Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now, I'm really CONFUSED, WingerFreefall applied only to 8 stories over 2.25 seconds of the total collapse time.
That would have required the near-simultaneous buckling and breaking of the 58 perimeter columns and most of the 25 core columns over all eight floors. Your government's official explanation is "office fires."
A Scientific Theory of the WTC 7 Collapse | Foreign Policy Journal
What would the "freefall" time be to drop 8 stories (approx 90 feet)
Acceleration due to gravity is 32 ft per second squared
A falling object would take 1.67 seconds to drop 90 feet
2.25 seconds is hardly "freefall"
Kind of shoots your theory to hell doesn't it?
So what do we have in terms of "Freefall" of WTC 7?
Worst case, 8 floors took 2.25 sec. The rest of the building took over 14 sec
At freefall speeds 162 feet would be covered in 2.25 sec almost twice that which WTC experienced
Now, I'm really CONFUSED, WingerWhat would the "freefall" time be to drop 8 stories (approx 90 feet)
Acceleration due to gravity is 32 ft per second squared
A falling object would take 1.67 seconds to drop 90 feet
2.25 seconds is hardly "freefall"
Kind of shoots your theory to hell doesn't it?
So what do we have in terms of "Freefall" of WTC 7?
Worst case, 8 floors took 2.25 sec. The rest of the building took over 14 sec
At freefall speeds 162 feet would be covered in 2.25 sec almost twice that which WTC experienced
571 feet is equal to about 174.04 meters.
According to equations on the Physics Classroom:Kinematic Equations and Free Fall, I get 5.959 seconds for an object to free fall 174.04 meters NOT feet in a vacuum.
Have you noticed how WTC7's roof line does not begin to collapse until about eight seconds into your video? No one is saying all 47 floors collapsed at free fall; however, 8 floors did which would have required 400 structural steel connections to fail evenly over all 8 floors every second.Now, I'm really CONFUSED, WingerSo what do we have in terms of "Freefall" of WTC 7?
Worst case, 8 floors took 2.25 sec. The rest of the building took over 14 sec
At freefall speeds 162 feet would be covered in 2.25 sec almost twice that which WTC experienced
571 feet is equal to about 174.04 meters.
According to equations on the Physics Classroom:Kinematic Equations and Free Fall, I get 5.959 seconds for an object to free fall 174.04 meters NOT feet in a vacuum.
Will you Truthers please get the lie you are trying to sell straight?
If you are talking about the WHOLE WTC 7 it took 14 SECONDS....much more than a 5.9 sec free fall
If you are talking about a tiny portion of the building which appeared to fall faster than the rest, those 90 feet took 2.25 sec, much more than the 1.67 free fall time
In either case, the building did not fall at FREEFALL speeds
Have you noticed how WTC7's roof line does not begin to collapse until about eight seconds into your video? No one is saying all 47 floors collapsed at free fall; however, 8 floors did which would have required 400 structural steel connections to fail evenly over all 8 floors every second.Now, I'm really CONFUSED, Winger
571 feet is equal to about 174.04 meters.
According to equations on the Physics Classroom:Kinematic Equations and Free Fall, I get 5.959 seconds for an object to free fall 174.04 meters NOT feet in a vacuum.
Will you Truthers please get the lie you are trying to sell straight?
If you are talking about the WHOLE WTC 7 it took 14 SECONDS....much more than a 5.9 sec free fall
If you are talking about a tiny portion of the building which appeared to fall faster than the rest, those 90 feet took 2.25 sec, much more than the 1.67 free fall time
In either case, the building did not fall at FREEFALL speeds
Half the speed of freefall?Have you noticed how WTC7's roof line does not begin to collapse until about eight seconds into your video? No one is saying all 47 floors collapsed at free fall; however, 8 floors did which would have required 400 structural steel connections to fail evenly over all 8 floors every second.Will you Truthers please get the lie you are trying to sell straight?
If you are talking about the WHOLE WTC 7 it took 14 SECONDS....much more than a 5.9 sec free fall
If you are talking about a tiny portion of the building which appeared to fall faster than the rest, those 90 feet took 2.25 sec, much more than the 1.67 free fall time
In either case, the building did not fall at FREEFALL speeds
What you saw was the internal structure of the building compromised which enabled the penthouse to drop down into it. That shows what happened to your 400 structural steel connections. They were gone.
