America you royally fucked up

IMG_2855.JPG
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: kaz
K see this is where i point out your retardation. The Great Recession that began 4 months before Bush left office would of course spill into Obama's first 6 months months. The fact of the matter is that recession ended shortly after Obama's stimulus package went into affect around June 2009. Since then, we've had job growth ever since. Those are the facts.

Oh and all those jobs lost in the recession were regained. 15 million jobs were created during his years. You are wrong.
Explain how money going into government coffers turned the economy around. You keep ejaculating the belief but never explain how it works. Taking money from the private sector and giving it to the public sector doesn't create any wealth. You believe in a fairy tale.
Easy. When a large chunk of the stimulus went to extending unemployment benefits to those affected by the recession, those people spent that money on the private market immediately on basics like food and clothing. That stimulated the economy. The reason why using revenue for this isn't a zero sum is because when it is used as consumer spending, it causes a ripple effect of stimulus in the market. Every dollar spent on revenue was replaced by $1.21 in growth in the market. That's capitalism 101. Consumer spending is the backbone of the economy.
 
K see this is where i point out your retardation. The Great Recession that began 4 months before Bush left office would of course spill into Obama's first 6 months months. The fact of the matter is that recession ended shortly after Obama's stimulus package went into affect around June 2009. Since then, we've had job growth ever since. Those are the facts.

Oh and all those jobs lost in the recession were regained. 15 million jobs were created during his years. You are wrong.
Explain how money going into government coffers turned the economy around. You keep ejaculating the belief but never explain how it works. Taking money from the private sector and giving it to the public sector doesn't create any wealth. You believe in a fairy tale.
Easy. When a large chunk of the stimulus went to extending unemployment benefits to those affected by the recession, those people spent that money on the private market immediately on basics like food and clothing. That stimulated the economy. The reason why using revenue for this isn't a zero sum is because when it is used as consumer spending, it causes a ripple effect of stimulus in the market. Every dollar spent on revenue was replaced by $1.21 in growth in the market. That's capitalism 101. Consumer spending is the backbone of the economy.
Economies don't work that way or we could simply spend until we were all filthy rich. Like I said, you believe in fairy tales.
 
Easy. When a large chunk of the stimulus went to extending unemployment benefits to those affected by the recession, those people spent that money on the private market immediately on basics like food and clothing. That stimulated the economy.
Yeah...nothing "stimulates" an economy like buying food and clothing. :lmao:
 
Okay, look. I am shocked by the result. I am devastated. And yeah, I won't deny I predicted Hillary would win this election several times on this forum so save your "I told you so"s.

America you fucked up. I don't say that because Hillary lost - I say it because Trump won. America is too dumb to know how dumb it is I guess. Trump will run this country into the ground.

Of course to be quite honest I suspect Trump will quit two months into his adminstration and the Pence the Teabagger will still fuck things up
th
 
Easy. When a large chunk of the stimulus went to extending unemployment benefits to those affected by the recession, those people spent that money on the private market immediately on basics like food and clothing. That stimulated the economy.
Yeah...nothing "stimulates" an economy like buying food and clothing. :lmao:
It does you dumbass. Do you really not understand supply and demand? God you are stupid. Businesses make profit off of people buying shit. That stimulates GDP and creates jobs. What other purpose is there in capitalism?
 
Easy. When a large chunk of the stimulus went to extending unemployment benefits to those affected by the recession, those people spent that money on the private market immediately on basics like food and clothing. That stimulated the economy.
Yeah...nothing "stimulates" an economy like buying food and clothing. :lmao:
It does you dumbass. Do you really not understand supply and demand? God you are stupid. Businesses make profit off of people buying shit. That stimulates GDP and creates jobs. What other purpose is there in capitalism?
th
 
K see this is where i point out your retardation. The Great Recession that began 4 months before Bush left office would of course spill into Obama's first 6 months months. The fact of the matter is that recession ended shortly after Obama's stimulus package went into affect around June 2009. Since then, we've had job growth ever since. Those are the facts.

