while ignoring the actual causes that go back to the early 70s.



You could lynch Trump and implement your socialist utopia, and the trends would not change in the slightest.

It is an evil plan of the rich

Maintain a lowly paid workforce that is afraid to lose their jobs
Abolish unions and make each employee fend for themselves

Yes, comrade Marx, we must kill the evil rich and the evil Joooooos

Nobody said anything about killing

Only make them contribute to society at levels like they did before Reagan

As much hate as you liberals inject into every conversation and/or issue, it is pretty obvious where it is all leading to.



You don't call people "nazis" because you want to build bridges. You do shit like that, when you are making your mind right, to put them up against the wall.

 

[Markle]

ah, Ray....>>>
Reagan fires 11,000 striking air traffic controllers Aug. 5, 1981

Specifically, why were they fired?

How many public-sector union workers were there at the time? How many public-sector union workers are there today?

 

[BrokeLoser]

No, it is class warfare to pretend it is a some evil plan of the rich, that just started under the new rich guy,


while ignoring the actual causes that go back to the early 70s.



You could lynch Trump and implement your socialist utopia, and the trends would not change in the slightest.

It is an evil plan of the rich

Maintain a lowly paid workforce that is afraid to lose their jobs
Abolish unions and make each employee fend for themselves

Yes, comrade Marx, we must kill the evil rich and the evil Joooooos

Nobody said anything about killing

Only make them contribute to society at levels like they did before Reagan

As much hate as you liberals inject into every conversation and/or issue, it is pretty obvious where it is all leading to.



You don't call people "nazis" because you want to build bridges. You do shit like that, when you are making your mind right, to put them up against the wall.

No irony at all....You see, the Right hate all the right people for all the right reasons.
You Lefties hate all the wrong people for all the wrong reasons.....you hate wealthy folks, white folks, Christians, heterosexuals, those against drug use, those who stand for law and order, prideful patriotic nationalists, those who demand a right to sovereignty...etc etc

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So you retract your statement two posts later?
You're a Fuken mental midget.

you'll see when the Democrats get in and give us a living wage, brainwashed functional moron. I didn't retract anything.

you'll see when the Democrats get in and give us a living wage,

Like Clinton and Obama did?

Moron.

several of the democratic candidates are talking about using the nuclear option to break the corrupt total obstruction GOP log jam. the GOP passed reconciliation in 1974 so they can cut taxes on the rich with 51 votes in the Senate. Quite a scam. At any rate when we get anything good you can be sure it will be done by democrats.

the GOP passed reconciliation in 1974 so they can cut taxes on the rich

Dems controlled both the House and Senate in 1974, you stupid twat.

It was a republican idea and its meaning changed under Reagan... At any rate it is used for cutting taxes on the rich and screwing everyone else. Cuts in taxes and cuts in services great idea if you're a rich a******.

It was a republican idea

You said they passed it.

Were you lying? Or were you a moron?

At any rate it is used for cutting taxes on the rich and screwing everyone else.

If that's true, why didn't your useless Democrats change it since 1974?
Are they morons just like you?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

No irony at all....You see, the Right hate all the right people for all the right reasons.
You Lefties hate all the wrong people for all the wrong reasons.....you hate wealthy folks, white folks, Christians, heterosexuals, those against drug use, those who stand for law and order, prideful patriotic nationalists, those who demand a right to sovereignty...etc etc

Poor little loser boy, wasting your life way hating people, maybe that is why you are such a loser.

I do not hate anyone at all...not even your loser self.

 

[Correll]

No, it is class warfare to pretend it is a some evil plan of the rich, that just started under the new rich guy,


while ignoring the actual causes that go back to the early 70s.



You could lynch Trump and implement your socialist utopia, and the trends would not change in the slightest.