Your eight floors fell at almost half the speed of freefalL
Half the speed of freefall?Have you noticed how WTC7's roof line does not begin to collapse until about eight seconds into your video? No one is saying all 47 floors collapsed at free fall; however, 8 floors did which would have required 400 structural steel connections to fail evenly over all 8 floors every second.
What you saw was the internal structure of the building compromised which enabled the penthouse to drop down into it. That shows what happened to your 400 structural steel connections. They were gone.
Your eight floors fell at almost half the speed of freefalL
90 feet is equal to about 27.43 meters.
Right?
I get a time of 2.365 seconds of free-fall over those 8 floors.
Show your math.Half the speed of freefall?What you saw was the internal structure of the building compromised which enabled the penthouse to drop down into it. That shows what happened to your 400 structural steel connections. They were gone.
Your eight floors fell at almost half the speed of freefalL
90 feet is equal to about 27.43 meters.
Right?
I get a time of 2.365 seconds of free-fall over those 8 floors.
You could FREEFALL 160 feet in 2.365 seconds
Almost twice the distance the building actually fell
Show your math.Half the speed of freefall?
90 feet is equal to about 27.43 meters.
Right?
I get a time of 2.365 seconds of free-fall over those 8 floors.
You could FREEFALL 160 feet in 2.365 seconds
Almost twice the distance the building actually fell
[
If a majority of Americans should ever become convinced elements of their government allowed 911 to happen,
5.6 x 32 = 179.2 feetShow your math.You could FREEFALL 160 feet in 2.365 seconds
Almost twice the distance the building actually fell
Equations for a falling body - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Near the surface of the Earth, use g*=*9.81*m/s² (meters per second squared; which might be thought of as "meters per second, per second", or 32*ft/s² as "feet per second per second") approximately.
2.365 squared equals 5.6
5.6 Times 32 equals 159 feet
Are you new here?I can't believe people here are still arguing about a simple physics formula most of us learned in 8th grade.
s = 1/2 x g x t x t
"Everyone has seen the destruction of the Twin Towers. Many people have never seen, or even heard about, the destruction of Building 7, a 47-story building across the street from the North Tower.
"For many people it was seeing Building 7 fall that brought them into the 9/11 Truth Movement. Building 7 came down at 5:20 in the evening of 9/11, even though it was not hit by an airplane and only had fires on a few floors.
"If you have ever seen a controlled demolition on TV, that is what the collapse of Building 7 looked like.
"It was a bottom-up demolition.
"It looks like the building is just sinking into the ground.
"The roof line stayed level as it fell, implying that the onset of collapse was simultaneous across the whole width of the building, and it came down in freefall, implying that it met zero resistance.
"I had heard others claim that it fell at freefall, which seemed hard to believe, so I measured the rate of collapse myself.
"I can confirm that the first 2.5 seconds of the collapse is indistinguishable from absolute freefall.
"Everything about the collapse points to controlled demolition.
"The 9/11 commission omitted any mention of Building 7, and the main NIST investigation offered no explanation for its collapse."
Why I Am Convinced 9/11 Was an Inside Job
false equivalent.. not valid5.6 x 32 = 179.2 feetShow your math.
Equations for a falling body - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Near the surface of the Earth, use g*=*9.81*m/s² (meters per second squared; which might be thought of as "meters per second, per second", or 32*ft/s² as "feet per second per second") approximately.
2.365 squared equals 5.6
5.6 Times 32 equals 159 feet
Here's the formula I found and how it applies to a roofer dropping a pile of shingles from a roof top located 8.52 meters above the ground:
"d = vi t + ½ a t2
Once the equation is identified and written down, the next step involves substituting known values into the equation and using proper algebraic steps to solve for the unknown information. This step is shown below.
-8.52 m = (0 m/s) (t) + ½ (-9.8 m/s2) (t)2
-8.52 m = (0 m) *(t) + (-4.9 m/s2) (t)2
-8.52 m = (-4.9 m/s2) (t)2
(-8.52 m)/(-4.9 m/s2) = t2
1.739 s2 = t2
t = 1.32 s"
Kinematic Equations and Free Fall
A&E FOR TRUTH is not scientifically credible..."Everyone has seen the destruction of the Twin Towers. Many people have never seen, or even heard about, the destruction of Building 7, a 47-story building across the street from the North Tower.
"For many people it was seeing Building 7 fall that brought them into the 9/11 Truth Movement. Building 7 came down at 5:20 in the evening of 9/11, even though it was not hit by an airplane and only had fires on a few floors.
"If you have ever seen a controlled demolition on TV, that is what the collapse of Building 7 looked like.
