An American Nightmare - the Arrest of Roger Stone

Look at the treatment difference between Hillary and her cronies and Trump and his.

Hillary's cronies get immunity, book deals, offers, etc. Trump's people like Cohen and Stone get their houses busted into at 5am with guns drawn.

Apparently equal justice for all should read "equal justice for all Republicans" because liberals get treated like the snowflakes they are.

Anyone who says this is SOP is a moron.

I lived in an apartment and the guy next to me was known to have many guns one was AK47. His apartment was raided one morning on suspicion of downloading child porn. Two people showed up. One FBI agent and one local cop. That was it. This is NOT the norm. 29 agents, a heli, two armed boats and two armored vehicles for 2 elderly people is NOT fucking normal you stupid fucking liberals.
Which of Hillary's "cronies" are you talking about who've been indicted?

NONE have been indicted. That's my point. Hell they weren't even raided. They weren't even investigated. They didn't have a "here's the person find the crime" special prosecutor for them.

The Benghazi investigation was a sham. NOBODY died with anything Trump is accused of. 4 americans died in Libya begging for help that Hillary didn't provide. WE KNOW THAT FOR A FACT. Trump is accused by the left of colluding to win an election. And for that doors are busted down, guns drawn, houses raided, etc.

Please name ONE person with Hillary ties who was raided by the FBI at 5am with 29 agents, helis. etc. You can't.
Leave it to a rightard to claim eight independent investigations into Benghazi were a “sham.”

:cuckoo:
Being STUPID isn't a crime.............Lying under oath is a crime.........Was a kind of perjury trap.........Politicians lie all the time............it's not a crime unless they are fishing for a crime under oath..........

Hillary and Obama lied about Benghazi..............making up stories for political fallout reasons..........which isn't a crime..........they do it all the time....

Shitty they did it...........YOU BETCHA
Neither Hillary nor Obama lied about Benghazi.

Sadly, you’re not grounded in reality.
They lied their asses off on the video did it..............plain and simple.................Not a crime..............Dirty as fucking hell to say it to the families of those who died in the coffin ceremony.

 
They fucking lied like hell. They said it was about some stupid fucking video. If Hilldabeast isn't lying she's asleep.
 
Which of Hillary's "cronies" are you talking about who've been indicted?

NONE have been indicted. That's my point. Hell they weren't even raided. They weren't even investigated. They didn't have a "here's the person find the crime" special prosecutor for them.

The Benghazi investigation was a sham. NOBODY died with anything Trump is accused of. 4 americans died in Libya begging for help that Hillary didn't provide. WE KNOW THAT FOR A FACT. Trump is accused by the left of colluding to win an election. And for that doors are busted down, guns drawn, houses raided, etc.

Please name ONE person with Hillary ties who was raided by the FBI at 5am with 29 agents, helis. etc. You can't.
Leave it to a rightard to claim eight independent investigations into Benghazi were a “sham.”

:cuckoo:
Being STUPID isn't a crime.............Lying under oath is a crime.........Was a kind of perjury trap.........Politicians lie all the time............it's not a crime unless they are fishing for a crime under oath..........

Hillary and Obama lied about Benghazi..............making up stories for political fallout reasons..........which isn't a crime..........they do it all the time....

Shitty they did it...........YOU BETCHA
Neither Hillary nor Obama lied about Benghazi.

Sadly, you’re not grounded in reality.
They lied their asses off on the video did it..............plain and simple.................Not a crime..............Dirty as fucking hell to say it to the families of those who died in the coffin ceremony.



Last time I heard Trey Gowdy launched a 2 years investigation about Benghazi against Hillary.
Found nothing against Hillary. Are you saying Gowdy is inept Republican law maker?

Am I wrong?
 
DNC and Podesta.

Russian intelligence.

As you know, Assange is not Russian intelligence. He also denied receiving data from Russian, or any other government.

Based on that, what Crime did Credico witness?
Asked and answered.

Let's summarize.

Me: "What is a crime there?"
You: "Computer hacking."
Me: "Whose computer was hacked and who hacked it?"
You: "DNC and Podesta. Russian intelligence."
Me: "What Crime did Credico witness?"
You: "Asked and answered."

Based on your answers, Credico witnessed hacking of DNC and Podesta emails by Russian intelligence.

Is anyone home? :disbelief:
That is only the assessment of someone who's truly brain-dead since I very clearly stated to what Credico witnessed...

"Stone working with Assange to release emails hacked by Russians."

Not, "hacking of DNC and Podesta emails by Russian intelligence."