It is an evil plan of the rich

Maintain a lowly paid workforce that is afraid to lose their jobs
Abolish unions and make each employee fend for themselves

Yes, comrade Marx, we must kill the evil rich and the evil Joooooos

Nobody said anything about killing

Only make them contribute to society at levels like they did before Reagan

As much hate as you liberals inject into every conversation and/or issue, it is pretty obvious where it is all leading to.



You don't call people "nazis" because you want to build bridges. You do shit like that, when you are making your mind right, to put them up against the wall.

Dude. I have no problem disagreeing with people on issues, or policy.


It is the liberals that feel a need to pretend that any disagreement with them must be because the person is Evul.

 

[Markle]

I doubt Trump has any problem choosing between property interests and human interests?

As you know, property interests massively improve human interests.

s you know, property interests massively improve human interests.

No. I didn't know that.
Do you have any evidence?

"...by 1860, there were more millionaires (slaveholders all) living in the lower Mississippi Valley than anywhere else in the United States.

"In the same year, the nearly 4 million American slaves were worth some $3.5 billion, making them the largest single financial asset in the entire U.S. economy, worth more than all manufacturing and railroads combined.

"So, of course, the war was rooted in these two expanding and competing economies—but competing over what? What eventually tore asunder America's political culture was slavery's expansion into the Western territories."

Slavery Made America

So wrong.

May 14, 2007
•
Commentary
Private Property Saved Jamestown, And With It, America
By David Boaz

Four hundred years ago today 105 men and boys disembarked from three ships and established the first permanent English settlement in North America. They built a fort along what they called the James River, in honor of their king.

The land was lush and fertile, yet within three years most of the colonists died during what came to be known as "the starving time." Only the establishment of private property saved the Jamestown colony.

What went wrong? There were the usual hardships of pioneers far from home, such as unfamiliar diseases. There were mixed relations with the Indians already living in Virginia. Sometimes the Indians and settlers traded, other times armed conflicts broke out. But according to a governor of the colony, George Percy, most of the colonists died of famine, despite the "good and fruitful" soil, the abundant deer and turkey, and the "strawberries, raspberries and fruits unknown" growing wild.

The problem was the lack of private property. As Tom Bethell writes in his book The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity through the Ages, "The colonists were indolent because most of them were indentured servants, expected to toil for seven years and contribute the fruits of their labor to the common store."

Understandably, men who don't benefit from their hard work tend not to work very hard.

Over the first two years, more colonists arrived from England, including women. By 1609, there were 500 settlers. And within six months fewer than 100 were still alive. People were desperate. They ate dogs and cats, then rats and mice. They apparently ate their deceased neighbors. And some said that one man murdered and ate his pregnant wife.

By the spring, they had given up. They abandoned the fort and boarded ships to return to England. But miraculously, as they sailed out of Chesapeake Bay, they encountered three ships with new recruits, so they turned around and tried to make another go of it. The additional settlers and supplies kept them alive.

But when a new governor, Thomas Dale, arrived a year after the starving time, he was shocked to find the settlers bowling in the streets instead of working.

Dale's most important reform was to institute private property. He allotted every man three acres of land and freed them to work for themselves. And then, the Virginia historian Matthew Page Andrews wrote, "As soon as the settlers were thrown upon their own resources, and each freeman had acquired the right of owning property, the colonists quickly developed what became the distinguishing characteristic of Americans – an aptitude for all kinds of craftsmanship coupled with an innate genius for experimentation and invention."

John Rolfe, the husband of Pocahontas, said that once private property was instituted, men could engage in "gathering and reaping the fruits of their labors with much joy and comfort."

The Jamestown colony became a success, and people from all over Europe flocked to America.

Private property is essential for economic growth; people don't work and invest if they can't reap the fruits of their labors. Property ensures that people will work to better their own condition and that of their families. And that work and investment then benefits the whole society, much more so than the attempt to force people to work directly for the common good.
[...]
Private Property Saved Jamestown, And With It, America

The problem was the lack of private property. As Tom Bethell writes in his book The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity through the Ages, "The colonists were indolent because most of them were indentured servants, expected to toil for seven years and contribute the fruits of their labor to the common store."