"It was a bottom-up demolition.
"It looks like the building is just sinking into the ground.
"The roof line stayed level as it fell, implying that the onset of collapse was simultaneous across the whole width of the building, and it came down in freefall, implying that it met zero resistance.
"I had heard others claim that it fell at freefall, which seemed hard to believe, so I measured the rate of collapse myself.
"I can confirm that the first 2.5 seconds of the collapse is indistinguishable from absolute freefall.
"Everything about the collapse points to controlled demolition.
"The 9/11 commission omitted any mention of Building 7, and the main NIST investigation offered no explanation for its collapse."
Why I Am Convinced 9/11 Was an Inside Job
really got any evidence to back that up?"Everyone has seen the destruction of the Twin Towers. Many people have never seen, or even heard about, the destruction of Building 7, a 47-story building across the street from the North Tower.
"For many people it was seeing Building 7 fall that brought them into the 9/11 Truth Movement. Building 7 came down at 5:20 in the evening of 9/11, even though it was not hit by an airplane and only had fires on a few floors.
"If you have ever seen a controlled demolition on TV, that is what the collapse of Building 7 looked like.
"It was a bottom-up demolition.
"It looks like the building is just sinking into the ground.
"The roof line stayed level as it fell, implying that the onset of collapse was simultaneous across the whole width of the building, and it came down in freefall, implying that it met zero resistance.
"I had heard others claim that it fell at freefall, which seemed hard to believe, so I measured the rate of collapse myself.
"I can confirm that the first 2.5 seconds of the collapse is indistinguishable from absolute freefall.
"Everything about the collapse points to controlled demolition.
"The 9/11 commission omitted any mention of Building 7, and the main NIST investigation offered no explanation for its collapse."
Why I Am Convinced 9/11 Was an Inside Job
Bldg 7 was controlled demo and that's the most obvious thing in the world. All the posters here who say otherwise are paid govt shills. That's obvious too.
"Everyone has seen the destruction of the Twin Towers. Many people have never seen, or even heard about, the destruction of Building 7, a 47-story building across the street from the North Tower.
"For many people it was seeing Building 7 fall that brought them into the 9/11 Truth Movement. Building 7 came down at 5:20 in the evening of 9/11, even though it was not hit by an airplane and only had fires on a few floors.
"If you have ever seen a controlled demolition on TV, that is what the collapse of Building 7 looked like.
"It was a bottom-up demolition.
"It looks like the building is just sinking into the ground.
"The roof line stayed level as it fell, implying that the onset of collapse was simultaneous across the whole width of the building, and it came down in freefall, implying that it met zero resistance.
"I had heard others claim that it fell at freefall, which seemed hard to believe, so I measured the rate of collapse myself.
"I can confirm that the first 2.5 seconds of the collapse is indistinguishable from absolute freefall.
"Everything about the collapse points to controlled demolition.
"The 9/11 commission omitted any mention of Building 7, and the main NIST investigation offered no explanation for its collapse."
Why I Am Convinced 9/11 Was an Inside Job
Bldg 7 was controlled demo and that's the most obvious thing in the world. All the posters here who say otherwise are paid govt shills. That's obvious too.
gremlins!"Everyone has seen the destruction of the Twin Towers. Many people have never seen, or even heard about, the destruction of Building 7, a 47-story building across the street from the North Tower.
"For many people it was seeing Building 7 fall that brought them into the 9/11 Truth Movement. Building 7 came down at 5:20 in the evening of 9/11, even though it was not hit by an airplane and only had fires on a few floors.
"If you have ever seen a controlled demolition on TV, that is what the collapse of Building 7 looked like.
"It was a bottom-up demolition.
"It looks like the building is just sinking into the ground.
"The roof line stayed level as it fell, implying that the onset of collapse was simultaneous across the whole width of the building, and it came down in freefall, implying that it met zero resistance.
"I had heard others claim that it fell at freefall, which seemed hard to believe, so I measured the rate of collapse myself.
"I can confirm that the first 2.5 seconds of the collapse is indistinguishable from absolute freefall.
"Everything about the collapse points to controlled demolition.
"The 9/11 commission omitted any mention of Building 7, and the main NIST investigation offered no explanation for its collapse."
Why I Am Convinced 9/11 Was an Inside Job
Bldg 7 was controlled demo and that's the most obvious thing in the world. All the posters here who say otherwise are paid govt shills. That's obvious too.
If it was controlled demo, why hasn't anybody come forward with proof of det cord and detonator remnants in the rubble??
