Amazing chutzpah - New 9-11 museum never mentions WTC-7!!!

I hate stupid capitalism. Somewhere in Pennsylvania some dumb shits pay the NPS money to see a field where a plane crashed. You'd have to be 1 stupid ass American to pay to see something like that let alone make a selfie in front of that shit.
 
I hate stupid capitalism. Somewhere in Pennsylvania some dumb shits pay the NPS money to see a field where a plane crashed. You'd have to be 1 stupid ass American to pay to see something like that let alone make a selfie in front of that shit.
What happens if enough Americans become convinced explosives were used to bring down all three towers?
 
[

"This included photos of people calling for investigations, protestors claiming 9/11 was an inside job, and the cover of Popular Mechanics which supposedly debunked all those 'conspiracy theories'.

PM didn't debunk building 7. No one can or even tries to. Everyone knows 7 was brought down by controlled demo. Buildings don't undergo unitary collapse at free fall speed because two other buildings a block away were hit by planes. THINK

Everyone knows 7 was brought down by controlled demo.

For what reason? Explain.
How can anyone supply a motive before an investigation into how the building fell and who stood to profit from its fall is completed?
 
How are buildings supposed to fall?

Like a tree, in the direct of the first side of the structure to fail.

How many skyscrapers have you seen fall like a tree?
Well, as all I've watch fall were controlled demolitions, none.

Luckily, youtube has the answer.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKeENdyIluI]Building Collapse - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzGJs-uyaSY]DRAMATIC BUILDING COLLAPSE CAUGHT ON TAPE! - YouTube[/ame]
 
I hate stupid capitalism. Somewhere in Pennsylvania some dumb shits pay the NPS money to see a field where a plane crashed. You'd have to be 1 stupid ass American to pay to see something like that let alone make a selfie in front of that shit.
What happens if enough Americans become convinced explosives were used to bring down all three towers?

People will end up in old sparky and Israel will get bombed.
 
PM didn't debunk building 7. No one can or even tries to. Everyone knows 7 was brought down by controlled demo. Buildings don't undergo unitary collapse at free fall speed because two other buildings a block away were hit by planes. THINK

Everyone knows 7 was brought down by controlled demo.

For what reason? Explain.
How can anyone supply a motive before an investigation into how the building fell and who stood to profit from its fall is completed?

If fell from uncontrolled fires and from debris from the towers causing massive damage.
 
Everyone knows 7 was brought down by controlled demo.

For what reason? Explain.
How can anyone supply a motive before an investigation into how the building fell and who stood to profit from its fall is completed?

If fell from uncontrolled fires and from debris from the towers causing massive damage.

All the fires did exactly the same damage to all the building's supports equally, thus the thing dropped in on itself.
Bullshit.
 
How can anyone supply a motive before an investigation into how the building fell and who stood to profit from its fall is completed?

If fell from uncontrolled fires and from debris from the towers causing massive damage.

All the fires did exactly the same damage to all the building's supports equally, thus the thing dropped in on itself.
Bullshit.

Yeah, that's harder to believe than secret demo charges.
Secret charges not disrupted by debris or uncontrolled fires burning for hours and hours. :cuckoo:
 
When the towers collapsed, FDNY lost 343 Firefighters

At that point they were not going to risk another firefighter. Especially in an evacuated WTC 7. The fires were allowed to burn unabated and nobody was going to do a thing about it. Intense fire weakens steel and a weakened structure collapses. That is what happened to WTC 7


HAHAHA Even you know that's a preposterous lie. The fires were barely visible and even if the fires had been extensive enough to cause collapse, the fires are NOT going to cause a unitary collapse. 7 came down all at once exactly as in controlled demo which it obviously was.
 
Last edited:
What I do know is that the truth movement has been largely an internet phenomenon since its inception, and has only been ridiculed in the mainstream if and when it's ever been mentioned by those media sources at all.

Fact is, without the internet , 911 would have never been questioned. Our pathetic pc-press would have repeated the govt line and that would have been the end of it.
 
[
Yup....And intense fires burning out of control will cause that steel core to yield

HAHAHA. You need to change your name to paid govt shill. There were no intense fires in 7. They were barely visible. In fact from the north, the building looked completely normal. Anyway - fires don't cause unitary collapse.
 
If fell from uncontrolled fires and from debris from the towers causing massive damage.


Uncontrolled fires? I guess they were but that doesn't matter. What's important is the fires were very small - barely visible from outside in fact. And there was no massive damage. All the damage was on the south side where debris from the collapsing tower a block away had hit it. How can that cause unitary collapse? THINK
 
It was a set, they even released the news of the collapse to the press BEFORE it fell down.

BBC-reports-the-collapse-of-WTC-BEFORE-it-fell-150x150.jpg


Yes, I know they made excuses after the fake news had been broadcast, they had to cover up their error.
 
They actually moved this by request to "conspiracy theories?" :p The government theory is the conspiracy theory. The "immense heat" is the equivalent of the "magic bullet" in the JFK terrorist act. Also performed by the MOSSAD.
 
What I do know is that the truth movement has been largely an internet phenomenon since its inception, and has only been ridiculed in the mainstream if and when it's ever been mentioned by those media sources at all.

Fact is, without the internet , 911 would have never been questioned. Our pathetic pc-press would have repeated the govt line and that would have been the end of it.
Without the internet, 911 would have disappeared like Liberty

"On June 8, 1967, US Navy intelligence ship USS Liberty was suddenly and brutally attacked on the high seas in international waters by the air and naval forces of Israel. The Israeli forces attacked with full knowledge that this was an American ship and lied about it. Survivors have been forbidden for 40 years to tell their story under oath to the American public. The USS Liberty Memorial web site tells their story and is dedicated to the memory of the 34 brave men who died."

USS Liberty Memorial
 
Everyone knows 7 was brought down by controlled demo.

For what reason? Explain.
How can anyone supply a motive before an investigation into how the building fell and who stood to profit from its fall is completed?

If fell from uncontrolled fires and from debris from the towers causing massive damage.
In what amount of time?
How does that amount of time compare to free-fall?
 
They actually moved this by request to "conspiracy theories?" :p The government theory is the conspiracy theory. The "immense heat" is the equivalent of the "magic bullet" in the JFK terrorist act. Also performed by the MOSSAD.

Yes indeed. The govt explanation that 911 was caused by arabs is, of course, a conspiracy theory too though the press never says that. Our useless pc-press takes the govt side on everything.
 

Forum List

Back
Top