How on Earth did your brain translate what I actually said into what you think I said??

2s0blvo.jpg

Again, Assange did not get emails from Russians.

And where is the proof that Russians stole it?

Those servers were never investigated by the FBI.
”Again, Assange did not get emails from Russians.”

Actually, not even Assange made that claim. You are saying that, not him. His claim is that he didn’t get the emails from the Russian government or s state party. But that could range from innocently not knowing the Russian he was dealing with was Russian since Guccifer 2.0 was denying their Russian connection; to Assange flat out lying.

Either way, Mueller has indicated Assange’s source really was Russian agents.

”And where is the proof that Russians stole it?”

This has been thoroughly proven by our intelligence community.

How the Russians hacked the DNC and passed its emails to WikiLeaks

”Those servers were never investigated by the FBI.”

Not exactly. The servers weren’t, but the data on the hard drives were. From that, cyber investigators were able to determine the location and identity of the hackers.
 
As you know, Assange is not Russian intelligence. He also denied receiving data from Russian, or any other government.

Based on that, what Crime did Credico witness?
Asked and answered.

Let's summarize.

Me: "What is a crime there?"
You: "Computer hacking."
Me: "Whose computer was hacked and who hacked it?"
You: "DNC and Podesta. Russian intelligence."
Me: "What Crime did Credico witness?"
You: "Asked and answered."

Based on your answers, Credico witnessed hacking of DNC and Podesta emails by Russian intelligence.

Is anyone home? :disbelief:
That is only the assessment of someone who's truly brain-dead since I very clearly stated to what Credico witnessed...

"Stone working with Assange to release emails hacked by Russians."

Not, "hacking of DNC and Podesta emails by Russian intelligence."

How on Earth did your brain translate what I actually said into what you think I said??

2s0blvo.jpg

Again, Assange did not get emails from Russians.

And where is the proof that Russians stole it?

Those servers were never investigated by the FBI.
”Again, Assange did not get emails from Russians.”

Actually, not even Assange made that claim. You are saying that, not him. His claim is that he didn’t get the emails from the Russian government or s state party. But that could range from innocently not knowing the Russian he was dealing with was Russian since Guccifer 2.0 was denying their Russian connection; to Assange flat out lying.

Either way, Mueller has indicated Assange’s source really was Russian agents.

”And where is the proof that Russians stole it?”

This has been thoroughly proven by our intelligence community.

How the Russians hacked the DNC and passed its emails to WikiLeaks

”Those servers were never investigated by the FBI.”

Not exactly. The servers weren’t, but the data on the hard drives were. From that, cyber investigators were able to determine the location and identity of the hackers.

DNC declined FBI's request to examine their server. The Russian narrative is just, that... a narrative to point in desired direction, not necessary to the right direction.

"cyber investigators"

Those investigators were on their payroll, their "findings" are worthless.
 
Fucking moron...

“I don't have a valid passport. Either that or it's about to expire in a few days." ~ Roger Stone
Link? I Googled that quote, and nothing turns up.

That doesn't change the fact that he has said numerous times that he doesn't
LOLOLOLOL

That you get nothing when Googling that quote actually reveals you’re a fucking moron, not that the quote cant’t be found...

rvy887.jpg


... not to mention, I posted a link to the interview where he said it.

1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif

This is all I get, douchebag, so I don't know how you got that:

2nvy1yc.jpg
LOLOL

I got it because I’m smarter than you. Waaaay smarter. :mm:
Your results are fake, obviously.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Fucking moron, your brain is fake. :lmao:

I posted a screen shot with my results, showing links to Stone saying that.

Now watch how I demonstrate yet again what a fucking moron you are by posting a link to the Google search that produced the results shown on my screen shot, which you fucking moronically think I "faked"...

Google search to prove conclusively that bripat9643 is a fucking moron: "I don't have a valid passport. Either that or it's about to expire in a few days."


:mm::mm::mm::mm::mm:
 
Asked and answered.

Let's summarize.

Me: "What is a crime there?"
You: "Computer hacking."
Me: "Whose computer was hacked and who hacked it?"
You: "DNC and Podesta. Russian intelligence."
Me: "What Crime did Credico witness?"
You: "Asked and answered."

Based on your answers, Credico witnessed hacking of DNC and Podesta emails by Russian intelligence.

Is anyone home? :disbelief:
That is only the assessment of someone who's truly brain-dead since I very clearly stated to what Credico witnessed...

"Stone working with Assange to release emails hacked by Russians."