Understandably, men who don't benefit from their hard work tend not to work very hard.

Thanksgiving and the Tea Party

"Historians say that the settlers in Plymouth, and their supporters in England, did indeed agree to hold their property in common — William Bradford, the governor, referred to it in his writings as the 'common course.'

"But the plan was in the interest of realizing a profit sooner, and was only intended for the short term; historians say the Pilgrims were more like shareholders in an early corporation than subjects of socialism.

"'It was directed ultimately to private profit,' said Richard Pickering, a historian of early America and the deputy director of Plimoth Plantation, a museum devoted to keeping the Pilgrims’ story alive...."

"The competing versions of the story note Bradford’s writings about 'confusion and discontent' and accusations of 'laziness' among the colonists.

"But Mr. Pickering said this grumbling had more to do with the fact that the Plymouth colony was bringing together settlers from all over England, at a time when most people never moved more than 10 miles from home.

"They spoke different dialects and had different methods of farming, and looked upon each other with great wariness.

"'One man’s laziness is another man’s industry, based on the agricultural methods they’ve learned as young people,' he said."

So, bottom line, you've got nothing.

Bye!

 

[francoHFW]

If you pay workers the productivity goes up. quite possible also true if you pay workers piecemeal.
How does that even effect the demand for the product? There is no correlation between the two

When people have money, they buy things. That is called demand. Right now 78% of American families live paycheck-to-paycheck. Great job! This is the GOP economy, a give away to the rich and a screw job for everybody else. Wake up and smell the coffee super dupe.

Got a link for that?
If true there's way more morons in this country than I ever imagined.

78% Of Workers Live Paycheck To Paycheck

Because they can't handle their money

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

pretty much

Of course it has to do with the GOP give away to the rich and screwjob for everyone else, especially as far as paying people a living wage. Blaming the victims of your scuzzball party's policies is ridiculous, brainwashed functional morons. People didn't get lazy all of a sudden. Google the only tax graph you need to know and also Google demise of the middle-class fact left. Your lack of curiosity is a disgrace.

 

[francoHFW]

When people have money, they buy things. That is called demand. Right now 78% of American families live paycheck-to-paycheck. Great job! This is the GOP economy, a give away to the rich and a screw job for everybody else. Wake up and smell the coffee super dupe.

Got a link for that?
If true there's way more morons in this country than I ever imagined.

78% Of Workers Live Paycheck To Paycheck

Because they can't handle their money

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

pretty much

Of course it has to do with the GOP give away to the rich and screwjob for everyone else, especially as far as paying people a living wage. Blaming the victims of your scuzzball party's policies is ridiculous, brainwashed functional morons. People didn't get lazy all of a sudden. Google the only tax graph you need to know and also Google demise of the middle-class fact left. Your lack of curiosity is a disgrace.

The middle class has been going to hell since 1982 and we have a flat tax system now if you count all taxes. And that's how you got the worst any quality and upward Mobility ever

 

[francoHFW]

you'll see when the Democrats get in and give us a living wage, brainwashed functional moron. I didn't retract anything.

you'll see when the Democrats get in and give us a living wage,

Like Clinton and Obama did?

Moron.

several of the democratic candidates are talking about using the nuclear option to break the corrupt total obstruction GOP log jam. the GOP passed reconciliation in 1974 so they can cut taxes on the rich with 51 votes in the Senate. Quite a scam. At any rate when we get anything good you can be sure it will be done by democrats.

the GOP passed reconciliation in 1974 so they can cut taxes on the rich

Dems controlled both the House and Senate in 1974, you stupid twat.

It was a republican idea and its meaning changed under Reagan... At any rate it is used for cutting taxes on the rich and screwing everyone else. Cuts in taxes and cuts in services great idea if you're a rich a******.

It was a republican idea

You said they passed it.

Were you lying? Or were you a moron?

