American Patriot Pat Buchanan Discusses 'Our Judicial Dictatorship' (He's Right!)

[mdk]

[

I could care less what "we the people" want if that want is in violation of the US Constitution. Social conservatives can cry all they wish about State's Right but those people don't have the right to craft discriminatory and unconstitutional laws under guise of state's right.

Discriminatory laws? You mean like affirmative action - the govt mandated persecution of whites and favoritism to blacks. That came from the feds not the states. THINK

Yes, l would classify those laws as discriminatory.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Discriminatory laws? You mean like affirmative action - the govt mandated persecution of whites and favoritism to blacks. That came from the feds not the states. THINK

Yes, l would classify those laws as discriminatory.

Glad you can see the obvious. Of course affirmative action is discrimination. That's the IDEA behind it. Republicans should be screaming about this but never do.

 

[Old Rocks]

He's the opposite of a patriot.

Just like you.

What is unpatriotic about him?

His combover that makes him resemble the fascist...

Are you running for Jerk-Of-The-Month, Moonpie? Pat Buchanan is absolutely correct. These pukey liberal judges are making unconstitutional decisions every day for the benefit of the ungodly, i.e. abominal crimes are now the accepted law of the land and the laws of the land are being declared criminal. America is sinning it's way into extinction at breakneck speed.

Lordy, lordy, you old fossils are still singing that song. Heard it when I was a child. Nation cannot last more than another decade with all this sinning and liberalism. Well here we are, still doing good, and having a really good time sinning. And you old sourpusses are still old sourpusses, missing out on all the fun. LOL

 

[Old Rocks]

Years back, I used to read Buchanan and Will. I found if I profoundly disagreed with Will, I would review the logic of my thinking. But if I agreed with Buchanan, I would really examine my logic.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Lordy, lordy, you old fossils are still singing that song. Heard it when I was a child. Nation cannot last more than another decade with all this sinning and liberalism. Well here we are, still doing good, and having a really good time sinning. And you old sourpusses are still old sourpusses, missing out on all the fun. LOL

the board notes you never addressed the issue. All you have is namecalling.

 

[bodecea]

Buchanan is the most prominent defender of accused Nazis in America. The most famous case is that of John Demanjuk, who was accused of being an infamous death camp guard named Ivan the Terrible. Buchanan proclaimed his innocence for years, against ample criticism, and felt vindicated when an Israeli court declared there was not enough evidence to convict Demanjuk of being Ivan.
Buchanan continues to declare that Demanjuk has been proved "innocent". Actually, a key piece of evidence (from German documents) that exonerated him as Ivan showed Demanjuk to be a willing guard at Sobibor, another extermination camp where 250,000 died. Even the National Review, while generally defending Demanjuk and Buchanan's support for him, concedes that "Demanjuk was probably guilty of being a lesser accomplice in the Nazi machinery of genocide. That is a fair summary of the Israeli court's findings."
More to the point, Demanjuk is only one of several accused Nazis Buchanan has defended in one way or another. These include Karl Linnas (Buchanan personally appealed to Ed Meese, then Attorney General, to block his deportation to the Soviet Union); Klaus Barbie (Buchanan did not oppose his trial, but argued the US should not have apologized to France for sheltering Barbie after WWII); Arthur Rudolph, a rocket scientist involved in slave labor and severe punishments at a German rocket factory (Buchanan argued his confession was a "lie" while acknowledging he was a "nominal member of the Nazi party and of the SA until 1934"); and Frank Walus (of all the accused, the one most likely innocent.)
One of the most striking examples is Kurt Waldheim, the disgraced former UN leader. Buchanan repeatedly attacked him during his tenure, but once his Nazi past came out, Pat complained that "the ostracism of President Waldheim [has] an aspect of moral bullying and the singular stench of selective indignation." He also rationalized that "like others in Hitler's army, Lt. Waldheim looked the other way."
In each of these cases, Buchanan found a factual reason to defend the accused, an appeal to justice. But put together, it is striking how often he rushes to the defense of accused Nazis. He has also attacked the US Justice Department's Office of Special Investigation (which pursues war criminals) more generally:
"You've got a great atrocity that occurred 35, 45 years ago.... Why... put millions of dollars [into] investigating that?"

We fought the wrong enemy in WW2. Patton was right. Just think today what it would be like in Europe if Hitler would have defeated the Soviets with our help.