Not, "hacking of DNC and Podesta emails by Russian intelligence."

How on Earth did your brain translate what I actually said into what you think I said??

2s0blvo.jpg

Again, Assange did not get emails from Russians.

And where is the proof that Russians stole it?

Those servers were never investigated by the FBI.
”Again, Assange did not get emails from Russians.”

Actually, not even Assange made that claim. You are saying that, not him. His claim is that he didn’t get the emails from the Russian government or s state party. But that could range from innocently not knowing the Russian he was dealing with was Russian since Guccifer 2.0 was denying their Russian connection; to Assange flat out lying.

Either way, Mueller has indicated Assange’s source really was Russian agents.

”And where is the proof that Russians stole it?”

This has been thoroughly proven by our intelligence community.

How the Russians hacked the DNC and passed its emails to WikiLeaks

”Those servers were never investigated by the FBI.”

Not exactly. The servers weren’t, but the data on the hard drives were. From that, cyber investigators were able to determine the location and identity of the hackers.

DNC declined FBI's request to examine their server. The Russian narrative is just, that... a narrative to point in desired direction, not necessary to the right direction.

"cyber investigators"

Those investigators were on their payroll, their "findings" are worthless.
Nah, you're lying again. CrowdStrike provided the FBI with exact byte-for-byte copies of the hard drives for them to perform their own forensics.

There is no question that Russian agents were behind the hacking. Only truly brain-dead trump cultists continue to deny it at this point.
 
Let's summarize.

Me: "What is a crime there?"
You: "Computer hacking."
Me: "Whose computer was hacked and who hacked it?"
You: "DNC and Podesta. Russian intelligence."
Me: "What Crime did Credico witness?"
You: "Asked and answered."

Based on your answers, Credico witnessed hacking of DNC and Podesta emails by Russian intelligence.

Is anyone home? :disbelief:
That is only the assessment of someone who's truly brain-dead since I very clearly stated to what Credico witnessed...

"Stone working with Assange to release emails hacked by Russians."

Not, "hacking of DNC and Podesta emails by Russian intelligence."

How on Earth did your brain translate what I actually said into what you think I said??

2s0blvo.jpg

Again, Assange did not get emails from Russians.

And where is the proof that Russians stole it?

Those servers were never investigated by the FBI.
”Again, Assange did not get emails from Russians.”

Actually, not even Assange made that claim. You are saying that, not him. His claim is that he didn’t get the emails from the Russian government or s state party. But that could range from innocently not knowing the Russian he was dealing with was Russian since Guccifer 2.0 was denying their Russian connection; to Assange flat out lying.

Either way, Mueller has indicated Assange’s source really was Russian agents.

”And where is the proof that Russians stole it?”

This has been thoroughly proven by our intelligence community.

How the Russians hacked the DNC and passed its emails to WikiLeaks

”Those servers were never investigated by the FBI.”

Not exactly. The servers weren’t, but the data on the hard drives were. From that, cyber investigators were able to determine the location and identity of the hackers.

DNC declined FBI's request to examine their server. The Russian narrative is just, that... a narrative to point in desired direction, not necessary to the right direction.

"cyber investigators"

Those investigators were on their payroll, their "findings" are worthless.
Nah, you're lying again. CrowdStrike provided the FBI with exact byte-for-byte copies of the hard drives for them to perform their own forensics.

There is no question that Russian agents were behind the hacking. Only truly brain-dead trump cultists continue to deny it at this point.

It's great that you provided the proof for your claim, otherwise, who would believe you.
 
Stone himself says his passport might be valid. You calling him a liar?

Link needed


This video doesn't match the transcript you're referring to. It should be video from 1PM on January 26.

"might be valid"

No, his words are, and you quoted it "I don't have a valid passport. Either that or it's about to expire in a few days".

Two things about it, if passport did not expired, it's still valid. Second, if passport is about to expire during the travel to another country, you may not be allowed to enter that country, therefore passport is technically invalid.

Dumbfuck, he's in that video saying what I quoted him as saying. That's what he said on January 25th as it aired live on CNN at 6PM EST.

As far as him not being able to travel because it was about to expire, that's meaningless since it varies from country to country and some countries allow entry as long as the passport has not yet expired.
 
Stone himself says his passport might be valid. You calling him a liar?

Link needed


This video doesn't match the transcript you're referring to. It should be video from 1PM on January 26.

"might be valid"

No, his words are, and you quoted it "I don't have a valid passport. Either that or it's about to expire in a few days".