At any rate it is used for cutting taxes on the rich and screwing everyone else.

If that's true, why didn't your useless Democrats change it since 1974?
Are they morons just like you?

Because for the billionth time you need 60 votes to do that. And 51 to cut taxes on the rich and services for the rest. Another GOP scam the GOP voters don't have any clue about....

 

[francoHFW]

I doubt Trump has any problem choosing between property interests and human interests?

As you know, property interests massively improve human interests.

s you know, property interests massively improve human interests.

No. I didn't know that.
Do you have any evidence?

"...by 1860, there were more millionaires (slaveholders all) living in the lower Mississippi Valley than anywhere else in the United States.

"In the same year, the nearly 4 million American slaves were worth some $3.5 billion, making them the largest single financial asset in the entire U.S. economy, worth more than all manufacturing and railroads combined.

"So, of course, the war was rooted in these two expanding and competing economies—but competing over what? What eventually tore asunder America's political culture was slavery's expansion into the Western territories."

Slavery Made America

So wrong.

May 14, 2007
•
Commentary
Private Property Saved Jamestown, And With It, America
By David Boaz

Four hundred years ago today 105 men and boys disembarked from three ships and established the first permanent English settlement in North America. They built a fort along what they called the James River, in honor of their king.

The land was lush and fertile, yet within three years most of the colonists died during what came to be known as "the starving time." Only the establishment of private property saved the Jamestown colony.

What went wrong? There were the usual hardships of pioneers far from home, such as unfamiliar diseases. There were mixed relations with the Indians already living in Virginia. Sometimes the Indians and settlers traded, other times armed conflicts broke out. But according to a governor of the colony, George Percy, most of the colonists died of famine, despite the "good and fruitful" soil, the abundant deer and turkey, and the "strawberries, raspberries and fruits unknown" growing wild.

The problem was the lack of private property. As Tom Bethell writes in his book The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity through the Ages, "The colonists were indolent because most of them were indentured servants, expected to toil for seven years and contribute the fruits of their labor to the common store."

Understandably, men who don't benefit from their hard work tend not to work very hard.

Over the first two years, more colonists arrived from England, including women. By 1609, there were 500 settlers. And within six months fewer than 100 were still alive. People were desperate. They ate dogs and cats, then rats and mice. They apparently ate their deceased neighbors. And some said that one man murdered and ate his pregnant wife.

By the spring, they had given up. They abandoned the fort and boarded ships to return to England. But miraculously, as they sailed out of Chesapeake Bay, they encountered three ships with new recruits, so they turned around and tried to make another go of it. The additional settlers and supplies kept them alive.

But when a new governor, Thomas Dale, arrived a year after the starving time, he was shocked to find the settlers bowling in the streets instead of working.

Dale's most important reform was to institute private property. He allotted every man three acres of land and freed them to work for themselves. And then, the Virginia historian Matthew Page Andrews wrote, "As soon as the settlers were thrown upon their own resources, and each freeman had acquired the right of owning property, the colonists quickly developed what became the distinguishing characteristic of Americans – an aptitude for all kinds of craftsmanship coupled with an innate genius for experimentation and invention."

John Rolfe, the husband of Pocahontas, said that once private property was instituted, men could engage in "gathering and reaping the fruits of their labors with much joy and comfort."

The Jamestown colony became a success, and people from all over Europe flocked to America.

Private property is essential for economic growth; people don't work and invest if they can't reap the fruits of their labors. Property ensures that people will work to better their own condition and that of their families. And that work and investment then benefits the whole society, much more so than the attempt to force people to work directly for the common good.
[...]
Private Property Saved Jamestown, And With It, America

The problem was the lack of private property. As Tom Bethell writes in his book The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity through the Ages, "The colonists were indolent because most of them were indentured servants, expected to toil for seven years and contribute the fruits of their labor to the common store."

Understandably, men who don't benefit from their hard work tend not to work very hard.