Oh and all those jobs lost in the recession were regained. 15 million jobs were created during his years. You are wrong.
Explain how money going into government coffers turned the economy around. You keep ejaculating the belief but never explain how it works. Taking money from the private sector and giving it to the public sector doesn't create any wealth. You believe in a fairy tale.
Easy. When a large chunk of the stimulus went to extending unemployment benefits to those affected by the recession, those people spent that money on the private market immediately on basics like food and clothing. That stimulated the economy. The reason why using revenue for this isn't a zero sum is because when it is used as consumer spending, it causes a ripple effect of stimulus in the market. Every dollar spent on revenue was replaced by $1.21 in growth in the market. That's capitalism 101. Consumer spending is the backbone of the economy.
th
 
Easy. When a large chunk of the stimulus went to extending unemployment benefits to those affected by the recession, those people spent that money on the private market immediately on basics like food and clothing. That stimulated the economy.
Yeah...nothing "stimulates" an economy like buying food and clothing. :lmao:
It does you dumbass. Do you really not understand supply and demand? God you are stupid. Businesses make profit off of people buying shit. That stimulates GDP and creates jobs. What other purpose is there in capitalism?
As Iceweasel essentially pointed out, we could simply just spend our way into prosperity then you nitwit. By your logic, we could thrive simply by paying every American to dig a hole in the backyard each day and then fill it in the following day. They would have money to then buy "food and clothing". Your grasp of economics is on a level with that of the average third grader.

Growth is achieved through opportunity and efficiencies.

The markets skyrocketed the past week and half off of the news that Donald Trump was elected president. No policies changed. No regulations changed. So why did the market change? Just the mere perception of future opportunity. Taxes also have a huge impact on the perception of opportunity.

In addition, efficiencies (such as when Ford created the assembly line) create growth because it can manufacture more products and at lower costs. Generally speaking this is achieved through technology but sometimes it is achieved through better processes.
 
Yeah...nothing "stimulates" an economy like buying food and clothing. :lmao:
It does you dumbass. Do you really not understand supply and demand? God you are stupid.
Supply and Demand effects price, you nitwit. Nothing we've discussed had anything to do with prices. You're about as knowledgeable about economics as Terri Schiavo at the end of her life. Good Lord, please stop talking. You are humiliating yourself.
 
Yeah...nothing "stimulates" an economy like buying food and clothing. :lmao:
It does you dumbass. Do you really not understand supply and demand? God you are stupid.
Supply and Demand effects price, you nitwit. Nothing we've discussed had anything to do with prices. You're about as knowledgeable about economics as Terri Schiavo at the end of her life. Good Lord, please stop talking. You are humiliating yourself.
Dude
Easy. When a large chunk of the stimulus went to extending unemployment benefits to those affected by the recession, those people spent that money on the private market immediately on basics like food and clothing. That stimulated the economy.
Yeah...nothing "stimulates" an economy like buying food and clothing. :lmao:
It does you dumbass. Do you really not understand supply and demand? God you are stupid. Businesses make profit off of people buying shit. That stimulates GDP and creates jobs. What other purpose is there in capitalism?
As Iceweasel essentially pointed out, we could simply just spend our way into prosperity then you nitwit. By your logic, we could thrive simply by paying every American to dig a hole in the backyard each day and then fill it in the following day. They would have money to then buy "food and clothing". Your grasp of economics is on a level with that of the average third grader.

Growth is achieved through opportunity and efficiencies.

The markets skyrocketed the past week and half off of the news that Donald Trump was elected president. No policies changed. No regulations changed. So why did the market change? Just the mere perception of future opportunity. Taxes also have a huge impact on the perception of opportunity.