Two things about it, if passport did not expired, it's still valid. Second, if passport is about to expire during the travel to another country, you may not be allowed to enter that country, therefore passport is technically invalid.

Dumbfuck, he's in that video saying what I quoted him as saying. That's what he said on January 25th as it aired live on CNN at 6PM EST.

As far as him not being able to travel because it was about to expire, that's meaningless since it varies from country to country and some countries allow entry as long as the passport has not yet expired.


Shitstain, I am not questioning did he said it or not, I said that video you posted doesn't match the transcript you linked to his quote, and that transcript you linked is from CNN show aired on 1PM, January 26.

"some countries allow"

Be specific, what countries?

Bripat already said that even airlines can turn you down if your passport is expiring in 30 days or less. I travel to Europe every year and I am not even able to purchase tickets for kids (valid for 5 years for minors) if their passports are expiring during the travel.
 
That is only the assessment of someone who's truly brain-dead since I very clearly stated to what Credico witnessed...

"Stone working with Assange to release emails hacked by Russians."

Not, "hacking of DNC and Podesta emails by Russian intelligence."

How on Earth did your brain translate what I actually said into what you think I said??

2s0blvo.jpg

Again, Assange did not get emails from Russians.

And where is the proof that Russians stole it?

Those servers were never investigated by the FBI.
”Again, Assange did not get emails from Russians.”

Actually, not even Assange made that claim. You are saying that, not him. His claim is that he didn’t get the emails from the Russian government or s state party. But that could range from innocently not knowing the Russian he was dealing with was Russian since Guccifer 2.0 was denying their Russian connection; to Assange flat out lying.

Either way, Mueller has indicated Assange’s source really was Russian agents.

”And where is the proof that Russians stole it?”

This has been thoroughly proven by our intelligence community.

How the Russians hacked the DNC and passed its emails to WikiLeaks

”Those servers were never investigated by the FBI.”

Not exactly. The servers weren’t, but the data on the hard drives were. From that, cyber investigators were able to determine the location and identity of the hackers.

DNC declined FBI's request to examine their server. The Russian narrative is just, that... a narrative to point in desired direction, not necessary to the right direction.

"cyber investigators"

Those investigators were on their payroll, their "findings" are worthless.
Nah, you're lying again. CrowdStrike provided the FBI with exact byte-for-byte copies of the hard drives for them to perform their own forensics.

There is no question that Russian agents were behind the hacking. Only truly brain-dead trump cultists continue to deny it at this point.

It's great that you provided the proof for your claim, otherwise, who would believe you.
LOL

You don't believe me when I do post links. So what difference does that make to someone hiding from reality?

Hear-No-Evil-See-No-Evil-Speak-No-Evil-2.jpg



Still, here ya go...

That is essentially what the FBI did with the DNC server: The bureau was provided with copies of the data on the server, like duplicating your own hard drive. Had Russians accessed the physical server after breaking into the DNC, the physical server itself might have been useful. Instead, they were given the server’s fingerprint, so to speak. This was confirmed by a spokesman for the DNC and by then-FBI Director James B. Comey

"We got the forensics from the pros that they hired which -- again, best practice is always to get access to the machines themselves, but this, my folks tell me, was an appropriate substitute." ~ James Comey

DNC spokeswoman Adrienne Watson told PolitiFact that the DNC cooperated with the FBI’s requests, which resulted in the DNC providing a copy of their server.
 
Stone himself says his passport might be valid. You calling him a liar?

Link needed


This video doesn't match the transcript you're referring to. It should be video from 1PM on January 26.

"might be valid"

No, his words are, and you quoted it "I don't have a valid passport. Either that or it's about to expire in a few days".

Two things about it, if passport did not expired, it's still valid. Second, if passport is about to expire during the travel to another country, you may not be allowed to enter that country, therefore passport is technically invalid.

Dumbfuck, he's in that video saying what I quoted him as saying. That's what he said on January 25th as it aired live on CNN at 6PM EST.

As far as him not being able to travel because it was about to expire, that's meaningless since it varies from country to country and some countries allow entry as long as the passport has not yet expired.


Shitstain, I am not questioning did he said it or not, I said that video you posted doesn't match the transcript you linked to his quote, and that transcript you linked is from CNN show aired on 1PM, January 26.

"some countries allow"

Be specific, what countries?

Bripat already said that even airlines can turn you down if your passport is expiring in 30 days or less. I travel to Europe every year and I am not even able to purchase tickets for kids (valid for 5 years for minors) if their passports are expiring during the travel.