Thanksgiving and the Tea Party

"Historians say that the settlers in Plymouth, and their supporters in England, did indeed agree to hold their property in common — William Bradford, the governor, referred to it in his writings as the 'common course.'

"But the plan was in the interest of realizing a profit sooner, and was only intended for the short term; historians say the Pilgrims were more like shareholders in an early corporation than subjects of socialism.

"'It was directed ultimately to private profit,' said Richard Pickering, a historian of early America and the deputy director of Plimoth Plantation, a museum devoted to keeping the Pilgrims’ story alive...."

"The competing versions of the story note Bradford’s writings about 'confusion and discontent' and accusations of 'laziness' among the colonists.

"But Mr. Pickering said this grumbling had more to do with the fact that the Plymouth colony was bringing together settlers from all over England, at a time when most people never moved more than 10 miles from home.

"They spoke different dialects and had different methods of farming, and looked upon each other with great wariness.

"'One man’s laziness is another man’s industry, based on the agricultural methods they’ve learned as young people,' he said."

So, bottom line, you've got nothing.

Bye!

Discovery of tobacco saved Jamestown. End of story. Your story is total crap propaganda.

 

[georgephillip]

I doubt Trump has any problem choosing between property interests and human interests?

As you know, property interests massively improve human interests.

s you know, property interests massively improve human interests.

No. I didn't know that.
Do you have any evidence?

"...by 1860, there were more millionaires (slaveholders all) living in the lower Mississippi Valley than anywhere else in the United States.

"In the same year, the nearly 4 million American slaves were worth some $3.5 billion, making them the largest single financial asset in the entire U.S. economy, worth more than all manufacturing and railroads combined.

"So, of course, the war was rooted in these two expanding and competing economies—but competing over what? What eventually tore asunder America's political culture was slavery's expansion into the Western territories."

Slavery Made America

So wrong.

May 14, 2007
•
Commentary
Private Property Saved Jamestown, And With It, America
By David Boaz

Four hundred years ago today 105 men and boys disembarked from three ships and established the first permanent English settlement in North America. They built a fort along what they called the James River, in honor of their king.

The land was lush and fertile, yet within three years most of the colonists died during what came to be known as "the starving time." Only the establishment of private property saved the Jamestown colony.

What went wrong? There were the usual hardships of pioneers far from home, such as unfamiliar diseases. There were mixed relations with the Indians already living in Virginia. Sometimes the Indians and settlers traded, other times armed conflicts broke out. But according to a governor of the colony, George Percy, most of the colonists died of famine, despite the "good and fruitful" soil, the abundant deer and turkey, and the "strawberries, raspberries and fruits unknown" growing wild.

The problem was the lack of private property. As Tom Bethell writes in his book The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity through the Ages, "The colonists were indolent because most of them were indentured servants, expected to toil for seven years and contribute the fruits of their labor to the common store."

Understandably, men who don't benefit from their hard work tend not to work very hard.

Over the first two years, more colonists arrived from England, including women. By 1609, there were 500 settlers. And within six months fewer than 100 were still alive. People were desperate. They ate dogs and cats, then rats and mice. They apparently ate their deceased neighbors. And some said that one man murdered and ate his pregnant wife.

By the spring, they had given up. They abandoned the fort and boarded ships to return to England. But miraculously, as they sailed out of Chesapeake Bay, they encountered three ships with new recruits, so they turned around and tried to make another go of it. The additional settlers and supplies kept them alive.

But when a new governor, Thomas Dale, arrived a year after the starving time, he was shocked to find the settlers bowling in the streets instead of working.

Dale's most important reform was to institute private property. He allotted every man three acres of land and freed them to work for themselves. And then, the Virginia historian Matthew Page Andrews wrote, "As soon as the settlers were thrown upon their own resources, and each freeman had acquired the right of owning property, the colonists quickly developed what became the distinguishing characteristic of Americans – an aptitude for all kinds of craftsmanship coupled with an innate genius for experimentation and invention."

