Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As I have said before, I've provided Census links where all that government spending on social programs can be tracked in total or by state and right-wingers have never used that data to support their claims about all these freeloaders. I've done it several hundred times over a span of over ten years, but they won't use the data, because it doesn't support their case.
http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/fas-10.pdf
Here it is again. You won't use it.
I claimed people who take money from the taxpayers are freeloaders. How do your government statistics dispute that?
Corporations should be included in your people, so it's a matter of how much money is involved. It's also a matter that your claim about freeloaders and what taking money involves is called into question. Is an infant getting formula taking money from the taxpayers and a freeloader?
Nope, according to the dictionary definition:
free·load (frld)
intr.v. free·load·ed, free·load·ing, free·loads Slang
To take advantage of the charity, generosity, or hospitality of others.
freeloader n.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin
freeloader [ˈfriːˌləʊdə]
n
Slang a person who habitually depends on the charity of others for food, shelter, etc.
freeloading n
Collins English Dictionary Complete and Unabridged © HarperCollins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003
As I have said before, I've provided Census links where all that government spending on social programs can be tracked in total or by state and right-wingers have never used that data to support their claims about all these freeloaders. I've done it several hundred times over a span of over ten years, but they won't use the data, because it doesn't support their case.
http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/fas-10.pdf
Here it is again. You won't use it.
I claimed people who take money from the taxpayers are freeloaders. How do your government statistics dispute that?
lol, hispanics would not be drawn to the GOP for years, if not a few decades.
lol, hispanics would not be drawn to the GOP for years, if not a few decades.
You are wrong
They will flock back to the Republican party so that Republicans will stop calling them freeloaders
Nope, according to the dictionary definition:
free·load (frld)
intr.v. free·load·ed, free·load·ing, free·loads Slang
To take advantage of the charity, generosity, or hospitality of others.
freeloader n.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin
freeloader [ˈfriːˌləʊdə]
n
Slang a person who habitually depends on the charity of others for food, shelter, etc.
freeloading n
Collins English Dictionary Complete and Unabridged © HarperCollins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003
As I have said before, I've provided Census links where all that government spending on social programs can be tracked in total or by state and right-wingers have never used that data to support their claims about all these freeloaders. I've done it several hundred times over a span of over ten years, but they won't use the data, because it doesn't support their case.
http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/fas-10.pdf
Here it is again. You won't use it.
I claimed people who take money from the taxpayers are freeloaders. How do your government statistics dispute that?
We think of it as diluting the asshole quality of our nation, so the weaken part is right
So people who are concerned are now not only "racist", but they are also "assholes"?
Gotcha!
You nativist reactionaries are not concerned for the country, only for your "we want to go back to the 1950s" sickness that infect so many of the far right.
So people who are concerned are now not only "racist", but they are also "assholes"?
Gotcha!
You nativist reactionaries are not concerned for the country, only for your "we want to go back to the 1950s" sickness that infect so many of the far right.
The 1950s...when people could leave their doors unlocked at night and cities like LA & Detroit were thriving economic centeGottars and didn't look like ghetto war zones. What's wrong with wanting something like that back?
There's nothing wrong with going forward...unless it involves going off a cliff like a lemming.
Gotta love ya Finger Boy
You represent you parties views so well. American workers are lazy freeloaders while you scamper to placate the whims of the super wealthy
Illegal aliens aren't "American workers," dipshit. By definition, they are foreigners.
Then why do republicans insult the American worker who is struggling to survive in a bad economy? You work hard to raise a family and are forced to accept some assistance to get by and Republcans call you a freeloader
Illegal aliens aren't "American workers," dipshit. By definition, they are foreigners.
Then why do republicans insult the American worker who is struggling to survive in a bad economy? You work hard to raise a family and are forced to accept some assistance to get by and Republcans call you a freeloader
Wrong! The people the GOP call "freeloaders" are those who abuse the system. For example: A single mother who is a cokehead and has 10 kids by 3 different men.
Or a businessman who takes tax subsidies but opposes sensible regulation.
So people who are concerned are now not only "racist", but they are also "assholes"?
Gotcha!
You nativist reactionaries are not concerned for the country, only for your "we want to go back to the 1950s" sickness that infect so many of the far right.
The 1950s...when people could leave their doors unlocked at night and cities like LA & Detroit were thriving economic centers and didn't look like ghetto war zones. What's wrong with wanting something like that back?
There's nothing wrong with going forward...unless it involves going off a cliff like a lemming.
Corporations should be included in your people, so it's a matter of how much money is involved. It's also a matter that your claim about freeloaders and what taking money involves is called into question. Is an infant getting formula taking money from the taxpayers and a freeloader?
Of course they're freeloaders, to the fringe right.
They only pretend to care about poor children before they are born. Once they draw their first breath, they're worthless burdens on society, especially if they're minority kids.
Corporations should be included in your people, so it's a matter of how much money is involved. It's also a matter that your claim about freeloaders and what taking money involves is called into question. Is an infant getting formula taking money from the taxpayers and a freeloader?
I didn't say a thing pro or con about businesses. As far as the baby is concerned, he isn't free-loading on the taxpayers, and that's all I care about.
By that you mean you didn't say it now. I've been around bripats for a long time.
Stupid braindead Libs and spineless jellyfish GOPers are nothing but appeasers. Placate to the newest big minority group to stay in power, to enjoy the luxurious perks that comes with the job and not having to worry about the chaos they dropped on the rest of us by letting in more Third Worlders.
Of course they're freeloaders, to the fringe right.
They only pretend to care about poor children before they are born. Once they draw their first breath, they're worthless burdens on society, especially if they're minority kids.
If inventing positions for others to hold was a valid argument, liberals would win every debate.