Ireland, for one...

Foreign Entry Requirement Information - Haiti to Jordan

But the better question is ... why on Earth would you listen to a fucking moron like him?
 
Which of Hillary's "cronies" are you talking about who've been indicted?

NONE have been indicted. That's my point. Hell they weren't even raided. They weren't even investigated. They didn't have a "here's the person find the crime" special prosecutor for them.

The Benghazi investigation was a sham. NOBODY died with anything Trump is accused of. 4 americans died in Libya begging for help that Hillary didn't provide. WE KNOW THAT FOR A FACT. Trump is accused by the left of colluding to win an election. And for that doors are busted down, guns drawn, houses raided, etc.

Please name ONE person with Hillary ties who was raided by the FBI at 5am with 29 agents, helis. etc. You can't.
Leave it to a rightard to claim eight independent investigations into Benghazi were a “sham.”

:cuckoo:
Being STUPID isn't a crime.............Lying under oath is a crime.........Was a kind of perjury trap.........Politicians lie all the time............it's not a crime unless they are fishing for a crime under oath..........

Hillary and Obama lied about Benghazi..............making up stories for political fallout reasons..........which isn't a crime..........they do it all the time....

Shitty they did it...........YOU BETCHA
Neither Hillary nor Obama lied about Benghazi.

Sadly, you’re not grounded in reality.
They lied their asses off on the video did it..............plain and simple.................Not a crime..............Dirty as fucking hell to say it to the families of those who died in the coffin ceremony.


She didn’t lie. Even Republicans had to finally confess the Obama Administration was repeating info they were getting from our intelligence community...

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.


http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi Report.pdf

... this is old news yet you brain-dead trump cultists continue repeating debunked lies.

That’s why I always say, conservatives are ineducable.
 
Stone himself says his passport might be valid. You calling him a liar?

Link needed


This video doesn't match the transcript you're referring to. It should be video from 1PM on January 26.

"might be valid"

No, his words are, and you quoted it "I don't have a valid passport. Either that or it's about to expire in a few days".

Two things about it, if passport did not expired, it's still valid. Second, if passport is about to expire during the travel to another country, you may not be allowed to enter that country, therefore passport is technically invalid.

Dumbfuck, he's in that video saying what I quoted him as saying. That's what he said on January 25th as it aired live on CNN at 6PM EST.

As far as him not being able to travel because it was about to expire, that's meaningless since it varies from country to country and some countries allow entry as long as the passport has not yet expired.


Shitstain, I am not questioning did he said it or not, I said that video you posted doesn't match the transcript you linked to his quote, and that transcript you linked is from CNN show aired on 1PM, January 26.

"some countries allow"

Be specific, what countries?

Bripat already said that even airlines can turn you down if your passport is expiring in 30 days or less. I travel to Europe every year and I am not even able to purchase tickets for kids (valid for 5 years for minors) if their passports are expiring during the travel.

"Shitstain, I am not questioning did he said it or not, I said that video you posted doesn't match the transcript you linked to his quote, and that transcript you linked is from CNN show aired on 1PM, January 26"

Dumbfuck... I didn't post any links to any transcripts dated January 26th.

You're hallucinating again. :cuckoo:
 
Again, Assange did not get emails from Russians.

And where is the proof that Russians stole it?

Those servers were never investigated by the FBI.
”Again, Assange did not get emails from Russians.”

Actually, not even Assange made that claim. You are saying that, not him. His claim is that he didn’t get the emails from the Russian government or s state party. But that could range from innocently not knowing the Russian he was dealing with was Russian since Guccifer 2.0 was denying their Russian connection; to Assange flat out lying.

Either way, Mueller has indicated Assange’s source really was Russian agents.

”And where is the proof that Russians stole it?”

This has been thoroughly proven by our intelligence community.

How the Russians hacked the DNC and passed its emails to WikiLeaks

”Those servers were never investigated by the FBI.”

Not exactly. The servers weren’t, but the data on the hard drives were. From that, cyber investigators were able to determine the location and identity of the hackers.

DNC declined FBI's request to examine their server. The Russian narrative is just, that... a narrative to point in desired direction, not necessary to the right direction.

"cyber investigators"

Those investigators were on their payroll, their "findings" are worthless.
Nah, you're lying again. CrowdStrike provided the FBI with exact byte-for-byte copies of the hard drives for them to perform their own forensics.

There is no question that Russian agents were behind the hacking. Only truly brain-dead trump cultists continue to deny it at this point.