John Rolfe, the husband of Pocahontas, said that once private property was instituted, men could engage in "gathering and reaping the fruits of their labors with much joy and comfort."

The Jamestown colony became a success, and people from all over Europe flocked to America.

Private property is essential for economic growth; people don't work and invest if they can't reap the fruits of their labors. Property ensures that people will work to better their own condition and that of their families. And that work and investment then benefits the whole society, much more so than the attempt to force people to work directly for the common good.
[...]
Private Property Saved Jamestown, And With It, America

The problem was the lack of private property. As Tom Bethell writes in his book The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity through the Ages, "The colonists were indolent because most of them were indentured servants, expected to toil for seven years and contribute the fruits of their labor to the common store."

Understandably, men who don't benefit from their hard work tend not to work very hard.

Thanksgiving and the Tea Party

"Historians say that the settlers in Plymouth, and their supporters in England, did indeed agree to hold their property in common — William Bradford, the governor, referred to it in his writings as the 'common course.'

"But the plan was in the interest of realizing a profit sooner, and was only intended for the short term; historians say the Pilgrims were more like shareholders in an early corporation than subjects of socialism.

"'It was directed ultimately to private profit,' said Richard Pickering, a historian of early America and the deputy director of Plimoth Plantation, a museum devoted to keeping the Pilgrims’ story alive...."

"The competing versions of the story note Bradford’s writings about 'confusion and discontent' and accusations of 'laziness' among the colonists.

"But Mr. Pickering said this grumbling had more to do with the fact that the Plymouth colony was bringing together settlers from all over England, at a time when most people never moved more than 10 miles from home.

"They spoke different dialects and had different methods of farming, and looked upon each other with great wariness.

"'One man’s laziness is another man’s industry, based on the agricultural methods they’ve learned as young people,' he said."

So, bottom line, you've got nothing.

Bye!

So, bottom line, you've got nothing.

Bye!

 

[francoHFW]

Is it class warfare to point out a growing disconnect between the compensation of workers and the profits of employers?

No, it is class warfare to pretend it is a some evil plan of the rich, that just started under the new rich guy,


while ignoring the actual causes that go back to the early 70s.



You could lynch Trump and implement your socialist utopia, and the trends would not change in the slightest.

It is an evil plan of the rich

Maintain a lowly paid workforce that is afraid to lose their jobs
Abolish unions and make each employee fend for themselves

Yes, comrade Marx, we must kill the evil rich and the evil Joooooos

Nobody said anything about killing

Only make them contribute to society at levels like they did before Reagan

As much hate as you liberals inject into every conversation and/or issue, it is pretty obvious where it is all leading to.



You don't call people "nazis" because you want to build bridges. You do shit like that, when you are making your mind right, to put them up against the wall.

It's your fake news we don't like dingbat. Everything you know is wrong and 95% of the world knows it.they only spike in violence since Trump is white supremacists and racists and mainly Republicans LOL against Jews blacks Muslims and gays.... Despite all your crap propaganda super duper..

 

[Correll]

No, it is class warfare to pretend it is a some evil plan of the rich, that just started under the new rich guy,


while ignoring the actual causes that go back to the early 70s.



You could lynch Trump and implement your socialist utopia, and the trends would not change in the slightest.

It is an evil plan of the rich

Maintain a lowly paid workforce that is afraid to lose their jobs
Abolish unions and make each employee fend for themselves

Yes, comrade Marx, we must kill the evil rich and the evil Joooooos

Nobody said anything about killing

Only make them contribute to society at levels like they did before Reagan

As much hate as you liberals inject into every conversation and/or issue, it is pretty obvious where it is all leading to.



You don't call people "nazis" because you want to build bridges. You do shit like that, when you are making your mind right, to put them up against the wall.