Had Hitler won World War II, what would be different in the post war world? Here are a few examples:

1 - No USSR (the Soviet government murdered millions of its own people during its 70 year reign - to study this topic read the writings of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn; Hitler would have liberated the USSR, though taking large parts of its Western region for lebensraum, "living space")

2 - No cold war (because there would be no USSR)

3 - No Communist Eastern Europe/Iron Curtain (when WWII ended, Eastern Europe fell to Communism - this was part of Stalin's spoils of war)

4 - No Red China and Mao's subsequent killing of 40 - 60 million Chinese (the USSR created favorable conditions for Mao's Communists which ultimately led to Mao's victory over Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalists in 1949, thus if no USSR, no Mao victory)

5 - No Communist North Vietnam (both the Soviet Union and Red China aided Ho Chi Minh)

6 - No Communist Cambodia and Pol Pot's slaughter of 2 million Cambodians (Red China aided Pol Pot)

7 - No dividing Korea into North Korea & South Korea (the Allies split Korea after WWII ended, with North Korea becoming Communist... another of Stalin's spoils of war)

8 - No Communist Cuba (given the previous, what support would Castro have had in the 1950's?)

9 - No Communism anywhere (Hitler was the world's most fervent anti-Communist)

10 - Liberalism & multiculturalism wouldn't dominate Western ethos (both are Jewish creations and both have always been heavily promoted/advanced by Jews; thus if no Jewish influence, then no liberalism and no multiculturalism... at least certainly nowhere near the degree we see today)

11 - No Cultural Marxism and no political correctness (these are social engineering "tools" which came out of the Jewish think tank known as the Frankfurt School)

12 - No third world immigration into Western nations (Jews wouldn't be in power positions to craft and force through liberal immigration laws; Jews are responsible for each and every Western nation's liberal immigration policy/laws, as all were orchestrated by a consortium consisting of the World Jewish Congress, the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, and B'nai B'rith)

13 - No depraved filth on TV, in movies, etc. (because Jews wouldn't run Hollywood)

14 - No widespread pornography (Jewish lawyers and Jewish activists were the main challengers of anti-obscenity laws, under the guise of "Freedom of Speech")

15 - There would still be prayer in public schools (Jewish lawyers were instrumental in banning prayer in public schools under the guise of so-called "separation of church and state," something that appears nowhere in the U.S. Constitution)

16 - No man-hating radical feminist movement (Jews such as Betty Friedan, Sonia Pressman, and Gloria Steinem, among others, were the key drivers of radical feminism)

17 - No Israel and all the problems it has brought the USA and the immeasurable misery it has wrought on the Palestinians

18 - Jews would be living in Madagascar (perhaps) and would be carefully monitored (Madagascar was one place Hitler considered as a Jewish homeland)

Who's surprised that Steve is a Hitler cheerleader?

 

[bodecea]

[

I could care less what "we the people" want if that want is in violation of the US Constitution. Social conservatives can cry all they wish about State's Right but those people don't have the right to craft discriminatory and unconstitutional laws under guise of state's right.

Discriminatory laws? You mean like affirmative action - the govt mandated persecution of whites and favoritism to blacks. That came from the feds not the states. THINK

Guess who benefits from AA the most? White women. Doesn't that twist your knickers?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Pat breaks it down and speaks the truth."

Actually he succeeds in only exhibiting his ignorance and stupidity.

 

[hipeter924]

Think this guy still can't comprehend the reality that most Americans have better things to do with their time than worry about the ramifications of same-sex marriage, like perhaps keeping their jobs and staying afloat financially - or education and healthcare.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Hossfly said: ↑


“Are you running for Jerk-Of-The-Month, Moonpie? Pat Buchanan is absolutely correct. These pukey liberal judges are making unconstitutional decisions every day for the benefit of the ungodly, i.e. abominal crimes are now the accepted law of the land and the laws of the land are being declared criminal. America is sinning it's way into extinction at breakneck speed.”


Obviously you're unaware of the stupidity of the bolded.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

[
Guess who benefits from AA the most? White women.

I don't know if `that's true or false but who cares anyway. All AA must stop. It's nothing but a hate crime. THINK

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Can anyone point to where the constitution gives judges the authority to repeal laws and write new laws in their place. The very first words of the constitution after the preamble are "all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states".

That means only congress can write laws. Courts, the president, and bureaucrats cannot - though they do it all the time.