It's great that you provided the proof for your claim, otherwise, who would believe you.
LOL

You don't believe me when I do post links. So what difference does that make to someone hiding from reality?

Hear-No-Evil-See-No-Evil-Speak-No-Evil-2.jpg



Still, here ya go...

That is essentially what the FBI did with the DNC server: The bureau was provided with copies of the data on the server, like duplicating your own hard drive. Had Russians accessed the physical server after breaking into the DNC, the physical server itself might have been useful. Instead, they were given the server’s fingerprint, so to speak. This was confirmed by a spokesman for the DNC and by then-FBI Director James B. Comey

"We got the forensics from the pros that they hired which -- again, best practice is always to get access to the machines themselves, but this, my folks tell me, was an appropriate substitute." ~ James Comey

DNC spokeswoman Adrienne Watson told PolitiFact that the DNC cooperated with the FBI’s requests, which resulted in the DNC providing a copy of their server.

LOL

Dude, I make living writing programs for anything that require programs (from corporate servers, data processing, to automation systems). Providing copies of the data from hard drives is not the same as providing hard drives. To some computer illiterate, such as yourself, what they sell you may be believable and acceptable, but it's not how it works.

To give you example, when Clinton was asked to provide her emails, she (or whoever she paid) provided pdfs of the emails. Had she provided the whole server, there would be a lot more to see from metadata, cache, temp files, dump files etc. The same goes for the "copy of the hard drives". But hey, you chose to accept what they said, and for you, that is enough.
 
”Again, Assange did not get emails from Russians.”

Actually, not even Assange made that claim. You are saying that, not him. His claim is that he didn’t get the emails from the Russian government or s state party. But that could range from innocently not knowing the Russian he was dealing with was Russian since Guccifer 2.0 was denying their Russian connection; to Assange flat out lying.

Either way, Mueller has indicated Assange’s source really was Russian agents.

”And where is the proof that Russians stole it?”

This has been thoroughly proven by our intelligence community.

How the Russians hacked the DNC and passed its emails to WikiLeaks

”Those servers were never investigated by the FBI.”

Not exactly. The servers weren’t, but the data on the hard drives were. From that, cyber investigators were able to determine the location and identity of the hackers.

DNC declined FBI's request to examine their server. The Russian narrative is just, that... a narrative to point in desired direction, not necessary to the right direction.

"cyber investigators"

Those investigators were on their payroll, their "findings" are worthless.
Nah, you're lying again. CrowdStrike provided the FBI with exact byte-for-byte copies of the hard drives for them to perform their own forensics.

There is no question that Russian agents were behind the hacking. Only truly brain-dead trump cultists continue to deny it at this point.

It's great that you provided the proof for your claim, otherwise, who would believe you.
LOL

You don't believe me when I do post links. So what difference does that make to someone hiding from reality?

Hear-No-Evil-See-No-Evil-Speak-No-Evil-2.jpg



Still, here ya go...

That is essentially what the FBI did with the DNC server: The bureau was provided with copies of the data on the server, like duplicating your own hard drive. Had Russians accessed the physical server after breaking into the DNC, the physical server itself might have been useful. Instead, they were given the server’s fingerprint, so to speak. This was confirmed by a spokesman for the DNC and by then-FBI Director James B. Comey

"We got the forensics from the pros that they hired which -- again, best practice is always to get access to the machines themselves, but this, my folks tell me, was an appropriate substitute." ~ James Comey

DNC spokeswoman Adrienne Watson told PolitiFact that the DNC cooperated with the FBI’s requests, which resulted in the DNC providing a copy of their server.

LOL

Dude, I make living writing programs for anything that require programs (from corporate servers, data processing, to automation systems). Providing copies of the data from hard drives is not the same as providing hard drives. To some computer illiterate, such as yourself, what they sell you may be believable and acceptable, but it's not how it works.

To give you example, when Clinton was asked to provide her emails, she (or whoever she paid) provided pdfs of the emails. Had she provided the whole server, there would be a lot more to see from metadata, cache, temp files, dump files etc. The same goes for the "copy of the hard drives". But hey, you chose to accept what they said, and for you, that is enough.
Then you're an imbecile, because even low level SA's know a digit copy of a hard drive is an exact byte-for-byte duplicate. It's not a PDF, it's not a text copy. Digital copies contain all the data from the source drives. And as Comey testified, the digital copies they were provided were an "appropriate substitute."

Oh, and by "computer illiterate,"you mean the lead senior software engineer for a fortune 100 company. :mm:
 

Forum List

Back
Top