In addition, efficiencies (such as when Ford created the assembly line) create growth because it can manufacture more products and at lower costs. Generally speaking this is achieved through technology but sometimes it is achieved through better processes.
Okay you're just meandering and rambling a bunch of crap. Yes obviously "growth and opportunity" matters, but none of this changes the fact that consumer spending stimulates the economy. People spend money. Businesses make a profit. That is the foundation.
 
The funniest part of this is the insulting and condescending tone put forth in the OP played no small part in why Trump won and the left sill hasn't grasped that yet.


I've been seeing some libs who have a dim grasp on what their problem is.

But I remain confident that the mob will suppress them and they will conform or be cast out, and that the lib will continue just as smug an asshole as ever.
 
Yeah...nothing "stimulates" an economy like buying food and clothing. :lmao:
It does you dumbass. Do you really not understand supply and demand? God you are stupid.
Supply and Demand effects price, you nitwit. Nothing we've discussed had anything to do with prices. You're about as knowledgeable about economics as Terri Schiavo at the end of her life. Good Lord, please stop talking. You are humiliating yourself.
Dude
Easy. When a large chunk of the stimulus went to extending unemployment benefits to those affected by the recession, those people spent that money on the private market immediately on basics like food and clothing. That stimulated the economy.
Yeah...nothing "stimulates" an economy like buying food and clothing. :lmao:
It does you dumbass. Do you really not understand supply and demand? God you are stupid. Businesses make profit off of people buying shit. That stimulates GDP and creates jobs. What other purpose is there in capitalism?
As Iceweasel essentially pointed out, we could simply just spend our way into prosperity then you nitwit. By your logic, we could thrive simply by paying every American to dig a hole in the backyard each day and then fill it in the following day. They would have money to then buy "food and clothing". Your grasp of economics is on a level with that of the average third grader.

Growth is achieved through opportunity and efficiencies.

The markets skyrocketed the past week and half off of the news that Donald Trump was elected president. No policies changed. No regulations changed. So why did the market change? Just the mere perception of future opportunity. Taxes also have a huge impact on the perception of opportunity.

In addition, efficiencies (such as when Ford created the assembly line) create growth because it can manufacture more products and at lower costs. Generally speaking this is achieved through technology but sometimes it is achieved through better processes.
Okay you're just meandering and rambling a bunch of crap. Yes obviously "growth and opportunity" matters, but none of this changes the fact that consumer spending stimulates the economy. People spend money. Businesses make a profit. That is the foundation.
dude, you fell for the m libturd mumbo jumbo. See those people who received the stimulus money will not get new money, there will be no cycle where they continue to spend the way they did. once the stimulus money was used up, they stopped buying. One can't pivot into a business growth without forecasts that show more money will be coming in. That's why job creation is the only way to spur growth. I wish you useless thugs would actually educate yourselves.

BTW, the fact that everyone knew it was only stimulus money highlighted there would not be future money coming in for product. FORECASTS.

See that is the advantage of Trump in office, he understands forecasting and the need to show there will be future money coming in and the need for actual job creators. OMG.
 
Last edited:
When a large chunk of the stimulus went to extending unemployment benefits to those affected by the recession, those people spent that money on the private market immediately on basics like food and clothing. That stimulated the economy.
"Contrary to official Democrat Keynesian witchcraft, you don’t promote economic recovery, growth and prosperity by borrowing a trillion dollars out of the economy to spend a trillion dollars back into it."

President Obama: The Biggest Government Spender In World History
 
When a large chunk of the stimulus went to extending unemployment benefits to those affected by the recession, those people spent that money on the private market immediately on basics like food and clothing. That stimulated the economy.
"Contrary to official Democrat Keynesian witchcraft, you don’t promote economic recovery, growth and prosperity by borrowing a trillion dollars out of the economy to spend a trillion dollars back into it."

President Obama: The Biggest Government Spender In World History
Ok facts matter. Half of that trillion dollar stimulus were tax cuts for the rich and middle class. Other funding went to infrastructure spending and green energy projects.
 

Forum List

Back
Top