Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Possible, but so are a lot of things. Don't see much to gain going that far. His brother took forgiveness to a new level and seemed naive with the no jail stuff, but it could have been inspired genius. I can't see an appeals court electing to change a thing after that show. This way the family has closure. Otherwise it could have dragged on and on. Oh, and she will pay as well in civil court no matter what the brother said he felt.
Little Bit Racists? No worries. You and Amber clearly don't qualify.
Possible, but so are a lot of things. Don't see much to gain going that far. His brother took forgiveness to a new level and seemed naive with the no jail stuff, but it could have been inspired genius. I can't see an appeals court electing to change a thing after that show. This way the family has closure. Otherwise it could have dragged on and on. Oh, and she will pay as well in civil court no matter what the brother said he felt.
What the politicians who enabled this political show trial fail to comprehend is that by placating the blacks...a minority...they have alienated the majority....now lets remember how elections work....hehheh
This is the point where you went from sanity to the insaneIt is very possible the room was lighted, and she fairly quickly realized it was not her apartment, but she had already gotten the idea in her head to shoot this guy
No, insanity is arguing the 'Castle Doctrine' for Amber Guyger murdering an unarmed man in HIS apartment.
Shooting a man to death in HIS home isn't how the Castle Doctrine works.
In her mind she was in her home....that is the reality of this case which the jury simply overlooked.
This is the point where you went from sanity to the insaneIt is very possible the room was lighted, and she fairly quickly realized it was not her apartment, but she had already gotten the idea in her head to shoot this guy
No, insanity is arguing the 'Castle Doctrine' for Amber Guyger murdering an unarmed man in HIS apartment.
Shooting a man to death in HIS home isn't how the Castle Doctrine works.
In her mind she was in her home....that is the reality of this case which the jury simply overlooked.
In her mind she could have been on the planet Zeldon it doesn't make a fucking difference. The fact is she trespassed into someone else's home armed and shot them dead. That's why she's in prison.
This is the point where you went from sanity to the insaneIt is very possible the room was lighted, and she fairly quickly realized it was not her apartment, but she had already gotten the idea in her head to shoot this guy
No, insanity is arguing the 'Castle Doctrine' for Amber Guyger murdering an unarmed man in HIS apartment.
Shooting a man to death in HIS home isn't how the Castle Doctrine works.
In her mind she was in her home....that is the reality of this case which the jury simply overlooked.
In her mind she could have been on the planet Zeldon it doesn't make a fucking difference. The fact is she trespassed into someone else's home armed and shot them dead. That's why she's in prison.
None.How many times has it been shown she was a innocent trespasser
This is the point where you went from sanity to the insaneIt is very possible the room was lighted, and she fairly quickly realized it was not her apartment, but she had already gotten the idea in her head to shoot this guy
No, insanity is arguing the 'Castle Doctrine' for Amber Guyger murdering an unarmed man in HIS apartment.
Shooting a man to death in HIS home isn't how the Castle Doctrine works.
In her mind she was in her home....that is the reality of this case which the jury simply overlooked.
In her mind she could have been on the planet Zeldon it doesn't make a fucking difference. The fact is she trespassed into someone else's home armed and shot them dead. That's why she's in prison.
How many times has it been shown she was a innocent trespasser and yet you want to keep making the same erroneous claim.
This is the point where you went from sanity to the insaneIt is very possible the room was lighted, and she fairly quickly realized it was not her apartment, but she had already gotten the idea in her head to shoot this guy
No, insanity is arguing the 'Castle Doctrine' for Amber Guyger murdering an unarmed man in HIS apartment.
Shooting a man to death in HIS home isn't how the Castle Doctrine works.
In her mind she was in her home....that is the reality of this case which the jury simply overlooked.
In her mind she could have been on the planet Zeldon it doesn't make a fucking difference. The fact is she trespassed into someone else's home armed and shot them dead. That's why she's in prison.
No she is in prison because the jury was rigged to have a lot of Negroes on it.
None.How many times has it been shown she was a innocent trespasser
None.How many times has it been shown she was a innocent trespasser
None.How many times has it been shown she was a innocent trespasserNone.How many times has it been shown she was a innocent trespasser
Try and keep up...perhaps you need a tutor?
So half true at best. I rate it stupid, hateful, and irrelevant. How many whites killed by whites over the same period for comparison? No mention? How about institutional racism? No mention again? Get serious.Our ruling
West said black people kill more blacks in six months than the KKK did in 86 years. Based on the evidence West provided, the claim essentially boils down to a comparison between the number of black-on-black homicides and the number of lynchings from 1882-1968.
Using 2012 FBI data and information from the Tuskegee Institute -- neither of which is perfect -- West is somewhat off in his numbers. There were approximately 2,936 black-on-black homicides in six months of 2012 and 3,446 black lynchings from 1882-1896.
But West also is wrong to ascribe the historical killing of blacks to the Ku Klux Klan, experts told us. There is no clear tally of Klan murders.
We rate the claim Half True.
Try reading your own links.
So half true at best. I rate it stupid, hateful, and irrelevant. How many whites killed by whites over the same period for comparison? No mention? How about institutional racism? No mention again? Get serious.Our ruling
West said black people kill more blacks in six months than the KKK did in 86 years. Based on the evidence West provided, the claim essentially boils down to a comparison between the number of black-on-black homicides and the number of lynchings from 1882-1968.
Using 2012 FBI data and information from the Tuskegee Institute -- neither of which is perfect -- West is somewhat off in his numbers. There were approximately 2,936 black-on-black homicides in six months of 2012 and 3,446 black lynchings from 1882-1896.
But West also is wrong to ascribe the historical killing of blacks to the Ku Klux Klan, experts told us. There is no clear tally of Klan murders.
We rate the claim Half True.
white nationalist ideologues — including politician and pundit Patrick Buchanan, Jared Taylor of American Renaissance, and the Council of Conservative Citizens — all have made considerable hay out of proffering “studies” laden with risibly bad statistics and other evidence to make their case.
The BJS study demonstrates plainly that this is simply not the case. Some 57 percent of crimes involving white victims were committed by white perpetrators, while only 15 percent were committed by blacks, and 11 percent by Hispanics.
Negroes are not sophisticated enough to be able to sit on a jury....they are blinded by their hate....just like we see on this thread...you can always spot a negro on here...their stupidity stands out.