It's your fake news we don't like dingbat. Everything you know is wrong and 95% of the world knows it.they only spike in violence since Trump is white supremacists and racists and mainly Republicans LOL against Jews blacks Muslims and gays.... Despite all your crap propaganda super duper..

I challenge you to support your hateful accusations.


Give me your best example of Trump being "white supremacists"


or you will be admitting that you just demonstrated the hate I was talking about.



And if you end up posting something about "code words", be warned, I will figuratively tear your head off and point out how you could not justify your hate.

 

[Desperado]

No, it is class warfare to pretend it is a some evil plan of the rich, that just started under the new rich guy,


while ignoring the actual causes that go back to the early 70s.



You could lynch Trump and implement your socialist utopia, and the trends would not change in the slightest.

It is an evil plan of the rich

Maintain a lowly paid workforce that is afraid to lose their jobs
Abolish unions and make each employee fend for themselves

Yes, comrade Marx, we must kill the evil rich and the evil Joooooos

Nobody said anything about killing

Only make them contribute to society at levels like they did before Reagan

As much hate as you liberals inject into every conversation and/or issue, it is pretty obvious where it is all leading to.



You don't call people "nazis" because you want to build bridges. You do shit like that, when you are making your mind right, to put them up against the wall.

It's your fake news we don't like dingbat. Everything you know is wrong and 95% of the world knows it.they only spike in violence since Trump is white supremacists and racists and mainly Republicans LOL against Jews blacks Muslims and gays.... Despite all your crap propaganda super duper..

If you are so much smarter than the rest of us, why are you still here? Shouldn't your intelligence have lead you to a country more of your liking and a population more befitting of your personality?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

When people have money, they buy things. That is called demand. Right now 78% of American families live paycheck-to-paycheck. Great job! This is the GOP economy, a give away to the rich and a screw job for everybody else. Wake up and smell the coffee super dupe.

Got a link for that?
If true there's way more morons in this country than I ever imagined.

78% Of Workers Live Paycheck To Paycheck

Because they can't handle their money

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

pretty much

Of course it has to do with the GOP give away to the rich and screwjob for everyone else, especially as far as paying people a living wage. Blaming the victims of your scuzzball party's policies is ridiculous, brainwashed functional morons. People didn't get lazy all of a sudden. Google the only tax graph you need to know and also Google demise of the middle-class fact left. Your lack of curiosity is a disgrace.

So explain to me dupe....how did I get to the top 5% when I dropped out of high school and retired at 46?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Got a link for that?
If true there's way more morons in this country than I ever imagined.

78% Of Workers Live Paycheck To Paycheck

Because they can't handle their money

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

pretty much

Of course it has to do with the GOP give away to the rich and screwjob for everyone else, especially as far as paying people a living wage. Blaming the victims of your scuzzball party's policies is ridiculous, brainwashed functional morons. People didn't get lazy all of a sudden. Google the only tax graph you need to know and also Google demise of the middle-class fact left. Your lack of curiosity is a disgrace.

The middle class has been going to hell since 1982 and we have a flat tax system now if you count all taxes. And that's how you got the worst any quality and upward Mobility ever

Well thats weird. I entered the legal the job market at 16 in 1981 and did just fine.

 

[Markle]

I the real world a company won’t hire from a company they know has a non compete.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It is an evil plan of the rich

Maintain a lowly paid workforce that is afraid to lose their jobs
Abolish unions and make each employee fend for themselves

Yes, comrade Marx, we must kill the evil rich and the evil Joooooos

Nobody said anything about killing

Only make them contribute to society at levels like they did before Reagan

As much hate as you liberals inject into every conversation and/or issue, it is pretty obvious where it is all leading to.



You don't call people "nazis" because you want to build bridges. You do shit like that, when you are making your mind right, to put them up against the wall.

Dude. I have no problem disagreeing with people on issues, or policy.


It is the liberals that feel a need to pretend that any disagreement with them must be because the person is Evul.

Oh yeah...only Liberals do that...



Does it not hurt your soul to type such blatant lies?